Because now that visual examples are included people are trying to do some next level spinning to defend the game's content and intentions. As fucking if the devs at ANY point in development thought "hey, what if the main character was female, we certainly are not appealing solely to a male demographic with the marketing and style of this game, now animate her moving in closer and hold that eye contact while someone else finalizes the maid outfit, man, how weird would it be if people thought this game was for men specifically, certainly not, our intentions are completely pure."Oh absolutely in its current state. I just meant going forward.
I'm not sure why "it was designed for men" is a talking point on either side tbh.
Like this dude here. Trying to craft a whole new narrative since visual examples are undeniable.Remove the /s for that part. There is no indication of the player avatar being anything more than a tutor and tutors have zero authority over their pupils. Her using the title Sensei is more or less just an indication that you are not a close acquaintance and that you are there to teach her shit. In that context, it has zero indication of you being a person of authority or of higher social standing compared to her. Instead, it merely means that your avatars grasp of the subject of the lessons is superior to hers.
A game teaching dudes that it's ok to make constant eye contact and lean in incredibly close to women is not much better than the grooming implications. If anything it would reinforce the anxiety once they realize that they shouldn't be taking social lessons from this sort of video game.I'm having trouble relating to the OP because this game seems totally innocent. There is no sexual content in the game whatsoever.
It's more likely that this game will help virgins overcome their social anxiety in a safe environment than train sexual predators to act out their desires.
Is this really a bad thing that people should be ashamed of? Comparing the socially awkward with compulsive eaters and implying that they're creeps with perverted intentions is incredibly judgemental and reductionist. Craving human interaction is a perfectly normal human desire.
Actually I said I thought that GAF generally speaking a livbral-progressive hive-mind (not saying I'm actually happy about that), and I found really strange to find so many defensive posts about this kind of game here. And people felt judged by that, maybe you feel judged by me too.
But it's ok really, like what you like. Just beware that that weird twinkie remark by the OP doesn't automatically disprove his argument about this game being kinda not ok by most people's standard of conduct around young girls and women in general (mine included). I guess OP's point was to call for some argument explaining why this was ok, and he got some actual well-articulated responses in the later pages (I don't agree but I can see some merit in them), but he also got some unexpected vitriol.
The Twinkie comment put me overboard. I was going to comment on the original post but that comment was so absurd and condescending that it doesn't even deserve a response. OP isn't judgmental but beware if you're food shopping in his vicinity.
Dropping in this thread just to say that I find Japan's creepy obsession with high school girls deplorable and that its good to talk about these things because something needs to change over there.
You insist people are bullshiting when you're the one who hasn't played the game and talking out of his own ass. People have been trying to explain what the gameplay and interactions consist on. Well at least now you went through the work of searching for some gifs. Yes she places an earbud on your right year and you can listen to a song that plays only on your right ear. You don't lean on anyone. In fact you have to be still or the earbud may fall off.I've not insulted a single person unless they're offended by me calling a duck a duck.
Like this dude here. Trying to craft a whole new narrative since visual examples are undeniable.
No, another country doesn't need to change anything because you find them creepy or deplorable based on nothing other than your subjective Western values.
Le sigh. I correct a single inaccuracy in your post while offering absolutely no comment on anything else and I'm spinning a narrative? I explained what the title of Sensei means and said literally nothing else on the subject. You really need to cool your heels and stop imaging things that aren't there.Like this dude here. Trying to craft a whole new narrative since visual examples are undeniable.
Japan, needs,really big, changes, sooner than, later.No, another country doesn't need to change anything because you find them creepy or deplorable based on nothing other than your subjective Western values.
Dude it's not a long game, the entire game is on youtube, it's incredibly simple to make gifs. Yes, there were people itt making the argument that this was a teaching simulator and nothing else or that it's "tame." I didn't even search for those, I made them from playthroughs on youtube. Regardless of if you don't specifcally lean on the girl while listening, she's making eye contact, quite clearly, the subtext is there, there's no projecting going on, the devs knew what they were doing, the target Japanese audience knew what the devs were doing and indulged in it. Meanwhile we have the flimsiest excuses itt since "Well Quiet breathes through her skin."You insist people are bullshiting when you're the one who hasn't played the game and talking out of his own ass. People have been trying to explain what the gameplay and interactions consist on. Well at least now you went through the work of searching for some gifs. Yes she places an earbud on your right year and you can listen to a song that plays only on your right ear. You don't lean on anyone.
Again no one is saying this is a teaching simulator. What most people are taking issue is with your (and others) analogies and references to "grooming" and "rape".
The narrative is that we're supposed to believe that the intentions are completely pure on the laughably unlikely that we're playing as a woman in a game where the character model for the VR headset is very clear a male, from the country that really should never be given the benefit of the doubt with this sort of subject matter especially in video games. And that the devs didn't solely have a male audience in mind when making this game. It's funny how different the tone of a thread is when the duck is called a duck instead of a trailer thread.That's not a narrative, it's literally what sensei means.
What visual examples are there that the player is an authority figure?l
Like this dude here. Trying to craft a whole new narrative since visual examples are undeniable.
Also you're not leaning into her private space, she leans into yours. The player looks very passive in this gameA game teaching dudes that it's ok to make constant eye contact and lean in incredibly close to women is not much better than the grooming implications. If anything it would reinforce the anxiety once they realize that they shouldn't be taking social lessons from this sort of video game.
No, another country doesn't need to change anything because you find them creepy or deplorable based on nothing other than your subjective Western values.
Dropping in this thread just to say that I find Japan's creepy obsession with high school girls deplorable and that its good to talk about these things because something needs to change over there.
It would be increasingly embarrassing to have this game in my trophy list.
First of all can I get a source for that second of all what part of unreported don't you understand?
Most significantly, they found that the number of reported cases of child sex abuse dropped markedly immediately after the ban on sexually explicit materials was lifted in 1989. In both Denmark and Japan, the situation is similar: Child sex abuse was much lower than it was when availability of child pornography was restricted.
Reporting isn't encouraged due to the following
Similar to here, (rape culture is absolutely a thing), but the fact that Japan is WAY behind in terms of the treatment of women, (underage women especially since we legit have dudes trying to argue that simulated CP is A-ok), makes things like this worse. They already have it bad enough yet devs think it's a good idea to produce shit like this.
So do we, except at the same time there's also a borderline industry based off of the exploitation of underage women.
Further normalization is wrong in every shape and form,
It's still way behind the times, how it took almost two decades to fully outlaw, (while arguing artistic freedom since simulated is still allowed when the CPPA rightfully banned that as well), is absolutely disgusting.
I've not insulted a single person unless they're offended by me calling a duck a duck.
"Sensei."What visual examples are there that the player is an authority figure?
You know how many games are advertised with non-lethal options these days? And open mission design where you don't have to kill anyone but the target. Quite a lot, there are also more non violent western games being made than ever before. Even God of War is trying to be less violent, GOD OF WAR! War is literally in the title and the demo was a total 180 and the story is that now Kratos is constantly keeping his anger in check and has a family and son in a peaceful albeit dangerous landscape. So while sexualization and objectification in Japan is absolutely stagnating and regressing, the portrayal of violence, (or lack there of), is absolutely changing in the western landscape. But ofc you can start a new thread on that subject instead of using false equivalence if you'd like.I find America's unhealthy obsession with murder simulation deplorable too TBH. It's a culture that glorifies and celebrates violence. Something needs to change over there.
A game teaching dudes that it's ok to make constant eye contact and lean in incredibly close to women is not much better than the grooming implications. If anything it would reinforce the anxiety once they realize that they shouldn't be taking social lessons from this sort of video game.
She actually closes her eyes while listening to the song. But anyway, if you're triggered by sharing an earphone and eye contact I honestly don't know what to say to you. Maybe I'm to dense to realize there's actually some type of implicit malice. Maybe I'm ironically becoming " to old for this shit".Dude it's not a long game, the entire game is on youtube, it's incredibly simple to make gifs. Yes, there were people itt making the argument that this was a teaching simulator and nothing else or that it's "tame." I didn't even search for those, I made them from playthroughs on youtube. Regardless of if you don't specifcally lean on the girl while listening, she's making eye contact, quite clearly, the subtext is there, there's no projecting going on, the devs knew what they were doing, the target Japanese audience knew what the devs were doing and indulged in it. Meanwhile we have the flimsiest excuses itt since "Well Quiet breathes through her skin."
I find America's unhealthy obsession with murder simulation deplorable too TBH. It's a culture that glorifies and celebrates violence. Something needs to change over there.
In what way would near constant eye contact and invasions of personal space give you anything but the wrong idea of how to behave in social situations?Obviously no one should take literal social lessons from a video game, but being used to making eye contact with the opposite sex in VR could give them a small confidence boost when making eye contact with the opposite sex in real life.
Did you just unironically use the term triggered? Also, not counting the fact that you contradicted yourself there, sharing a headphone and listening to music with someone you're supposed to be teaching, (who's also under age), is definitely creepy as hell and inappropriate.She actually closes her eyes while listening to the song. But anyway, if you're triggered by sharing an earphone and eye contact I honestly don't know what to say to you.
I mean the Japanese audience seemed to realize what the intention was pretty quickly so instead of dense I'd say intellectually dishonest/disengenous. It's like, you know what the implication is.Maybe I'm to dense to realize there's actually some type of implicit malice. Maybe I'm ironically becoming " to old for this shit".
At most you'd get people saying "It's god of war. And it's literally a fantasy game."I think the difference is people look at God of War and don't come away thinking it's acceptable behaviour. Where as people look as Summer Lesson and come away saying that it's totally innocent.
But then no one was inventing a narrative despite visual examples, someone was explaining the visual examples. Japan is very delicate about polite forms, so not like it sounds absurd."Sensei."
Being said near constantly .
"Sensei."
Being said near constantly.
You know how many games are advertised with non-lethal options these days? And open mission design where you don't have to kill anyone but the target. Quite a lot, there are also more non violent western games being made than ever before. Even God of War is trying to be less violent, GOD OF WAR! War is literally in the title and the demo was a total 180 and the story is that now Kratos is constantly keeping his anger in check and has a family and son in a peaceful albeit dangerous landscape. So while sexualization and objectification in Japan is absolutely stagnating and regressing, the portrayal of violence, (or lack there of), is absolutely changing in the western landscape. But ofc you can start a new thread on that subject instead of using false equivalence if you'd like.
This thread needs a poll.
For now put me in the camp that finds the game sad and creepy. Simulating "that ticklish feeling when alone with underage girl!" just isn't something I can find any positive attributes for.
Materially the game itself is harmless, but I share the OP's confusion and disappointment with the gaming community at large. I think Japan has many issues with this stuff, and there it might have a diiferent context, but I wouldn't really know.
i just want you guys to know i think youre all creepyso what do you want?
For it to not exist? Not get localized?
i feel like people often stop at what they actually want in these threads.
A game teaching dudes that it's ok to make constant eye contact and lean in incredibly close to women is not much better than the grooming implications.
In what way would near constant eye contact and invasions of personal space give you anything but the wrong idea of how to behave in social situations?
"Sensei."
Being said near constantly.
I think the difference is people look at God of War and don't come away thinking it's acceptable behaviour. Where as people look as Summer Lesson and come away saying that it's totally innocent.
Mortal kombat certainly wasn't advertised at e3. Instead we got this incredibly tame DC game trailer instead. The latest GoW was overwhelmingly praised for the new tone and direction. People noted that not a single person was killed in the WD2 demo. Then we had games like Days Gone where the main enemy is zombies while the main enemy in Horizon is robots. Even COD is now set to scifi grappling hooks in the future which has no real life equivalents. The shit is summer lesson is almost still life in comparison. Same with London Heist, these things don't have realistic portrayals of violence and instead have been going farther and farther away from it.That's bollocks though. For every good example there's tens of thousands of people celebrating the latest fatalities in Mortal Kombat or the fact that you can kill dozens of henchmen in the London Heist in an even more realistic experience than ever before.
Then start the thread.It's long been established that the medium of Games doesn't have any kind of moral compass. Should we consider and have a discussion about that? Absolutely.
It's not unfamiliar, this sort of shit has tons of real life connotations and equivalents. Both in Japan and in the west.in this case however people seem to be getting bent out of shape because the flimsy construct developers have put in place to facilitate this morally bankrupt action is unfamiliar and abhorrent to them without acknowledging this is what video games have done for decades for all kinds of illegal and morally bankrupt actions.
Ok?Some people are going to find doing some of those things fun, I don't feel like judging them for playing a game.
Not in the way it's portrayed in summer lesson, if I were to address my students in that way they'd absolutely be uncomfortable. Why an adult dude is tutoring a girl alone in her room is beyond me but ofc that's part of the implication.Believe it or not many women are fine with eye contact, and if someone is clearly enjoying your company and you're courteous, clean and presentable, then close proximity often happens of its own mutual accord. And guess what? It doesn't have to be sexual, either.
Look at those gifs on the last page dude. A duck...is a duck.If you think this game aims to fulfil dishonourable fantasies (and personally I'm really not seeing it), I'd say that displays more of a lack of trust on your part than any moral negligence on the part of the developer.
I mean people weren't even calling that DOA VR harassment simulator what it was so it's really not surprising to see a defense force for this creepy ass game.Being used to a virtual girl in their personal space could keep someone from choking up and making an ass of themselves when a real girl enters their personal space.
The way you are framing this game to sound like a harassment simulator is very disingenuous.
Oh my god. Ok, seriously, stay away from teenagers if you legitimately think that being alone with an underage girl in her room and sharing headphones while making eye contact is ok behavior for a teacher. Just a reminder of how that's portrayed in the game btw.You've been told several times that the common use of sensei is "someone who is more knowledgeable in a subject", while possibly also being the same age as them, or younger. Her behavior corroborates that. If you feel that it's some sort of creeper position-of-power abuse to lock eyes and listen to music, that's all on you.
i just want you guys to know i think youre all creepy
No, another country doesn't need to change anything because you find them creepy or deplorable based on nothing other than your subjective Western values.
She makes eye contact before the music plays. Also, better call my 11th grade computer class teacher then. She was clearly taking advantage of me... * rolls eyes *Did you just unironically use the term triggered? Also, not counting the fact that you contradicted yourself there, sharing a headphone and listening to music with someone you're supposed to be teaching, (who's also under age), is definitely creepy as hell and inappropriate.
Again, no one is denying the potential and even likely target market for the game. What I'm taking issue is what your description of what the game actually is and plays. I'm saying the developers were actually really ingenious because the game can be completely innocuous or not depending on the player.I mean the Japanese audience seemed to realize what the intention was pretty quickly so instead of dense I'd say intellectually dishonest/disengenous. It's like, you know what the implication is.
This isn't a hentai game, though. There's literally nothing sexual you can do with her, no kissing or groping or anything. If someone bought this hoping to jerk off (which they wouldn't if they had any sense, since it has a 12+ age rating) they'd be incredibly disappointed.
Mortal kombat certainly wasn't advertised at e3. Instead we got this incredibly tame DC game trailer instead. The latest GoW was overwhelmingly praised for the new tone and direction. People noted that not a single person was killed in the WD2 demo. Then we had games like Days Gone where the main enemy is zombies while the main enemy in Horizon is robots. Even COD is now set to scifi grappling hooks in the future which has no real life equivalents. The shit is summer lesson is almost still life in comparison. Same with London Heist, these things don't have realistic portrayals of violence and instead have been going farther and farther away from it.
Then start the thread.
It's not unfamiliar, this sort of shit has tons of real life connotations and equivalents. Both in Japan and in the west.
Ok?
People here who are Day One or who know they are getting this game upon release, can I ask why or what you are most excited about?
She says her mother is worried she can't get to college so I suppose she's at least in highschool. The tutor has no defined or implied age since it's a blank sheet supposed to be filled by the player.dont most tutors in japanese culture teach in rooms secluded away from parents or whatever, hell i remember persona 4 doing the same thing. Also I hate to keep bringing this up as it doesnt get answered, how do we know the age of said girl and tutor. (or are we going with assumptions here? girl i assume is 14(youngest) through 17(oldest) and tutor would more than likely be anything above the age of 20
so we can safely assume the girl is in her later years of high school so.. 16-18 would be an appropriate guess.She says her mother is worried she can't get to college so I suppose she's at least in highschool. The tutor has no defined or implied age since it's a blank sheet supposed to be filled by the player.
I figured the tutor was at most only a few years older and possibly even the same age.
Really cool social simulation technology with a stat whoring aspect.
I don't think many women would be fine with the sort of contact eye contact and invasion of personal space seen in this game. And again, gifs don't lie, the devs knew what they were doing dude. Why are you afraid to call a duck a duck?Believe it or not many women are fine with eye contact, and if someone is clearly enjoying your company and you're courteous, clean and presentable, then close proximity often happens of its own mutual accord. And guess what? It doesn't have to be sexual, either.
If you think this game aims to fulfil dishonourable fantasies (and personally I'm really not seeing it), I'd say that displays more of a lack of trust on your part than any moral negligence on the part of the developer.
I posted a gif before and after the music plays, she makes eye contact multiple times. It's incredibly creepy. There are at least six moments with incredibly creeping implications. And more that will be added in an update like going to the beach, (because that's totes important to tutoring), being fed, and maid outfits. Maid outfits. One of the most common fetishes in Japanese media.She makes eye contact before the music plays. Also, better call my 11th grade computer class teacher then. She was clearly taking advantage of me... * rolls eyes *
Again, no one is denying the potential and even likely target market for the game. What I'm taking issue is what your description of what the game actually is and plays. I'm saying the developers were actually really ingenious because the game can be completely innocuous or not depending on the player.
If you wanna see what they're most excited about, check out the tone of the threads man.wait, what... It's not for lewd purposes or whatever? As someone who doesn't follow this game, what is it about then?I had assumed it was that >_>
People here who are Day One or who know they are getting this game upon release, can I ask why or what you are most excited about?
Lol let's see how Japan talks about the game to see what kind of game it is. I wonder how in depth they'll go into the teaching aspect of the game!
Oh no, they're talking about "the things you can do ... up close ... with a girl."
"Sasuke was unable to conceal his excitement about seeing her work part time in a maid cafe!"
Can someone explain to me whether or not this works in regards to talking about picking up the product?
Because it says "let's hurry up and touch [it] at once." The [it] can and is obviously meant to be substituted with "her."
During your lessons, you can have a lot of conversations and close-proximity experiences that will get your heart beating. While guiding Hikari, enjoy the seven days you'll spend with her!
lazy link
I mean besides the fact that every enemy in the game is armed and constantly hostile if alerted to your presence, (compared to civilians who can't be killed by the player), but again, if you wanna discuss game violence, start that thread instead of derailing this one.So what about The Division, where there's some kind of flimsy excuse given for roaming round New York on a power trip where you get to shoot other dudes in the face.
From what I saw of the campaign there's plenty of wide open level spaces where conflict can be avoided while you head to the objective. So yes, even one of the most brutal conflicts of history is allowing non lethal options outside of multiplayer which is active battles only. While also portraying the war in a much more hollywood way than a simulator.Is there a non-lethal way to play Battlefield 1, one of the most brutal conflicts in human history?
She says her mother is worried she can't get to college so I suppose she's at least in highschool. The tutor has no defined or implied age since it's a blank sheet supposed to be filled by the player.
Nope, even at the same age, a tutor would still be referred to as sensei.Well the tutor cant be in normal school like her, since i believe at that point tutor would be called senpai(or however older class students are called over there) so at best we can assume its something that the tutor/sensei can be a college student to whatever (since college students tutoring kids isnt an odd thing).
That's bollocks though. For every good example there's tens of thousands of people celebrating the latest fatalities in Mortal Kombat or the fact that you can kill dozens of henchmen in the London Heist in an even more realistic experience than ever before.
It's long been established that the medium of Games doesn't have any kind of moral compass. Should we consider and have a discussion about that? Absolutely.
in this case however people seem to be getting bent out of shape because the flimsy construct developers have put in place to facilitate this morally bankrupt action is unfamiliar and abhorrent to them without acknowledging this is what video games have done for decades for all kinds of illegal and morally bankrupt actions.
Some people are going to find doing some of those things fun, I don't feel like judging them for playing a game.
Dropping in this thread just to say that I find Japan's creepy obsession with high school girls deplorable and that its good to talk about these things because something needs to change over there.