Is that his own binder full of women?Trump doesn't send Emails - he's still using paper and letters and shit:
Can't hack a binder.
I know there aren't words in there. He can't read.
FBI tweet releases Clinton Foundation Investigation documents from 2001
- Thread starter diablos991
- Start date
- Status
I know there aren't words in there. He can't read.
They dropped their files on Fred Trump 2 days ago because of a FOIA request.
Of course, it's only 8 pages.
But it contains more information than the entirety of this FOIA drop lol
DragonSworne
Banned
Trump doesn't send Emails - he's still using paper and letters and shit:
Can't hack a binder.
You'll have to do an actual Watergate break-in to get dirt on his dealings.
Nice photoshopped picture. Trump can't read.
Sgt. Kabukiman
Banned
What the fuck is the FBI doing?
Don't fuck up an election that is going to affect the entire world, that's the CIA's job.
Don't fuck up an election that is going to affect the entire world, that's the CIA's job.
DragonSworne
Banned
Yep, she won't placate Republicans like Obama has the last 8 years.
Epsilon-delta
Banned
This is by far the biggest shitshow I've ever witnessed during an election year.
From Trump and his possible Russian ties, to Comey's great timing a few days ago, to Donna's tweet earlier today and now this.
What a disaster.
From Trump and his possible Russian ties, to Comey's great timing a few days ago, to Donna's tweet earlier today and now this.
What a disaster.
distantmantra
Member
But no one cares.
I'm starting to think that politics and critical thinking don't go together very well.
'Im going to ignore anything that has happened in the last week to paint both sides as the same'
Trump doesn't send Emails - he's still using paper and letters and shit:
Can't hack a binder.
You'll have to do an actual Watergate break-in to get dirt on his dealings.
trump can't read in general...that's why he's always all about innuendo.
SlimySnake
Flashless at the Golden Globes
I dont know even know wtf. lol
If you were in the FBI, who do you think would expand your reach and increase your budget?
RPGCrazied
Member
And you know Trump jackass is going to talk about this first chance he gets.
Nice
My fellow liberals want to believe the narrative that the FBI is behind some insidious push to get Trump elected for some reason :-/
lastflowers
Banned
shoplifter
Member
Guess who was one of Mark Rich's attorneys, that lobbied for his pardon?
*that* does make me wonder if the FBI are playing a few games here, though it's conspiracy theory level stuff.
Assistant AG Peter Kadzik, who is now overseeing the email/Huma investigation
*that* does make me wonder if the FBI are playing a few games here, though it's conspiracy theory level stuff.
DragonSworne
Banned
You don't need extra money to do stop and frisk. A Trump presidency will let the FBI harass Muslims.
diablos991
Can’t stump the diablos
Well there's a hell of a connection!
America might, but the rest of the world doesn't.
Yet it "just" so happens 6 days before a presidential election, and Democrats in Congress can't get a single update about the ongoing investigations in the Trump campaign and his aids?
I mean, you can believe in conspiracy theories if you like, but people tend to call the right nut jobs when they make such claims as I'm seeing here. I see certain arguments only benefit one when its convenient for them.
QuantumBro
Banned
I hope the intern that posted that tweet gets executed for treason. We need to make sure the FBI realizes what will happen if they want to try to influence the election through completing public records requests.
Conspiracies are always based on fear so the same sentiments tend to produce the same kinds of wacky theories.
Its so weird to me, its fine/good to investigate this shit. Make sure no one is corrupt. I'm glad people do it. But these investigations keep finding that. "No corruption here!" Seems like that would make people happy. Seems like Hillary would be running on "Its been proven time and time again that I'm honest and non-corrupt and trustable" Instead it just makes people even more suspicious and un-trusting. She's running against "Why would they be investigating her at all if she was trustworthy".
From scanning the documents it appears in 2001 there was an investigation into two DNC/Clinton Foundation donors who were pardoned of white collar crime (wire fraud/racketeering) on the last day of Bill Clinton's presidency. Both men fled the country after being pardoned.
There doesn't appear to be an answer as to what was proven or discovered. It is heavily redacted.
There doesn't appear to be an answer as to what was proven or discovered. It is heavily redacted.
ElectricBlanketFire
Member
Pai Pai Master
Banned
To defend against the cyber
Don't worry, they probably post it on Facebook, too
ElectricBlanketFire
Member
At least it's not Jimmy Fallon slow-jamming it or whatever he does.
To disseminate information as a public agency. It is their job to serve the people.
No, it's not.
The information was disseminated from the FBIs public policy website and just posted to Twitter as a matter of course.
Deaf Spacker
Memb
As a Brit I'm sitting here thinking that someone in Trump's camp must have some dirt on someone high up in the FBI.
HammerOfThor
Member
Real question: what does the FBI have against Clinton?
DragonSworne
Banned
XFiles was on when Clinton was President.
???
If I request Weiner's dick pics, will the FBI also tweet that?
How can this be justified as being in the public interest? The pages are so heavily redacted as to be completely useless. They're literally tweeting uninterpretable scrap paper and attaching Clinton's name to it. There's no benefit to the public. There's no information or analysis. The only result is the implication / perception of a scandal.
Calamari41
41 > 38
It should have been printed out on paper with a copy delivered to the city hall of each state's capital for review, should the public wish to see it.
shoplifter
Member
Which is actually *better* than simply posting the information on the public policy site like they would have done before social media was an option to notify interested parties about the release.
1) They'd probably be redacted. Maybe not. You'd still have to wait for the investigation to end before an FOIA request would be considered.
2) If a FOIA request is made, they're *obligated* to release what they can, even if it ends up being nothing but entirely redacted documents. People have actually proven the existence of once secret programs by making FOIA requests with the right wording. They got back nothing but garbage, but the fact that they got anything sort of proved the point for them.
REDACTED Dick Pics are still REDACTED.
I guess. Or maybe given to town criers who would yell them aloud in public squares for no less than 6 hours a day for the next 4 days.
lastflowers
Banned
But don't you see that this world is crumbling because of 140 character limits. Disregard that it can be used just like Reddit for disseminating information to large amounts of people quickly. Or like newsletters a decade ago, or news feeds, pamphlets...
- Status