They aren't trying to show people how wrong he is with this. This is going to make the other X-Men angry and they'll be upset about how Cyclops was being used. On the Emma side they will probably write that the grief of losing Cyclops messed her up and redeem her that way.
This book has plenty of issues though lol.
No wonder he's so hated and reviled by the everyone because he did........nothing.
The only explanation I have about this is that Marvel just didn't know what the noddle incident was or changed their minds in the last second. Everyone post-SW talked about how Cyclops did something horrible and out of character, so maybe they planned the "Wasn't actually Cyclops, but Emma" since the beginning, but decided to change what they did before this event.
Remember that Storm said to Old Man Logan to kill Sunfire if necessary because he was on Cyclops team when "he did that thing" or something like that, but in this comic he just fly Alchemist around.
Maybe they originally planned Cyclops' team to do things much more extreme than Cyclops would ever do, like destroying a Inhuman embassy killing dozens of innocents, but chickened out in the end because that would make Emma truly irremediable?
Okay so I've been trying to keep up with this whole Terrigen Mists killing mutants thing somewhat and I gotta ask, how is Cyclops keeping his people from dying by a Terrigen Mist cloud enough for Black Bolt to fly down and kill him? They have more clouds and the mists haven't been stopped, so why kill Cyclops over this? They have more clouds. Inhumans are popping up more often then mutants are and aren't being killed off by a genocidal death cloud.
I mean... if being team leader when a supe makes a heroic sacrifice to save thousands of lives makes you basically as bad as hitler, you'd expect a lot of soul searching from, well, every frigging super team leader ever
The only explanation I have about this is that Marvel just didn't know what the noddle incident was or changed their minds in the last second. Everyone post-SW talked about how Cyclops did something horrible and out of character, so maybe they planned the "Wasn't actually Cyclops, but Emma" since the beginning, but decided to change what they did before this event.
Remember that Storm said to Old Man Logan to kill Sunfire if necessary because he was on Cyclops team when "he did that thing" or something like that, but in this comic he just fly Alchemist around.
Maybe they originally planned Cyclops' team to do things much more extreme than Cyclops would ever do, like destroying a Inhuman embassy killing dozens of innocents, but chickened out in the end because that would make Emma truly irremediable?
You must not have read any Superman books in a long while then.
Oh I'm sorry, killing off New 52 Superman with cancer to bring back old Superman is perfectly fine. Let alone Man of Steel 2 aka BvS
the xbooks have been garbage since Bendis got his hands on them.
Oh I'm sorry, killing off New 52 Superman with cancer to bring back old Superman is perfectly fine. Let alone Man of Steel 2 aka BvS
Oh I'm sorry, killing off New 52 Superman with cancer to bring back old Superman is perfectly fine.
Oh I'm sorry, killing off New 52 Superman with cancer to bring back old Superman is perfectly fine. Let alone Man of Steel 2 aka BvS
He better be a boss when they inevitably bring him back.
Tired of my boy getting shat on.
He legit didn't even do anything wrong this time, AGAIN!
I was talking specifically about the "Cyclops is wrong/right" thing you mentioned.This is supposed to be the explanation for why Storm and the others were upset with "what he did" and blamed him for renewed mutant hatred. It simply doesn't work and makes the other X-Men look even worse than before.
I hope IvX is going to bomb so that Marvel once and for all gets the message.
Oh I'm sorry, killing off New 52 Superman with cancer to bring back old Superman is perfectly fine. Let alone Man of Steel 2 aka BvS
Superdad is one of the best decisions DC has ever made.
I was talking specifically about the "Cyclops is wrong/right" thing you mentioned.
Also, we already know Marvel is planning on taking the X-Men in a completely different direction similar to the older books so I don't see what IvX bombing would do.
Remember when Cyclops murdered his mentor and father figure Professor X.
Remember when Cyclops murdered his mentor and father figure Professor X.
Remember when Cyclops murdered his mentor and father figure Professor X.
Then I honestly don't see your point because that's what they are trying to do. They want to depict him as being "in the wrong", as in taking it too far with the revolution.
IvX bombing would show them that they can't force Inhumans into the market just because they really want to.
It has nothing to do with want. The need the Inhumans to supplant the X-Men because they aren't going to get X-Men movie rights back as an in house thing.
Remember when Cyclops murdered his mentor and father figure Professor X.
Remember when Cyclops murdered his mentor and father figure Professor X.
I know this. This was implied in what I'm saying. They need to directly see that they are losing money on this idea. Even more than they are now (Inhumans team books are already selling very poorly).
Oh I'm sorry, killing off New 52 Superman with cancer to bring back old Superman is perfectly fine.
Considering the whole line's been amazing, yes.
Now if they just make Tim Drake important again. All will be right with the world.
the xbooks have been garbage since Bendis got his hands on them.