Subtle as in it was there and gone, never mentioned again.What was subtle about her kiss with Riley?
Subtle as in it was there and gone, never mentioned again.What was subtle about her kiss with Riley?
Subtle as in it was there and gone, never mentioned again.
Too subtle, clearly. Gotta toe that line between subtext and text for some reason or else it's "forced" and "pandering"Are people really trying to dismiss the events of the DLC as "unconfirmed"?...Like...really? Does she need to write it on a greeting card or something? I felt it was pretty clear she was gay in the DLC and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. If anything it just made her far more interesting of a character.
Heh, yeah some of the posters tend to yell "fuckboi" a little too hard, myself included, when it comes to some topics of identity politics and such. I realize that and have to make sure I'm conversing with a poster and not just doing some circlejerk. The constant snark is grating and only self serving after all.
But some posters are legitimately pissed at some others that won't accept gay characters, so tempers will flare. That's a GAF forum thread for ya.
I never said it was forced or pandering.Too subtle, clearly. Gotta toe that line between subtext and text for some reason or else it's "forced" and "pandering"
Didn't specifically mean you, sorry. I just meant in generalI never said it was forced or pandering.
I found Ellie being a lesbian cool because it was subtle and not a big deal.
If it becomes a focus point of the second game it would be disappointing I think.
There are many , many Gay people who are still defined by their sexuality whatever they like it or not, their experiences, both good and bad, shapes them in an Heteronormative society, wich i think why they still need a strong sense of community.even if it wont always fit all tastes.It would be presumptuous of me to say that I "disagree" with your statement as your feelings are your own; it is your right to feel defined by your sexuality. My feelings could not be any more different however.
I am not DEFINED by being a gay man. I am a man who, as fate would have it, happens to be gay and I absolutely fucking love it. But the idea of my entire life being defined by my sexuality is quite frankly terrifying.
This surpasses ideas like "queens" or "flaming" or "straight-like" as stereotypes within the community itself. Do I not have enough confidence in my representation as person, not as a gay person, but a just a person, that I feel my sexuality must be some sort of aura that is apparent to all who see or interact with me? Absolutely not.
Similarly, the idea that homosexual representation in videogames cannot be subtle or that representations that are not overtly or quite clearly gay is straight fear mongering just seems off.
Whilst I have no problem whatsoever with characters who portray their sexuality more flamboyantly than others (there is no WRONG way to be gay), I have to say that having slightly more nuanced, less pronounced gay characters has its merits as well.
Ellie will be what she will be. If her character development dictates that her sexuality be at the forefront of her growth and her story, wonderful. If her sexuality is merely a facet of her as a person and is organically weaved into her growth and her story, wonderful.
Just my thoughts!
Why does this even Matter?
I agree. I want good GAMEPLAY over anything else.
She was a 14 year old girl that kissed her friend.Did not even know Ellie was gay.
Was that revealed in the DLC? I should play that.
Really have to applaud ND (and Sony?) here.
Two of gamings biggest franchises not only having female leads, but one of them being gay is unprecedented and super awesome.
Sure, why not? Naughty dog has a really complex character on their hands and it would add more to her development, we already got a taste of it in Left Behind.
Did these people seriously get banned because of that? I thought GAF was a place that promoted respectful, non-offensive freedom of speech? I don't get it, I hope I don't get banned as well.
saw the thread title and thought, welp, that will be radioactive for at least 10 pages.
brief thoughts, as they occurred to me –
– that headline sucks. sorry Danielle. big fan. but it's a really poor, really cynical title. of course a lot of people are going to read "super gay" as "giant flaming broadway play" gay and of course that sounds like a comically bad idea for a series like The Last of Us. "I hope next season of Walking Dead is super gay". They knew it would get clicks and rile folks up. Which is, I suppose, good headline writing in a way, but it just feels really ill-considered. (no, I didn't see "Melissa Etheridge", what the fuck is that about. context, woman!)
– Ellie is already gay, it is known. I liked how they handled Bill, so I am utterly unconcerned with how Naughty Dog portrays her, because so far they are 2 or 2. There's no way they are gonna ignore that aspect (especially after Riley) but will it be front-and-center? No. Why would it?
I could see an Ellie romance very early on being the impetus for the revenge story. Maybe a former partner gets killed. But this isn't gonna be a love story, and probably shouldn't be. It's gonna be a tragedy.
This is getting a little close to all the insipid "shipping" chatter that happens with beloved series. Which is self-indulgent at best and myopically poisonous at worst.
As pointed out earlier, really over-the-top gay characters were horrible stereotypes in media up until recently, so let's not yell about "any representation is good". Of course it isn't. If the villain were a twisted sadistic gay character the choir would be up in arms about Othering and all that.
Subtle as in it was there and gone, never mentioned again.
I mostly agree. While straight people, especially men, are largely catered too, look at how objectively terrible 75% of written characters are in games. Someone said in here earlier they don't care if the character is fucking terrible, as long as the LGBT checkbox is ticked for representation. I do suggest expectations should be held a bit higher, you really aren't missing out on much with the slew of non-charismatic, poorly written, brain dead male shit shows gaming shovels our way.
If anything ND should be praised in general for how well they write many of their characters, straight, gay, male, female or whatever else. Even Drake while he fills a power fantasy Indiana Jones -esque role is still top tier at doing that. Versus say Marcus Fenix or any other amazing cardboard thin bald space marine AAA games throw our way.
It's not Naughty Dog's responsibility to move this bar. It's just great that they do.milena87 said:Because it does matter. Because I remember being a little girl and thinking I was broken. And because I remember the feeling of finally realizing that I wasn't.
And I'll forever be thankful to Willow and Tara for that feeling.
Did these people seriously get banned over this? I thought GAF was a place that promoted respectful, non-offensive freedom of speech? I don't get it, I hope I don't get banned as well.
I wonder what would happen – as in, how fans would react – if Ellie was indisputably gay in the game, and turns indisputably evil by the end. Think Walter White. I'm not so sure that would be hailed as a victory for gay representation, even though it probably would be, at least on a literary level, if done with the same quality as Breaking Bad.
(Or – if Ellie was indisputably gay, but so fucking butch that she out-alpha-Bro's Duke Nukem, and we wonder if we've actually made progress, ha!)
Well it depends on what the individual values. As I said above I've seen at least one post in here just pretty much say checking the LGBT checkbox does it for them. Most do seem to be wanting some fleshed out relationship/tackling of same sex relationships. Which to I say have expectations in check. Not because Druckmann and ND want to shatter what you want, but because they are writing to a defined post apocalyptic world with a first entry that ended in a very exact way.
Frozenprince said:This whole "it needs to be done right/well" argument is pointless. It can be done like that when we're on equitable standing with the heteronormative community in pop culture. Until that time, ANY representation is good.
I remember Neil saying he imagined Ellie as being lesbian, so she is definitely a LGBT character, Left Behind is proof of that.
However, I don't remember if he unambiguously said she is gay or if he was talking about her concept and what he wanted, which doesn't necessarily translates into the actual character because there are other people involved in the production of the game story.
During the actual game, Ellie never identified herself as anything (and honestly, it's just fine). That said, I'm curious if they will explore her sexuality again, confirm that she is exclusively gay or if she is bi. I take that many people would be disappointed if she is bi, as that would be considered a step back? Or bisexual characters are also under represented?
LISA the Painful RPG is a super gay post apocalypse, but not exactly very strong relationships since everyone is a pervert in a men-dominated worldBeing Super gay in the apocalypse would be super hard. I imagine finding a straight relationship would be very hard, could not imagine trying to find a gay relationship at humanities end.
.Are people really trying to dismiss the events of the DLC as "unconfirmed"?...Like...really? Does she need to write it on a greeting card or something? I felt it was pretty clear she was gay in the DLC and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. If anything it just made her far more interesting of a character.
Its just not easy to define someone's sexuality based on what they did as a teenager.
I kissed a boy myself when I was little because I was discovering myself. Im heterosexual now, but when I was little I dont even know what I was. Its a time to discover yourself, ellie could be anything, honestly.
If Druckman wants to write her as homossexual then go right on ahead, I believe him to do an amazing work. I wont be disapointed if she turns out pan, bi, or asexual.
She was a 14 year old girl that kissed her friend.
Don't really know if you can talk about a guy character here.
I don't understand the second part of your criticism. Romance in Fallout 4 is initiated by the player. If you feel like it's inappropriate for your character then you don't act on their advances.I'm gay and while I'd love to see more homosexual / bisexual romances in RPGs, I don't care if my hero is straight or gay. Yes, I'd love to play The Witcher 3 with a gay character but I'm ok with the fact that it can't work for Geralt because he is straight.
Fallout 4 destroyed everything I hoped when I started the game : my character has a wife / (husband if I play a woman) and a child. Ok, I don't mind playing a straight and father character (just like TLOU). But then, after mourning on the corpse of his wife in the prologue, a few hours later Preston was hitting on me and my character was perfectly ok to romance him like he never had any wife and never cried over her dead body.
I love gay romances, but not this way, feel so empty.
Very well said. She is a lesbian and let's leave it there
I hope Ellie does have a partner but instead of wanting revenge for her partner, it's revenge for another potential cure. One who dies early in the game.
A story where she tries to help a potential cure get to scientists. Scientists who ultimately kill this character and fail to get a cure. Ellie goes off like a time bomb.
Spoilers for the end of the first game.
Doing this would mirror the end of Joel's story in the first game, somewhat justifying his some of his actions and working to build back up the players acceptance of him.
The meat of the game should be Joel working Ellie up on the revenge gig, with Ellie's lover/partner being alive and better used as a rational point of view trying to save Ellie from turning her back on her own humanity on yet another Murder Quest.
I think something deeper can be done with Ellie's sexuality than the standard, revenge for lover plot. Regardless I look forward to seeing who she is involved with, be it a long or short appearance within the plot.
Very well said. She is a lesbian and let's leave it there
"My sexuality absolutely friggin defines me." Dying with laughter.
About Ellie: I hope they do something on that matter, at least it's different and and a lot of doors were open in Left Behind, at least story wise.
Sexuality defines most people. Most people do attempt to find happiness by finding long term romantic partners. We even have a whole institution surrounding it called Marriage.
Also for what it is worth, we didn't decide to make our orientation the focal point of our existence. The people who discriminate against us because of the simple fact we are romantically and sexually inclined toward the same sex forced us to create community identities to protect ourselves from violence and validate our self worth.
Most straight people dont even have to think about holding their lover's hand in public. I do. And yet because I actually am concerned about being able to do so I get shit on for "letting my sexuality define me".
Sure, why not? Naughty dog has a really complex character on their hands and it would add more to her development, we already got a taste of it in Left Behind.
Did these people seriously get banned over this? I thought GAF was a place that promoted respectful, non-offensive freedom of speech? I don't get it, I hope I don't get banned as well.
Because he's not one. At no point is he viewed as someone on the spectrum, he's mentally imbalanced.Jame Gumb/Buffalo Bill, for instance, is not hailed as an amazing representation of a nonbinary character in film.
Besides the writers very clearly saying "Yes she's homosexual. That entire thing was written with it in mind."While I don't disregard the fact that Ellie kissing Riley was "gay", I don't necessarily believe that there was a clear indicator that she was definitively homosexual.
Besides the writers very clearly saying "Yes she's homosexual. That entire thing was written with it in mind."
People seemingly so rarely interact with homosexuals that they expect the interaction to be drastically different from two heterosexual people interacting with each other, the neck biting, the stares and awkward pauses. These are all incredibly obvious signs of attraction that don't get a second look or any sort of speculation, no one would wonder about or question a scene like this if Riley was male:
Besides the writers very clearly saying "Yes she's homosexual. That entire thing was written with it in mind."
People seemingly so rarely interact with homosexuals that they expect the interaction to be drastically different from two heterosexual people interacting with each other, the neck biting, the stares and awkward pauses. These are all incredibly obvious signs of attraction that don't get a second look or any sort of speculation, no one would wonder about or question a scene like this if Riley was male:
![]()
^
"But is there really a clear indicator tho."
People are so conditioned by heteronormativity that they don't even register the possibility that these two are giving each other the fuck me eyes for basically every scene they are in together.i can almost literally see sparks flying. so fucking obvious, haha.
Why make big gifs if they're going to be dithered to hell and back? Come on