If Nintendo went 3rd party, would the quality of their games drop?

KillGore

Member
Many people already GAVE examples as evidence to their statements ( Hudson/SNK/Sega/Atari, all you have as counterpoint is calling those people sour.

I wouldn't compare Nintendo with Atari, SNK nor SEGA. Nintendo blows all of these companies out of the water. Even when they made their own consoles.

Like I said. Creating consoles doesn't mean you will make quality games. Not sure where that logic comes from.
 
Popular Game company, 1 off .

Maybe they could do better, see Pokemon Go and Mario runner.

Nintendo would be fine even if they were a mobile IOS company, and you know that.

2015 was Nintendo's worst year ever in video game sales. They still made more money than the most successful mobile publishers.

Here's something - Tencent is the 4th biggest internet company in the world behind Amazon, Google, and Facebook. They have 25,000 employees and a market cap of roughly 194 billion USD. Among other things, they own Riot Games (League of Legends) and Supercell (Clash of Clans).

Yet 2015 was their best year ever ($17b in sales) and they still didn't make as much money as Nintendo did in 2009.
 

Grinchy

Banned
They wouldn't be held back by their hardware ineptitude. I'd love to see what Nintendo could pull off without their self-imposed shackles.

Imagine Nintendo not having to dump R&D into ridiculous last-gen machines that use odd control schemes or gimmicks just for the sake of looking different. They could hire more developers and make awesome games instead.
 
Because many of the games that provide said variety don't sell well (i.e. Metroid), and so they will be the first to go when Nintendo has to focus solely on output on other platforms.

I disagree that Nintendo doesn't exceed other first parties in terms of variety.
Where is Metroid right now as a franchise? The bones are already fairly bare. I don't believe there would be a world changing drop in quality, and that notion definitely isn't supported by anything real.
 
There are pros and cons. The first year of the Wii U was rough, but then they started pumping out great games like Pikmin 3, Super Mario 3D World, Smash, Mario Kart 8, Captain Toad Treasure Tracker, Donkey Kong Tropical Freeze, Splatoon, and Mario Maker.

Then when it became abundantly clear that the Wii U couldnt be saved they gave up on the platform after only 2 years, moved their A teams to the next platform they want to sell us, and started giving us rushed filler games like Mario Tennis, Mario Party 10, and Paper Mario Color Splash. That is not acceptable.
 

geordiemp

Member
Yet 2015 was their best year ever ($17b in sales) and they still didn't make as much money as Nintendo did in 2009.

That was almost 8 years ago, last decade.

Nintendo like profits will always mean their hardware is gimmicky and weak, and most consumers almost expect this now. 2009 was different. Things do change.

Even Nvidia technology will be used for profits instead of strong hardware and you know it, Nintendo and wow technology advanced hardware at crazy prices is something that wont happen ......MS yes they have the coffers, Sony sometimes when head not up ass, Nintendo No, cant see it..

Could Nintendo better Ps4, ofcourse, easily, but they wont because Nintendo.
 

Oddish1

Member
They wouldn't be held back by their hardware ineptitude. I'd love to see what Nintendo could pull off without their self-imposed shackles.

Imagine Nintendo not having to dump R&D into ridiculous last-gen machines that use odd control schemes or gimmicks just for the sake of looking different. They could hire more developers and make awesome games instead.

Why would they need to hire more developers to make mobile games? :)

More seriously, the logic that "Nintendo doesn't do well on their hardware so they'll do better on someone else's hardware that they'd be less familiar with and have less time to develop games on because ????" is pretty questionable logic.

Honestly, ALL "Nintendo going third party and developing on PS5 means Mario but in pretty graphics, with Metroid, and F-Zero" always feels more like someone's fantasy wishlist than anything that would realistically happen.
 

scamander

Banned
To the bolded, come on now. Not to mention that Sony and Microsoft have third parties to fill almost every gap. Nintendo does not.

Xbox is just as much supported by Japanese developers as Nintendo is by Western. Sony is the only platform holder which can really fill almost every gap with their third party support. Only almost though, you still don't get Nintendo (-like) games on there.

You've just made a list with almost every significant Wii U release.

Yep, a list with almost every significant Wii U release, but missing Mario Kart, Super Smash Bros 4 and Super Mario 3D World. Absolutely, you got me.

It's a list with games that aren't simply "rehashes". Games that Spieler Eins claimed don't exist on the platform.

What is the basis to say that their games will lose variety (any more that can be lost anyways) by going third party?

Empirical value and common sense. Third party developers don't need variety to support their own platform, they only need sales. Sales are generated by games with the biggest sales potential and IP's with the biggest market appeal.

lol
Some of the comments here. Nintendo going third party does not mean quality necessarily has to drop. The consoles dont define the games. The developers do. Mario would still be amazing on xbox and playstation. Pokemon would still be amazing on Vita and even mobile. You guys are just being sour about it. Trying to convince yourself and others that Nintendo and the gaming industry would go to shit if they stop making consoles.

Mario would still be amazing on Xbox and PlayStation, Pokémon would be a shitty f2p game on mobile. That aside there wouldn't be much else, except for unpolished Zelda-games and f2p Animal Crossing mobile games. Brave new world...
 
I think they'd adapt and survive.

They're also used to funding and distributing games from third parties and negotiating second party exclusives, so I can see them becoming a pretty great publisher for non in house studios too.

There's certainly a risk that they'd fall back on Mario, Pokemon, Animal Crossing and Zelda more heavily for a while, but once they got into the swing of things they'd be leaving money on the table by not broadening their portfolio, especially as they'd be facing more direct competition and would be entirely reliant on games sales, requiring diversity to survive changing taste trends and finding untapped markets. Going third party wouldn't suddenly make them forget the unexpected success of new IP's like splatoon, or how the market for older series like Fire Emblem can suddenly explode after a shake up.

If anything, I'd say it'd mostly benefit us as consumers. They'd be forced to compete on pricing, feature party, and modernised userbility, and our getting to enjoy enjoy Nintendo games with basic standardised features like cloud saves, proper online gaming and accounts would be a God send.

I think they'd rather go bankrupt than sell on other people hardware though.
 

JoeM86

Member
Where is Metroid right now as a franchise? The bones are already fairly bare. I don't believe there would be a world changing drop in quality, and that notion definitely isn't supported by anything real.

It's supported by numerous factors which have been stated multiple times in this thread.

Fact is, Metroid as a series doesn't sell well despite the godlike view people have of it in the dedicated gaming communities. Yes, Federation Force was a mis-step, but that doesn't mean Metroid is a dead franchise at the moment
 

Zero83

Member
There are pros and cons. The first year of the Wii U was rough, but then they started pumping out great games like Pikmin 3, Super Mario 3D World, Smash, Mario Kart 8, Captain Toad Treasure Tracker, Donkey Kong Tropical Freeze, Splatoon, and Mario Maker.

Then when it became abundantly clear that the Wii U couldnt be saved they gave up on the platform after only 2 years, moved their A teams to the next platform they want to sell us, and started giving us rushed filler games like Mario Tennis, Mario Party 10, and Paper Mario Color Splash. That is not acceptable.

You may not have liked the new Paper Mario, but that game most definitely was not a rushed filler game. And Nintendo has always released filler games, though usually they release them inbetween high quality games, which has been lacking lately for the WiiU.
 

Oddish1

Member
I think they'd adapt and survive.

They're also used to funding and distributing games from third parties and negotiating second party exclusives, so I can see them becoming a pretty great publisher for non in house studios too.

There's certainly a risk that they'd fall back on Mario, Pokemon, Animal Crossing and Zelda more heavily for a while, but once they got into the swing of things they'd be leaving money on the table by not broadening their portfolio, especially as they'd be facing more direct competition and would be entirely reliant on games sales, requiring diversity to survive changing taste trends and finding untapped markets. Going third party wouldn't suddenly make them forget the unexpected success of new IP's like splatoon, or how the market for older series like Fire Emblem can suddenly explode after a shake up.

If anything, I'd say it'd mostly benefit us as consumers. They'd be forced to compete on pricing, feature party, and modernised userbility, and our getting to enjoy enjoy Nintendo games with basic standardised features like cloud saves, proper online gaming and accounts would be a God send.

I think they'd rather go bankrupt than sell on other people hardware though.

They're selling games on other people's hardware right now.

unless, you, like most people in this thread, assume third party Nintendo would mean that they would develop for other consoles, and I think that's a faulty assumption. It makes more sense to me that Nintendo would just go all-in on mobile.

I think you'd be right that they would license out their properties to other developers to develop for consoles, but you're more optimistic than I am that they would put much in the way of creative input for it. Mobile would probably just be a way better opportunity for them.
 
Paper Mario is fine if its complimenting other great games, its not suppose to be the only Wii U game when get in a year. Imagine if Square Enix's big game this year was I Am Setsuna. I will repeat my statement, the support the Wii U has received in the final 2 years of its (very short) lifespan is not acceptable.
 

cw_sasuke

If all DLC came tied to $13 figurines, I'd consider all DLC to be free
Yes, not because the current Nintendo cant develop great games for other system but them having to go 3rdParty would mean that they messed up in some big way financially. SO they likely would have way less resources for development and experimenting.

A lot of what makes Nintendo special comes from them being independent and able to do what they want whenever they want.
 

DrWong

Member
Every six month the same thread, with the same posters and with the same stances. It's not a discussion it's a parade. Boring gaf.
 

Zero83

Member
Paper Mario is fine if its complimenting other great games, its not suppose to be the only Wii U game when get in a year. Imagine if Square Enix's big game this year was I Am Setsuna. I will repeat my statement, the support the Wii U has received in the final 2 years of its (very short) lifespan is not acceptable.

Don't get me wrong, I do agree that the Wii U has had a really rough year.
 

Gaspard

Member
Yes, not because the current Nintendo cant develop great games for other system but them having to go 3rdParty would mean that they messed up in some big way financially. SO they likely would have way less resources for development and experimenting.

A lot of what makes Nintendo special comes from them being independent and able to do what they want whenever they want.

I agree with this, Nintendo going third party likely isn't something that would sneak up on them.

There would have been a period of massive layoffs and restructuring to try and salvage the company's financial future. So a third party Nintendo would probably be in shambles.
 
D

Deleted member 125677

Unconfirmed Member
Every game would be mario, zelda, pokemon and animal crossing
 

scamander

Banned
Paper Mario is fine if its complimenting other great games, its not suppose to be the only Wii U game when get in a year.

Star Fox Zero & Guard
Pokken Tournament
Tokyo Mirage Sessions
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess HD
Mario & Sonic

Far from a good year, but stop the hyperbole.
 
Yeah, added to my post "On a Nintendo console". It would likely sell better on a more popular console for gamers.

EDIT: XC and XCX aren't necessarily "high quality" though. Good point.

what?
Xenoblade had one good game. The first one. The quality already dropped from that series with XCX.

still its a great game that looks extremely great and has great gameplay. sure the story is meh but other than that its a great package. MC wise it fares better than most JRPGs this gen.
 
Captain Toad Treasure Tracker
Hyrule Warriors
Pokken Tournament
Project Zero 5/ Fatal Frame 5
Kirby and the Rainbow Curse
TLoZ Breath of the Wild
Lego City Undercover
NES Remix 1+2
Nintendo Land
Pikmin 3
Splatoon
Star Fox Guard
Super Mario Maker
Tokyo Mirage Sessions
The Wonderful 101
Xenoblade Chronicles X

For 4 years, that's a pretty barebones list. And more importantly, what is there to lose? You think on PS5 they wouldn't do cheap nostalgia milking like NES Remix, Tecmo wouldn't have asked for a Mosou cash-in, or that they'd just drop Monolith?
WiiU is the first console to not even have a single exclusive Zelda game for a single second in its lifetime. It can't get worse than that. The first year of mobile will see Mario, Pokemon, Fire Emblem, Animal Crossing and even some dumb Mii thing.
Their catalogue would be fine and at worst stay at WiiU-level. Which would be okay, since you wouldn't have to buy subpar hardware for it anymore.
 
The crucial point about such a question would be in which situation Nintendo would be if they are going third party.

Nintendo today would have the fiancial power to etablish a wide range of studios for consoles, mobile and other non gaming stuff. It wouldn't be like Sega which was forced to cut down everything didn't make enough money.
 
Yes: Both a lack of variety and a drop in quality.

Everyone should read this feature (written by a GameCentral reader):

Why Nintendo won't go third party

Frogs Bowser said:
Secondly, going third party would lead to a huge decline in the quantity and quality of their games.

The best way to demonstrate this is by looking at the closest analogue to this situation by summoning the ghost of Christmas past: Sega. Back when it was in the hardware business Sega had a roster of games such as Sonic, the Virtua series, and their racing games which could be relied upon to produce decent sales. However, they were also able to produce a regular supply of niche titles including Ecco The Dolphin, Gunstar Heroes, Comix Zone, Seaman, and so on.

These niche titles would have produced little (if any) profit but Sega were able to make these games due to their position as a hardware manufacturer. The main purpose of these games would have been to expand the library of games available on their consoles and thus encourage more people to buy the consoles, as well as make their consoles look more enticing to third party publishers to bring their games to them.

Another example of this is Shenmue. Although the gigantic cost of the games was one of the contributing factors to Sega’s downfall, they would never have even been made in the first place if Sega was not in the business of making hardware.

This also applies to the current console makers. Would Microsoft pump fortunes into making and marketing Kinect and Halo, or paying for Gears Of War and certain downloadable content exclusivity, if they didn’t make the Xbox line? Sony similarly spends huge sums on Gran Turismo and Uncharted for modest sales relative to their cost, and The Last Guardian would have been cancelled long ago if all that mattered were its profit margin.

So let’s imagine a scenario around 2006 where Nintendo exited all hardware production after the GameCube and Game Boy Advance to go third party. Firstly, all franchises which don’t have decent sales would be scrapped, meaning no Advance Wars, Sin And Punishment, Kid Icarus, or Fire Emblem (until Awakening the series had never been a big seller worldwide). Also, the biggest-selling single format game of the year so far, Luigi’s Mansion 2, would likely not exist given the lukewarm sales and reception of the first entry.

Secondly, there’d be no need to produce niche/experimental games to grow a console library, meaning no Xenoblade, Ouendan, Rhythm Heaven, or Pullblox. Plus, hardware showcases such as Wii Sports and Nintendogs would not exist.

Finally, there’d be no partnerships with publishers/developers to produce exclusive games, meaning no Professor Layton, The Last Story, Lego City Undercover, The Wonderful 101, and Bayonetta 2 – which Sega cancelled and was unsuccessfully pitched to various publishers before being picked up by Nintendo.

Bringing us to the modern day, that would mean a third party Nintendo would only be producing games for a select handful of franchises – namely Mario, Pokémon, and Zelda – whose quality would suffer due to requiring extra resources to make the games for multiple formats as well as reduced development times to meet budgets and deadlines.

I think you can guess which current games company this scenario most resembles. After Sega went third party we initially got sequels for Panzer Dragoon, Jet Set Radio, and Space Channel 5 but as they sold poorly those franchises have been sidelined. These days Sega is most widely known for the Aliens: Colonial Marines mess and 15 years of mediocre to middling Sonic games.
 

fireflame

Member
I know this is a dream that cannot come true but i would appreciate seeing so many nintendo games land on Steam. And then i understand why it cannot and should not happen, but a part of me secretly dreams of it.
 

SmokedMeat

Gamer™
Let me look at my crystal ball...its cloudy right now, sorry :(

Only thing I'll say is comparisons to Sega are barely skin-deep. Sega was bankrupt and dead if not for a donation from a former owner. They didn't have IP that the mass-market liked enough to buy in great quanities on their own hardware. When they put out similar titles, ports and sequels of their DC titles on other platforms they still didn't sell.

The era of high quality, sought after Sega first-party software is a myth.

Apples and oranges.

Looks like you summed up my thoughts. Thank you!
 

Fbh

Gold Member
Nah. I think quality would remain high.

Variety would certainly take a hit though. As others have said, they would probably just stick to Mario, Zelda and Smash with mabye a new/different IP every now and then


Also, with the WiiU they did some great stuff partnering up with devs like Platinum (well, except for Star Fox) and Atlus. I think projects like that would most certainly be dead. They funded Bayonetta 2 to have a cool , well reviewed exclusive action game that would diversify their WiiU lineup. I seriously doubt they would have published it if they were a third party dev/publisher.
 
There are pros and cons. The first year of the Wii U was rough, but then they started pumping out great games like Pikmin 3, Super Mario 3D World, Smash, Mario Kart 8, Captain Toad Treasure Tracker, Donkey Kong Tropical Freeze, Splatoon, and Mario Maker.

Then when it became abundantly clear that the Wii U couldnt be saved they gave up on the platform after only 2 years, moved their A teams to the next platform they want to sell us, and started giving us rushed filler games like Mario Tennis, Mario Party 10, and Paper Mario Color Splash. That is not acceptable.

I do agree fully with your comment. The WiiU was just really illconceived and it stuns me how they thought the initial drought was okay.

I personally got my fill with the console due to the games you mentioned but would have cared a lot for a few third party titles that i could play off TV

I still hope that they learned their lesson and that they will have a constant stream of games with switch (even if the first batch are just updated WiiU ports).
 

ggx2ac

Member
Yes: Both a lack of variety and a drop in quality.

Everyone should read this feature (written by a GameCentral reader):

Why Nintendo won't go third party

It's as though those games people want like Splatoon or Xenoblade wouldn't have existed in the first place if Nintendo went third party.

This is why again, I can only see Nintendo going third party benefitting nostalgia fanboys because they don't care about what new IP Nintendo could bring in the future.

This is like if Sony exited the hardware business and closed down their studios from how bad ps3 did, there'd never be a Bloodborne or Horizon Zero Dawn or even Death Stranding which are games everyone keeps hyping about.

But if you suggested in anyway that Sony should exit the hardware business, you'd get the same reasons here for why Nintendo shouldn't.

Again, the following summarises what would happen if Nintendo exited the hardware business:

Every game would be mario, zelda, pokemon and animal crossing
 
Those are first party games

Sega made Tokyo Mirage Sessions, Bandai made Pokken, Tantalus made Twilight Princess HD. Those arent first party studios.

You can certainly make a strong argument that we wouldnt have gotten Toyko Mirage Sessions or Bayonetta 2 if Nintendo were third party, and thats a great argument to make. But all im saying is that certain conditions need to be met for Nintendo to be at its best, and simply making consoles (like the Wii U) does not necessarily mean we are going to get a bunch of great games from them. They need to actually support the platforms that they make, they did not properly support the Wii U.

There are pros and cons to the OPs question, im just presenting the other side of the argument.
 
Yes: Both a lack of variety and a drop in quality.

Everyone should read this feature (written by a GameCentral reader):

Why Nintendo won't go third party

"all franchises which don’t have decent sales would be scrapped"

So... WiiU, basically. Whose franchise and genre variety shrunk dramatically compared to Wii because Nintendo thought they could milk "safe" cashcows like 2D platformers and minigame collections forever.

I mean, just imagine a world in which Nintendo would stop making Advance Wars! ... lol. But we don't even have to count dead franchises like Metroid, when WiiU didn't even receive its own Zelda game. Thinking they wouldn't have made Luigi's Mansion is a huge stretch and the industry is big enough for mid-budget releases to find their way. I'm preeetty sure Platinum Games is quite busy and their latest Nintendo game has been kinda shitty. 3rd Parties also wouldn't stop asking to work with Nintendo IP, why would they?
Even 3DS fell off a cliff after 2013. Got an endless amount of 2D sidescrollers and generic Mario spinoffs on the 1st party side.

We already live in the timeline in which Nintendo suffers from these symptoms, with the only exception being that they still sell hardware which no one wants anymore.
 
Sega made Tokyo Mirage Sessions, Bandai made Pokken, Tantalus made Twilight Princess HD. Those arent first party studios.

You can certainly make a strong argument that we wouldnt have gotten Toyko Mirage Sessions or Bayonetta 2 if Nintendo were third party, and thats a great argument to make. But all im saying is that certain conditions need to be met for Nintendo to be at its best, and simply making consoles (like the Wii U) does not necessarily mean we are going to get a bunch of great games from them. They need to actually support the platforms that they make, they did not properly support the Wii U.

There are pros and cons to the OPs question, im just presenting the other side of the argument.

the same also rings true to a lesser extent with the 3DS. there were years where you had only a handful of good games mostly from nintendo (on DS there was so much third party stuff that it was hard to catch up)

however if you combine the 3DS and WiiU lineup it would be a solid lineup all throughout the year (also with the side effect of less cannibalization; NSMB2 and NSMBU releasing within a year or the situation with Smash 4)
"all franchises which don’t have decent sales would be scrapped"

So... WiiU, basically. Whose franchise and genre variety shrunk dramatically compared to Wii because Nintendo thought they could forever milk "safe" cashcows like 2D platformers and minigame collections forever. I mean, just imagine a world in which Nintendo would stop making Advance Wars! ... lol. But we don't even have to count dead franchises like Metroid, when WiiU didn't even receive its own Zelda game. Thinking they wouldn't have made Luigi's Mansion is a huge stretch and the industry is big enough for mid-budget releases to find their way. I'm preeetty sure Platinum Games is quite busy and their latest Nintendo game has been kinda shitty. 3rd Parties also wouldn't stop asking to work with Nintendo IP, why would they?
Even 3DS fell off a cliff after 2013. Got an endless amount of 2D sidescrollers and generic Mario spinoffs on the 1st party side.

We already live in the timeline in which Nintendo suffers from these symptoms, with the only exception that they still sell hardware which no one wants anymore.
true and that will probably get better since they now only focus on one hardware
 

Busaiku

Member
Sega made Tokyo Mirage Sessions, Bandai made Pokken, Tantalus made Twilight Princess HD. Those arent first party studios.

You can certainly make a strong argument that we wouldnt have gotten Toyko Mirage Sessions or Bayonetta 2 if Nintendo were third party, and thats a great argument to make. But all im saying is that certain conditions need to be met for Nintendo to be at its best, and simply making consoles (like the Wii U) does not necessarily mean we are going to get a bunch of great games from them. They need to actually support the platforms that they make, they did not properly support the Wii U.

There are pros and cons to the OPs question, im just presenting the other side of the argument.
Intelligent Systems isn't a Nintendo studio either.
So no 1st party games!
 
What kind of quality does OP refer to? If quality only means "fun", I am sure they will continue to be fun to play with. But let's not forget gaming industry should be an innovative industry, we treasure new ideas and new ways to play a game. Nintendo's games never lacks innovations, but this will become history if Nintendo go third party. The risk for making games are too high, AAA developers would rather stay inside the comfort zone to make popular yet similar games. While Mario, Zelda or Pokemon will continue to exist, it is likely that they will follow the same formula set by the previous games instead of making breakthroughs like Super Mario Galaxy or Breath of the Wild.
 

Oddish1

Member
"all franchises which don’t have decent sales would be scrapped"

So... WiiU, basically. Whose franchise and genre variety shrunk dramatically compared to Wii because Nintendo thought they could milk "safe" cashcows like 2D platformers and minigame collections forever.

I mean, just imagine a world in which Nintendo would stop making Advance Wars! ... lol. But we don't even have to count dead franchises like Metroid, when WiiU didn't even receive its own Zelda game. Thinking they wouldn't have made Luigi's Mansion is a huge stretch and the industry is big enough for mid-budget releases to find their way. I'm preeetty sure Platinum Games is quite busy and their latest Nintendo game has been kinda shitty. 3rd Parties also wouldn't stop asking to work with Nintendo IP, why would they?
Even 3DS fell off a cliff after 2013. Got an endless amount of 2D sidescrollers and generic Mario spinoffs on the 1st party side.

We already live in the timeline in which Nintendo suffers from these symptoms, with the only exception being that they still sell hardware which no one wants anymore.

The 3DS just had one of its strongest months ever on the back of a game that isn't a 2D sidescroller or generic Mario spinoff. Metroid even had a spin-off released this year on 3DS. When gauging how no longer producing hardware will affect Nintendo it's important to remember that they had a handheld that was reasonably successful. The Wii U is not their entire output.
 

13ruce

Banned
If Nintendo went full 3rd party then Mario and Zelda and Pokemon still will sell very well. People think Nintendo would follow Sega's path but Mario, Zelda, Pokemon and even Animal Crossing are way more relevant than Sonic.

It might even boost their software sales like crazy if they release on PS, Xbox and PC(Steam).

But i only see this happening after they go through another Wii U situation.
 

Oddish1

Member
If Nintendo went full 3rd party then Mario and Zelda and Pokemon still will sell very well. People think Nintendo would follow Sega's path but Mario, Zelda, Pokemon and even Animal Crossing are way more relevant than Sonic.

It might even boost their software sales like crazy if they release on PS, Xbox and PC(Steam)

PS and Xbox's ecosystems aren't really friendly to the types of games Nintendo typically makes. How many mascot platformers do you see topping the PS4's charts?

That said, Nintendo would probably do well on mobile, which is probably what their main focus would be if they stopped making hardware. Not other consoles.
 

SmokedMeat

Gamer™
Looks like i lived through a mythical era then. Yay me!

You did if you lived the Genesis era, which was their only successful era. The mass market never gave a shit about Saturn or Dreamcast. They didn't care about Shenmue, Virtua Cop, or Outrun.

They are nothing like Nintendo.
 

random25

Member
With the discussion of Nintendo going third party and stuff, people keep forgetting that Wii U was not their only console this gen. 3DS, the current leading gaming hardware until the PS4 catches up eventually, exists and has the kinds of games the Wii U had and some more, and sells software pretty well. This should be considered a little more.
 

mindsale

Member
If they went third party I would be so, so happy to be rid of the Nintendo Shuffle - when they stop releasing content for a system two years into its lifespan and just create shovelware and low-budget titles - if anything at all - while resources Switch (pun intended) to new platforms.

There would almost certainly be more content released and I'd be happier as a consumer.
 
Top Bottom