Yoshikage Kira just wanted a quiet life. Can't help that he was born with his tastes, and tried to act positively about them
![]()
Actual answer might be Kessler from the first InfamousTravelled back in time so his past self wouldn't punk out of being a hero
Yes, it starts to take over, but Saren was a character of extreme views and methods way before his indoctrination. We know that from others
I didn't contradict myself. I'm not "implying" he was willfully going along with, I'm outright saying it. To some degree he also saw it as a way to gain power for himself, and his actions around the Krogan and Rachni are a bit unforgivable. That along with several conversations where he even tries to entice Shepard to join him as an enforcer, a chosen puppet at the expense of billions, to help with the destruction of those who would stand againsy it, with the selfish belief that he particularly could be spared in exchange for obedience. He's very similar to Saruman in that regard, not by accident I imagine.
And he didn't sacrifice himself immediately after shaking the effects off, you've had many conversations with him under similar circumstances. It actually took a good amount of convincing from Shepard and a total realization of what he had become (he was physically altered by Sovereign) and that there was no going back for him.
Shepard can convince Saren that, indoctrinated or not, he still has a way to stop Sovereign. Saren commits suicide by shooting himself in the head, to prevent himself from opening the Citadel relay, but not before muttering, "Goodbye, Shepard. Thank you."
That's why I said that maybe in the end there's an element of pity towards him. I would only consider him a sympathetic figure if, for example, you had learned throughout the game of him making attempts to stop, warn, or build failsafes against the invaders during some of his moments of doubt, but he faltered when he realized instead destruction was inevitable and decided to take advantage instead. You would say pragmatic and opportunistic perhaps, but not something I would ever sympayhize with when his motivation and actions were so selfish.
Wanting to "save everyone from extinction" is an aftetrthought at best, and I'm not really convinced it was a true motive to begin with.
![]()
How can you not like such a jovial guy. Also had the best personal theme in a long time!
King Bowser wanted to find a girlfriend
Ganondorf was a crazy old man who felt entitled to violently take over a country that didn't belong to him because the wind in his country sucked, and has never been able to let go that he was rightfully beaten. I have never been able to understand why people genuinely sympathized with him. Ganondorf in TWW is an unusually intimate and multifaceted look at a character who is normally just "evil incarnate and that's it," but he's not in any way actually sympathetic.
Him
![]()
Ok, he was a dictator, but he wanted only protect his people for the ones who stole their planet (Vekta) and banished Helgast on a unliveable planet only for political and economic reasons.
And in Shadow Fall they were told they can live segregate in a part of the planet that was their home from the beginning.
ISA is the true evil.
I want a game where i can control an Helgast soldier next time.
Gwyn's decision to extend the First Flame become more justified when you look at the results of the Dark taking hold in New Londo and Oolacile. Spoilers: It didn't end well for anyone, gods and humans alike. Kaathe is manipulating people just as hard as Frampt.You're ignoring that the current state of both worlds are directly the result of Lord Gwyn and King Allant's actions.Boletería wouldn't be in that decaying state if King Allant hadn't awoken the Old One, and in the case of Lordran, Gwyn wanted his family to remain in power so bad that he sacrificed himself so the status quo of the world didn't change, in fact, the world didn't move forward for thousands of years because of him.
![]()
How can you not like such a jovial guy. Also had the best personal theme in a long time!
Olgierd Von Everich - The Witcher 3: Hearts of Stone
A character who's backstory hid a lot more to him and turned me around slowly at what I initially thought was just a disturbingly cruel bastard.
Made Hearts of Stone one of my all time favourite DLCs/expansions.
And related:
O'Dimm for people wondering. Also great.
You're ignoring that the current state of both worlds are directly the result of Lord Gwyn and King Allant's actions.Boletería wouldn't be in that decaying state if King Allant hadn't awoken the Old One, and in the case of Lordran, Gwyn wanted his family to remain in power so bad that he sacrificed himself so the status quo of the world didn't change, in fact, the world didn't move forward for thousands of years because of him.
That would be my choice for most sympathetic.![]()
Owl Kuro from Ori and the Blind Forest.The forest called for its children, killing the owl's in the process. Blinded by rage, the owl seeks to kill the forest's child, Ori, in return. She succeeds at doing so, but realizes that her attempts to kill him left her nest and last remaining chick unprotected, and so she sacrifices herself to save her child in the nick of time. Ori's foster mother, who understood the owl's plight, adopts the chick and they form a new family.
Gwyn's decision to extend the First Flame become more justified when you look at the results of the Dark taking hold in New Londo and Oolacile. Spoilers: It didn't end well for anyone, gods and humans alike. Kaathe is manipulating people just as hard as Frampt.
It's weird how so many Dark Souls fans have started acting like linking the fire is evil and letting the Age of Dark happen is good when the choice is deliberately morally ambiguous. It's not about good vs evil, it's about sticking to the dwindling status quo or risking the dangerous unknown.
Is he really even portrayed as the villain? Aside from the Followers of the Apocalypse, (and possibly the Kings) he's the only one citizens don't have a problem with entirely. NCR wants to control everything where everything is Marshall Law, Caesars Legion are murderous psychopaths without being reckless like the Fiends and the Brotherhood of Steel are hell bent on technology that they go to war just to obtain it.
Yep. People judge him too harshly.Kefka
I sympathized with Solidus until recently when I realized the Patriots were right about the whole Internet thing. So Zero I guess.
![]()
Went about uniting Ivalice in his own direct, and more bloody way. Actually succeeds, albeit with the lowkey help of our heroes. He brings peace to the land for many centuries, and enjoys a long reign as king himself.
I think we simply disagree about the nature of indoctrination and how much of an effect it has on someone's volition. To me the original, non-indoctrinated Saren would have fought the Reapers to the death.
Whoa, no, no, no, no. Seriously, Neff?![]()
His ultimate intentions were noble, even if his actions were horribly unjustified.
Uh, how is the Shadowlord from Nier not a bad guy?
Just because he has a tragic backstory doesn't justify all the bad shit he does. Are we all just forgetting the fight in the Town Hall?
So many Tales mentions, but no one mentioned Duke from Vesperia.
![]()
Dude was right. You idiots were literally killing the planet, and he was all "Stop doing that you pricks".
Are there any video game stories where the "doing bad shit for the greater good" kind of character actually wins and gets away with it? Or better yet you actually play as them? Not some sort of edgelord stuff, but characters who were actually right not getting beaten just because it's written that way/by the power of love. Seems that most of the stories, in video games at least, that involve that kind of character normally uses the fact that they are sympathetic to make you feel for that character while still giving the good guys an out/way to save the day without doing all the bad shit.
Joel
Yeah I said it! Come at me!!!
Whoa, no, no, no, no. Seriously, Neff?
Armstrong was trying to create a world where only the strong survive. There's nothing good about that.
You're both wrong! /s
Letho gets my vote. He did some horrible things that made it easier for the events of Witcher 3 to happen but damn, I just couldn't hate him at the end.
[IMG ]https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-SNc3BFGIoXQ/VqGUzVUM1oI/AAAAAAAAAG0/P4UO4X0Rpl0/w800-h800/Letho%2Bof%2Bgulet.jpg[/IMG]
Olgierd Von Everich - The Witcher 3: Hearts of Stone
A character who's backstory hid a lot more to him and turned me around slowly at what I initially thought was just a disturbingly cruel bastard.
Made Hearts of Stone one of my all time favourite DLCs/expansions.
And related:
O'Dimm for people wondering. Also great.
Caius Ballad the guy had to live through and endless time loop of watching the one person he cared for more than any other die over and over and over again in an endless loop of torment never able to escape
For me it is Krellian from Xenogears.
Guy had experienced a ton of loss, and did what he thought was right. (Even though what he did was horrible)
Just remembered
Undertale spoilers:Flowey/Asriel. Poor guy, he's the only one you can't save.
I suppose Chara is the real villain though. That kid has issues.
What?Flowey/Asriel is saved in the true ending pacifist run it's actually required for you to do so to get that ending. That's basically the point of the game, that every enemy without exceptions in the game can be redeemed