• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Peter Moore recounts how he almost got into some gangster shit with Yuji Naka

Renekton

Member
I loved Sega, still love Sega, but it was dominated by the developers to the extent where Sega as a company couldn't move if Nakagawa-san, Yu Suzuki, Iguchi weren't into it.
Don't know how I feel about this
 
Sounds like Sega alright. God the Japanese leadership at that place really do live in their own world. To this day, they still refuse to accept that things work differently outside Japan, Hell, outside their own echo chamber of a board room. It's sheer luck the company hasn't completely collapsed under the weight of their own xenophobia.
 
Also wtf about those responses. No way Sega was like a grandad in 2002. Still had unique and modern games.

They were being compared to EA (Madden) and Rockstar (GTA3) directly. They were 'granddad' in as much as they were fading from memory in a year where GTAIII, MGS2, and Halo were taking over the mindshare of their most lucrative audience. Whether or not the teenagers they asked were mistaken about the actual content of Sega's output, Moore was attempting to illustrate that they had a huge perception problem on their hands.
 

Blackage

Member
I'm convinced that Japanese companies have no fucking clue what the world outside of Japan thinks of them. -_-
 

DSN2K

Member
no shocked at all about Sega, was quite apparent how out of touch they were from a consumer point of view already.
 

Ban Puncher

Member
61zRTFg.jpg
 
I side with Naka on this one,no matter his personality.
He was seeing this from the angle of a creator who gave his best years at Sega. It would be natural to feel insulted.

Moore saw things from the side of a businessman, without any experience at video games.

Also wtf about those responses. No way Sega was like a grandad in 2002. Still had unique and modern games.

Yeah, well guess what.

This was a business meeting. There's not that many game developers out there who are particularly great at running a business, and a developer who flips out like that in the face of criticism clearly is not one of them.

And yes, Sega most definitely WAS like a granddad and a relic in 2002. You miss the part where the market largely shrugged at and ignored the Dreamcast, resulting in Sega dropping their console business? And their "unique and modern" games of that era flopped one after the other.

Consumers as a whole largely did not give a shit about Sega in 2002, and the survey Moore was trying to communicate to the Japanese branch clearly reflected that.
 
Fantastic interview. His rise to the top at Sega must have been crazy. "They said "Sega has got a new console coming out. They're in a little bit of trouble. They've got no head of marketing and they are nine months from launch, they don't have anything. They have no creative, they have no designs, no brand ID, we're still even fighting over the name. And the Japanese are panicked". Then all of a sudden, Bernie leaves Sega, and they said to me, after five months on the job, "You're in charge. You're the new president, chief operating officer, of Sega America," and I'm still waiting for my clothes to arrive from Boston". From marketing to head of a sinking ship in 5 months.
 

MattKeil

BIGTIME TV MOGUL #2
This was before they made trash though... Anyway who did he ask, a bunch of punk brats? Who the hell would even answer these questions like that?

To the general audience Sega had been making trash since at least 1995. They were never the same after the Saturn launch debacle.

I side with Naka on this one,no matter his personality.
He was seeing this from the angle of a creator who gave his best years at Sega. It would be natural to feel insulted.

Moore saw things from the side of a businessman, without any experience at video games.

Also wtf about those responses. No way Sega was like a grandad in 2002. Still had unique and modern games.

Moore saw things correctly, because videogames are a business. The notion that anyone would say what Naka said in that story seriously at that time is ludicrous. I was a diehard Sega fan going back to the '80s arcade days and even I knew the ship was sinking by 1998 or so. Sega hadn't been cool or relevant for years. The granddad comparison was exactly correct to the mainstream gaming audience at the time. Only Sega fans were even bothering to take note of what they were releasing by then.
 

Protome

Member
The sonic games were not badly received at the time this would have occurred.

Untrue, he left Sega in 2003. The Gamecube versions of Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 were out. Adventure DX was poorly received pretty much across the board, Adventure 2 Battle was more mixed/tepid admittedly.
 

MattKeil

BIGTIME TV MOGUL #2
Untrue, he left Sega in 2003. The Gamecube versions of Sonic Adventure 1 and 2 were out. Adventure DX was poorly received pretty much across the board, Adventure 2 Battle was more mixed/tepid admittedly.

And Billy Hatcher was close to finished, so Moore would have direct knowledge of how far out in the weeds Naka was at the time.
 

DrFunk

not licensed in your state
To anyone who knew me better/
Know I chose Saturn first Cause it's 2-D heaven/
Bernie Stolar dropped the ball with the RAM cartridge/
X-men Vs. Street fighter could've expanded the market/
 
Explains a lot about the puzzling decisions Japanese companies make in the industry

I've seen firsthand how Japanese companies will willfully make decisions not in their best interest because making the better decision would be an implicit admission they'd been wrong all along. Dead serious. I have a feeling Sho Nuff knows what I'm referring to!
 

dh4niel

Member
So I said to the translator, 'Tell him to fuck off.' And the poor guy looks at me and says, 'There's no expression in Japanese.' I said, 'I know there is.' And that was it. That was the last time I ever set foot in there," Moore explains.

That's amazing.
 

kmfdmpig

Member
Naka must have been delusional to think that in 2003 people would have a great impression of Sega. I mean the hardcore fans had been screwed by the Dreamcast surrender, and their output as a third party was mixed at best. It was hardly an unassailable company at that point.
 

heringer

Member
I've seen firsthand how Japanese companies wil willfully make decisions not in their best interest because making the better decision would be an implicit admission they'd been wrong all along. Dead serious. I have a feeling Sho Nuff knows what I'm referring to!

Honor and shame are huge parts of japanese culture. I'm an expert.
 
Honor and shame are huge parts of japanese culture. I'm an expert.

You joke, but having worked with major Japanese clients, there is a bit of this to it. While lower down members might see the issues, the higher ups are usually reluctant to admit things are going badly until shit is pretty much right before hitting the fan
 

heringer

Member
You joke, but having worked with major Japanese clients, there is a bit of this to it. While lower down members might see the issues, the higher ups are usually reluctant to admit things are going badly until shit is pretty much right before hitting the fan

It's a joke based on that old meme, but I know it's true, hehe.
 

MrS

Banned
Peter Moore is a good dude. I like him. Hope he's successful at Liverpool. Hope he puts out an autobiography one day.
 

gypsygib

Member
Shame, maybe if he could be open to criticism (from the all important consumer base) Sega wouldn't have failed so badly.
 

Pie and Beans

Look for me on the local news, I'll be the guy arrested for trying to burn down a Nintendo exec's house.
Seeing Naka amount to fuck all post Sega has been pretty sweet. Dudes arrogance was fluffed to absurd levels during the Sonic 1-3 years and all the horror stories about how he fucked Sega Saturn projects afterwards.

Moore probably had him pegged from day one.
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
Lol. "You have made them say this!"

No, years of trash made them say that. I wonder how many devs are deluded along those same lines?

I'd think Nintendo might be the same way with regards to certain features people want on their systems. Like friendcodes being stupid trash.

Key difference is Nintendo never really stopped making great games.
 

petran79

Banned
They were being compared to EA (Madden) and Rockstar (GTA3) directly. They were 'granddad' in as much as they were fading from memory in a year where GTAIII, MGS2, and Halo were taking over the mindshare of their most lucrative audience. Whether or not the teenagers they asked were mistaken about the actual content of Sega's output, Moore was attempting to illustrate that they had a huge perception problem on their hands.

Sega definitely were not at their best around that time, but had those teens visited arcades and played games like Virtua Tennis, Ocean Hunter, Virtua Striker, Sega Rally, Lost World, House of the Dead and the whole Sega Model 3 library, they'd change their opinion. Sequels were even better.

In 2002 those games were still hot and technically impressive. No way they'd be developed by backward thinking people. It was the swan song of Sega. After 2003 they can bash Sega all they want.
 
Sega definitely were not at their best around that time, but had those teens visited arcades and played games like Virtua Tennis, Ocean Hunter, Virtua Striker, Sega Rally, Lost World, House of the Dead and the whole Sega Model 3 library, they'd change their opinion. Sequels were even better.

In 2002 those games were still hot and technically impressive. No way they'd be developed by backward thinking people. It was the swan song of Sega. After 2003 they can bash Sega all they want.

Neighborhood arcades were dead, dead, dead, dead, dead by then.
 
Man, I really want a Sega movie but I'll happily take another highly embellished page-turner about them from Saturn to post-DC demise in the vein of Console Wars.
 

Nuu

Banned
It's so sad to me that Sega died.

Out of every console maker from SONY, Microsoft, NEC, and Nintendo, I always felt that Sega made by far the best consoles. From a hardware standpoint, there systems always felt like they weren't compromised. Saturn aside, the Genesis was able to display enough colors to look "16-bit" but while also running with next to no slowdown. The Master System felt like a non-limited NES with a well running titles and varied color pallete. The Dreamcast actually had 3D games look good, run well, and had fantastic image quality.

In terms of library, Sega was difficult to beat. They had a great balance of kid friendly and mature titles, traditional games, and experimental ones, Japanese focused and Western focused, 2D and 3D. The systems had fantastic arcade ports such as Shinobi, Strider, X-Men vs Street Fighter, Marvel vs Capcom 2. And a varied arcade library. But they also had cutting edge and unique console styled games like Phantasy Star, Ranger-X, Panzer Dragoon Saga, and Skies of Arcadia.

It makes me so upset that the company that we once knew isn't around anymore. I'd trade Sony or Microsoft for a traditional Sega in modern times in a heartbeat.
 
It makes me so upset that the company that we once knew isn't around anymore. I'd trade Sony or Microsoft for a traditional Sega in modern times in a heartbeat.

You're not the only one, man. I'd trade both away for prime Sega, but it was just too busy at war with itself to last.
 

RagnarokX

Member
Don't know how I feel about this

I'd say Sega's problem is they backed the wrong developers. All the stories of Yuji Naka paint him as very egotistical and driving away other creative forces. Sega put him in charge of Sonic because he wrote the code for the game when the one who should have been in charge was Hirokazu Yasuhara (Carol Yas), who was in charge of overall game design and level design for the Genesis Sonic games.
 
Top Bottom