OfTheOverflow
Member
Why are we discussing this stuff over, like, 3 different threads lol. Would help to consolidate.
Sadly not. When I posted about it before in the other E3 thread, the mod of the Discord server deleted the comments at the request of the GAF insider. Sn4ke_911 should be able to vouch for it as he asked about it too and I linked him to a thread with screengrabs.
I don't really know the insider's track record and not wanting the info on GAF could be a red flag given if they acknowledged it they would likely have to get vetted by the mods. It's also worth noting that a couple of supposed insiders said last year RDR2 was being revealed at Sony's conference and that press had seen the game which obviously didn't happen and Jason at Kotaku debunked the "press seeing" it part, so I'm taking everything with a grain of salt unless shinobi or Jason mention it.
It's gonna make the E3 climax so much sweeter though, man.
Except Horizon's motion blur, lighting and overall models are not even close to those in that video.
And yes I have a PS4 and beat Horizon, loved the game.
Not even close? The settings are so different, it's hard to compare lighting, and in terms of models, there's barely any useful footage to compare characters.
Those RDR2 gifs are so freaking gorgeous. I think that game could give Horizon a run for its money.
I meant overall sceneries, objects etc. This is clearly on another level.
I have a reaaaaaally hard time believing that was gameplay.
No way! that is a damn movie or cut scene!Especially this part blew me away:
![]()
Can you believe this is actual gameplay footage? well according to Insomniac it really is.
![]()
and that wasn't even on PS4 Pro.
![]()
Now what will the game look like a year later? hhnnnnggg
In the meantime, something to go along with those sweet Spidey gifs:
![]()
![]()
As much as I'm feeling the open-world fatigue right now, I do have to make an exception for Rockstar. They truly are in a league of their own compared to all the other companies that try to specialise in that sort of thing *cough*Ubisoft*cough*.
I know Rockstar typically don't 'do' E3, but the GTA V remaster was announced at Sony's presser in '14 after all, and they've got that marketing partnership deal going on, so I'm thinking there's a good chance we'll see more of Red Dead Redemption 2 at the presser.
I just don't believe that Spider-Man isn't an Ubisoft type of situation, it's not going to look like that exactly, there will be a downgrade.
Except Horizon's motion blur, lighting and overall models are not even close to those in that video.
And yes I have a PS4 and beat Horizon, loved the game.
True, Sony/Insomniac have a history of downgrades.
I don't agree. These are mostly cutscene equivalents, meaning optimal framing, etc. Horizon looks as good in its real time cutscenes. I especially disagree about lighting and modelling anyway...As it stands, I would maybe even give Horizon a slight edge, but it is really apples and oranges. Very much looking forward to seeing more of the game. This as someone who isn't really a Spiderman or marvel fan.
It doesn't matter what their history is, that doesn't look right. Especially when Insomniac's response isn't directly calling it 'game play' but 'in engine', similar to what Ubisoft does.
Then clarified 'in game/engine/real time'.
And that's basically the same response that ND have enquiries about the original U4 reveal trailer too which obviously got paired down a little bit especially re: 60fps > 30fps. Also, vertical slice etc.Then clarified 'in game/engine/real time'.
And that's basically the same response that ND have enquiries about the original U4 reveal trailer too which obviously got paired down a little bit especially re: 60fps > 30fps. Also, vertical slice etc.
I didn't understand his modeling comment as well, Aloy and other NPCs in the game are much more impressive than the models we see in the diner part of the trailer, not sure Spiderman's lighting is that much superior as well though it's really good, the more impressive stuff is the scale of everything, all of the details, not sure Horizon can compare there.
Anyway I do think it's in the realm of what we saw in U4 and Horizon but no doubt that if it will turn out like that trailer (will look like that during gameplay, no cutscenes) than this might dethrone Horizon as the best looking game.
They didn't clarified it, the guy was asking in game and Insomniac said it's in game.
Another guy asked for gameplay and Insomniac said the trailer was gameplay.
It was in engine, but not 'gameplay' really. How could it have been gameplay, they didn't have anything playable, just a proof of concept thing. It raises a flag that they were so quick to characterize that as 'gameplay'.
Then there's the use of the term 'in-engine' and 'real time'... we know the deal with that at this point, don't we?
Maybe it does look just like that now with a game built around it, I'd love to be wrong.
You think this is not gameplay?
![]()
You think this is not gameplay?
![]()
No, because it's not. It's a proof of concept.
Those are multiplat examples and Killzone happened years ago.The Division/ Watch Dogs/ other shit reveals were also made an "in engine" thing to look like real gameplay, and if we go even further (not saying this is the case here), Killzone 2 reveal was a CGi that was made to look like gameplay.
So yea this doesn't prove anything really.
Those are multiplat examples and Killzone happened years ago.
What are the examples from this gen regarding PS4 exclusives?
Uncharted 4, though it was a teaser not a gameplay.
I know the game was canned but Deep Down reveal looked much better than the gameplay we saw afterwards, and I might misremember but Infamous reveal also looked better than the final game (which looked amazing in 2014 no doubt, though very "dead" and with a minimal scale for an open world title), but it wasn't too bad to be an actual controversy.
Wasn't Bloodborne suffered from a downgrade as well? even though initial trailer doesn't look better than Horizon and U4 so it is possible if FROM had the budget or/and skill technically but still.
Actually they started on time for their last two E3s. Let's see if they keep it up though.Translation: 6:15 PT.
Staying outta this conversation because I'm not in that studio so idk what they're doing or capable of enough to try and call them out
So Dreams and days gone hype!!
![]()
![]()
Did they, I seem to remember B-roll playing for a while before real start.Actually they started on time for their last two E3s. Let's see if they keep it up though.
I know right! It's alright Mm can be the silent heroesMan Dreams is underrated visually, it looks spectacular and deserves to be mentioned when people talk about the best looking stuff among Horizon, U4, GOW4, Battlefront etc...
It was in engine, but not 'gameplay' really. How could it have been gameplay, they didn't have anything playable, just a proof of concept thing. It raises a flag that they were so quick to characterize that as 'gameplay'.
Then there's the use of the term 'in-engine' and 'real time'... we know the deal with that at this point, don't we?
Maybe it does look just like that now with a game built around it, I'd love to be wrong.
Nope they started on time I just checked the threads for them. I think last PSX they may have been a little late or some other non-E3 conference.Did they, I seem to remember B-roll playing for a while before real start.
Is the story in the Gravity Rush games any good?
Is the story in the Gravity Rush games any good?