Oxford student spared jail after stabbing boyfriend had two other assault charges.

So what was she convicted of?

I don't generally have a problem with people not going to jail, as their record is going to ruin their lives more than that anyway.

Honestly at least in the US the system is fucked. If you serve your time/complete your probation I think it's completely fucked that your records are just public information. It makes it nearly impossible to get a job, so it drastically increases the odds of recidivism.

I have issues with this too...except when it comes to attaining a job that involves someone's life or death. I would have no problem barring someone who has issues stabbing people from becoming a heart surgeon.
 
All doctors in the UK have to provide 'enhanced disclosure' of their records. Even a minor offence could cause major problems, and had done for colleagues. What this girl has/is getting away with is unheard of. And her actions obviously speak to her temperament and character.

Oh I'm aware of the law, I'm saying it should be changed for the betterment of society.

I agree, this event speaks to her temperament and character... now and in this point of time. Where I differ from you (I think) is that I do not believe that the person who comes out at the end of a jail sentence has to be the same person with the same temperament/character as the one who went in.

Given she is clearly bright in some very significant ways, given the proper rehabilitative prison structure I think that as she served her time and with the appropriate guidance she could indeed be sufficiently changed enough. There are all sorts of ways we could do this. For example, what about a prison sentence where she serves 4 years, being given proper anger management therapy and the oversight of a psychiatrist. If at the end she goes to all her drug classes, completes all her programs and is given the green light by her psychiatrist, then at the end of her prison term her record is locked and expunged and she is free to finish her schooling and become a surgeon?

Society gets a rare commodity - a talented surgeon - so she pays back in that sense, she is given a goal so recidivism is unlikely, and she did her time so the justice system isn't unfairly penalizing someone for a life sentence. Is this not a good compromise? Don't get me wrong, I understand that as the law stands now she would be fucked. I am instead pondering whether there may not be some meaningful patches we could apply to the system to make society as a whole benefit further from the process of seeking justice.
 
XS9PKCv.png
 
One accident? Fine, counseling + probation + community service if it wasn't severe. Girl went to med school. Many of you don't understand the load of work they go through and effort it takes to even succeed in that environment.

But a history of other assault chargers? Now you're just enabling her. Girl needs to do some time now.
 
Surely everything that needed to be said, was said in the other thread, the only reason The Sun made the article was to post pictures of her in leather and wading in a lake with no bra, the article is about the length of a GAF Defense Force post.

You made me click the link, I hope your proud of yourself.
still would. I'd just carry protection (a stab proof vest)
 
Can I just point out how creepy The Sun is for posting those pictures of her?

It screams "she stabbed him, but also she's a woman with boobs." Which is kinda weird given the point of the article.

All the papers are doing it in some way, it's kind of disturbing.
 
I care about both of them. I don't immediately write people off based on Sun.co.uk articles.

I'm sure the guy's alright. Do we even know how severe the wound was? I doubt she'd be free if she had crippled the guy for life. Or should I be suing my sister for that time we were in a fight, and she pushed me, and I fell on the back of my head, which left me with a gash?
You're really defending domestic abuse here? Would you be saying the same stupid shit if the genders were reversed? Seriously, fuck off.
 
I care about both of them. I don't immediately write people off based on Sun.co.uk articles.

I'm sure the guy's alright. Do we even know how severe the wound was? I doubt she'd be free if she had crippled the guy for life. Or should I be suing my sister for that time we were in a fight, and she pushed me, and I fell on the back of my head, which left me with a gash?

You one of those people that ask if it is "Rap-rape" aren't you?

Damn how much of stabbing counts? must see bone?
 
I care about both of them. I don't immediately write people off based on Sun.co.uk articles.

I'm sure the guy's alright. Do we even know how severe the wound was? I doubt she'd be free if she had crippled the guy for life. Or should I be suing my sister for that time we were in a fight, and she pushed me, and I fell on the back of my head, which left me with a gash?

You care about the female. How do you know the guy is alright if you don't even know about the wound? Go sue your sister, no one is stopping you nor is it against the law.
 
Also with Europe's Right to be Forgotten laws, all records of this will be wiped from Google/Bing when you search her name soon!
 
I care about both of them. I don't immediately write people off based on Sun.co.uk articles.

I'm sure the guy's alright. Do we even know how severe the wound was? I doubt she'd be free if she had crippled the guy for life. Or should I be suing my sister for that time we were in a fight, and she pushed me, and I fell on the back of my head, which left me with a gash?
What
 
LMAO at the American apparel ad for her in The Sun.

here. consider her guil-oh look we poked you eyes out with nipples. now consider that.
 
Can I just point out how creepy The Sun is for posting those pictures of her?

It screams "she stabbed him, but also she's a woman with boobs." Which is kinda weird given the point of the article.

I mean they're just showing the real reason she got off, so might as well.
 
The purpose of imprisonment is to segregate the general public from those likely to do them harm - physical harm in particular, as other forms (e.g. theft) can usually be partially rectified through restitution or some form of community service.

That this person has a history of physical assault suggests previous sanctions have been ineffective, particularly as the violence used has escalated and could have resulted in death.

This behaviour may have resulted from a sustance abuse problem, mental health issues, or a combination of the two. Regardless, all people should be equal under the law. Whether or not they have a career that could be damaged is irrelevant, and something that person should have considered beforehand.

I could understand if the sentence was deferred until this person could complete their studies (provided this was expected within a reasonable timeframe) but completely letting them off sets a terrible precedent which favours the rich and successful over all others.
 
In order to be a successful surgeon, you have to have the right temperament. This woman getting off free for her actions makes me wonder how'll she'll act when she literally has someone's life in their hands. She doesn't have the composure or attitude to be working in any hospital.

I don't really care about her potential when you have young Black and other minorities getting funneled into a school to prison pipeline. What about their potential? She has a history of violence and more than likely she'll reoffend.
 
You think racism is limited by country lines?

For all the talk about white privilege this forum sure seems to be blind to American privilege of putting their social problems on other countries despite others not having the same demographics or politics.

Racism is true in all parts of the world, it's very obvious. Labeling this particular case as white privilege though does a disservice to the 90% of the population that are white but, i would argue, not being able to have such privilege without being rich or good looking. It's also demeaning towards the people who are experiencing the bulk of the racism that happens in European countries, other white people with different ethnicity as opposed to the country they are currently living in.
 
There was a fucking defense force for this? Are you shitting me?!

This criminal needs jail time.

One accident? Fine, counseling + probation + community service if it wasn't severe. Girl went to med school. Many of you don't understand the load of work they go through and effort it takes to even succeed in that environment.

But a history of other assault chargers? Now you're just enabling her. Girl needs to do some time now.

Holy shit. Do you really believe something like this alleviates her of her crimes? That it puts her above others?
 
There was a fucking defense force for this? Are you shitting me?!

This criminal needs jail time.

...but what about the cardiac patients in need of surgery that the 100s of other heart surgeons can perform instead of this bright young woman!?

The only reason to defend her is if she was the last heart surgeon on Earth, which isn't the case (thankfully).
 
For all the talk about white privilege this forum sure seems to be blind to American privilege of putting their social problems on other countries despite others not having the same demographics or politics.

Racism is true in all parts of the world, it's very obvious. Labeling this particular case as white privilege though does a disservice to the 90% of the population that are white but, i would argue, not being able to have such privilege without being rich or good looking. It's also demeaning towards the people who are experiencing the bulk of the racism that happens in European countries, other white people with different ethnicity as opposed to the country they are currently living in.

There's a totally different approach to justice in the US compared to most of Europe too. Incarceration rates in the US are over 4x those in the UK and over 10x or more than somewhere like Sweden or Ireland.

I can see no evidence of racism in this case. If someone can present any then go for it. I also don't see how it's in any way useful to project US problems onto this case.

That's not to say the judge made a good decision. Might be, you know, that he's just not very good at his job.
 
I'm not sure what evidence you need? Lets not delude ourselves into thinking the outcome would have been exactly the same if she was black. And yes I'm from the UK.
 
This isn't a win-lose thing. It's me voicing my opinion. I'm sure there are others out there who'd agree with me, but who in their right mind would come into these threads when they largely result in the minority opinion being ridiculed and overwhelmed by nigh-on aggressive responses? Don't worry, have fun in here. I'm heading out.

No one cares. Your opinion is dumb as fuck.
 
We have no idea at all if this is true or not.

Black offenders presented before a sentencing judge, for example, are 44% more likely to be given custodial sentences for driving offences than white people, 37% more likely for public order offences or possession of a weapon, and 27% more likely for drug possession. Meanwhile, Asian offenders are 19% more likely to be given custodial sentences for shoplifting, and 41% more likely for drug offences.

According to the Young review, the disproportionate representation of young black and Muslim prisoners in the UK is now greater than that in the US.

https://www.theguardian.com/society...hnic-minority-young-prisoners-stop-and-search
 
Top Bottom