ElBoxyBrown
Banned
JL is gonna be Snyder's final redemption.
I'll gladly eat crow on the fact that I thought Gal would be the weakest link and hold it back.
Still super happy to see the movie be great critically. Especially with such a prominent female super hero and given DCs recent film record. Aside from JL, I'm fairly excited for the rest of the DC talent lined up, but especially Whedon on Batgirl.
The sooner DC can out the Snyder movies behind them, the better.
Many of the trailers looked like rubbish, by the way, so if this in fact a good film, well done to the marketing team for failing to communicate that.
Many of the trailers looked like rubbish, by the way, so if this in fact a good film, well done to the marketing team for failing to communicate that.
This seems to have combined the cool grimdark with some color. We got both fam. Patty made everyone happy.
So wait, are reviewers not biased against DC anymore? I'm confused.
Still feel like Suicide Squad was low-balling, especially now. If for no reason other than Wonder Woman is better known than anyone in Suicide Squad was.
JL is gonna be Snyder's final redemption.
Well, Bruce Wayne is also an established murderer here.
People were saying she was the best though i don't see it and only thought she was the least bad and she didn't have a great impression on me but i'm glad she is good hereI mean, I don't think those of us who doubted Gal following Batman V Superman are entirely blameless. In my opinion, she's really not very good in that film, and her performance wasn't particularly well received either critically, I don't think.
I'm definitely happy she seems to have really made the role work this time around, though.
JL is gonna be Snyder's final redemption.
Nothing I've read about this movie sounds remotely like Snyder grimdark.
I like Watchmen so that's on you.We can put it to rest that he's a hack fraud?
damn, got caught up with the MRA and almost missed this gem 😂
...What? It means that I think it's good, which is all there is. There's no objective good or bad in art, there's just consensus. I can turn that around and say: "Just because you don't like something doesn't make it bad."
Lol come on. Everything has been on point from trailers, posters etc. Starting from that first comic con trailer.
Or, alternatively since WW is apparently pretty good, it will be the final verification that he's indeed a bad director
i'm kind of baffled that people still completely misunderstand what the rt percentage represents even though it comes up in more or less every single review thread. i still remember the bvs review thread that had people leaving impressions saying 'it was no way near as bad as critics said, i'd give it a 5/10!' even though the average rating was literally 5/10.What 'kid gloves'? Don't most Marvel movies sit around 6/7 out of 10?
I swear people see 95% on RT and just assume 'oh shit, it got 9.5/10!'
So Warner Brothers finally learnt how to pay off reviewers...
We'll see with the changes to JL.
Implemented by Joss Whedon?
I mean, I don't think those of us who doubted Gal following Batman V Superman are entirely blameless. In my opinion, she's really not very good in that film, and her performance wasn't particularly well received either critically, I don't think. It wasn't like some of us were judging her without having gotten to see her in the role first.
I'm definitely happy she seems to have really made the role work this time around, though. I'll have my crow with a side order of Greek salad, please.
Implemented by Joss Whedon?
You can critically dissect a film and show that it has flaws. If you still enjoy a film despite those flaws then that's fine.. but it doesn't mean that those flaws aren't there.
What 'kid gloves'? Don't most Marvel movies sit around 6/7 out of 10?
I swear people see 95% on RT and just assume 'oh shit, it got 9.5/10!'
.
Funny that a team that was set up to take down Superman-level threats could easily be solo'd by Batman.
Implemented by Joss Whedon?
He's not changing anything.
No, they did extensive reshoots that changed the tone of the movie from reports. Joss is only coming in to finish post-production stuff. It won't change Snyder's vision.
Implemented by Joss Whedon?
I mean, I don't think those of us who doubted Gal following Batman V Superman are entirely blameless. In my opinion, she's really not very good in that film, and her performance wasn't particularly well received critically either, I don't think. It wasn't like some of us were judging her without having gotten to see her in the role first.
I'm definitely happy she seems to have really made the role work this time around, though. I'll have my crow with a side order of Greek salad, please.
Funny that a team that was set up to take down Superman-level threats could easily be solo'd by Batman.
He's not changing anything.
No, they did extensive reshoots that changed the tone of the movie from reports. Joss is only coming in to finish post-production stuff. It won't change Snyder's vision.
"Watch out, Superman! It's Harley Quinn!"
"Who's she?"
"A crazy woman who wears hotpants! She carries a baseball bat!"
"Sounds like I'd better be careful!"
DCEU lives under Injustice universe fighting terms."Watch out, Superman! It's Harley Quinn!"
"Who's she?"
"A crazy woman who wears hotpants! She carries a baseball bat!"
"Sounds like I'd better be careful!"
"There's no version of reality where Ant-Man tops 500 million worldwide."
Also, you seem to be purposefully ignoring my question from earlier in the thread at this point.
Considering you implied that there is a possibility that Wonder Woman makes $1 billion, I'm not sure you're the best guy to be giving out box office predictions.
Yup, I think lots of folks saw the performance in BvS and felt that way. In retrospect I think it was more due to the material and perhaps the direction.I mean, I don't think those of us who doubted Gal following Batman V Superman are entirely blameless. In my opinion, she's really not very good in that film, and her performance wasn't particularly well received critically either, I don't think. It wasn't like some of us were judging her without having gotten to see her in the role first.
I'm definitely happy she seems to have really made the role work this time around, though. I'll have my crow with a side order of Greek salad, please.
if you're talking about fans maybe, but critics? not true, especially when you look at the average ratings for these films. movies that get rt scores in the 80s and 90s usually have average ratings in the 7-8/10 range, whilst something like, say batman v superman, which has an rt score in the 20s has an average rating of 5/10. a lot of critics give middling reviews and scores. stuff like rogue one getting a high rt percentage didn't mean it was seen as 'amazingly amazing' by critics, just that a lot of people liked it enough.To be clear I didn't think BvS or SS were good films but the critics are frequently easier on stuff like the previous two Star Wars films which were solid but didn't deserve the praise that they got in some areas of the press.
There seems to be two critical extremes, amazingly amazing or mind bendingly awful when it comes to these big franchise films with no room for nuance.
Like all you need is Enchantress and maybe Diablo's god form even though he's still weak. Even if you need skilled specialists why the fuck do you need an insane clown with a bat and a shitty bank robber with a boomerang and a big guy with a skin condition. Don't forget the man who can climb anything.Funny that a team that was set up to take down Superman-level threats could easily be solo'd by Batman.
"Watch out, Superman! It's Harley Quinn!"
"Who's she?"
"A crazy woman who wears hotpants! She carries a baseball bat!"
"Sounds like I'd better be careful!"