That's not how the burden of proof works.
Plus, nobody says he's lying. He only said a "trusted source". Assuming the source is legitimate, that could be anyone within the internal supply chain. It's not indicative of anything and we don't know what it is based on.
Similarly, just saying that something is "amazing" tells us nothing. I'm sure it isbut it's subjective. Now, there's nothing wrong with that, of course but as a result, it's a statement that offers very little value without context.
Okay...Cool
*shrugs*