Marc Laidlaw reveals Half-Life 2 Episode 3's story synopsis

How the tables have turned. I appreciate the likes of Activision, Blizzard, EA, Ubi way more than Valve, who are now sharing the same shit-tier in my eyes with Konami.
 
Nah, HL3 would've still had Gordon Freeman as the main character probably. The Alyx stuff would probably be either Valve working towards an Alyx spin-off or, more likely, setting Alyx up as an antagonist of sorts. The G-Man is heavily implied in the episodes to be working for an evil entity, while the Vortigaunts are the forces of good.

The BreenGrub twitter account, written by Marc Laidlaw, actually implied that the Vortigaunts have their own agenda and are not really "the forces of good".
 
tumblr_inline_mmt8m7oK3G1qz4rgp.png
 
How the tables have turned. I appreciate the likes of Activision, Blizzard, EA, Ubi way more than Valve, who are now sharing the same shit-tier in my eyes with Konami.

2007 me thought Blizzard and Valve were the best, most reliable developers in the game and could do no wrong, while I was losing faith in Nintendo.

10 years later, it's the opposite.
 
I just searched "fuck" in this thread, I only saw 13 "fuck Valve" posts in 29 pages. Essentially negligible for a Valve thread. Saying that people are "yelling fuck you Valve over and over again" is the actual hyperbole.

It was an example. There were also a few folks making fat jokes about Gabe earlier on in this thread, along with other unpleasant insinuations.

Are the people who bought SiN Episodes: Emergence still mad too?

This still stings :(

There was a lot of promise in that first episode.
 
How the tables have turned. I appreciate the likes of Activision, Blizzard, EA, Ubi way more than Valve, who are now sharing the same shit-tier in my eyes with Konami.

Valve loved gambling revenue even more than Konami, since they abided the inclusion of minors on the action of CSGO betting.
 
I understand the sentiment entirely. I want the 3rd episode, but I can make the distinction between what I want and what I am owed. I am not owed anything, as I got exactly what I paid for.

You paid for it based on a lie, though. Again, they sold Episode 1 & 2 as parts of a trilogy. THEY made the deal. Fans didn't tell them they needed to make a trilogy, THEY told fans it needed to be a trilogy.

They didn't deliver their end of the deal. That is all there is to it. Congrats to you for being a good little consumer who doesn't believe customers should expect what they're promised.
 
Sometimes I think that not enjoying Half-Life or Half-Life 2 (and I played them at the time) was one of the greatest blessings of my time spent in this hobby.

The pain I've seen these fans endure these long years, only to have it end like this... thank goodness I was spared it. I couldn't have taken being both a Metroid and Half-Life fan at the same time, no sir.
 
Damn I can picture the set piece of you fighting on the ship while the outside is phasing in an out of different timelines. Not doubt it would have been amazing.
 
Sometimes I think that not enjoying Half-Life or Half-Life 2 (and I played them at the time) was one of the greatest blessings of my time spent in this hobby.

The pain I've seen these fans endure these long years, only to have it end like this... thank goodness I was spared it. I couldn't have taken being both a Metroid and Half-Life fan at the same time, no sir.

It could be worse.

Imagine being a Megaman fan...
 
But... they don't?

Well, humanity effectually

1) Cut off access for the Combine to ever come back to Earth, baring their own advancement in portal technology.

2) Denied an the asset that would have allowed them to return to Earth, and travel across space and time.

Earth still has to deal with the remaining Combine left, it's probably in a constant, decade long war of uprising and resistance. The Combine are still left and shown to be a nearly unstoppable force, but for now Earth is free from the main empire.
 
In 2007 I was one year away from my last year of high school, played HL since the beginning in the 90's (yeah, M rated but my parents didn't cared) and saw those gaben interviews when he says that next year they are going to launch the last episode of the trilogy.

Now I finished university, got a degree and already had three jobs.

Can't believe I saw the ending on a blogpost on my cellphone taking breakfast before going to work.

Hope someone could make it into a SFM movie.
 
Once upon I time I was all fired up to make the Ep3 OT, and now? I'm not even shocked. I'm even somewhat satisfied that we have this bit of closure.
 
I have to laugh at these "entitlement" arguments. The Half Life Episode 3 situation is basically just like going to a restaurant and ordering food, and then having the waiter disappear and bring neither your food, your bill, or any kind of update on what's going on.

I guess if you're a stickler for legality alone, then no, no one is entitled to anything. But there's no way to deny that it's just plain shitty how Valve have managed the whole series. There OUGHT to be some kind of closure to be had (in game or out of it), no way around it. Whether you want to use the word "entitled" is a personal decision, but there's really no way to frame Valve as having done the right thing here.
 
Man i cant imagine how different everyones tune would be if Telltale did this to people.

Oh whats that you want the final episode of Wolf Among Us or Tales from the Borderlands? Dont worry guys we're "working" on it.
 
I don't even understand why a company like Valve is so reluctant to make Half-Life 3.

For a company like Valve, there's literally no reason for them to be so risk-averse:
- they're a privately owned company
- the own the monopoly on PC digital distribution for games
- Steam prints money
- they have a number of first party developed games that print money (TF2, DOTA2)
- Steam prints money
- Steam prints money

They are in the most enviable position of any game development company (despite the fact that technically they barely qualify as a games developer anymore—since they barely develop games). They have once of the largest, most hardcore, most enthusiastic fanbase followings of any platform holder (they basically ARE PC gaming for a lot of PC gamers).

If Valve made Half-Life 3 today, even if it was a flawed but great game, it would be heralded as the second-coming of Christ and would sell literal gangbusters of the order of Blizzard or Rockstar's games.

Most games developers today wish they had a cash cow like Steam under their belt, so that they could take more risks producing more and more creative games. In reality, however, it seems that developers like Valve and Blizzard that have these major money-printing cash-cows, tend to be some of the most risk averse companies in all of gaming.... it honestly makes no sense to me (well... it makes perfect sense from a business perspective, but from a doe-eyed, naive gamer perspective, for companies like these where money isn't an issue, I'd really want them to be the ones pushing the medium forwards and they aren't).
 
They're sure acting like it.

After 10 years, its time to get over it.

And spoilers:
The good guys win.

They said they were making 3 episodes. Sticking up for Valve in not releasing more Half Life after a decade is beyond what I thought anyone on GAF was capable of, but clearly we're there.

Is it unreasonable to expect story conclusion in something that was promised to fans? We're not talking about a series that nobody cared about and didn't make any money. If a developer cans a series that didn't sell that's something else entirely.
 
I bought Half Life 2 episodes 1 and 2 under the impression that I would get to finish the trilogy because Valve stated it was a trilogy. So yes I have the right to complain because that's false advertising. And Fuck anyone that sides with the company over the consumer. Get your brain checked, Valve isn't your friend and consumers have every right to criticize and complain.
 
I like the games, but in 2017 would a new sequel really be the big deal people here are predicting? I mean outside enthusiast forums, and the novelty news value of another long-dead franchise coming back to life, who cares?

The first game came out more than 20 years ago. We're living and working alongside people who weren't even born when HL1 came out.

I'm pretty sure that if HL3 was announced tomorrow, the majority reaction would be "what's that?"

They were all good games, it's true, but the FPS genre has rebooted itself so often since then, what as-yet unmet need would it fulfil?

Imagine the leak was purposeful and tomorrow Valve announces a new half life.

12:00 HL3 announced
12:02 first forum posts "I'm worried about the direction HL3 is going in"
12:03 "HL3 is not what I was expecting"
12:04 "the character models are a bit low resolution"
12:05 "I don't like the new mechanics"
12:06 "HL3 is pandering to political correctness"
12:07 "HL3 has no soul"
12:09 "I wish HL3 had stayed cancelled"
 
Because I've had to read their whining for years. They have the end of the story now. Its time to move on.

I mean, you could just not go into the threads. It will certainly get you further than telling people to get over it, which is guaranteed to get you nowhere ever in life.

But, I do kind of agree with your last sentence. This really does bring on some feelings of closure. That's what people have wanted.

Why Valve has chosen for silence to be their official statement on HL is what has fueled all this anger for years. Things don't go away if you refuse to address them long enough.
 
I like the games, but in 2017 would a new sequel really be the big deal people here are predicting? I mean outside enthusiast forums, and the novelty news value of another long-dead franchise coming back to life, who cares?

The first game came out more than 20 years ago. We're living and working alongside people who weren't even born when HL1 came out.

I'm pretty sure that if HL3 was announced tomorrow, the majority reaction would be "what's that?"

They were all good games, it's true, but the FPS genre has rebooted itself so often since then, what as-yet unmet need would it fulfil?

I see more people disappointed that they won't be able to experience a sequel to a game/series they loved than people who are talking about how "important" or "culturally relevant" that sequel would be. I doubt most people care about the latter than they do about the former.
 
I always wondered if GNs visceral reaction to Windows 8 (And more directly, the Windows Store itself) was a solid indication of where his focus and the focus of Valve were at and the subtext here seems to confirm those fears. Valve really doesn't seem interested in big, bold projects anymore now that they can sit back and collect income on microtransactions.
 
Top Bottom