I pointed out that this shit has happened before and those running around in a panic need to calm down. Jesus!
Of course we knew, it was always headed for the sea as NK has literally done this before on multiple occasions. Kim isn't going to attack the least populated island of Japan as a prelude to war.
Pretty much like the point flew over you.
Apparently it isn't right and normal for people to be scared and irrational because of a missile flying over their country but everytime the american president makes some dumb statement we have 90+ page threads on how it's going to change world society from now on and how dangerous he could be.
I personally don't get that line of thinking. Even if NK has done this before, this can legitimately be a cause of concern for people. It's a missile flying over populated land.
No, but it's inevitable.
Delaying the inevitable simply raises the casualty counts for when it really does happen.
So you got two options: Just do nothing and wait for North Korea to strike and kill first -OR- strike now, take out as many launchers and silos as you can as quickly as you can and hope you can limit the casualties.
In fact, when it comes to the egos of madmen, doing nothing in response to their threats and displays of strength only emboldens them to be more threatening.
Apparently it isn't right and normal for people to be scared and irrational because of a missile flying over their country but everytime the american president makes some dumb statement we have 90+ page threads on how it's going to change world society from now on and how dangerous he could be.
I personally don't get that line of thinking. Even if NK has done this before, this can legitimately be a cause of concern for people. It's a missile flying over populated land.
The nuclear bit isn't the key reason why NK can get away with this though."wars have started over less"
Yet North Korea has done worse before and here we are.
The thing is, you usually go to war when you feel confident about your chances of winning. Such notion is thoroughly incompatible with going to war against a nuclear power. Which again, explains how we got here.
So what happens when NK eventually kill people? Is a response viable then?
Maintain? NK is dying slowly. He isn't on a good path now. Crazy people will take as many with them as they can.
There is no way this doesn't lead to something. How many will be dead by the end of the week...
Of course. But that's unlikely to ever happen.
THEY HAVE KILLED PEOPLE!!
Several times!
Definitely a man known for his prudence.Everytime I read stuff like this I remember this quote from Machiavelli:
"The Romans never allowed a trouble spot to remain simply to avoid going to war over it, because they knew that wars don't just go away, they are only postponed to someone else's advantage. Therefore, they made war with Philip and Antiochus in Greece, in order not to have to fight them in Italy... They never went by that saying which you constantly hear from the wiseacres of our day, that time heals all things. They trusted rather their own character and prudence knowing perfectly well that time contains the seeds of all things, good as well as bad."
It's not to get into the news. This was an important test for NK.Sorry but they have zero means of defense against anyone if they attack first. Their generals aren't stupid. It's provocation to get themselves in the news again.
Has NK officially said anything about the missile yet?
Fire missiles in NK's general direction as a test.
This happened 20 years ago. He's trying to show us he has an ICBM. These continually show that. They're also designed to undermine the US's commitment to Japan.This is a massive escalation from NK.
Firing missiles offshore is dickwaving, firing a missile which passes over another country is the sort of thing that starts wars.
If this is met with nothing stronger than harsh words and increased sanctions then NK will be emboldened further, and that will lead to a true catastrophe sooner or later. This aggressive act demands a defensive retaliation.
No. Its an attempt to say the US can't win without its own citizens and military bases taking unacceptable losses. He knows he would lose and die in any nuclear attack.I'm not sure what North Korea's end game is here. I mean, does Kim Jong Un actually think he can win this?
If the regime falls do you have any idea how many refugees would be pouring into China? On top of that, the most likely aftermath senerio is SK and US starting developing what's left of NK and eventually unite them again. Which would leave a pro US country at China's doorstep.Seems like China doesn't have any reason to do anything about this
I assumed it was on the outer edges, but this was straight across Hokkaido.
Thats crazy.
Yeah my bad, continue to let nk artillery sk, torpedo ships, launch monthly missiles near / over countries.
Even if a missile lands, the situation will still be sensitive, nothing should be done then either.
Well yeah they kind of have to, the U.S. attacking first is a big deal.Hell they even said theyd support NK if the US attacks first
Everytime I read stuff like this I remember this quote from Machiavelli:
"The Romans never allowed a trouble spot to remain simply to avoid going to war over it, because they knew that wars don't just go away, they are only postponed to someone else's advantage. Therefore, they made war with Philip and Antiochus in Greece, in order not to have to fight them in Italy... They never went by that saying which you constantly hear from the wiseacres of our day, that time heals all things. They trusted rather their own character and prudence knowing perfectly well that time contains the seeds of all things, good as well as bad."
Of course. But that's unlikely to ever happen.
The narrative of him being an irrational crazy person isn't really accurate. He acts pretty rationally to maintain what he has. He's a brutal murderer, but he has goals and none of them include being killed.
There's plenty of reporting being done on what the options are and why, and also on NKs leadership.
Everytime I read stuff like this I remember this quote from Machiavelli:
"The Romans never allowed a trouble spot to remain simply to avoid going to war over it, because they knew that wars don't just go away, they are only postponed to someone else's advantage. Therefore, they made war with Philip and Antiochus in Greece, in order not to have to fight them in Italy... They never went by that saying which you constantly hear from the wiseacres of our day, that time heals all things. They trusted rather their own character and prudence — knowing perfectly well that time contains the seeds of all things, good as well as bad."
I am in the boat that think it's time to attack NK. Sadly, Trump is the CIC... which doesn't bode for anything positive just dumb actions.
There is no such thing as "military strikes against North Korean launchers". There is only either Korean War 2.0 or the status quo. A limited strike will lead to a full on war just as surely as a full invasion would.There has to be military strikes against North Korean launchers.
You can't just let a madman fire off rockets in the "general direction" of populated countries.
Preemptive/First Strike threshold has already been passed to be honest. Any response now would be considered reactionary and defensive in nature.
The usual equation is whether the costs incurred by fighting an all-out war is worth the price of relieving the status quo. This decision is ultimately up to South Korea, and I doubt that it's a close call for them."wars have started over less"
Yet North Korea has done worse before and here we are.
The thing is, you usually go to war when you feel confident about your chances of winning. Such notion is thoroughly incompatible with going to war against a nuclear power. Which again, explains how we got here.
Everytime I read stuff like this I remember this quote from Machiavelli:
"The Romans never allowed a trouble spot to remain simply to avoid going to war over it, because they knew that wars don't just go away, they are only postponed to someone else's advantage. Therefore, they made war with Philip and Antiochus in Greece, in order not to have to fight them in Italy... They never went by that saying which you constantly hear from the wiseacres of our day, that time heals all things. They trusted rather their own character and prudence — knowing perfectly well that time contains the seeds of all things, good as well as bad."
Prove it's inevitable.
I'm not willing to murder 10 million people on your fucking feelings
And prove that delaying raises casualties
So any idea why it split into 3? Do ICBMs normally do that, or is it another failed one?
How is it unlikely, it's already happened.
An expensive test that just emboldens Kim Jong Un's stance.Fire missiles in NK's general direction as a test.
No, this is a first.
The only two other times they've fired something that went over Japan were with SLVs, not a ballistic missile.
North Korea defied demands from Japan, South Korea and the United States not to go ahead with a planned launch of what Pyongyang said would carry into space an experimental communications satellite.
The United States says North Korea launched a Taepodong- 2 missile which flew into the Pacific Ocean over northern Japan.
Japan says no debris has apparently fallen on its territory after what it calls a provocative rocket launch. Japan has called for an emergency session of the United Nations Security Council later in the day to discuss the event, which it and others say violates a U.N. resolution.
There is no way this doesn't lead to something. How many will be dead by the end of the week...
oh come the fuck on
It makes no sense for North Korea to attack. He wants to keep his kingdom just the way it is and keeping the situation in this state is how he does that. He can't survive a war with the rest of the world. The threat of innocents dying is all that keeps him alive and in power. The instant he kills people he's finished.
I knew it. You aren't afraid of something escalating. You're itching for it.
I assumed the poster meant in a mass attack. A few deaths here and there will not provoke a war that kills millions.
I assumed the poster meant in a mass attack. A few deaths here and there will not provoke a war that kills millions.
How does flying a missile over Japan maintain what he has? Do you really think there won't be consequences for this?
NK is essentially a hostage situation... With the hostage count in the multiple millions of innocent "not aligned with crazy man" people.
Everyone thinking we can end this by somehow "blowing them up" without the kill count of millions is being overly simplistic. Similarly, in a hostage situation its easy to say "go ahead and murder the hostages we don't like you" when its not your children being held captive.
It beats definitely killing a million+ innocent people though. It sucks and it's not a fun situation but that's what it is.
Fire missiles in NK's general direction as a test.
Sigh. I'm not dismissing this as a thing of nothing. But NK has been doing this for a while now. Kim has everything to lose by attacking a major US ally. These launches always seem to make GAF go into panic mode. Chill out.