• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

how come time isn't in metric?

Because all forms of measurement are essentially arbitrary so whatever you're used to makes more sense than an alternate method. The whole world tells time the same way so there's really no reason to change it.
 
No year, (If I understand the system correctly) we are on the first day of the complementary days, the 5 days that happen between every year. Yesterday it was the last day of year 225, and on Saturday it will be the first day of the year 226.

Man...what?
 
O29DbWs.jpg

Ah, one of the last good Simpsons episodes before everything completely went to hell.
 
Why do we not correct time intervals to eliminate leap years and leap seconds?

Because it's impossible. I'm going to focus on leap year here.

So, a day is when the earth makes a (little over one) revolution around its axis.
A year is when the earth makes one revolution around the sun.

Now these two things are not in sync, calendar year and a year are not the same ting. In 365 days the earth is a little short from completing its orbital period and 366 days is a little over it. The current leap year system gives a good enough approximation to keep the calendar years somewhat in their right places.

If the time intervals were purely based on days, the months and years would slowly move out of place - i.e. december being at the time of harvest. If the time intervals were based on the orbital period, the times would go awry.
 
Because time has a lot to do with angles (think sundials), and angles are more easy to work with 360° as the full circle (just think about equilater triangles, they'd have periodic angles in a system where angles are based on a decimal scale).
 
Time and calendars are linked to the length of the day and year, and become distinctly less useful if they lose that linkage. If you set the day and year to have a decimal relationship, assuming the "day" is still roughly equal to one planet rotation, the "year" becomes useless for all kinds of important and useful things like knowing when to plant your crops or when the solstice is or whatever.

It's actually a kludge in any calendar system. Leap years are the way we adjust for the mismatch in the Gregorian calendar. Other calendars have different kludges. None of them fit exactly because the year isn't a whole number of days.
 
I sort of wish we'd just go to the 24 hour clock. You can communicate what time it is faster and there's no ambiguity.

Used interchangeably with AM/PM here in the UK. It's particularly popular in transport timetables. Colloquial usage is still mostly AM/PM and we mentally adjust. The fact that this is possible suggests to me that there wasn't a lot wrong with AM/PM in the first place, but I prefer to use 24 hour clock for display and for writing.
 
Used interchangeably with AM/PM here in the UK. It's particularly popular in transport timetables. Colloquial usage is still mostly AM/PM and we mentally adjust. The fact that this is possible suggests to me that there wasn't a lot wrong with AM/PM in the first place, but I prefer to use 24 hour clock for display and for writing.

In the US, 24hour is associated with the military primarily and people call it "military time".
 
its because 60 is more convenient in the way it divides

60 divides by 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10

100 divides by 2, 4, 5, 10
... 15, 20, 30

... 20, 25, 50

But still I think 25 and 50 are more intuitive as a quarter and a half as opposed to 15 and 30.

What I want to see is an timekeeping scale with prime numbers. 59 minutes in an hour, 23 hours in a day because fuck you that's why.
 

Quoted for truth.

So if we were to engineer a base system for ease of use, Base 60 might be a bit much though, as many more unique numbers are needed to be memorized.

10 - {1, 2, 5, 10} rr = 0.4
12 - {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12} rr = 0.5
60 - {1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 12, 15, 20, 30, 60} rr = 0.2

So in terms of a factors to integer ratio, 60 isn't great as a base system, while base 12 has the highest return out of the three.

I am sure there is a set with the highest ratio, but I need to go to work and can't focus on this right now.
 
One day, every discussion on the internet will converge into a gigantic orgy of cat pictures and Simpsons pictures. The internet will be over.
 
We have .beats for that. One day = 1000 .beats.

I always found that measurement rather useless because it doesn't subdivide further (or at least clocks like that in PSO don't show smaller increments). Can't see how long until the beat counter increases, can't get a feeling for how long a beat is...

But the distance is measured by how far light travels in a year or arcsecond or whatever which is a unit of time. Why cant we measure time in units of distance? I dont get what you mean by a second being a 186k miles for a photon in a vacuum. Its making my brain hurt.
I'm going to bed.

Easy, just take a meter stick and stick out your thumb, stick your index finger out perpendicular to that and your middle finger perpendicular to the other two. Now hold the meter stick perpendicular to all three fingers and it shows you how long a meter in the time dimension is.
 
It's actually a kludge in any calendar system. Leap years are the way we adjust for the mismatch in the Gregorian calendar. Other calendars have different kludges. None of them fit exactly because the year isn't a whole number of days.
Wow imagine being on the internet and thinking that someone doesn't know what a leap year is.
 
Top Bottom