Mass shooting at the Mandalay Bay Las Vegas; 58 dead, 500+ injured.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Watching Fox News live stream (I know I know) and they seem to be just in awe of how "skilled" and "diabolical" this guy is. They even compare him to Islamic terrorists and how it's much harder to pull off what this guy did. In a sort of twisted way it really sounds like they're bragging about how much better white criminals are.

Anyone else get this odd feeling?

The feeling of giving up on the entire world?
 
What I think it boils down to was the situation. The assailant was shooting far away with cover, at a very large crowd that couldn't spread out quickly, and at the time of the shooting people couldn't easily tell where the assailant was shooting from.

What I want to know is why the sicko wanted to do this. Hopefully that other suspect turns out to be his partner in crime and spills the beans.

I don't know how still gun rights folks still trust our society to have access to firearms, especially semi automatic rifles which can be modified to be fully automatic. I'm assuming that is what happened with this latest shooting. However...how many more psychos do we need to kill our people before we decide to actually pass some sane firearm regulation? "It won't happen to me" can't work when we have mass shootings nearly every day.

Yes, I fully understand the argument of an armed populace being able to actively resist a tyrannical government and keep it in check..................see, that theory worked up until the military tech of WW II and was thrown out the window with the invention of atomic weapons.

No parity can possibly exist now ---- there is absolutely no need for a populace to be armed and trained to stand up to their nuclear-armed govt, because they have zero chance of actually succeeding in countering that tech.

Let the people keep their hunting gear. Hunting is fine. You don't need automatic weapons or extended clips for handguns to hunt, and you're not taking down a hydrogen bomb-armed, drone packing, cruise missile launching govt with those weapons either.
 
You took a giant leap from gun control to nullifying the second amendment. There are literally dozens of things we can do right now that don't require changing the constitution. These things would have an immediate effect on gun violence.

Right, but what I'm saying in regards to the SC is that a lot of those new laws that could be made would be found unconstitutional by (especially the current) SC.
 
Watching Fox News live stream (I know I know) and they seem to be just in awe of how "skilled" and "diabolical" this guy is. They even compare him to Islamic terrorists and how it's much harder to pull off what this guy did. In a sort of twisted way it really sounds like they're bragging about how much better white criminals are.

Anyone else get this odd feeling?
Again, please watch the video that was linked above. The media absolutely fetishize the shooters, their methods, their killcounts...
Trust Fox to be extra gross about it though ugh
 
Watching Fox News live stream (I know I know) and they seem to be just in awe of how "skilled" and "diabolical" this guy is. They even compare him to Islamic terrorists and how it's much harder to pull off what this guy did. In a sort of twisted way it really sounds like they're bragging about how much better white criminals are.

Anyone else get this odd feeling?

Yes, that odd feeling is the vomit on the verge of my mouth whenever Fox anchors speak on these matters.
 
Hell I wouldn't be surprised if Trump gives into his base and says that the gun laws weren't lax enough, and if people were allowed to have guns at the concert they could have shot back and saved countless lives.
 
So on CNN the police said there is no known motive but how is terrorism already ruled out? It’s domestic terrorism at the very least.

RIP to the victims, but certainly this is the time to debate gun control. Automatic weapons should be banned, semi automatic even.

It seems like the numbers just keep going up each year.

Technically the definition includes violence for "political" reasons. Which is why people wait to say it's "terrorism". It's stupid because honestly it doesn't even matter at that point but they will wait to see the motive none the less.
 
AWDZPO3.png


XeNpbbK.png


https://www.lvmpd.com/en-us/Press Releases/PO 235 10-02-17.pdf

Looks like he committed suicide?
 
Horrifying, RIP to all the victims. :(

Honestly, if America won’t outright ban guns or start enacting any sort of control soon, there’s gotta be something else that can be done that could possibly work as some kind of prevention method for these tragedies.

Like, what about a system that involves security doing a body check on people to see if they have weapons before entering a big populated room or whatever, and if they do, they can put a big sticker on them saying “Watch out, I’m armed!” or something like that.

Obviously gun control would be preferred, but at least that’d be something.

Nothing will happen, it will be the same song and dance from now until the end of time :(

One of these days, something will change because of this.

I mean, they’ve only been getting worse and worse. It’s only a matter of time before some whack job ends up wiping out a small town or an entire community.
 
Get rid of fucking guns, America!

Even if the president and every single elected politician agreed, it would have 0 chance of happening.

Registries are largely non existent outside of the most extreme shit.

There are already 250-300 MILLION guns in the states. Yes 250-300 million as of 2013 (pew research link at bottom).

Even the most strict draconian methods of eliminating gun ownership in the states would be a fucking violent shit show where trigger happy police would have a fucking field day.

This isn't to say I'm not for much stricter rules.
- If your gun is stolen and used in a crime and there's evidence it was out of your possession/theft is unreported for 48+ hours you're an accomplice.
- Anyone who living in your household uses your gun in a crime you share in the charges, 100% your fault if someone unstable or a child gets a hold of it.
- Mandatory multi-week gun safety classes for any first time purchaser.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...ricans-own-guns-but-just-how-many-is-unclear/
 
Watching Fox News live stream (I know I know) and they seem to be just in awe of how "skilled" and "diabolical" this guy is. They even compare him to Islamic terrorists and how it's much harder to pull off what this guy did. In a sort of twisted way it really sounds like they're bragging about how much better white criminals are.

Anyone else get this odd feeling?

They are trying to indirectly imply that this is an 'exceptional case' and that it should be treated differently than if it was a coloured guy or traditional 'terrorist' attached to a group.

Expect them to talk about a 'lone wolf' for two days than go on to some shit like 'ISIS DOING IT WOULD HAVE BEEN MUCH WORSE, THEY ARE THE REAL THREAT HERE'
 
Even if the president and every single elected politician agreed, it would have 0 chance of happening.

Registries are largely non existent outside of the most extreme shit.

There are already 250-300 MILLION guns in the states. Yes 250-300 million as of 2013 (pew research link at bottom).

Even the most strict draconian method of eliminating gun ownership in the states would be a fucking violent shit show where trigger happy police would have a fucking field day.

This isn't to say I'm not for much stricter rules.
- If your gun is stolen and used in a crime and there's evidence it was out of your possession/theft is unreported for 48+ hours you're an accomplice.
- Anyone who living in your household uses your gun in a crime you share in the charges, 100% your fault if someone unstable or a child gets a hold of it.
- Mandatory multi-week gun safety classes for any first time purchaser.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...ricans-own-guns-but-just-how-many-is-unclear/
The very simple solution is take away and ban.

But muh rights tho.
 
Just woke up to hear this news. What type of gun could fire off that many shots consecutively?:(
Thought and prayers go out to all the victims
 
Right, but what I'm saying in regards to the SC is that a lot of those new laws that could be made would be found unconstitutional by (especially the current) SC.
If it includes outright bans then yes it could be struck down. There's a lot of in between there. There's no way they would strike down expanded background checks for example (fixing all background check loopholes)
 
Hell I wouldn't be surprised if Trump gives into his base and says that the gun laws weren't lax enough, and if people were allowed to have guns at the concert they could have shot back and saved countless lives.

I don't want to hear one word from that evil orange fuck. God, I can't believe he has any power at all.

Yeah, I dunno. I want to crawl in a hole for five years. Maybe bring some canned food. If I come out and Bernie or Kamala isn't President and we haven't banned or otherwise restricted stupidly overpowered guns, I might just crawl back in that hole without the canned food this time.
 
The very simple solution is take away and ban.

But muh rights tho.

Unfortunately its like North Korea at this point. You can't take that kind of action without there being an unacceptable number of casualties as a result. If the government actually mandated a firearms ban and was planning to literally take people's guns away, there would be some form of armed insurrection that would do way more damage than anyone would want to see before they got put down.

I'm all for a gun ban but it's just not possible with gun obsession as pervasive as it is in America. There's got to be somewhere we could start, if Republicans actually cared and weren't just lining their pockets.
 
Yes, I fully understand the argument of an armed populace being able to actively resist a tyrannical government and keep it in check........

That's a myth.

State militias, the predecessor to the national guard, are what they're talking about. Citizen staffed, and state run. Many would bring their own riffles, because they were expected to supply towards the Civic good.

This warped idea of a lone gunman protecting his property or enacting his will on "the government" is nonsense that's been pushed since the 80s to sell more guns and increase stock prices.
 
Even if the president and every single elected politician agreed, it would have 0 chance of happening.

Registries are largely non existent outside of the most extreme shit.

There are already 250-300 MILLION guns in the states. Yes 250-300 million as of 2013 (pew research link at bottom).

Even the most strict draconian methods of eliminating gun ownership in the states would be a fucking violent shit show where trigger happy police would have a fucking field day.

This isn't to say I'm not for much stricter rules.
- If your gun is stolen and used in a crime and there's evidence it was out of your possession/theft is unreported for 48+ hours you're an accomplice.
- Anyone who living in your household uses your gun in a crime you share in the charges, 100% your fault if someone unstable or a child gets a hold of it.
- Mandatory multi-week gun safety classes for any first time purchaser.

http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...ricans-own-guns-but-just-how-many-is-unclear/

Add to that the requirement to get insurance, just like cars, which would scale per-gun owned, and the economics of it would take care of most stockpiles.
 
Again, please watch the video that was linked above. The media absolutely fetishize the shooters, their methods, their killcounts...
Trust Fox to be extra gross about it though ugh
To be fair the media is good at click bait. If they fetishise it it is because people want it.
If we trained kids at school to ignore mass murderers or pity them without being the least bit interested in their homes friends and lives then the media would change really fast,
 
Its not my speculation....

An M60 has a very distinct low rate of fire. Given that we know they found several different rifles, the gun report is of a higher cyclic rate, and there's obvious pauses for reloads or switching weapons, your speculation seems pretty wild.
 
The very simple solution is take away and ban.

But muh rights tho.
How can you possibly take away all the guns

I think if we instituted a ban on people who are born after a certain year from buying guns it might help , but I don't think it's possible to take all the guns out of circulation from the public
 
Unfortunately its like North Korea at this point. You can't take that kind of action without there being an unacceptable number of casualties as a result. If the government actually mandated a firearms ban and was planning to literally take people's guns away, there would be some form of armed insurrection that would do way more damage than anyone would want to see before they got put down.
Do you think a group of rednecks is gonna be anything more than a nuisance to THE US Army?
How can you possibly take away all the guns

I think if we instituted a ban on people who are born after a certain year from buying guns it might help , but I don't think it's possible to take all the guns out of circulation from the public
You don't, you do it as a voluntary thing, then prosecute everyone in possession of one after the fact. It's the same methods used when peace treaties are achieved.
 
I was shocked for a second when I heard this happened, but since we just had a 50+ death toll shooting spree a year ago, it's just numbing at this point.
 
This isn't to say I'm not for much stricter rules.
- If your gun is stolen and used in a crime and there's evidence it was out of your possession/theft is unreported for 48+ hours you're an accomplice.
- Anyone who living in your household uses your gun in a crime you share in the charges, 100% your fault if someone unstable or a child gets a hold of it.
- Mandatory multi-week gun safety classes for any first time purchaser.
The idea that any of this is “much stricter” is fucking laughable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom