Battlefield V projected to be the great AAA flop of 2018

The marketing team needs to be fired, the reveal was bad, everything about the marketing was poorly put together and the political sjw agenda is just ridiculous. Pandering to people who have no intention to buy your game is not how you do things in this industry.
Has any game with a similar agenda ever saw a success from this?

So far it looks like a method to kill your game.
 
Last edited:
I would of bought it if they didn't make the PC version digital only... since my internet sucks, i'll pass...

Sticking with BF4.
 
Mat Piscatella claims the analyst is going by Amazon alone and Amazon isn't offering physical preorders, whereas previous Battlefields were available physically. I don't know the history there, but that would be a significant monkey wrench if so.
 
Marketing is horrible for this but I'll still buy it because BF games have never let me down. I've always been able to enjoy them.
 
Well if folks are going to critically judge an entire game based on a trailer, sucks to be them honestly.



At this rate, at least BFBC3 could be nextgen lol.
How else are people going to judge their interest in a game when it is revealed, if not by the reveal trailer???
First impressions are huge, EA should know that....
 
It's funny that Battlefield 1 preorders were so high when it was the worst BF this gen by a lot, both BF4 and BFH are far better games.
 
Or just have the women be men amirite?

Women don't get the benefit of doubt. That's the problem. I doubt anyone here legit hates women but instead of rolling with it (like everyone would have if it the women were men) people cry about misrepresentation of the conflict.

I hate hypocrites like you. But I put that on ignorance. There is a huge problem with revising History and it's not about "accuracy". Go out tell people the Holocaust is a lie and maybe only a thousand jewish people were deported...you wouldn't because you're a hypocrite or ignorant coward, and yet I'm sure you're incapable of arguing why it would actually be a problem.

Same goes with revising History by portraying women as having taken any part in WWII: this is not about accuracy but ignoring the fact that feminist movements of the 1920s and it's consequences had a lot to do with the rise of social violence, fascism, the absence of women on battlefields and the fact that even after the war nobody would dare talk about feminism again until 1960s. I'm sure you have absolutely no fucking clue why and that's what makes it all the more intolerable that Dice lies and falsifies History this way.

Also it is spitting on hundreds of millions of men amongst which pre-pubescent boys who died in the atrocities, I'd like to see you tell your bullshit to one of those survivors and veterans...
 
Last edited:
I don't get why they didn't simply create an "alternate reality" game, where women were in the exact same position as men. They could even have wacky (but interesting) weapons, like Valkyria Chronicles.

This sounds like wanting to have your cake and eating it too. You can have a recreation of WW2 with amputee women on the front lines, leading the charge, but it's going to look just a tiny bit ridiculous.
If, beyond that, you fail to justify your decision and basically tell fans to vote with their wallets... I'm pretty sure they're going to do just that.
 
2gaqw4.jpg
OR
2gavgc.jpg
 
Last edited:
I know! Like a game where you play as a company, that its not completely correct...maybe call it...Not good Company or something.

I was thinking more like VC, really.

Call it the Europan War. I'm sure SEGA won't mind... too much. Throw in some ragnite canisters too. And a Valkyrur DLC.
 
I find it very refreshing when someone says if you don't like it: don't buy it; don't go there; change the channel, etc., etc.

But um, you know, its not really a good thing for a company spokesperson to say to the actual people who have historically bought their products. That's what you should say to the people who don't really give a shit about your product in large numbers. It's a common sense thing for any business. Which makes it really weird when someone says it with a hundred million, give or take, n the line for development, marketing, etc.
 
Well, at least PC gamers who spring for RTX 2080 Ti can enjoy the game with raytrace rendering at 45 ms per frame
aka ~22fps
 
Last edited:
I will give bf5 some credit though. At least they had the decency to include a campaign mode unlike another pretty famous FPS coming out this fall. Sydney they the game that has the campaign will most likely sell worst. It does have a campaign, right?
 
Mat Piscatella claims the analyst is going by Amazon alone and Amazon isn't offering physical preorders, whereas previous Battlefields were available physically. I don't know the history there, but that would be a significant monkey wrench if so.
I can't trust Mat fully considering that he already gave his opinions about BFV and the backlash right after the game's reveal, so I have no idea if he's telling the truth or trying to damage control.
 
Yep, I remember battlefield 1 and Titanfall II for $40, less than a month after release. I'll wait for the first sale then to get it.
That's $30 in excess of what i would buy this game for
Had to look it up. Holy crap EA has literally told their fans, that if they don't like their SJW agenda then don't buy it.
It's really nice to see people voting with their wallets.
bu bu but angry Joe said....
 
Last edited:
I hate hypocrites like you. But I put that on ignorance. There is a huge problem with revising History and it's not about "accuracy". Go out tell people the Holocaust is a lie and maybe only a thousand jewish people were deported...you wouldn't because you're a hypocrite or ignorant coward, and yet I'm sure you're incapable of arguing why it would actually be a problem.

Same goes with revising History by portraying women as having taken any part in WWII: this is not about accuracy but ignoring the fact that feminist movements of the 1920s and it's consequences had a lot to do with the rise of social violence, fascism, the absence of women on battlefields and the fact that even after the war nobody would dare talk about feminism again until 1960s. I'm sure you have absolutely no fucking clue why and that's what makes it all the more intolerable that Dice lies and falsifies History this way.

Also it is spitting on hundreds of millions of men amongst which pre-pubescent boys who died in the atrocities, I'd like to see you tell your bullshit to one of those survivors and veterans...

I think you making light of those accomplishments, by comparing them to having women in a video game, make a good point.

Having women in a WWII shooter is akin to denying the Holocaust. Yup. Same thing! How did I fail to see it that way...? Hitler rose to power on the back of the suffragettes, it's all socialism after all.
 
Last edited:
It's funny that Battlefield 1 preorders were so high when it was the worst BF this gen by a lot, both BF4 and BFH are far better games.

I agree, and i think thats why BFV is selling so poor, i have bf1 but i only play bf4 and bf3, BF1 sold very well but it was indeed a step back, and ppl noticed.
 
Crazy how trailors can help or break a game. The battlefield 1 trailors were great. People were hyped. The trailor for this are bad. I'm sure game will be good despite the sjw bs
 
Even if the numbers the analysts were picking from were off, I'd recon that all the hubbub isn't doing the game any favors. Hell just browsing through the gaming feed this weekend on YouTube is/was full of channels knocking the game's expected sales. And with a game so multiplayer focused that may well scare people away. Its kind of crazy though seeing so many factors against this title.
 
I am buying it. Too bad people can't see past the reveal trailer, and the same thing happened to CoD Infinite. It looks like a much improved BF 1 which to me, is great. It also has a BR mode in it and this is the one game dev I thought could make an amazing BR game. We'll see. Maybe I'll play the 10 hour EA access and then decide, but Dice, at the very least, always delivers a pretty enjoyable experience.


The first year of BF4 was a shit show then came BF Hardline, SWBF & SWBF 2 say hello. They used to deliver. They used to get the benefit of the doubt. Not anymore. And when this game tanks the blame will be endless as to why but it won't matter bcs the "free" post launch DLC will be non existent. Just think about this. Star Wars is a HUGE entertainment property. And they not only fucked that up but they've abandoned that game bcs they couldn't fuck everyone over for a dollar. If they will do that with Star Wars you bet your ass when this underwhelms they'll drop it without a second thought and move on. Anyone expecting the game to be supported post launch is going to be very very disappointed.
 
I would have happily purchased a season pass. I am not paying for cosmetics.

Same. I'm still buying day 1 as I'm happy all get the maps for free to keep the community intact. We'd have to see how it plays out long term as BF games have long tails.
 
I could not care less about the cosmetics or the women inclusion or whatever.. they have not sold me with the marketing for this game. I expect big epic trailers for BF and they have absolutely not delivered.. basically for the first time that I can remember (going back to BF1942).

I might pick it up, but right now my interest is very low.
 
If it was present day aka a sequel to BF4 it would have been a runaway success imo.


If it was a simple $40 add on to BF 1 it would be a success in all likelihood. Even with the bullshit surrounding it. They're going to have to take the loss in this one and hopefully learn from it.
 
I'm like you but I feel like we are a minority. I don't have issues with a woman. But a soldier with a bionic arm being a sniper during Second World War looks weird. It feels like they are adding a lot of customization so they can sell a lot of micro transactions.

But this kind of complaint is ignored and reduced to "you don't like the game because you are sexist" ;(
If it was wolfenstein I don't think ppl would complain
 
I think you making light of those accomplishments, by comparing them to having women in a video game, make a good point.

Having women in a WWII shooter is akin to denying the Holocaust. Yup. Same thing! How did I fail to see it that way...? Hitler rose to power on the back of the suffragettes, it's all socialism after all.

You may well be antisemitic, since you're totally ignorant of History. Also nice straw man, reducing the previous feminist cycle to the suffragettes, even though I'm talking about the flappers, and you don't even understand or know what I'm referencing.
 
Who came up with this idea we had WW2 with BF1/COD for couple of years, now, more of the same for another 2-3 yrs, and we know these guys in no rush for BF6, plus, they support the shit out of their gms post launch for a hot min..nah, you can have that.

Modern Warfare for life.
 
Who fuckin cares. The game is releasing right off the balls of RDR2 aka the biggest game of this generation. Of course preorders will be low. The game will be fine.
 
As an old BF customer who left the series years ago, I actually hope to see this game crash and burn commercially as it should. The BF games have been dumbed down and ruined for years. They deserve failure. EA, until I see real gameplay and a consumer friendly business model, you will never see a dime from me.
 
Looks like they are doubling down and wishing they added Women into BF1 from the start and then said some stuff about jumping on bandwagons but not being bandwagons or something. Basically sounds like they are just pushing character customization for those sweet sweet micro transactions.

http://m.ign.com/articles/2018/08/2...battlefield-1?abthid=5b7ca9cf9fa21d233600096b

"I mean, if we were getting on the bandwagon, I created Battlefield 1, and we could've 'jumped on the bandwagon' that time around," Grøndal said. "I think it's a shame we didn't [add women], because that perhaps would've been better for us. I don't think it's a bandwagon thing, I think it's about gamers wanting to express themselves in different ways."
 
Last edited:
What pisses me off is their marketing strategy for the DLC. Every single relevant fraction that participated in the war should be in it Day 1.
 
The developer response towards those who voiced concern was very politically motivated and not at all consumer-centric.

"Don't like it? Don't buy it."

Guess what?

They didn't! They won't!

Fucking brilliant.
 
As an old BF customer who left the series years ago, I actually hope to see this game crash and burn commercially as it should. The BF games have been dumbed down and ruined for years. They deserve failure. EA, until I see real gameplay and a consumer friendly business model, you will never see a dime from me.

Oh fuck off with your shit. It deserves to crash and burn? People have devoted shitloads of their time and effort developing a game and you are wishing critical and commercial failure on them and their product because it doesn't fit in to your little perfect bubble of comfortability? Can the entitlement get any worse?

You want to see a consumer friendly business model? Wtf?! Every DLC is FREE! FUCKING FREE!! What else could your little self entitled ass want? You want the whole game for free? You want them to hand deliver it to you?

It's "gamers" like you that make the whole hobby seem like a joke. "Gamers" like you that project an air of shit which makes the rest of the world sit back and think that "gamers" are the worst group of hobbyists known to mankind. Get a grip buddy.
 
Last edited:
My concern is that EA and the game press will take the wrong lesson from this, and we'll be seeing articles along the lines of "gamers vote with their feet; single player campaigns in FPS games are no longer wanted"
 
Oh fuck off with your shit. It deserves to crash and burn? People have devoted shitloads of their time and effort developing a game and you are wishing critical and commercial failure on them and their product because it doesn't fit in to your little perfect bubble of comfortability? Can the entitlement get any worse?

You want to see a consumer friendly business model? Wtf?! Every DLC is FREE! FUCKING FREE!! What else could your little self entitled ass want? You want the whole game for free? You want them to hand deliver it to you?

It's "gamers" like you that make the whole hobby seem like a joke. "Gamers" like you that project an air of shit which makes the rest of the world sit back and think that "gamers" are the worst group of hobbyists known to mankind. Get a grip buddy.

This.

I'm not saying ignore everything EA does, simply that if they charged for a season pass many on here would have that same argument of "selling half a game, splitting the community, nickle and dime" yet when they give free dlc, we see a new argument.

The glass will always be half empty to some, they don't want to see any of the good things some publishers do. Last time it was complain about season pass, now its about find something else to complain about. So its hard to take anyone seriously that move such massive goal post.
 
Oh fuck off with your shit. It deserves to crash and burn? People have devoted shitloads of their time and effort developing a game and you are wishing critical and commercial failure on them and their product because it doesn't fit in to your little perfect bubble of comfortability? Can the entitlement get any worse?

You want to see a consumer friendly business model? Wtf?! Every DLC is FREE! FUCKING FREE!! What else could your little self entitled ass want? You want the whole game for free? You want them to hand deliver it to you?

It's "gamers" like you that make the whole hobby seem like a joke. "Gamers" like you that project an air of shit which makes the rest of the world sit back and think that "gamers" are the worst group of hobbyists known to mankind. Get a grip buddy.
I find it interesting that you are so emotional over my right as a consumer to demand a certain level of quality and depth from a product I purchase. Perhaps you need to re-evaluate your existence if my opinion on a financial matter bothers you so much. Perhaps it is you who will need to examine the location of your head.
 
I find it interesting that you are so emotional over my right as a consumer to demand a certain level of quality and depth from a product I purchase. Perhaps you need to re-evaluate your existence if my opinion on a financial matter bothers you so much. Perhaps it is you who will need to examine the location of your head.

It is because it is just so physically uncomfortable cringe to watch you defend your "right" as a consumer. For a certain level of quality? The game looks like it is a high budget triple A title, the quality will be there. Whether or not it fits into your subjectively determined definition of quality is another thing. Legally be expected that when you put the disk in the PS4 it will work, that covers your legal rights as a consumer.

The game will play fine and will be a shitload of good times for everyone else while you complain that this game isn't like the one released over a decade ago.
 
Top Bottom