Sure you can. Here is one. Or this one. Both by the same user. They aren't malicious, but they are spam threads either way.
This was posted before. Also contains a few other nuggets from this prominent member in good standing.
Banned arguing in bad faith; history of similar posts.
Interestingly, I do not agree with the warning. It was a pretty harmless sarcastic remark, especially when compared to other aggressive postings by the same user. I do not think this should warrant a warning.
I think that your assessment is not fair and not well-justified. Considering the current climate around here, leaning very heavily right, it is not necessary to go into detail why a certain aggressive left-leaning post is inappropiate or why a Resetera moderation action is too strict - a lot of people do this either way. The opposite position is pretty underrepresented and necessitates more arguing, because there won't be many to have given your arguments in advance already.
Nobody_Important
's posting behaviour here puts an emphasis on the points where he does not agree with the large majority opinion here and does not give long arguments for things that are more or less consensual around here. This is reasonable posting behaviour from my perspective.
I think that your assessment is not fair and not well-justified. Considering the current climate around here, leaning very heavily right, it is not necessary to go into detail why a certain aggressive left-leaning post is inappropiate or why a Resetera moderation action is too strict - a lot of people do this either way. The opposite position is pretty underrepresented and necessitates more arguing, because there won't be many to have given your arguments in advance already.
Since when? Some point (shortly) after the migration of a substancial part of the community to Resetera. Note that I am not talking about the moderators here, they are reasonably neutral in that regard. I am just talking user base. I would also like to add that being right does not necessarily mean I do not value the poster, there are quite a few right-leaning posters here who I certainly enjoy debating with. But the big majority of the forum is pretty heavily right-leaning right now. As evident especially in this thread and discussions about
I feel that
Nobody_Important
's position is authentic and he is arguing honestly here. He is also pretty consistent in his postin behaviour, so I see no reason to claim he is dishonest at all. In fact, if people want the forum to be neutral they should be very happy we have a user that likes to discuss all those political issues with such a huge "opposing front". It is not acceptable to always reduce reactions to him to ad hominem attacks.
That's actually a badass shirt. Something i would want to have myself.Staying at Rehoboth beach over night. Didnt bring a bathing suit or extra shirt..
Only pair of swim shorts I could find in the discount rack my size were a pair of stars and stripes flag ones..
And I found this shirt for $10..
Wish me luck...I'm gonna get drunk and try not to get attacked by leftist Nazis lol
And yet they keep saying this is a Nazi forum now. I don't see anyone asking someone to be killed here... It's like they don't see the forest from all the trees.
Considering I've seen you do nothing but defend that place, I think it's more than safe to assume that you're some kind of viral marketer or just flat out trolling.
This is essentially something i referenced yesterday, here. In the early days of ERA i tried to adher to their transparent policy, which (in my eyes) meant holding a open view towards issues: What is (likely) right, might be wrong aswell. I remember how i tried to iterate this in the beginning days regarding these matters and yet got shunned at because people doubted that #metoo victims would exaggerate their stories or make them up. Or in the very least its not that wide spread (No pun intended.)
As of yet, he has yet to put the deed with the word (thankfully) but user is still instigating and threatening this stuff over and over. It does represent a point that is worth bothering over: It shows that if you threaten with suicide and let them know by tweet or PM The Names about it, they don't contact any authorities. Now The Names are no stranger to banning suicidal people for Transphobia when they are Trans themselves but you would think there is some kind of obligation to take these threats seriously. If anything, this is one of those rare events where making a hollow threat to violence should have been rightly called out, especially when you openly claim to live in the same area as the accused scientist. As the brother, i would want to talk to you personally aswell for making such a careless comment. But nobody on ERA thinks this, or condones the fact that this user made a threat, which is totally actionable as shown in point 1 here above. Once more, the erratic nature of ERA in action.Given the intent, i think there is more to it than just that post. Its not harmless at all. Ofcourse, the warning is a severe misstep by this staff member: Most people are aware that Sheet (Lets name this user like that) has Tony Stark levels of protection around the place given how a meltdown ensued when Sheet got banned for a full 20 mins a month ago. Only Purple Thanos (Cerium) could expel Sheet, and that's never going to happen.
In how far do you think it is not harmless? Excelsiorlef makes fun of
You are aware of Sheet's track record, do you?
I am aware of the statistics you have posted that you are easily banned when you communicate with excelsiolef and that there are quite a few instances of excelsiorlef posting in a way to make people post things that will lead to a ban. You decide whether that is a yes.
I don't know, I just said that I think that the warning in this specific instance seems harsh to me. If there is background that makes it shows that it is actually not, it would be interesting for me.
I'm just old as fuck I guess. When I was young, people standing on street corners with sandwich boards preaching non sense was ignored. It was understood that these people were looney toons af.
You know what they say: nothing like a morning cup of REEE to turn reason into treason.
But it was never their look that gave them away. It was their message.
No doubt.
Then you didn't have to ask the question in the first place, since you are already aware, and you would know that i shared your opinion on the warning anyways.
So nothing really.
Them echo chambers aren't really durable, no surprises there when the main components that hold these critters together are fragility and entitlement.
To them words are violence, and if you don't agree with their political views they'll find some way of construing that to mean that people get hurt. So to them you probably do advocate violence.
I had the opposite impression, otherwise I wouldn't have debated it with you, because, well, apparently we are completely on the same boat here.
Its not my problem that you don't read posts fully. Its there.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/in...nfronted-harassers.73476/page-2#post-13575236
Staying at Rehoboth beach over night. Didnt bring a bathing suit or extra shirt..
Only pair of swim shorts I could find in the discount rack my size were a pair of stars and stripes flag ones..
And I found this shirt for $10..
Wish me luck...I'm gonna get drunk and try not to get attacked by leftist Nazis lol
Your only refutation of the warning was in an ironic text about the protected status of excelsiorlef, so if you actually wanted to say the warning is unsubstantial, you should have said so in a serious context. Moreover, it was you who started the discussion by calling out my claim that it was a harmless post excelsiorlef got warned for.
This is not racism. They say, based on a statistic on the election that non-whites have voted better (from their perspective) than whites and that had only they voted, the US and the world would be better off. I agree with them on that valuation, as a white human. That being said, the person who said black voters are always the best voters, I cannot agree, as evident by the same election cycle: Black people are a big reason why the Democrats chose the wrong - I'd even say catastrophic - candidate.More anti-white racism on Reset.
If someone said "white voters are the best" or if black people were to lose their right to vote, there would be a shitstorm.
https://www.resetera.com/threads/la...er-gap-w-trump-approval-m-8-w-31.73605/page-3
The person is talking about the outcome of the election. Of course, in the literal sense, it would not be good for the world if white people lost their right to vote, but you need to keep in mind the context. It is merely the observation (and frustration with the fact) that the sole demographic responsible for a far right demagoge to lead the most powerful country in the world is white people. If people were actually demanding for the future that white people lost their voting rights, that would be a different story, but this is in response to a demographic breakdown of existing election results.
But even this is wrong. The reason someone like Trump won in my opinion is because people wanted change. Most of them would have either voted for Sanders or Trump. Hillary was a symbol for the same old shit and people were tired of it. And this is happening all over the world right now. And the one profit from the incompetence of the democratic parties around the world are the right wing groups.
Your mental gymnastics are amazing
Oh i am sorry, i figured ''Ofcourse, the warning is a severe misstep by this staff member:'' was clear enough, but let me saying it again: The warning was a severe misstep.
Because it isn't a harmless post. Sheet herself is at the forefront of supporting the most inane ridicules so for Sheet to be sarcastic in this isn't harmless, at all. If you still aren't aware that you need to take anything Sheet says with a truck load of salt and assume there is a double floor in intent then i don't know what to tell you.
Nobody_Important
does who seemingly has poofed from this thread.The thing is, you tend to over-debate things and you aren't reading the tone of what people are posting.
