Off-site Community Discussion (Reset, etc.) -- READ OP. Stay civil. Don't make it personal. Keep it in here.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I am 31 and I cannot remember a time where anything that Trump does would have been considered center-left. Or center. I wonder when from 1999 till now any of Trump's policies would have been considered left leaning. Please provide examples.

Then you weren't paying attention. Even Trump's most "extreme" idea, the border wall, was supported by Democrats within the last 10 years.
 
Yes. With Trump, he is a far right ideologue. I wouldn't say Nazi, but he is a right extremist and this is sufficiently close to Nazism that I wouldn't call it stupid.
If you weren't so brainwashed by your Twitter feed, you would see how utterly insane this statement is.

At 31 years old, you are old enough and experienced enough to know better. Honestly man, when you reach this level of naivety, it's time to re-evaluate your life.
 
If you weren't so brainwashed by your Twitter feed, you would see how utterly insane this statement is.

At 31 years old, you are old enough and experienced enough to know better. Honestly man, when you reach this level of naivety, it's time to re-evaluate your life.
My Twitter feed consists of Rare, Rare staff, Playtonic, Playtonic staff and Richard Dawkins. Calling Trump a right extremist is not insane.
 
Ok Yoshi Yoshi , let's get back to basics.

Why did Hitler hate the Jews?
What do you want to achieve with this? Either way your question is pretty vague, for you could be asking one of several things:
1. How did Hitler justify his hate against jews?
2. What are historical reasons for antisemitism to be such a popular opinion (especially) at the time?
3. Whose works had the biggest impact on Hitler in terms of antisemitism?
Due to the unclear aim of your question and the blatant underspecification of your question I am not willing to engage in this discussion. Because either way, if you read carefully, I wouldn't call Trump a nazi (his ideology is not the same as nazism), but since he is a far right politician, calling him a nazi is not nearly as out there as calling someone who is merely right of extreme left positions a nazi. That would entail calling someone like Sanders, a classical social democrat, a nazi, and that definitely is much less justified than calling a far-right demogoge a nazi.
 
In this edition of:

m7RYtm2.jpg

Okay okay, i know you guys are doubting. What is Red up to again besides showcasing his unironic presence of lingering autism and assburgers syndrome. Well, you may just want to find out! Is the first reaction you have on a Redneckerz post in this thread this?

461.gif

Then keep reading! :)
Yes, that must be why Ban Justice existed. Tell me Vector, how is the user activity on ERA? Still seeing new members? Ahh, did you stay stagnation?
But... why would anyone ignore such an incredible safe space?
174967519.png


Be on the right side of history,
UY0fm0b.png

  • Our lord and savior/regular Joe Hecht is not only skirting the lines of morality by playing a part or involvement in doxxing attempts at CDPR HQ, but he is also pestering King of the Web, Pewdiepie. So. Many. Tweets. Dedicated to the cause. last tweet says it all:

Its not odd at all that Hecht keeps upholding the insanity that he seemingly despises himself per his tweet:


  • Did you know that ResetERA is an anagram for
    7bKESHC.png
    ??? Makes you think!
  • Today atleast one user on ERA was banned for
  • 98Q0vib.png

  • These are all facts!

What does Jason Lacour aka Nanashrew have to say about all this?



This concludes this edition of Tales of Reseteria. The latest news around the triggered, the selfish and the shameless.
egomaniac.png


AND REMEMBER KIDS:

Utyj6bU.gif

Redneck Out.
salute.png


PS: People who'se first reaction to a Redneckerz post is this:

903.gif

Please stand by whilst we contact ERA/Tyler.
 
Last edited:
What do you want to achieve with this? Either way your question is pretty vague, for you could be asking one of several things:
1. How did Hitler justify his hate against jews?
2. What are historical reasons for antisemitism to be such a popular opinion (especially) at the time?
3. Whose works had the biggest impact on Hitler in terms of antisemitism?
Due to the unclear aim of your question and the blatant underspecification of your question I am not willing to engage in this discussion. Because either way, if you read carefully, I wouldn't call Trump a nazi (his ideology is not the same as nazism), but since he is a far right politician, calling him a nazi is not nearly as out there as calling someone who is merely right of extreme left positions a nazi. That would entail calling someone like Sanders, a classical social democrat, a nazi, and that definitely is much less justified than calling a far-right demogoge a nazi.

peak Yoshi
 
Yoshi Yoshi is one step away from full-blown SJW. Lay off the cool-aid
I may or may not have had ulterior meanings when posting the Jimmy and Kyle Schwartz pics and gifs. Inability to recognizing the obvious is one of them.

Also you, Papa Papa and Yoshi Yoshi need to like my post or i will poison you all IRL. I know your avatars, so i know where to find you.
 
Last edited:
I may or may not have had ulterior meanings when posting the Jimmy and Kyle Schwartz pics and gifs. Inability to recognizing the obvious is one of them.

Also you, Papa Papa and Yoshi Yoshi need to like my post or i will poison you all IRL. I know your avatars, so i know where to find you.

It's so long that I haven't read it yet and am instead choosing to weaponise the like system against you.
 
It's so long that I haven't read it yet and am instead choosing to weaponise the like system against you.
You are just a slow reader.

It does not matter. Cunth Cunth did his part. Cunth is my friend now. In Cunth's honor, i will bring shame to Yoshi Yoshi aswell:

Green Dino, you are just one step away from being a full SJW. That is so close, that you do not need a pedometer to count it.

Also, watch more South Park. As a German, you will need it in life. Trust me.
 
You are just a slow reader.

It does not matter. Cunth Cunth did his part. Cunth is my friend now. In Cunth's honor, i will bring shame to Yoshi Yoshi aswell:

Green Dino, you are just one step away from being a full SJW. That is so close, that you do not need a pedometer to count it.

Also, watch more South Park. As a German, you will need it in life. Trust me.

This is just a devious ploy to demonstrate how the like system can be weaponised so that it stays banned from pol. I'm on to you, Red. I just caught you red handed.
 
What do you want to achieve with this? Either way your question is pretty vague, for you could be asking one of several things:
1. How did Hitler justify his hate against jews?
2. What are historical reasons for antisemitism to be such a popular opinion (especially) at the time?
3. Whose works had the biggest impact on Hitler in terms of antisemitism?
Due to the unclear aim of your question and the blatant underspecification of your question I am not willing to engage in this discussion. Because either way, if you read carefully, I wouldn't call Trump a nazi (his ideology is not the same as nazism), but since he is a far right politician, calling him a nazi is not nearly as out there as calling someone who is merely right of extreme left positions a nazi. That would entail calling someone like Sanders, a classical social democrat, a nazi, and that definitely is much less justified than calling a far-right demogoge a nazi.

Not everyone who's a nationalist is a nazi.
Calling Trump a nazi makes as much sense as calling the democratic party communists.
 
You are just a slow reader.

It does not matter. Cunth Cunth did his part. Cunth is my friend now. In Cunth's honor, i will bring shame to Yoshi Yoshi aswell:

Green Dino, you are just one step away from being a full SJW. That is so close, that you do not need a pedometer to count it.

Also, watch more South Park. As a German, you will need it in life. Trust me.
Better an SJW than a cunth.

I have nothing against South Park, but with Star Trek, sports and video games my free time that I use when my son is in bed is completely used up. I will not watch South Park with a baby.
 
Better an SJW than a cunth.

I have nothing against South Park, but with Star Trek, sports and video games my free time that I use when my son is in bed is completely used up. I will not watch South Park with a baby.

What's with the misogyny bro?
 
Not everyone who's a nationalist is a nazi.
Calling Trump a nazi makes as much sense as calling the democratic party communists.
The democratic party is a pretty conservative neoliberal party with some social democrats, they do not share any ideology with nazism. Nationalism is a big part of nazism, sprinkle it with xenophobia (also a trait of Trump) and you have something that is pretty close. However, Trump is hardcore neoliberal in terms of fiscal policies, that's not true for nazism.

What's with the misogyny bro?
I'm Australian in spirit. Afterall, Yoshis come from a foreign island, just like Australians.
 
The democratic party is a pretty conservative neoliberal party with some social democrats, they do not share any ideology with nazism. Nationalism is a big part of nazism, sprinkle it with xenophobia (also a trait of Trump) and you have something that is pretty close. However, Trump is hardcore neoliberal in terms of fiscal policies, that's not true for nazism.

No, nationalism is a part of nazism, I consider antisemitic views to be a much bigger part (You know the thing nazis are famous for). Plenty of countries are nationalists.
Being against illegal Immigration is not xenophobia, neither is strict immigration laws.
Calling Trump a nazi is just completly missusing the term, otherwise you can call any nationalist a nazi.
 
No, nationalism is a part of nazism, I consider antisemitic views to be a much bigger part (You know the thing nazis are famous for). Plenty of countries are nationalists.
Being against illegal Immigration is not xenophobia, neither is strict immigration laws.
Calling Trump a nazi is just completly missusing the term, otherwise you can call any nationalist a nazi.
Nationalism was a huge part of nazism. Antisemitism as well. Anticommunism as well. Either way, being a nationalist is repugnant enough, so there is that.
 
Nationalism was a huge part of nazism. Antisemitism as well. Anticommunism as well. Either way, being a nationalist is repugnant enough, so there is that.

Almost every country that has ever existed has been Nationalist, associating it with nazism is beyond stupid.
What exactly is wrong with Nationalism?
 
Almost every country that has ever existed has been Nationalist, associating it with nazism is beyond stupid.
What exactly is wrong with Nationalism?
It is irrational, because it is connected with pride for something you had no influence in. It is self-agrandising, it is elitist, it aids warmonering, is easily instrumentalised to incite hate. The better question would be "what is not wrong with nationalism".
 
It is irrational, because it is connected with pride for something you had no influence in.
But is that flaw necessarily exclusive to nationalism?

It is self-agrandising, it is elitist, it aids warmonering, is easily instrumentalised to incite hate.
How so? In what ways? Are these flaws also exclusive to nationalism?

The better question would be "what is not wrong with nationalism".
Neither question is better than the other because any political system has its advantages or disadvantages. Nationalism can be beneficial in that nation-state governments have greater sovereignty over the operations of their countries. This is why we're seeing a nationalist rise in European countries such as Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Austria, and Italy. Those countries grew tired of being told by officials from other countries what to do. Why should Belgium, France, and Germany call the shots for the rest of Europe?
 
It is irrational, because it is connected with pride for something you had no influence in. It is self-agrandising, it is elitist, it aids warmonering, is easily instrumentalised to incite hate. The better question would be "what is not wrong with nationalism".

Anything can be used to incite hate and used as a means to warmonger. Hell, you saw first hand the regressive/far left weaponizing progressive views just to spew hate and actively wish for death and war on certain groups.

As for "having pride in something you had no influence in" I am going to assume you are also against racial pride (Black pride as an example) or pride in your sexuality (gay pride) as you cannot control those factors either? They are something you are born with and you cannot influence those factors. Difference is, you can help change a country and take pride in that fact. Pride in the actions of the nation you are a part of, a choice that is indeed up to you as a person.
 
Damn, if you think America and a few idealists are bad with nationalism, Japan must be goose-stepping their way across the world by now. :pie_eyeroll:

Or is it only bad when "white people" express it?
 
I am 31 and I cannot remember a time where anything that Trump does would have been considered center-left. Or center. I wonder when from 1999 till now any of Trump's policies would have been considered left leaning. Please provide examples.


Provide examples? Examples of the negative?

Mate, it is on you to provide the extreme right policies that Trump holds that weren't center-Left in very recent history.

By the way, you can't. For example, Wall/Border Control, lolno, even Obama still held this view.
 
Last edited:
Just chiming in to say hello to any of those people who have been banned over at era in the last 24hours...All 100 of you :) please feel free to stop by put your feet up and have an open discussion about topics such as
  1. Louis ck..is a nazi
  2. Rhonda rousey is a nazi and transphobe
  3. If you don't like Gillette razor ads you are a nazi/transphobe and toxic man.
Please enjoy your stay and feel free to contribute.
 
Provide examples? Examples of the negative?

Mate, it is on you to provide the extreme right policies that Trump holds that weren't center-Left in very recent history.

By the way, you can't. For example, Wall/Border Control, lolno, even Obama still held this view.

Damn it, Obama is now a Nazi.
 
I am going to assume you are also against racial pride (Black pride as an example) or pride in your sexuality (gay pride) as you cannot control those factors either?
Uhm yes of course. It is incredibly stupid.
But is that flaw necessarily exclusive to nationalism?

How so? In what ways? Are these flaws also exclusive to nationalism?
How? By stating superiority of the country over others and by stating its needs (real or alleged) are more important than others. None of the negatives are exclusive to nationalism and I haven't said that, but nationalism combines all these negatives without any positives.
even Obama still held this view.
Even Obama? He is a neoliberal politician, not remotely left, I do not know why you cite him.

Mate, it is on you to provide the extreme right policies that Trump holds that weren't center-Left in very recent history.
You ar emaking that outlandish claim that Trump's policies would have been center-left in the recent past. Even if we disregard his rhethorics (which we should not and are highly demagogic), let's look at Trump's actual new regulations:
- Massice tax cuts favouring in particular big corporations and very high income people
- a law giving him additional powers to sanction Russia (i.e., a law centralising power in a single person!)
- putting DACA to an end, jeopardising the security of second generation migrants who have lived all their life in the US
- travel ban to several countries that was even stopped as unconstitutional at first for being discriminatory
- "the wall"
- Monetarily enforcing a strict stance on immigration in federal states
- withdrawing from international climate goals
- Keystone pipeline
- Speeding up environmental impact reviews for infastructure decisions
- stopping federal hiring except for security - which also goes to show the authorative, right-leaning priorities here
- "Mexico city" policy to combat abortions in other countries (by declining support for groups that even support the right for abortions)
- reducing tax-support for medical care, making it (even) less affordable to low income people
- new "National Day of Patriotism", which promotes nationalism
- removal of the term "climate change" from federal websites while publically denying the impact of human behaviour on climate

Absolutely nothing here is remotely left. Everything is anti-climate, neoliberal or auhtoritarian / security oriented.
 
Just chiming in to say hello to any of those people who have been banned over at era in the last 24hours...All 100 of you :) please feel free to stop by put your feet up and have an open discussion about topics such as
  1. Louis ck..is a nazi
  2. Rhonda rousey is a nazi and transphobe
  3. If you don't like Gillette razor ads you are a nazi/transphobe and toxic man.
Please enjoy your stay and feel free to contribute.
Hey that's me.

Honestly been trying to get banned there for awhile now, but finally perma'd for daring to call out the insanity that was a thread where the OP was unironically hypothesizing that GamerGate was responsible for organizing the Russian meddling of the 2016 election. It's really amazing how dense their bubble is. I'm sure someone there will find a way to retroactively pin every atrocity in human history to GG someday.
 
Uhm yes of course. It is incredibly stupid.
Can we get this meta-politik bullshit out of this thread? There is a whole subforum dedicated to this nonsense for a reason. I am in this thread to read about Excelsheet being pissy. I want to read things like this, saying that you are straight gets you banned:

upload_2019-1-16_20-8-37-png.641382

https://archive.ph/CMuoI#selection-8765.0-8768.0

I want to read how the stalemate of this very thread and Mental Health helper Ketkat has a one on one in typical Ketkat fashion with a moderator over a joke, and she would have reported him if he was not one:
https://www.resetera.com/threads/wh...st-scream-read-op.65064/page-94#post-16639931 (https://archive.fo/D0aTA)

upload_2019-1-8_0-16-16-png.633238

upload_2019-1-8_0-16-30-png.633240


upload_2019-1-8_0-16-46-png.633241

upload_2019-1-8_0-16-59-png.633242

upload_2019-1-8_0-17-12-png.633244

upload_2019-1-8_0-17-22-png.633245

Fortunately RedCrayon saw his ways were flawed and that you should not joke on ERA, for all you know you might enrage someone.

upload_2019-1-8_0-18-10-png.633247


We were just wrong on the Little Helpers. They actually help The Names improve their ways!
Or should Cerium not be more ashamed that he incorporates known anti-Black proponents like Nepenthe and pseudo-transphobes like Redcrayon to this army of CO's, Correctional Officers? I mean, how does SweetNicole feel about this?

But what does Jason Lacour/Nanashrew have to say about this?



Thanks Jason for your input.
 
Then you weren't paying attention. Even Trump's most "extreme" idea, the border wall, was supported by Democrats within the last 10 years.
?
We've always been at war with Eastasia.
Damn, if you think America and a few idealists are bad with nationalism, Japan must be goose-stepping their way across the world by now. :pie_eyeroll:

Or is it only bad when "white people" express it?
Fuck white people. Especially white men.
 
Last edited:
They have their new target, Ronda Rousey: https://www.resetera.com/threads/ro...inting-and-problematic-decision-by-nrs.94189/

Already several bans for transphobia, along with conspiracy rehortic, etc.

Look at page 12. I can't even........... :lollipop_beaming_smiling:

These people...

I really despise how ResetEra appears to see themselves as some kind of "Video Game Police".

Ronda Rousey is a very well known public figure. Considering what she is known for it is kind of a big deal for Mortal Kombat to be able to cast here as Sonya Blade.

We are talking about an Olympic medal winner, a US Judo champion, a mixed martial arts champion and these fucking dipshits think that casting her as a character in a fighting game is "problematic"? Fuck off.

Now I would honestly ask these people what position Rousey should be in, realistically. Should she be banned from finding work at all? Should she just be banned from finding work in the video game industry.

Here was me thinking that ResetEra were absolutely 100% against women being excluded from the video game industry yet here they are whining because the wrong kind of woman is being included. Hm.

Makes me wonder how sincere they REALLY are about inclusion in gaming.

I have literally no opinion on her political views because the political views of an athlete/wrestler/actor are of no interest to me. I don't see why her involvent in Mortal Kombat would be problematic at all. Has she done something illegal?

If Rousey hated Trump and spent her days regurgitating NPC phrases then she'd be a badass woman making a name for her self in areas that really are traditionally very male-dominated. Once they realize she can think for herself and isn't afraid to voice her opinions she's "problematic" and the Video Game Police are on the case.

How funny that they are upset because she is a literal playable character! :)
 
These people...

I really despise how ResetEra appears to see themselves as some kind of "Video Game Police".

Ronda Rousey is a very well known public figure. Considering what she is known for it is kind of a big deal for Mortal Kombat to be able to cast here as Sonya Blade.

We are talking about an Olympic medal winner, a US Judo champion, a mixed martial arts champion and these fucking dipshits think that casting her as a character in a fighting game is "problematic"? Fuck off.

Now I would honestly ask these people what position Rousey should be in, realistically. Should she be banned from finding work at all? Should she just be banned from finding work in the video game industry.

Here was me thinking that ResetEra were absolutely 100% against women being excluded from the video game industry yet here they are whining because the wrong kind of woman is being included. Hm.

Makes me wonder how sincere they REALLY are about inclusion in gaming.

I have literally no opinion on her political views because the political views of an athlete/wrestler/actor are of no interest to me. I don't see why her involvent in Mortal Kombat would be problematic at all. Has she done something illegal?

If Rousey hated Trump and spent her days regurgitating NPC phrases then she'd be a badass woman making a name for her self in areas that really are traditionally very male-dominated. Once they realize she can think for herself and isn't afraid to voice her opinions she's "problematic" and the Video Game Police are on the case.

How funny that they are upset because she is a literal playable character! :)

Ideology trumps all to these clowns. You can be a woman, minority, etc, but if you're not 100% on board with their ideology you're of no use to them and are attacked.
 
How? By stating superiority of the country over others and by stating its needs (real or alleged) are more important than others. None of the negatives are exclusive to nationalism and I haven't said that, but nationalism combines all these negatives without any positives.
But if the negatives are not exclusive to nationalism, but then cite those negatives as reasons for nationalism to be irrational, why aren't you applying the other ideologies the same standard?

How does stating superiority of the country over others necessarily bad? A country whose constitution stands for the separation between church and state is definitely better than a country whose constitution establishes religious/theological rule.

Each country has needs as not every country is the same. You can't control the climate, geology, and topography of a nation and thus, that country has certain needs that other nations do not whether they are agriculturally related or infrastructure related.

And if I were to drag globalism into the conversation for a little bit, the higher up the power ladder you go, the more detached the leaders are from the local populations. They most likely never lived through the challenges local populations have to go through nor go out of their way to see them. This is the problem with the EU as its leaders are not elected and detached from the needs of countries whose right-wing governments got elected in response to that.
 
Who the fuck is that redneck dude, made 2000+ posts in 6 months here after being banned on era lol?
You have addressed me before and didn't answer.

What do you want to know?

FWIW, "being banned from ERA" was not the reason i signed up here.

PS: no gotcha's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom