NeoGAF Ban Review/Justice Project

Status
Not open for further replies.
That's a lot of bans in a short time.
You wanna be next?
LwtLA.gif
 
I've always wanted to know about this "Samuel L. Jackson" mod that would ban people like a lawnmower back in the early 2010's. Who is he? Is he still around in QQERA? Is he still living? Why was he a gimmick mod in the first place? So many questions :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy:
Because some people have nothing in their life but worthless forum notoriety. It's pretty sad.
 
In anticipation of the new terminator movie, is there any chance we could give Skyn3t another life? I miss that crazy mofo.

FashtagFreeSkyn3t
 
Not really sure where to post this, but any reason why it says "You have insufficient privileges to reply here." in any of the PoliGAF threads?
 
I have many friends who are...

So I can't be...

🤣

When has bish ever given the impression that he's anti-white? The guy works in a predominantly white gaming industry, has a lot of white friends, and has never said or done anything - while in the industry or as a mod on GAF - that meets a reasonable definition of "anti-white." What leads you to think otherwise?
 
Did you just go with the "I have black friends" excuse?

🤡🌎

I don't think so, since the "black friends" excuse is employed by people with a history of anti-black racism. Never once has bish ever said or done anything racist, as far as we know from his history on GAF and ERA, towards white people because they were white.
 
I don't think so, since the "black friends" excuse is employed by people with a history of anti-black racism. Never once has bish ever said or done anything racist, as far as we know from his history on GAF and ERA, towards white people because they were white.

His stealth banning spree after the 2016 election was racially motivated.
 
His stealth banning spree after the 2016 election was racially motivated.

I mean, it might be easy to surmise that since everyone who was banned was white, but that would be a logically unsound conclusion to make. I'm not defending his stealth bans, but my understanding is that those who were included in his sweeping expulsion of users were people who had a history of bad faith argumentation, dog whistling, and diet racism. The fact they all happened to be white doesn't mean that his stealth bans were racially motivated.
 
I mean, it might be easy to surmise that since everyone who was banned was white, but that would be a logically unsound conclusion to make. I'm not defending his stealth bans, but my understanding is that those who were included in his sweeping expulsion of users were people who had a history of bad faith argumentation, dog whistling, and diet racism. The fact they all happened to be white doesn't mean that his stealth bans were racially motivated.

He told me they were racially motivated when I confronted him about it.
 
He told me they were racially motivated when I confronted him about it.

Wow, OK. That's interesting. I'm curious about how he framed that admission. If you're not able to divulge it, out of respect for his privacy, I understand. From what I've heard from others, the people who were stealth banned all engaged in a history of concern trolling and diet racism. Is that not true?
 
From what I've heard from others, the people who were stealth banned all engaged in a history of concern trolling and diet racism. Is that not true?

You're welcome to look at my notes on some of the stealth bans of his I reviewed at the beginning of this thread.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom