• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

NFL Divisional 2010 - "DON'T STOP ME NOW (I'm having such a good time)"

Status
Not open for further replies.
ryutaro's mama said:
Wow. You are name dropping me cross thread territories.

This latest Pats failure must be really getting to you.

I was so bitter last year when my Laker team ( mostly Ron Artest ) smacked up your Czzz.

And then we never heard from you again in NBA-AGE.
Go back to your shithole.
 
NewYorkJetsvsNewEnglandPatriots-Photos-January162011-ESPN.png
 
DancingJesus said:
I think he's speaking of Pittsburgh's and Ravens.

He's mad that the Jets are considered the third best defense.

No, he was specifically talking about the Pats.

And people were talking about them; mainly how it was a foregone conclusion that the Pats were Super Bowl bound.
 
ryutaro's mama said:
I was so bitter last year when my Laker team ( mostly Ron Artest ) smacked up your Czzz.

And then we never heard from you again in NBA-AGE.

i was there watching shuttlesworth taking a dump on the miami pretenders, and was also there when lebron and his sorority slapped you, but i guess you were too busy waving that flag

i want the lakers again this year cause how bad they are. but sadly the way your criminal is playing "we aint coming back to LA"
 
DeaconKnowledge said:
No, he was specifically talking about the Pats.

And people were talking about them; mainly how it was a foregone conclusion that the Pats were Super Bowl bound.

I dunno then, he's spouting nonsense. Hah.
 
Beating falcon fans senseless at kinect table tennis is just as satisfying as watching the game saturday night... thanks for the memories
 
This whole thing with the Pats does make me wonder: just how are we supposed to assess a team's turnover differential? The Pats ability to create and avoid turnovers was downright ridiculous this season, unusually so. I mean, on one hand you can say that the games happened the way they did and as such the Pats really did perform as well as their numbers and records indicated, but on the other hand, you can say that the absurd turnover numbers was more a product of luck than anything else and that their true talent level lies far below where they appeared to be.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that when evaluating a team's actual ability, turnover numbers have such an enormous impact while yet being a product of luck. So what are we supposed to do about that, especially in regards to extremely fluky statistical outliers like this year's Patriots.
 
Lunchbox said:
i was there watching shuttlesworth taking a dump on the miami pretenders, and was also there when lebron and his sorority slapped you, but i guess you were too busy waving that flag

i want the lakers again this year cause how bad they are. but sadly the way your criminal is playing "we aint coming back to LA"

This is the last of the b-ball talk I will engage in here.

Did any of the things you mention happen in Game 7 of the Finals?

If you want to talk NBA, we have a thread for that and it isn't hard to find.

See you there!
 
dralla said:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v30/Myke256/NewYorkJetsvsNewEnglandPatriots-Photos-January162011-ESPN.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
Damn. When it happened, in my mind, I thought it'd turn out to be a good Haters Gonna Hate pic.
 
VALIS said:
Fuck you, Bill Simmons.
Simmons is unbearable when it comes to anything Boston related. Fuck him.

And when are you guys going to learn that you shouldn't doubt or mock me? I have been telling you fools for the past few years that the Pats are a paper tiger. But despite 6 years of evidence every year the causal fan always falls for their regular season mirage. Maybe next year you will all learn your lesson.

And if the Steelers beat the Jets with Legursky and Foster starting (honestly our 10th and 11th best guys, :JANKCOKE) then Ben should get some kind of fucking award. I can't remember the last time someone was able to win game(s) in the playoffs with such garbage for an offensive line. And that is no disrespect to Legursky, Foster, Scott, etc. I mean there is a reason these guys are sitting so deep on our bench behind what was already at best an average offensive line.

So get well soon Flozell and JScott. We need your broke asses if we are going to get no. 7.
 
Also, I was vindicated with my defense of Roethlisberger in the offseason. Thank God the owners did not cave to the feminist, left, liberal agenda in Foxboro!
 
Whose cock is the east coast media going to suck now that the Pats are over? I swear NFL Prime Time still spent 75% of its coverage on the Patriots and they lost the game today!
 
Zeke said:
I'll jump in NBA-Age sucks, I also have no intrest in the SB now. I can't stand any of the teams left sigh

Zeke, you love the cowboys though? A team with historic amounts of swagger (not to mention coke and hookers) so why can't you support a Jets team with crazy amounts of swagger?
 
Mrbob said:
Whose cock is the east coast media going to suck now that the Pats are over? I swear NFL Prime Time still spent 75% of its coverage on the Patriots and they lost the game today!

All aboard the USS Sanchez!

What could go wrong?
 
DeaconKnowledge said:
I'm more worried about the Jets then I ever was about the Patriots.

Never thought i'd say that.
You are crazy. The Jets are a perfect matchup for our team. I couldn't have asked for a better team to play in the Championship. And we get it at home.

Bellicheat is a lot smarter than our coaches and we don't have enough backs to cover the Pats they go to spread. The Jets are a run first team that likes to throw screens and go deep. That is tailor made for LeBeau. I have a lot of confidence in our defense, my only worry is the health of our 2nd string offensive line. It is a lot to ask of the offense to win with the 3rd string guys...
 
bionic77 said:
Simmons is unbearable when it comes to anything Boston related. Fuck him.

And when are you guys going to learn that you shouldn't doubt or mock me? I have been telling you fools for the past few years that the Pats are a paper tiger. But despite 6 years of evidence every year the causal fan always falls for their regular season mirage. Maybe next year you will all learn your lesson.

And if the Steelers beat the Jets with Legursky and Foster starting (honestly our 10th and 11th best guys, :JANKCOKE) then Ben should get some kind of fucking award. I can't remember the last time someone was able to win game(s) in the playoffs with such garbage for an offensive line. And that is no disrespect to Legursky, Foster, Scott, etc. I mean there is a reason these guys are sitting so deep on our bench behind what was already at best an average offensive line.

So get well soon Flozell and JScott. We need your broke asses if we are going to get no. 7.

The one downside to the Steelers bringing home #7 would be the potential of the brass being satisfied and not bringing in some real O lineman.
 
exarkun said:
Zeke, you love the cowboys though? A team with historic amounts of swagger (not to mention coke and hookers) so why can't you support a Jets team with crazy amounts of swagger?
the foot-fetish is whats holding me back
 
Mrbob said:
Whose cock is the east coast media going to suck now that the Pats are over? I swear NFL Prime Time still spent 75% of its coverage on the Patriots and they lost the game today!
This is going to hurt, but they are going to deep throat ARod all week and all but guarantee him to win the next 5 Superbowls.

The Primetime guys hate Ben, they rightfully think Sanchize is overrated, and no one has 100% faith in Cutler. That leaves Rodgers and his stats are going to make TJ stutter more than usual.
 
bionic77 said:
This is going to hurt, but they are going to deep throat ARod all week and all but guarantee him to win the next 5 Superbowls.

The Primetime guys hate Ben, they rightfully think Sanchize is overrated, and no one has 100% faith in Cutler. That leaves Rodgers and his stats are going to make TJ stutter more than usual.

Haha you are probably right. The game line already has GB as 3 point favorites on the road. The media has the Packers in the Super Bowl already maybe Chicago shouldn't even play on Sunday!
 
bionic77 said:
You are crazy. The Jets are a perfect matchup for our team. I couldn't have asked for a better team to play in the Championship. And we get it at home.

Bellicheat is a lot smarter than our coaches and we don't have enough backs to cover the Pats they go to spread. The Jets are a run first team that likes to throw screens and go deep. That is tailor made for LeBeau. I have a lot of confidence in our defense, my only worry is the health of our 2nd string offensive line. It is a lot to ask of the offense to win with the 3rd string guys...

Couldn't the argument be made that the Jets are just a better version of the Ravens? Defense isn't as pressure centric but the coverage is way better, and the offense is more stable than "LOL lets see what Joe feels like doing today".

So in that way, it would just be harder for the Steelers to win, especially now that they are down two starters on the o-line? Thus making the Jets have more pressure than they normally do and making them a better defensive unit overall.

I think the key will be Polamalu v Sanchez. If he can rattle him and he throws a pick, things can get ugly.
 
bionic77 said:
You are crazy. The Jets are a perfect matchup for our team. I couldn't have asked for a better team to play in the Championship. And we get it at home.

Bellicheat is a lot smarter than our coaches and we don't have enough backs to cover the Pats they go to spread. The Jets are a run first team that likes to throw screens and go deep. That is tailor made for LeBeau. I have a lot of confidence in our defense, my only worry is the health of our 2nd string offensive line. It is a lot to ask of the offense to win with the 3rd string guys...

You don't understand.

I spent the last 8 weeks wishing and praying we saw the Pats again. I was so pissed at the loss in week 10 I focused all my energy on them, to the point that I knew their team inside and out. I thoroughly convinced myself they had no chance when the Steelers walked into Foxborough.

Now that's over.

Not to mention that the Jets are riding some serious momentum. We match up well with them yeah, but so did the Colts and Pats.


exarkun said:
Couldn't the argument be made that the Jets are just a better version of the Ravens? Defense isn't as pressure centric but the coverage is way better, and the offense is more stable than "LOL lets see what Joe feels like doing today".

No.

The Ravens front seven is practically God Tier, but aside from Reed their defensive backs are average at best. The Jets are the complete opposite.
 
Spectral Glider said:
The one downside to the Steelers bringing home #7 would be the potential of the brass being satisfied and not bringing in some real O lineman.
We actually are going to have a lot of needs in the next few years because our defense is getting old. No idea how we are ever going to come close to replacing Harrison and Polamalu. We need some more cover corners as well so we can better match up with the spread packages that are all the rage. We need our doctors to tell us what the deal is with Starks injury and we need to get some help on the right side, which really isn't very good. We are pretty set at the skill positions on offense, but we really need to figure out what we are going to do with Hines going forward. I love the guy, but he should be sharing snaps with someone else with more speed. We need to see if we are happy with our kicker. We are set at LB for now, but we need a little more youth at DL.

Like I said, we need help all over the place. But that is the price of sustained success and a price well worth paying.
 
DeaconKnowledge said:
No.

The Ravens front seven is practically God Tier, but aside from Reed their defensive backs are average at best. The Jets are the complete opposite.
Yup. Also I think the Ravens were clearly the better team overall on both sides of the ball. Sanchize does appear to have more poise than Flacco though, but lets see how he does in the Championship game with Harrison and Woodley bearing down on his ass.

And honestly our injuries on the o-line are going to be huge. But hopefully we get Flozell and JScott healthy in time for Sunday. It isn't like the Jets are going to overpower us, but we need some veteran savvy to pick up their crazy blitzes.
 
jman2050 said:
Also MLB-Age is the best Sports-Age, and it isn't even close.

The Football (read:soccer) thread used to be a glorious, sprawling mess of awesome before Red Scarlet ruined it forever
 
Spectral Glider said:
The one downside to the Steelers bringing home #7 would be the potential of the brass being satisfied and not bringing in some real O lineman.

I honestly think this is the last year the Steelers can truly contend before the defense just gets too old. Keisel has a few years in him, but Smith is finished. McFadden's lost it, and I don't have faith in Keenan Lewis or Madison becoming good nickels as Gay is most definitely going to inherit his slot. Farrior is 36. We have 2, maybe 3 long terms options at OT in Starks, Pouncey and Colon, but that line needs to be torn the fuck down. Honestly, I see our o-line getting fixed, only to have the defense break down. We won't have both in sync for a while.
 
jman2050 said:
This whole thing with the Pats does make me wonder: just how are we supposed to assess a team's turnover differential? The Pats ability to create and avoid turnovers was downright ridiculous this season, unusually so. I mean, on one hand you can say that the games happened the way they did and as such the Pats really did perform as well as their numbers and records indicated, but on the other hand, you can say that the absurd turnover numbers was more a product of luck than anything else and that their true talent level lies far below where they appeared to be.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that when evaluating a team's actual ability, turnover numbers have such an enormous impact while yet being a product of luck. So what are we supposed to do about that, especially in regards to extremely fluky statistical outliers like this year's Patriots.

Or last year's Saints.

But that run the Pats were on this year wasn't luck. It was a direct result of a no risk offense. They got rid of Moss and then never took chances down the field. IMO, there are three kinds of turnovers. 1. Created by the defense. 2. Created by the offense. 3. Luck. Most turnovers are 1 or 2 and sometimes both. Luck really doesn't come into play much until the ball is free on the turf.
 
Akim said:
i'm here to eat my crow

fuck my life

You should be extremely proud of how far your Seahawks went.

You guys upset the defending world champions. You proved EVERYONE wrong.

Besides, you guys get to play the 49er's twice a year. So you guys should be back in the playoffs next season.

You guys proved that the NFC West isn't the worst division in football any more.

The NFC East is.
 
Mike Mayock once again proves he's the only "analyst" worth listening to (even though I'm pretty sure he took the Falcons...for shame). He's brought up multiple times this week how the Pats hype didn't match the product on the field. Plus he got the Seahawks right against the Saints...he should be declared GOAT just for that.
 
eznark said:
Wow. Time to eat crow, Patriots fans who pretended to be offended by Sal Alosi!
he didnt actually do it, "attempting" and committing isnt the same

like how error rodgers attempts to be elite, but cant
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom