Rentahamster
Rodent Whores
Dead is dead, yo.Not in the same gruesome way. Also a lot of soldiers in de building are not dead. So the whispers are opinionated?
Its bullshit really.
Also, a lot of soldiers in the building ARE dead. We killed them.
Dead is dead, yo.Not in the same gruesome way. Also a lot of soldiers in de building are not dead. So the whispers are opinionated?
Its bullshit really.
Uh no, a little after that you see zack walking paste Aerith and she feels something, so it's definitely something. Aerith 'feeling' other dimensions is bullshit as well of course.
why not a 9 or a 10? i also put it at an 8 btw, just curious of your pros/consThis game is a solid 8/10.
Very much reminded me of playing a PS2 game.
He vanishes from the game 7 seconds after he says that, imo he basically says "I'm out of here" but in a creepy dramatic way.Sephiroth mentioned 7 seconds. What was it all about?
I dunno. It seems like at several points the game tells us that actually beating people in combat just OKs them, like the security guys who have Johnny.Also, a lot of soldiers in the building ARE dead. We killed them.
KO'd people don't dissolve into the lifestream.I dunno. It seems like at several points the game tells us that actually beating people in combat just OKs them, like the security guys who have Johnny.
KO'd people don't dissolve into the lifestream.
At any rate, however, dead or not, the grunts are just grunts, and are inconsequential to the overall story, which is why the whispers don't give a damn about those scrubs.
I'm not sure what you mean.So the whispers care about the story now?
Makes sense to me. Sephiroth is giving Cloud a chance to change the fate and save Aeris? But why would he?
Uh no, a little after that you see zack walking paste Aerith and she feels something, so it's definitely something. Aerith 'feeling' other dimensions is bullshit as well of course.
Well, I guess that could make sense. Sephiroth seems to want Cloud to change fate that ultimately leads to Sephiroth's downfall.
If Cloud stops Sephiroth from killing Aerith, that further changes fate.
The question is then, why doesn't Sephiroth just not kill her? Perhaps, the Sephiroth we see in game one and the Sephiroth we encounter the rest of the game (when we normally should based on the OG) are NOT the same. Maybe Sephiroth from part one is actually a time traveler, alternate-universe, etc version, who just came to disrupt the timeline.
Who knows? But, I'll still be ticked if Aerith does somehow survive.
Yes a million times. I'm fine with people offering their own interpretations. That's part of the fun of art. But please don't turn it into a crusade where only your reading is the correct one and other people need to be belittled into accepting it.stop calling everything you personally dont like "bullshit". Let other people have fun interpreting the story. Its fine if you dont like it and dont want to think about it, that still doesnt make it bullshit.
The sephiroth in this game is sephiroth from advent children. I think thats a pretty confirmed statement. They even play his advent children theme and everything.
I think that's part of the genius here. As writers, the devs got to have their cake and eat it too - capitalize on the nostalgia of an already completed work by keeping most of it faithful and expanding on it, while changing juuuuust enough so that the audience doesn't know what the hell is going to happen, thus renewing their sense of suspense.The really cool thing is we will go into the next part not knowing if she would survive or not. Imo that's a pretty neat thing to do.
stop calling everything you personally dont like "bullshit". Let other people have fun interpreting the story. Its fine if you dont like it and dont want to think about it, that still doesnt make it bullshit.
It is unclear if he is alive in the player's timeline or a separate one. If he is alive in the player's timeline, and assuming Back to the Future rules, a lot should have changed for the party at that instant. But it didn't. What remains to be seen is if the altered Stamp is also carried over to the player's reality.He's alive.
Why?And yes, him being alive, Aerith sensing timelines and timelineS being a thing at all is bullshit.
It is unclear if he is alive in the player's timeline or a separate one. If he is alive in the player's timeline, and assuming Back to the Future rules, a lot should have changed for the party at that instant. But it didn't. What remains to be seen is if the altered Stamp is also carried over to the player's reality.
Mysteries for the next installment.
Why?
A Centra can speak with the Planet only while he/she reaches the Lifestream? Maybe that. If Aeris survives she can't summon the Lifestream to prevent Meteor from destroying the Planet. Just my thinking.Well, I guess that could make sense. Sephiroth seems to want Cloud to change fate that ultimately leads to Sephiroth's downfall.
If Cloud stops Sephiroth from killing Aerith, that further changes fate.
The question is then, why doesn't Sephiroth just not kill her? Perhaps, the Sephiroth we see in game one and the Sephiroth we encounter the rest of the game (when we normally should based on the OG) are NOT the same. Maybe Sephiroth from part one is actually a time traveler, alternate-universe, etc version, who just came to disrupt the timeline.
Who knows? But, I'll still be ticked if Aerith does somehow survive.
In the Remake Cloud and the rest know shit of the Ancients. In the original Cloud seemed aware of them. Correct me if I'm wrong.
In the original Sephiroth told him that he's a descendant of the Ancients. Cloud seemed to know something/heard something. In the remake Barret got some knowledge of the Centra.I don't remember Cloud knowing about the Ancients in the original at that point, but you could be right.
2. Sephiroth's early appearance. While it was epic and amazing, I always look at remakes as both a veteran and someone who goes to this game out of the blue. For a guy who comes here uninitiated, the final battle with Sephiroth lacks OOMF and impact. The player doesn't know who he is, doesn't know his connection with Cloud, doesn't know why there is such deep animosity, and the final battle will feel like, "Yeah, I'm fighting this guy and I'm supposed to feel an intense hatred for him, but … eh, I don't really know what happened …" I understand that Nomura had to make an epic final battle for a game whose story never ended at this point so it needs a form of epic closure, but we just had like, six boss encounters in the past two hours. There was no need to throw in Sephiroth as well. The ending was purely intended for veterans, and it shows.
3. Zack's appearance. Terribly unnecessary, and it ruins one of the biggest surprises in the original. Now the player KNOWS there's this guy, and the fact that Cloud doesn't mention him will definitely clue in smart players (Zack having Cloud's weapon, Reno laughing at Cloud's claim that's he's 1st Class, a mere grunt talking to Cloud as if they're pals) that Cloud isn't nearly the person he claims to be, and he most likely did something to Zack. Actually, the scene with the soldier recognizing Cloud at Shinra's headquarters and Reno's mocking was enough; now they did too much and it ruins the YOURWHOLELIFEISALIE moment in the original.
2.I don't think seeing him early is a mistake, we don't know how deep the hate goes but for a totally new play, the first thing they see of him is him talking about killing Cloud's mother. I don't think saving the battle for when you know everything about him is the best move, Thinking of Vergil from Devil May Cry. You fight him 3 times and every time the fight just gets better as you learn more and it's exciting to see the clear gap between you close
3. I think the amount of people that are gonna get any big epiphanies due to this scene are extremely small, almost non existant. Smart one will know that Cloud isn't who he says he is but they will still probably just see Zack as a fellow soldier who saved Cloud at most. People who figure it out will figure it out due to looking online.
Actually that fight was someone else's idea. Nomura ended up approving it though.Nomura did it because he feared long-time fans would complain about having a Final Fantasy VII game without a Cloud/Sephiroth fight. Or maybe he did because he thought it was a cool idea. I personally think it was a mistake.
I stand half-corrected, but still think it was a mistake.Actually that fight was someone else's idea. Nomura ended up approving it though.
2. Compare the last time you fight Vergil in that time, with the last time you fight Sephiroth in THIS game. And no, sequels do not count, because this specific final battle must be judged as this game's final last battle. And it is horribly, horribly lacking in context, for a player who knows nothing about the original. I consider it a flaw, and I think Nomura did it because he feared long-time fans would complain about having a Final Fantasy VII game without a Cloud/Sephiroth fight. Or maybe he did because he thought it was a cool idea. I personally think it was a mistake.
3. My problem with that scene lies in the fact that people may have had a couple of doubts on whether Cloud is who he says he is. The Zack scene however, clearly will make people suspect that something happened to/with that raven-haired guy. In the original, when Sephiroth starts showing photos and says shit about Zack, we can root for Cloud and believe Sephiroth's full of shit. We want to believe Cloud, and just like him, we want to cling on to the lie until the last minute. Zack may be a fiction Sephiroth pulls out of his ass to screw Cloud. Now in the remake, the second Sephiroth mentions Zack, the player will immediately buy it and immediately see Cloud for the 'fraud' that he is. This was one of the most mind-fuck what-is-real-what-is-false moments in the original, and you get a major plot point shown to you that immediately resolves some of the future tension - you KNOW that Zack is real, and you'll IMMEDIATELY believe Sephiroth's claims. In Nomura's thirst to pay homage to the original's moments and characters, I think he somewhat ruined that scene.
I'm more annoyed with the fact that the president of Shinra gives zero fucks about the fact that he murdered thousands of people and probably made Shinra's stocks plummet all the way down to the shitter, with no clear reason of why he did it, other than the fact he *might* want to go to war with Wutai for Round 2. We can see that soldiers and civilians of the upper plates feel bad about what happened with the lower-classed citizens, would it hurt to make president Shinra a more realistic character by having him lament over the death of his own people for the sake of one-upping Wutai in a second war in order to ensure the safety of Midgar? And why does Shinra want to go to war with Wutai when they're busy searching for the promised land? Shouldn't they secure the Promised Land first, THEN use the unlimited Mako energy to destroy Wutai and ensure their victory, revenge and safety?Some good points made here. I am surprised it needs to be spelled out like this, I mean I really like the game but it's pretty obvious the changes made to storytelling made the story a lot worse. Even small changes like Shinra blowing up their own reactor is just slightly worse.
It's just surprising why they would do this, because it costs Square Enix more resources to change the story, and they could've known there would be a high likelyhood to end up with a story that is worse. There is likely ego involved, which I understand, but you'd need some serious talent to think you can top a storyline that has been renowned for 25 years.
Serious question, how would you guys feel if in FF7R2 Cait Sith was just temp member of your party during the Gold Saucer portions like how Red XIII works in Part 1?
They'd have to find some other way to utilize the "spying" element but no one would really care, right? We all agree he fucking sucks, yeah?
A lot of subtext on the original had the potential to be missed since it involves interacting with all the townspeople.Also, the Shinra president mention accelerated cell aging written in all SOLDIER members. Nothing about it in the original.
In Junon during Final Fantasy VII the player can talk to an old man in the top floor of a shop who remarks he used to be in SOLDIER. It is unknown what rank or member he was, but later in the game he starts to wear a cape, similar to Sephiroth-clones, stating that he got a sudden urge to dress that way. This hints at SOLDIER members being given Jenova cells as well as mako infusion.
tyrants have done this repeatedly throughout history. a false flag event. and it doesn't even take a tyrant to murder thousands of people for people to not give a fuck. look at defenders of politicains irl. there are people who decide to go to war and end up killing far more than that. wars are very profitable, you pay lots of money to make weapons that are meant to be destroyed. effectively you are creating a product that costs the most also and has the shortest shelf life. money is often a reason enough for w villains.I'm more annoyed with the fact that the president of Shinra gives zero fucks about the fact that he murdered thousands of people and probably made Shinra's stocks plummet all the way down to the shitter, with no clear reason of why he did it, other than the fact he *might* want to go to war with Wutai
I'm more annoyed with the fact that the president of Shinra gives zero fucks about the fact that he murdered thousands of people and probably made Shinra's stocks plummet all the way down to the shitter, with no clear reason of why he did it, other than the fact he *might* want to go to war with Wutai for Round 2. We can see that soldiers and civilians of the upper plates feel bad about what happened with the lower-classed citizens, would it hurt to make president Shinra a more realistic character by having him lament over the death of his own people for the sake of one-upping Wutai in a second war in order to ensure the safety of Midgar? And why does Shinra want to go to war with Wutai when they're busy searching for the promised land? Shouldn't they secure the Promised Land first, THEN use the unlimited Mako energy to destroy Wutai and ensure their victory, revenge and safety?
I don't have a problem with time travel if done with modesty, or even alternate dimensions. It's the multiverse clusterfucks I hate - where there are suddenly 50 versions of the same character forming an army against some major cosmic threat. I mean, seriously, if Final Fantasy VII Remake ends up pulling a shit with like, ten Aeriths (I'm the Aerith that married Cloud, I'm the Aerith who never got killed by Sephiroth, I'm the Aerith who married Wedge instead of Cloud, I'm the Aerith who cut her hair short, I'm the Aerith who gained a few pounds by eating a lot of rice), I will literally throw my PS5 out of the window, not caring whom I may kill with it.Why bother with sensible story telling when you can throw in time travel and faith and stuff, KAPOW!
Those themes don't necessarily negate "sensible story telling", especially when you're in the realm of sci-fi fantasy.Why bother with sensible story telling when you can throw in time travel and faith and stuff, KAPOW!
2. Compare the last time you fight Vergil in that time, with the last time you fight Sephiroth in THIS game. And no, sequels do not count, because this specific final battle must be judged as this game's final last battle. And it is horribly, horribly lacking in context, for a player who knows nothing about the original. I consider it a flaw, and I think Nomura did it because he feared long-time fans would complain about having a Final Fantasy VII game without a Cloud/Sephiroth fight. Or maybe he did because he thought it was a cool idea. I personally think it was a mistake.
You seem to be forgetting that the original story/timeline already happened. These aren't simply premonitions of a possible future, but events that have already happened.I don't really see all the "character has visions of the future" = "time travel". That's feels like a big jump to conclusions.
People can have premonitions about the future without it meaning they traveled through time or into an alternate dimensions or whatever. I mean Sarah Conner has that vision of the world ending in T2 yet she is not a time traveler in that movie. Anakin has a premonition of Padme dying in the future but it doesn't mean he time traveled to the future.
Usually prophetic visions take place in the head of the person having them. Impossible to show that without some artistic license.
You seem to be forgetting that the original story/timeline already happened. These aren't simply premonitions of a possible future, but events that have already happened.
Personally I think Sephiroth has traveled to the past using the lifestream (which is connected to the flow of time itself). Due to Aerith being a Cetra she is in tune with the planet and sees flashes of the future. It's the only way Sephiroth would act as he does and know so much.
Yeah time travel is always a wild card. I'm keeping my hopes up but I'm really glad they're treating this as a sequel and not a remake since this is the direction they've chosen.Aerith knows way too much herself, which is confirmed in the ultimania, and apparently has the ability to pass some of that knowledge to others herself, what with Red getting magic knowledge of the whispers and Cloud seeing the future after she touched him.
It's a bit ridiculous.
Yup, my thoughts exactly. This is the first Final Fantasy game I've bothered to finish since 10.For me, this is the first time Final Fantasy has felt like Final Fantasy since FFX, back in 2001.
the way i see the story changes is like. you are a band like Hall & Oatest and you had a bunch of hit singles in the 80s. say it is 2006 and you are playing a concert and you play all of your hit songs, except you add a string section, extended guitar solos, and song medleys here and there. some people are just mad that the band played a version of the extended 12" remix of "Maneater" with a 10 min jam at the end, rather than the album version. it's just, if you are there and demanding the same people to play the same song the exact same way 20 years later, you're kind of being entitled and unreasonable.