'kinell. Step away from GAF for a bit to have a slow, soapy wank and we're on 5 pages![]()
Console Launch Exclusive
If I understand correctly, Cerny is an outside advisor to Sony. He would only hurt himself if he didn't keep what he promised, especially since Sony is a big client.Ok let's assume he doesn't even have a contact and can say whatever he likes. He's still selling his own service as consultant/engineer. Cerny has used pr speak in the past. Why is this time different?
Yeah The Gunk was stated as a console launch exclusive in that video too. Then this article came out:
![]()
The Gunk is Xbox exclusive, no time-exclusive deal in place
Developer Image & Form and publisher Thunderful have revealed that The Gunk, which was shown at the Xbox Games Showcase, is an Xbox exclusive.www.gamereactor.eu
So again explain to me what console launch exclusive means. I don't think it means what you think it does.
max teoretical xsx tf is 12.147 and ps5 10.275 so 18.48% (probably performance differ slightly bigger in games due variable clocks of ps5 and higher bandwidth of xsx), it's more like rtx 2080 vs rtx 2070 superWhat do I need to spin for that statement to become true?
There is 44% CU advantage in XSeX favor.
To address the gargantuan gap (which is bigger than the gap between 5700XT and 2080Ti), Sony went with OC-ing the GPU.
Even if we take maximum figure of 10.28, XSeX (12.75) is at 24% more flops.
That is much more than the difference between 2070 and 2060.
You can't do math.That makes it 18.1%.
Still bigger than difference between 2060 and 2070.
And real figures could be much worse, due to 10.28 being "max" not typical/average.
Yeah The Gunk was stated as a console launch exclusive in that video too. Then this article came out:
![]()
The Gunk is Xbox exclusive, no time-exclusive deal in place
Developer Image & Form and publisher Thunderful have revealed that The Gunk, which was shown at the Xbox Games Showcase, is an Xbox exclusive.www.gamereactor.eu
So again explain to me what console launch exclusive means.
Guess we gotta preare for the digital foundry comparisons.
Lock if old.
You can't do math.
10.28/12.1 x 100 = 0.8495867769 x 100 = 84.95867769% = 84.9% -> 100% - 84.9% = 15.1%
Hence, the difference is 15.1%, NOT 18%.
Wasn't the new Halo "up to 4K/60fps"? That whole game is last gen.My guess is when your talking 4k native at 60fps the series x can cope. But the ps5 is struggling. Of course its capable of 30fps. But thats last gen. This gen, people want 60fps in multi plats which traditionally focus on multiplayer elements.
It means its exclusive at launch. If it was a perm exclusive deal, they'd use different terminology.
It's coming to PS5 down the line. You're delusional if you think otherwise
max teoretical xsx tf is 12.147 and ps5 10.275 so 18.48% (probably performance differ slightly bigger in games due variable clocks of ps5 and higher bandwidth of xsx), it's more like rtx 2080 vs rtx 2070 super
I hope you are quite young.You can't do math.
but they didnt wanted to create problems for developers.
Another topic where people cant accept that XSX is stronger.
Well a developer with a console launch exclusive is saying otherwise. They know more than you so I will choose to believe them.
Another topic where people cant accept that XSX is stronger.
He hasn't promised anything. He gave numbers that very well could be in a best case scenario that's not easy to achieve. All I'm trying to say is Cerny who has things to gain or lose in this can't be taken without any scrutiny, which is what all the pro variable clocks comments are doing.If I understand correctly, Cerny is an outside advisor to Sony. He would only hurt himself if he didn't keep what he promised, especially since Sony is a big client.
It depends on the console from whose perspective the calculation is being made. However, it makes more sense to calculate the difference of the PlayStation 5's power in terms of the Xbox Series X's power rather than the Xbox Series X's power in terms of the PlayStation 5's power, since the Xbox Series X is the standard for performance out of the two due to being the more powerful box.10.28 * 1.18 = 12.13. It's 18% more powerful.
Another info, this time from Jeff Grubb...
...but he is probably also Microsoft shill seeking for attention
From 28:30
Sarcasm. There were a bunch of people on here playing the FP16 secret sauce trumpet in regards to the Pro and X, pretending the Pro is actually more powerful.Why would we? They're both based on the same AMD CPU and GPU architecture. Its like asking if the 2080 can do something that the 2080ti cant.
It depends on the console from whose perspective the calculation is being made. However, it makes more sense to calculate the difference of the PlayStation 5's power in terms of the Xbox Series X's power rather than the Xbox Series X's power in terms of the PlayStation 5's power, since the Xbox Series X is the standard for performance out of the two due to being the more powerful box.
Wait so you think that just because the PS5 has more power than the One X it will be able to do everything at native 4K just because it's the same amount of pixels?Not relevant. Resolution is resolution and 4.000 pixels are 4.000 pixels this gen, next gen and the one after that.
That makes it 18.1%.
Still bigger than difference between 2060 and 2070.
And real figures could be much worse, due to 10.28 being "max" not typical/average.
Of course its relevant. It could be pr talk, but the fact that his designs are used on PC and Xbox means it isn't pr talk. Vs Spencer who has done... What?Because he has a boss and that boss' job is to make sure they make money. Like all specs given its pretty much always best case scenario. Best case isn't necessarily easy to achieve.
None of that is relevant. I showed Cerny speaking pr talk yet the variable clocks is taken as gospel when it could very well be pr.
Plus, let's not forget about VRS, which alone can boost the performance by stupid levels, and elevate the gap even further:
Exactly, almost 20% difference is the best case scenario, assuming there's light CPU usage and, so depending on the game the difference can be god knows how much, 25-30%? Plus, let's not forget about VRS, which alone can boost the performance by stupid levels, and elevate the gap even further:
You're both right. I think both of you can do math, but can't do math vocabulary.10.28 * 1.18 = 12.13. It's 18% more powerful.
This is funny. Go back and watch the digital foundry comparison of Call of Duty Ghosts on the xb1 and ps4......
He leaked the re8 village stuff and the fact ono was punted off SF6 project so I'd believe him over you![]()
Great to be you I guess, most people don't have your setup, and won't for a long time.
And then, I have to ask the obvious question, if you are fortunate enough to get the best of the best why you bother with console gaming?
Honestly mate, I don't think many people care about either game. The Gunk looks like a cutesy platformer, and that's covered by R&C. Scorn has been in development hell and nobody knows anything about the game. 2 games with little hype behind them from no-name developers.Sounds like he shut down a journalist desperate for a PS5 version. Looking forward to its release this year so I can read all the posts in the OT reminding me its coming to the PS5 with no evidence, confirmation, or date to present.
Exact quoteOf course its relevant. It could be pr talk, but the fact that his designs are used on PC and Xbox means it isn't pr talk. Vs Spencer who has done... What?
On PC platform developers dont need to optimize their games just for one GPU. They also dont need to build gamers with certain resolution / performance target, because PC gamers can adjust these things accordingly by themselves.What problems for devs? LOL. Looks like they don't have problems with variable clocks on PC.
He's not wrong and it's not pr.Exact quote
"It's possible to perform two 16-bit operations at the same time, instead of one 32-bit operation. In other words, with full floats, PS4 Pro has 4.2 teraflops of computational power. With half floats, it now has double that -- which is to say, 8.4 teraflops of computational power. As I'm sure you understand, this has the potential to radically increase the performance of games,"
That didn't happen. It was pr speak to make it sound better to dumb people. It wasn't new and it wasn't invented by Cerny.
I'm not saying Phil isn't a pr machine, he is. What I'm saying is Cerny has used pr talk to make things sound better then they are so how can we be sure this time is different?
Call it a waste if u want. Its still higher. And anyway, MS have talked about ai learning in the xsx meaning they may come up with a dlss alternative.So, 18% difference is native 4k on XSX and 1800p on PS5 with same graphical settings. WTF is wrong with that? Well, PS5 is fake 4k. LOL
Didn't someone from Digital Foundry not so long time ago said that native 4k is a waste of resources?
We're talking multi plats. Not exclusive titles. Try again though.Wasn't the new Halo "up to 4K/60fps"? That whole game is last gen.
Ah ok so in that case, you must know all his contacts, and the contacts of the contacts. You do realise people have conversations. You do know people who work with one dev, will more than likely have friends working for other devs. People talk.So he leaked some capcom game stuff, that means he must know sony and MS pricing.
He must also know about other 3rd party games going by that logic....
Logical....continue..../s
Love how bad Xbox showings and news leads to apologetic media reactions and bad PS5 rumors. They no longer bother saying "Devs are telling me", it's just full on "I think". Oh and rumored big time exclusives on PS5 obviously lead to outrage and bargaining(they need exclusives because PS5 is weak).
The 360 really was a homerun with that generation huh?
It's on 3 different systems, how is that not multiplatform?We're talking multi plats. Not exclusive titles. Try again though.