Entroyp
Member
Shu is my fav exec he's a real gamer not those fruit cake car salesmen tht look creepy and think they are cool because they wear a gaming shirt, so cringy lol
I’ve been watching his Fall Guys videos, dude has some skills.
Shu is my fav exec he's a real gamer not those fruit cake car salesmen tht look creepy and think they are cool because they wear a gaming shirt, so cringy lol
He be gaming lol he loves his switch too lolI’ve been watching his Fall Guys videos, dude has some skills.
Chances are next to zero. One does not play with yields.So what are peoples thoughts on the PS5 having 38CUs maybe.![]()
Sony will not price the PS5 at 449$ It makes no sense. I f they do, MS will also decrease the price of the X to 449$. Both MS and Sony leave 50$ on the table
Sony will price the PS5 at 499$ to reach equilibrium (most probable scenario) or at 549$ if they believe their brand power is sufficient (it is).
399$ for the DE is a bold move. No way a disc-drive is worth 100$. I predict 449$. If there's too great a price difference between the DE and the full fat PS5, people will massivly go for the cheaper version.
So what are peoples thoughts on the PS5 having 38CUs maybe.![]()
To be brutally honest, if an extra $100 for a 5-10 year investment is a lot of money, you probably shouldn't be spending $300 on a gaming console in the first place.
My backlog of games that I HAVE CHOSEN is already big, that's why I don't bother about a service with games someone else chose. Maybe get a 1-month low price promotion just for one or two eventually.Same for stuff like Gold and PS+ games
All they've done is give me a bigger library of games I won't bother to install lol
Well, I think it makes sense if people wait for deals when there are no or few games that interest them. But trying to save $100 by buying an inferior product AT LAUNCH doesn't.This has always been the strangest logic to me. Many who are interested will absolutely wait on a better price, either via price cut or a BF deal. You think there is something wrong with these individuals?
Sony will not price the PS5 at 449$ It makes no sense. I f they do, MS will also decrease the price of the X to 449$. Both MS and Sony leave 50$ on the table
Sony will price the PS5 at 499$ to reach equilibrium (most probable scenario) or at 549$ if they believe their brand power is sufficient (it is).
399$ for the DE is a bold move. No way a disc-drive is worth 100$. I predict 449$. If there's too great a price difference between the DE and the full fat PS5, people will massivly go for the cheaper version.
Well, I think it makes sense if people wait for deals when there are no or few games that interest them. But trying to save $100 by buying an inferior product AT LAUNCH doesn't.
Why would I be salty I'll be playing the game on my ps4 lol. I'm not the one trashing cross generation games. That is the advantage of buying them all I get a chance to play them all. I was just asking people to be consistent.Don't be so salty just because a big studio with a budget of 500kk and 5 years of production couldn't deliver a crossgen game that looked better than one made by a small 14-person studio.
The absolute insanity around PS5's pricing is reaching new heights. From this, a new philosophical paradox has arised:
Schrödinger's PS5
The PS5 is simultaenously too costly to manufacture and so much worse than the Xbox Series X that
This new paradox goes hand in hand with two new paradoxes created by next-gen propaganda and is being added to two existing paradoxes:
- it cannot be priced at 399/499 because they would lose too much money
- It cannot be priced at 449/549 or 499/599 because there's no value to it
The Power Paradox
Which states that a console's power can only be used as an argument depending on how powerful the console is compared to a Sony product
The Speed Paradox
- The PS5 is underpowered and will hold back the Series X
- The Series S is fine and will not hold back the Series S
Which states that a console's speed can only be measured if the manufacturer cannot show it
- Sony showing R&C loading new levels in 2 seconds does not prove virtually no loading screens and that the console is faster than the XSX / XSS
- Microsoft showing two games taking >10 seconds to load a save does not prove that the console is not slower than the PS5.
In case people want to tune in![]()
Wait what who?
hes right 6 tflops is not the same as 4 rdna 2.0 tflops. that would be 5 polaris tflops = 4 rdna 2.0 tflops.Tom now saying teraflops ain’t important all of a sudden
![]()
Tom now saying teraflops ain’t important all of a sudden
![]()
Unless someone mentions PS5 TFs, then feel free to ridicule them for their measly 9TFsTom now saying teraflops ain’t important all of a sudden
![]()
Basically this dude is doing Microsoft’s job. and which payroll he is on?Tom now saying teraflops ain’t important all of a sudden
![]()
Tom now saying teraflops ain’t important all of a sudden
![]()
Some are skeptical with Godfall, but if it was an XSX exclusive it'll be the best game so far there.
What’s wrong with wanting your system of choice to be the most powerful ?Get the Series X then?
Seen here trying to bring the balance to the force.Golem doing his regular balancing work.
I'm sure you're already on the trainA ticket for me aswell please
"Don't get fixated on Teraflops .... unless we're talking shit about the PS5."Tom now saying teraflops ain’t important all of a sudden
![]()
He'll yeah, shit looks fire to me so I'm in day one. Easily better than anything we've heard from Microsoft which says alotSome are skeptical with Godfall, but if it was an XSX exclusive it'll be the best game so far there.
I'm gonna go out on a limb and ask, is this an example of sony fans harassing the guy and making him out to be a villian, simply because of something he said that they don't like?
What’s wrong with wanting your system of choice to be the most powerful ?
PS4 was more powerful than Xbone last gen at launch.
I won’t get Xbox because Playstation has the best exclusives and honestly I hate the Xbox dashboard design.
Yup, they all have shit gameplay and stories.Sony first party: it's all about graphics.
Tom now saying teraflops ain’t important all of a sudden
![]()
I'm gonna go out on a limb and ask, is this an example of sony fans harassing the guy and making him out to be a villian, simply because of something he said that they don't like?
Yup, they all have shit gameplay and stories.
Wait...
Thanks i can see me now, both of me! I suppose this means i need to buy 2 ps5sI'm sure you're already on the train
Oh well two tickets for you, I've put you on top so you can see lol
![]()
Sure they are, all that walking simulation in Gran Turismo, Dreams and MLB and so on. Gran Turismo, The Real Walking Simulator.First Party Sony titles are all the same. All walking simulators, all third boring person action game. Please. Welcome to Playstation, since 2009, we offer you every year the same genre of games.
Why ask? Are you a sony ninja?
(Btw, are they real? and that they lurk the forums?)
I think we should at least be happy that a small team can deliver something like this right at the beginning of generation, makes you think what big teams will be able to offer.Whilst looking a bit better I still see no shadows sometimes where there should be, in the previous trailers they are there under different lighting conditions, more direct sunlight, but also not there for eg when there's a fire burning youd expect shadows cast, but not to be. Not a lot of environmental movement or destruction either.
I dont think its a surprise this probably won't be featured in the big show coming up, its a smallish team and looks quite fun but its not really pushing the next gen feel outside of metrics.
Warhawk? Everybody's golf? Singstar? Wipeout? Buzz? Little Big planet? Tokyo Jungle?First Party Sony titles are all the same. All walking simulators, all third boring person action game. Please. Welcome to Playstation, since 2009, we offer you every year the same genre of games.
The PCB needs additional layers for a 320bits bus compres with 256bits bus... that is the reason nVidia tries do avoid big buses colored with AMD using even the hell expensive PCB for 512bits bus.The PCB and RAM cost differences are very likely negligible. I think the reason MS is only going with 16GB is to keep the costs down and comparable to what a 16GB setup with uniform chips would be.
The APU cost differences are unknown. Yes, its a smaller APU, but the APU has to hit much higher clocks and that does impact yields. The end result could be that both APU's are very similar in cost.
I guess my point in the end is that I expect both to be very close in their actual BOM.