Well, to die is a common (but not inevitable) thing that happens when someone gets shot.From Die shots?
![]()
It costs only a couple of dollars on Udemy and you're all set!I love how everyone is a silicone engineer all of a sudden and can immediately identify weak spots in the chip design.
PS5 is more based off of RDNA1 architecture
So that's Mark Cerny's secret sauce™It costs only a couple of dollars on Udemy and you're all set!
![]()
Design a CPU: Learn Computer Architecture by Building Your Own
Computer Architecture and Designwww.udemy.com
![]()
He is the course tutor.So that's Mark Cerny's secret sauce™
Didn't someone get shot? Who died?
Isn't RDNA 2 based off RNDA 1?So basically what this seems to boil down to is what i got banned in the speculation thread for saying... PS5 is more based off of RDNA1 architecture and was ready for release probably at least a year before XSX... PS5 tools had MUCH more time to mature. XSX was waiting for more RDNA2 features to implement so tools are way behind. Hence why we are seeing PS5 keeping up at the moment. Once XSX hits its full stride and the tools have a chance to mature more it very well may had an advantage period moving forward. *tooools
Missing those FPU features, huh?I have nothing to add.
Are you going to belive this rumour? Seems fake
I just realized this is a new video. I remember the one he did for PS5.side note here - Locuza is one of the good guys. If he delivered ammo for either of the Fanboys it was 100% unintentional - if anything he gave the Sony camp some ammo by soing his latest "Xbox X = RDNA2 ? Video..
because he discovered that not every aspüect of their chip is full rdna2.
You mean whatever fits your narrative, if you want to try and defend someone who spreads rumours, and then shouts it on twitter like he believes it, then that's on you.Terms like RDNA 3 features, is putting the cart before the horse, maybe he should've said this PS5 feature is likely to appear in RDNA 3, maybe that could've been more palatable to you (I doubt it)
But click bait videos aside, and you obviously haven't watched any of them, he indicated every one of the things you mentioned was a rumour and to be taken with a pinch of salt.
What I imagine happened is he reached out to ask his sources why PS5 was outperforming the Series X and got a few guesses in return. Hardly worth burning him at the stake for really. But whatever fits the narrative you've built for yourself.
Isn't RDNA 2 based off RNDA 1?
Which is why it's called RDNA 2
Only difference, is it has Ray Tracing and Infinity Cache.
No wonder you got banned.
And if that's the case, why doesn't XBSX has Infinity Cache?
Which is a RDNA 2 feature.
I think Cerny is right when he said the PS5 is based on RDNA 2.
You only need to keep what would benefit your console.
Isn't RDNA 2 based off RNDA 1?
Which is why it's called RDNA 2
Only difference, is it has Ray Tracing and Infinity Cache.
No wonder you got banned.
And if that's the case, why doesn't XBSX has Infinity Cache?
Which is a RDNA 2 feature.
I think Cerny is right when he said the PS5 is based on RDNA 2.
You only need to keep what would benefit your console.
How does that image relate to PS5?![]()
So going by this the PS5 has its own version of VRS via the GE. As the PS5 is supposedly the older RB.
I'd be very surprised if there isn't VRS in the PS5, especially when you have to consider VR.
So basically what this seems to boil down to is what i got banned in the speculation thread for saying... PS5 is more based off of RDNA1 architecture and was ready for release probably at least a year before XSX... PS5 tools had MUCH more time to mature. XSX was waiting for more RDNA2 features to implement so tools are way behind. Hence why we are seeing PS5 keeping up at the moment. Once XSX hits its full stride and the tools have a chance to mature more it very well may had an advantage period moving forward. *tooools
No, you are wrong. PS5 is based on RDNA2, that's not under debate. What we are trying to understand is what makes a PS5 perform like an XSX.
Can't it simply be because of the extra 0.4GHz?At this point it seems like it's running on magic. Loads of theories but no benchmarks to prove them.
i guess he will make another PS5 Video now that we have the silicon photo..I just realized this is a new video. I remember the one he did for PS5.
This one is interesting....
Agree, he's one of those highly informed posters that I sit back and try to take in what they're saying.
I think PS5 performs just like PS5.No, you are wrong. PS5 is based on RDNA2, that's not under debate. What we are trying to understand is what makes a PS5 perform like an XSX.
Can't it simply be because of the extra 0.4GHz?
Funny thing is, I got banned on that thread... for arguing with those morons.
I think the mods were on the side of their bullshit and got bothered but all the technical information that I was posting there that they couldn't argue against, they decided to eject me from there instead of trying to prove me wrong.
By the way, MODS! Why I'm still blocked from the speculation thread? Time isn't proving who was right in that discussion?
Yep, I didn't buy it one bit, and now it's clearly been put to rest. I said from the get go I needed to see actually released games to believe it, and I've gotten that in convincing fashion. At least in my case once I see evidence disputing a belief I have, I accept it and move on. Do you all still believe PS5's CPU has a unified L3 cache and that the PS5 has infinity cache? There was never any basis for any of that, but here we are.Same as you didn't buy the hardware RT from Cerny? Then you whined later why you got attacked. Poor guy!
no one is expecting that ps5 perfom like the xsx and ppl not debating this.No, you are wrong. PS5 is based on RDNA2, that's not under debate. What we are trying to understand is what makes a PS5 perform like an XSX.
This has a very slight almost invisible side effect of making every single component of PS5's GPU around 20% faster/stronger than XSX's counterpart, this can't possibly have an effect on performance, how dare you?Can't it simply be because of the extra 0.4GHz?
it's cerny magicAt this point it seems like it's running on magic. Loads of theories but no benchmarks to prove them.
Did you see how excited longdi got when he thought he had something to beat down the PS5 with??? He was in a such a rush to gloat he completely forgot to read the context of the thread. Then the rest of the warriors arrived. The worst ones are the ones that pretend they are neutral or think they are smart thinking they are fooling anyone.Why everyone is suddenly so eager to accept that PS5's CPU doesn't have native AVX-256 despite Cerny's clear statement about it? Am i missing something? It was just an early wild guess from Locuza, they think now that Sony just removed the FADD block deemed to be redundant.
I don't think the average buyer would be interested in this? Outside of gaming forums like this nobody cares.Why doesn't Sony just release the die shot diagrams themselves just like MS? What is the point of keeping it all secret?
The right question should actually be: why the XSX is not performing like a 12tf RDNA GPU? Because the PS5 does seem to perform like a 10tf GPU.No, you are wrong. PS5 is based on RDNA2, that's not under debate. What we are trying to understand is what makes a PS5 perform like an XSX.
The right question should actually be: why the XSX is not performing like a 12tf RDNA GPU? Because the PS5 does seem to perform like a 10tf GPU.
Upon checking on your Basically, shitting up the thread and preventing actual discussion.
Basically, shitting up the thread and preventing actual discussion.
To be clear i am not accusing anyone of anything, this is a speculation thread essentially, of course that people will speculate as they wish both ways as long as it's in a respectful and nonantagonistic manner. I was just a little perplexed about the speed of eagerness based on someone's first impression about the matter, that's all.Did you see how excited longdi got when he thought he had something to beat down the PS5 with??? He was in a such a rush to gloat he completely forgot to read the context of the thread. Then the rest of the warriors arrived. The worst ones are the ones that pretend they are neutral or think they are smart thinking they are fooling anyone.
No.So basically what this seems to boil down to is what i got banned in the speculation thread for saying... PS5 is more based off of RDNA1 architecture and was ready for release probably at least a year before XSX... PS5 tools had MUCH more time to mature. XSX was waiting for more RDNA2 features to implement so tools are way behind. Hence why we are seeing PS5 keeping up at the moment. Once XSX hits its full stride and the tools have a chance to mature more it very well may had an advantage period moving forward. *tooools
Yep, I didn't buy it one bit, and now it's clearly been put to rest. I said from the get go I needed to see actually released games to believe it, and I've gotten that in convincing fashion. At least in my case once I see evidence disputing a belief I have, I accept it and move on. Do you all still believe PS5's CPU has a unified L3 cache and that the PS5 has infinity cache? There was never any basis for any of that, but here we are.
The right question should actually be: why the XSX is not performing like a 12tf RDNA GPU? Because the PS5 does seem to perform like a 10tf GPU.
The unified cache stuff was always odd considering Sony's own diagram showing cache scrubbers showed a cache only attached to the GPU, not the CPU.There is a difference. Hardware RT was confirmed by system architect directly during presentation.
You called it crap for no good reason.
Unified L3 cache was just a rumor and speculation. There is a reason to call it crap since 1st rumor appeared. And that's OK
Fixation on teraflops. That's an incurable disease apparently. Even the passing time and accumulation of knowledge doesn't seem to help it.Bottle necks?
Then there are those saying that cross gen games don't use the extra TFs. But Control proves that it isn't the case.
I give you A for effort but an F for execution as I am simply making fun of the childish Sony bots. The joke is on you because I own both systems and adore both for different reasons. Try a lil harder next time little friend. GG.1.5/10
no one is expecting that ps5 perfom like the xsx and ppl not debating this.
And I'm saving this post in case xsx (like eveyone is expecting) when engine will change and utilize rdna2 feature you will say " but but but we know this "
There is a difference. Hardware RT was confirmed by system architect directly during presentation.
You called it crap for no good reason.
Unified L3 cache was just a rumor and speculation. There is a reason to call it crap since 1st rumor appeared. And that's OK
FUD machine.maybe it was a last minute downgrade after mark speech?