CheeseCake
Member
Even though the whole "Starfield is only on Xbox" is pretty obvious (and anyone who believes otherwise is a concerned troll), this guy has always been a dick.
Last edited:
But Starfield is a first party game.
They can't be upset because twitter and other places told us for years they all have "High-end gaming pc's" that's a lie from youThis only upsets sony fanboy with no pc
Honestly how many Playstation fanboys are there out there that also have a nice gaming rig?This only upsets sony fanboy with no pc
Honestly how many Playstation fanboys are there out there that also have a nice gaming rig?
Have you been living under a rock the past 10 years?Yeah … no.
Please show us proof of Xbox fans actually saying that. Otherwise it never happened, just Sony fanboys loosely putting together words and twisting it.
I mentioned this long ago.
But it makes perfect sense for Starfield to be the first Xbox exclusive for Bethesda.
Fallout and Elder Scrolls are a known quantity. They have the past sales data to know how much money they would miss out if they don't sell it on Playstation.
However, Starfield is a new IP. Even if it is just a reskinned Skyrim In Space, technically it is like Bloodborne for Sony (instead of part of the Darksouls franchise).
And the thing is that there is no loyal customers of Starfield out there, no expectations and nobody to get mad. Further there is no sales data, so the stock market wouldn't be able to compare the Starfield sales with past versions of its self that was multiplat, as it doesn't exist before.
So Xbox obviously want to have Starfield as an Xbox exclusive FIRST, as it is the best one for testing the waters. What would the reception be? How much money would they gain/lose? How much effect if any on Gamepass numbers? And either way would reflect on what Xbox would do with the future projects AFTER Starfield.
I know more people with that combination then Xbox and pc. PS and PC always has been the best combo.
Who is asking you why you don't have an Xbox bro why are you so pressed lolAgreed.
Thats the combo I have lol
I mean...people need to really fucking look at it, its hard to really tell someone like me to buy an XB when their best titles have come to PC.
XB. KOTOR 1 and 2, Halo 1 and 2, Fable, Half Life 2, Doom 3 etc (then fucking ask why I don't own an XB)
XB360 Gears Of War, Mass Effect gets bought by EA, Fable 3 put on PC...yet again (fucking ask why I don't own an XB)
XONE...fuck it, all that shit is now on PC....(then fucking ask why I don't own an XB)
I mean seriously folks lol I didn't care much for what MS put out last gen and I own a gaming PC, why would I then BUY another fucking system to play a set of games by MS I don't even play on PC RIGHT NOW? Thats like saying you don't like EA games, but I keep asking you to buy the EA BOX lol
So if I don't really buy much of what the publisher puts out, I don't see why I'd then pay more money to buy a system for JUST what they put out or something. I don't see that ever really happening, especially with their new stance on PC
I though that XBox don't have exclusives because their games are also on PC?Remember when Xbox Fanboys were arguing that Exclusives were anti-consumer. Fun times lol.
I am talking about percentage of fanboys of PS that also have a PC. Not comparing numbers of PS to XB that own a gaming PC too. I would think being any kind of console fanboy makes it less likely to be into PC gaming too.I know more people with that combination then Xbox and pc. PS and PC always has been the best combo.
Remember when Xbox Fanboys were arguing that Exclusives were anti-consumer. Fun times lol.
I am talking about percentage of fanboys of PS that also have a PC. Not comparing numbers of PS to XB that own a gaming PC too. I would think being any kind of console fanboy makes it less likely to be into PC gaming too.
Why are you mad? lol the fuck?Who is asking you why you don't have an Xbox bro why are you so pressed lol
Did we really need this thesis?Agreed.
Thats the combo I have lol
I mean...people need to really fucking look at it, its hard to really tell someone like me to buy an XB when their best titles have come to PC.
XB. KOTOR 1 and 2, Halo 1 and 2, Fable, Half Life 2, Doom 3 etc (then fucking ask why I don't own an XB)
XB360 Gears Of War, Mass Effect gets bought by EA, Fable 3 put on PC...yet again (fucking ask why I don't own an XB)
XONE...fuck it, all that shit is now on PC....(then fucking ask why I don't own an XB)
I mean seriously folks lol I didn't care much for what MS put out last gen and I own a gaming PC, why would I then BUY another fucking system to play a set of games by MS I don't even play on PC RIGHT NOW? Thats like saying you don't like EA games, but I keep asking you to buy the EA BOX lol
So if I don't really buy much of what the publisher puts out, I don't see why I'd then pay more money to buy a system for JUST what they put out or something. I don't see that ever really happening, especially with their new stance on PC
It never fucking happened. Like literally NEVER happened.Yeah … no.
Please show us proof of Xbox fans actually saying that. Otherwise it never happened, just Sony fanboys loosely putting together words and twisting it.
Have you been living under a rock the past 10 years?
You need proof for that? Damn you must have been born yesterday…
No Xbox fan who isn't a complete idiot ever said exclusives were bad for the industry or anti-consumer. And if anyone did, they are to be ignored.
Who said that?Remember when Xbox Fanboys were arguing that Exclusives were anti-consumer. Fun times lol.
May aswell ask how many Playstation fans are there who are serious gamers and who aren't brokeHonestly how many Playstation fanboys are there out there that also have a nice gaming rig?
Maybe we can start a 12k thread about the possibility of it coming to PlayStation.Even though the whole "Starfield is only on Xbox" is pretty obvious (and anyone who believes otherwise is a concerned troll), this guy has always been a dick.
That hasn't really stopped MS in the past so.... who knows.
I wouldn't be shocked if we saw this 1 year later release on other platforms anyway lol Its hard to tell with MS. They've claimed something was exclusive in the past and lied, they've put their first party titles on rival systems before. Its really hard to just say "but would Sony or Nintendo" when they just don't have a deep history of doing that compared to MS. Either way, its a day 1 for me regardless.
Yeah it’s the reason I’m likely to reinvest in my PC first instead of a PS5 (that and my PC can play a fair amount of stuff and the PS5 is hard to find). Sony keeps eying PC and their console becomes less attractive (like Xbox before it).I mean seriously folks lol I didn't care much for what MS put out last gen and I own a gaming PC, why would I then BUY another fucking system to play a set of games by MS I don't even play on PC RIGHT NOW? Thats like saying you don't like EA games, but I keep asking you to buy the EA BOX lol
So if I don't really buy much of what the publisher puts out, I don't see why I'd then pay more money to buy a system for JUST what they put out or something. I don't see that ever really happening, especially with their new stance on PC
Narrator: there were, in fact, 3 ‘lols’Did we really need this thesis?
You could have just said "I have a big... PC" and be done with it. Lost me at the 5th 'lol'
Honestly how many Playstation fanboys are there out there that also have a nice gaming rig?
Yes, this was my immediate thought when I read his actual response and not just the title of this thread.'Launching exclusively' is still quite unclear....
Is it perpetual or is it just for launch?
Of course the xbox guys are going to say it will be exclusive forever but it needs to be clarified beyond doubt and that statement from Greenberg just didn't do that. IMO.
Don't be obtuse. Your own prophet said it.Showme
the
comments
where
that
was
said.
Must be loads of proof everywhere on the internet right… right? Yeah thought so.
Exclusives aren't bad, but they may be somewhat annoying because sometimes they force you to buy a new hardware to play the game you want.
But Starfield isn't "exclusive" since MS allows me to play it on my PC too, that's the point, they didn't force me to buy a new console.
No, not really.Remember when Xbox Fanboys were arguing that Exclusives were anti-consumer. Fun times lol.
Sales do not matter for games in gamepass. Using it as a metric is like making a big deal that x artist CD didn't sell as well as an album from 2010...the data used to track success for a gamepass game is totally different and as said is more about engagement than pure sales. I do agree that Starfield is a good BGS game to first launch into gamepass only cause its the next one. But based on history Elderscrolls being exclusive would have been twice as big of a controversy but also twice as good for Xbox next holiday season. Tho both should do extremely well on the platform. Wouldn't be surprised if they become the most played games on it.I mentioned this long ago.
But it makes perfect sense for Starfield to be the first Xbox exclusive for Bethesda.
Fallout and Elder Scrolls are a known quantity. They have the past sales data to know how much money they would miss out if they don't sell it on Playstation.
However, Starfield is a new IP. Even if it is just a reskinned Skyrim In Space, technically it is like Bloodborne for Sony (instead of part of the Darksouls franchise).
And the thing is that there is no loyal customers of Starfield out there, no expectations and nobody to get mad. Further there is no sales data, so the stock market wouldn't be able to compare the Starfield sales with past versions of its self that was multiplat, as it doesn't exist before.
So Xbox obviously want to have Starfield as an Xbox exclusive FIRST, as it is the best one for testing the waters. What would the reception be? How much money would they gain/lose? How much effect if any on Gamepass numbers? And either way would reflect on what Xbox would do with the future projects AFTER Starfield.
Yes, like 1st party games that got released on PS after being acquired by MS like Minecraft Story Mode, Psyconauts 2, Quake 2021 or the other games that got DLCs and updates after the acquisition on PS like Minecraft, Fallout 76, Elders Scrolls Online, Doom Eternal etc.
I couldn't find the one were he said exclusives are anti consumer but this is close enoughYeah … no.
Please show us proof of Xbox fans actually saying that. Otherwise it never happened, just Sony fanboys loosely putting together words and twisting it.
Yes, I agree.MineCraft is it's own Mega brand that will stay multiplat.
Psychonaughts, Deathloop, etc. were already under contract or nearly finished.
ESO, FO76, etc are existing titles that they will continue to support as they should.
Quake 2021 is a legacy title. Which Xbox execs clearly mentioned legacy titles would also continue to be cross platform titles.
I would expect any other legacy remakes to be cross plat.
We'll see. I think some will be full console exclusive and other will be 'first (timed console exclusive) or best (multi since day one) on Xbox' as the boss of Xbox finances said. As an example, I think Indiana Jones will be multi day one, and if not after a timed exclusivity.All future AAA Titles is what will be exclusive.
yeah and if you look beyond a clickbait headline he saysDon't be obtuse. Your own prophet said it.
![]()
Kotaku | Gaming Reviews, News, Tips and More.
Gaming Reviews, News, Tips and More.www.kotaku.com.au
If you don’t mind me asking, why does it suck?The ship of Starfield on PS5 sailed when Microsoft dropped billions on a publisher with an army of studios. The sooner people accept it the less frustrated they’ll be. Yes it sucks. No, you can’t do anything about it.
Yeah it’s the reason I’m likely to reinvest in my PC first instead of a PS5 (that and my PC can play a fair amount of stuff and the PS5 is hard to find). Sony keeps eying PC and their console becomes less attractive (like Xbox before it).
Narrator: there were, in fact, 3 ‘lols’