Wow perfectly stated! The idea that it was special hardware and not developer optimization was a always silly notion. UE4 can run fantastically on all types of hardware but the devs still have to put in the work. This confirms that yet again.
You do know this was a joke post right?
is it ? its 20-30% perf advantage in quality mode not much far from 20-25% theoreticaly faster xsx gpu, as df said they should just use dynamic rest probably 1440p-4k on ps5 and 1620p-4k on xsx
The game still plays pretty smooth in my eyes. Seriously if some of you guys get bothered this much by few pixels and frames then what the hell are guys doing playing on consoles? Buy a PC and be done with it.
That's my platform of choice most of the time. I was lucky to get a 3080 at msrp so I'm not worried. I'm just having a bit of fun.
I like when people bring this up because it's peak irony. Surely you realize that the point you're making works both ways?
So this time the xbox got the 'optimization' and the PlayStation didn't? What gives?
The pop-in is because it's a lazy port. The pop-in is necessary on the last gen consoles, but certainly not on current gen ones. They could've fixed it if they wanted to, even on UE4.
Dragon Quest 11 "definitive" was the same. Luckily Unreal 4 can be tweaked to mitigate the worst.
was it? What about the other 30+ posts in that thread?
I find it weird everyone is saying XBSX has a big performance advantage, but I don't see it.
There was no side by side comparison, not to mention XBSX also drops in the 30s at the 9m19s mark.
I hope Digital Foundry isn't purposely withholding findings to make XBSX look good?
In this particular case, I wonder if they developed mainly for Xbox and did minor porting job to PlayStation. The marketing is certainly Xbox-centric.
I find it weird everyone is saying XBSX has a big performance advantage, but I don't see it.
There was no side by side comparison, not to mention XBSX also drops in the 30s at the 9m19s mark.
I hope Digital Foundry isn't purposely withholding findings to make XBSX look good?
Bro what the fuck Xbox one did you have
its becoming like most of the time ...as expected to be and no pls don't @ me isn't console war is just specs
I find it super unlikely that a Tales game was developed for Xbox first. The previous three Tales games are not even available on Xbox.
No reason to get all defensive.
If you paid attention, I was always talking about the tech side as to way PS5 outperform XBSX.
I find it weird everyone is saying XBSX has a big performance advantage, but I don't see it.
There was no side by side comparison, not to mention XBSX also drops in the 30s at the 9m19s mark.
I hope Digital Foundry isn't purposely withholding findings to make XBSX look good?
So only with the power of the PS5 a game can game run 4k 60fps with raytracing? Still haven't heard a good reason Medium has raytracing on Xbox and PS5 did not especially with your claims.
Leyasu
said and go with games being as good as the time developers take with it. Both consoles are capable of delivering similar performance.
Yea, I get the console war stuff.
SMH if that's how you read it.So only with the power of the PS5 a game can game run 4k 60fps raytracing? Still haven't heard a good reason Medium has raytracing on Xbox and PS5 did not especially with your claims.
I'll stick with what
I think it's pretty obvious XSX has the lead on performance here. I see no reason why DF would try to make the XSX look better, they have never shied away from showing games that have performance advantages on PS5. Besides, the video findings match what Elanalistadebits found as well.
I don't think that the Ghostrunner thread is eating anyone up.
So should tales have been 4k 60hz with RT? I don't get you?
