I don't see it. He's basically just confirmed everything Phil already said. Only difference is he's bitching and calling it "inadequate." That's literally all that's happened. MS isn't lying to anyone in the middle of a large acquisition reviewed by governments around the world. People here just can't read.
This is what Phil wrote in the blog the day after they were questioned by UK regulators:
https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2022/09/01/gaming-everyone-everywhere/
We’ve heard that this deal might take franchises like Call of Duty away from the places where people currently play them. That’s why, as we’ve said before, we are committed to making the same version of Call of Duty available on PlayStation on the same day the game launches elsewhere. We will continue to enable people to play with each other across platforms and across devices. We know players benefit from this approach because we’ve done it with Minecraft, which continues to be available on multiple platforms and has expanded to even more since Mojang joined Microsoft in 2014.
He basically suggested this would be like Minecraft when actually they had already decided months ago, before the deal was closed, when they would make COD exclusive.
Regulators won't like this

Last edited: