reinking
Gold Member
Is that his poop pouch hanging off of his belt?
Is that his poop pouch hanging off of his belt?
You believe this because they tried hard to downplay the impact of Call of Duty.
Anyone with common sense knows they were bullshitting in order to get the deal passed.
Is that his poop pouch hanging off of his belt?
I've said this before but Phil Spencer to me is a wartime general.
Is there a stage of grieving called delusion?If MS give up COD, we have the answer and they weren't bullshitting.
Near the end game here. Looks like MS got more pushback than they anticipated.
You're using an old script, please log back into your ms astroturfing account and find the new one.Microsoft is more interested in Blizzard than COD.
King is their number 1 desire, Blizzard number 2 and Activision number 3.
It's an onion tied to his belt, which was the style at the time.Is that his poop pouch hanging off of his belt?
We just have nothing in common with the continentals aside from 99% of the common aspects of our nations. Simple really.*Ahem*
Do I need to remind you, Brexit means Brexit.
Ke?Is there a stage of grieving called delusion?
They've been used to a period of relaxed regulatory scrutiny. If this gets blocked, it will mark a pause in this period of gaming industry consolidation.Considering the size of the deal it's ridiculous that they seem to have approached this with such a degree of complacency.
What I said was accurate, regardless of how many disagree with me here.
What you said is opinion. Accuracy has nothing to do with it.What I said was accurate, regardless of how many disagree with me here.
My opinion tends to hold a lot of weight with me. So there is that.What you said is opinion. Accuracy has nothing to do with it.
![]()
They've been used to a period of relaxed regulatory scrutiny. If this gets blocked, it will mark a pause in this period of gaming industry consolidation.
Lots of unfounded dismissal in this thread. Look at the price ATVI is currently trading at. If you're so confident then put all your money into the stock, it'll be free money (~13.5%).
@3liteDragon it might be worth updating the OP with this:
This article from the FT is far more comprehensive than the market watch article:
[/URL]
Lina Khan is looking to stamp her feet and EU regulators will also be looking into it.
Here's the interview with Lina Khan (starts 6 minutes in):
- He knows Lina Khan is lying in wait watching his every move preparing to pounce and put the Activision Blizzard deal in jeopardy.
Found this gem.
![]()
Found this gem.
![]()
If that were the case then there would have been lawsuits filed ages ago.
I got college classes these days. Dont really have time for a forum.Sounds like a sentence lifted directly from resetera's copium thread. I'm surprisedfeynoob didn't quote it directly.
Jokes aside, the deal faces an uphill battle on 3 separate fronts. If you think office politics at the FTC changes the EU and CMA's findings, you're mistaken. I know Khan's hairstyle and political viewpoint are a factor on era, outside of that bubble those things are non factors.
If the deal collapses this has been a massive botch job from Microsoft. Their initial reading of the state of play, the constant public theatre when silence was the answer, letting the mask slip in terms of their 'good guy / games for all image' by trashing Sony throughout, the Zenimax lies being bought back up - it's hard to imagine that heads won't roll.Well if someone as unqualified as me saw this coming:
And thought/expected they would put a muzzle on Phil (or at least give him strict guidance for what he can and can't say while this deal is in the balance) :
Then I would have thought at the very least they would have wised up a bit and acted/prepared accordingly. But what do I know eh?
Sony is a front for the Yakuza. This is will all come out and MS will be forced to absorb Sony and all their subsidiaries.sony has been indulging in illegal activites in the gaming industry for a long time , amazing discovery and surely the end of playstation
MS has said outright that they need a mobile presence. It has been a big thing for them.You believe this because they tried hard to downplay the impact of Call of Duty.
Anyone with common sense knows they were bullshitting in order to get the deal passed.
sony has been indulging in illegal activites in the gaming industry for a long time , amazing discovery and surely the end of playstation
MS has said outright that they need a mobile presence. It has been a big thing for them.
They also want to increase their PC foothold and communities. WOW gives them this.
COD? Meh, it's another Shooter that will always be on Xbox. It's too big to go exclusive for any console.
Would they love COD? Sure, but I think if push came to shove they would take the other two over it.
You are thinking like a console only gamer.
Again, you are thinking like a console owner that doesn't understand that the Mobile and PC markets are far bigger than console.You're using an old script, please log back into your ms astroturfing account and find the new one.
Says the guy who is cut and pasting the last few replies to me from others.It's rude to read off a script when you're conversing
Is that whats written on the teleprompter?Again, you are thinking like a console owner that doesn't understand that the Mobile and PC markets are far bigger than console.
The entire saga around this deal will be taught in business majors/schools for decades. The pure hubris for them to claim they believed the most expensive acquisition by pure dollar amount would go through uncontested.Considering the size of the deal it's ridiculous that they seem to have approached this with such a degree of complacency.
MS has said outright that they need a mobile presence. It has been a big thing for them.
They also want to increase their PC foothold and communities. WOW gives them this.
COD? Meh, it's another Shooter that will always be on Xbox. It's too big to go exclusive for any console.
Would they love COD? Sure, but I think if push came to shove they would take the other two over it.
You are thinking like a console only gamer.
You believe this because they tried hard to downplay the impact of Call of Duty.
Looks like Super Joost was onto something.
![]()
Where did Sony comment that they were in "private negotiations"?
Open the image, it's in the final paragraph which the way it's embedded in the tweet cut off.
ah yes horrible Sony and their exclusivity deals because Microsoft is altruisticFound this gem.
![]()
Open the image, it's in the final paragraph which the way it's embedded in the tweet cut off.
They didn't because they're private. Or something.Where did Sony comment that they were in "private negotiations"?
They didn't because they're private. Or something.
Looks like Super Joost was onto something.
![]()