StreetsofBeige
Member
People are having fun seeing the clever AI creations and the first thing you think about is faking crimes? Do you live in a bad neighbourhood?
He's just setting up his alibi early. He'll pull up this thread in court and say "See, I wuz set up, I knew this 4 years ago!"
Congrats on winning the long game.....of murder
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
No I'm just a realist and know better than to expect humanity to use this responsibly.
As we have already seen.
Last edited:
Tams
Member
My point is, while regulation and legislation would be a good idea, is already out there.
That's generally fine and workable for companies that can be held accountable.
But AI is already readily and freely available out there. And, like digital piracy, there's almost fuck all you can do to prevent that.
StreetsofBeige
Member
Shakira. Get on licensing your AI voice. I wanna hear her hip shaking vocals in different songs.
And I love Roxette. RIP Marie Fredrikson. Would be awesome if I could hear her sing other songs too.
And I love Roxette. RIP Marie Fredrikson. Would be awesome if I could hear her sing other songs too.
Last edited:
LiquidMetal14
hide your water-based mammals
Damn his oily hide!
Eotheod
Member
The bottle is very well smashed for the AI genie, because the technology is already in the hands of your average joe. Whether we have imitation AI music or "fake" crimes, the technology used is widely available and simplistic enough to create results. There is no stopping AI now outside of regulation, and even then that will not do much due to how outdated laws are once implemented (see digital copyright, social media harassment etc).
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
Bit of a difference though. Any schmuck with a tablet and a wifi connection can go pirate a song or a movie. Programming an AI to sound like someone or create an entire realistic video is not something that any schmuck can do. They either have to have the tech and knowhow themselves or have to be provided it. Harsh penalties and regulation can help limit the spread of the that technology or a company's ability to share it freely without consequences.
Not saying it would stop it entirely, but it could slow the flood before it becomes too widespread.
Revolutionary
Member
Dr.Morris79
Gold Member
I checked out some of these AI remixes, they're good bit they do still sound a bit off, especially the Freddy mercury ones.. but, this made me laugh my arse off..
the escape plan
Neo Member
My thoughts are the song sounds robotic and lacks emotion. Now I'm cleansing my palette with actual Johnny Cash music. 
sharp weiner
Member
The sooner the better!Let's just completely flood and destroy all physical records of human history.
Mr Blobby
Member
alternatively, you have artists like Grimes working with AI, where she's letting creators use her voice and she gets a cut of the revenue
Nobody_Important
“Aww, it’s so...average,” she said to him in a cold brick of passion
If artists are fine with it then go for it!
The problem lies when people hijack peoples image and likeness without permission.
Mr Blobby
Member
for sure. and I can see this being regulated eventually, but like mentioned, it won't stop people doing it. There's also the issue of how they're used e.g. in a derogatory sense and if they're trying to monetize someone's voice. I'm not sure voice is copyrightable, but there are appropriation laws to protect the artist. But what would happen when you combine 2+ artists to create something unique?
Someone should use the sounds of an animal to create a song
Giallo Corsa
Member
Wheeljack539
Member
Some recent ones that are really, really good that should have us all wondering what AI will be able to do by the end of the decade.
Similar threads
- Locked