Jigsaah
Gold Member
Why is she annoyingly hot?I think "waves" is being generous. It was only actually a couple of people.
![]()
Why is she annoyingly hot?I think "waves" is being generous. It was only actually a couple of people.
![]()
![]()
CMA's request to adjourn appeal had nothing to do with FTC loss
The adjournment request from the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) was unaffected by the Federal Trade Commission's loss in the United States.www.tweaktown.com
![]()
They're begging for T2 now lol, these morons are why we can't have nice things in gaming.This thread has got to be one of the most impressive, informative and embarrassing in the history of the forum
It takes a special kind of retarded to support, let alone cheer for massive corporations and extreme purchases like this.
Cause she got a mouth that could suck start a leaf blower.Why is she annoyingly hot?![]()
Why is she annoyingly hot?![]()
Ok mates, quick question: What would the next acquisition have to be to get a new thread as dramatic as this one?
Banned incidentally.
Yeah but to be fair to you guys the CMA had been dealing with far smaller deals and nothing like this. Which meant the whole world is watching and after the FTC had failed (the CMA had aligned themselves very closely to them) they had no where to go.
When the EU gave the deal the thumbs up the CMA were furious as it massively diminished their ruling, but the FTC was still there. After they fell and Microsoft clearly caved somewhat (by how much we'll soon find out) it's best for the UK to comply but still look strong as being the last man standing.
And in fairness you shouldn't either with your bribery peddling theory.
I get the legal expert disclaimer here (I ain't one either) but to me there's no such thing as a "soft-close", once the money gets deposited into shareholders' accounts, the deal's closed worldwide, cause you literally own the company right after the transaction. That's how I see it, I don't know how it exactly works either lol.Here's what I think is going on (keep in mind, I am NOT a legal expert in any way):
MS presented an informal offer to the CMA sometime last week or maybe earlier that the CMA liked, and now the CMA are willing to go through the review process for that offer when it's presented in a legally-binding document by Microsoft. So long as Microsoft do that, they basically have a guarantee from the CMA that they will approve the deal, and MS's people have probably parlayed with ABK people so that ABK don't walk after the 18th, and the $3 billion is either waived or paid back to MS once the deal is completed, at the current $69 billion price (because I think if ABK ask for significantly more, MS would actually walk).
So basically, Microsoft and ABK I guess kind of "soft-close" in the UK on the 18th while officially closing the deal in the other markets where they can already do so (which includes America and European countries). And then they'll officially close in the UK sometime late August. Until then I guess in the UK, ABK will have to be kept more separate in some way, but I don't know how that would be done.
The judge is basically going to ruin the head of the CMA if he can't show the reasoning why it is substantially different, and he cooked the CMA's lack of transparency by saying the Head of the CMA's statement is for 3rd parties to read to understand if they wish to appeal the final order and given a proper process to do so, meaning the backdoor discussions are going to land someone in a lot of trouble. Personally this request of evidence from the CMA is going to end the head of the CMA's legal teams career when the deal shows that Microsoft got all of Activision with zero SLC appeasement.The whole thing is crooked.
CMA were in bed with MS long time ago.
Everyone is in cahoots.The judge is basically going to ruin the head of the CMA if he can't show the reasoning why it is substantially different, and he cooked the CMA's lack of transparency by saying the Head of the CMA's statement is for 3rd parties to read to understand if they wish to appeal the final order and given a proper process to do so, meaning the backdoor discussions are going to land someone in a lot of trouble. Personally this request of evidence from the CMA is going to end the head of the CMA's league teams career when the deal shows that Microsoft got all of Activision with zero SLC appeasement.
The judge also went on attack of Sony being leveraged to sign a deal by asking Microsoft to evidence how they came to have a change of heart, meaning if the deal is now worse, he's going to see that and rule against adjournment.
The corruption by the CMA has probably got the deal over the line, but not because the judge hasn't made a final decision on adjournment which is easy to get from honest people giving evidence. The judge didn't seem convinced and no wonder after he had to read their 500page report.
wouldnt want anyone defaming and slandering megacorporations or government agencies now, would we?And in fairness you shouldn't either with your bribery peddling theory.
It's all for the optics at this point. The wet noodles at the CMA aren't gonna block this under any circumstances. They had three choices: (a) say nothing and proceed with their case; (b) tell today's judge they are just giving MS time to submit something new; or (c) tell today's judge they think a deal can be reached even though they couldn't discuss what would be different. And they chose option c.Looks like they are still preparing for a possible case with the CMA just incase.
The judge also went on attack of Sony being leveraged to sign a deal by asking Microsoft to evidence how they came to have a change of heart, meaning if the deal is now worse, he's going to see that and rule against adjournment.
Transaction takes time.I get the legal expert disclaimer here (I ain't one either) but to me there's no such thing as a "soft-close", once the money gets deposited into shareholders' accounts, the deal's closed worldwide, cause you literally own the company right after the transaction. That's how I see it, I don't know how it exactly works either lol.
The judge is basically going to ruin the head of the CMA if he can't show the reasoning why it is substantially different, and he cooked the CMA's lack of transparency by saying the Head of the CMA's statement is for 3rd parties to read to understand if they wish to appeal the final order and given a proper process to do so, meaning the backdoor discussions are going to land someone in a lot of trouble. Personally this request of evidence from the CMA is going to end the head of the CMA's league teams career when the deal shows that Microsoft got all of Activision with zero SLC appeasement.
The judge also went on attack of Sony being leveraged to sign a deal by asking Microsoft to evidence how they came to have a change of heart, meaning if the deal is now worse, he's going to see that and rule against adjournment.
The corruption by the CMA has probably got the deal over the line, but not because the judge hasn't made a final decision on adjournment which is easy to get from honest people giving evidence. The judge didn't seem convinced and no wonder after he had to read their 500page report.
That's why I assumed that MS offered the same deal that was offered to Sony back in Dec 2022. From the little info we know about it, the agreement Sony signed seems to be materially the same.The judge is basically going to ruin the head of the CMA if he can't show the reasoning why it is substantially different, and he cooked the CMA's lack of transparency by saying the Head of the CMA's statement is for 3rd parties to read to understand if they wish to appeal the final order and given a proper process to do so, meaning the backdoor discussions are going to land someone in a lot of trouble. Personally this request of evidence from the CMA is going to end the head of the CMA's league teams career when the deal shows that Microsoft got all of Activision with zero SLC appeasement.
The judge also went on attack of Sony being leveraged to sign a deal by asking Microsoft to evidence how they came to have a change of heart, meaning if the deal is now worse, he's going to see that and rule against adjournment.
The corruption by the CMA has probably got the deal over the line, but not because the judge hasn't made a final decision on adjournment which is easy to get from honest people giving evidence. The judge didn't seem convinced and no wonder after he had to read their 500page report.
You went hard with this prediction.Not with the CMA, they've got more chance of finding another 8GBs of RAM and a second GPU in the Series power supplies than it being approved here, prior to the 4-6 week timeline the CMA tweeted today of another probe.
But that deal could show that the CMA failed the public by colluding. What he wants in evidence to give the adjournment has about 6 smell tests, and he'll only need one to be off to deny the adjournment.Which is precisely why Jimbo shouldn't have signed any damn deal.
WEll, to be clear I lost and won. Lost cuz I was against the deal, but I voted that the deal would go through with behavioral changes. I guess there's still room for structural changes to ABK, but I kinda doubt it at this point.Fair enough, I guess.DeepEnigma was posting in this thread just last night. Today is a Monday and typically the middle of a work day in the US. You are trying far too hard to look for "meltdowns" and absences for folks who have been part of a really good discussion/debate all along.
Seemed clear that CMA's confidence died with the FTC loss. And I don't disagree with you on the scope of this deal versus priors. This was uncharted territory on a number of levels. For myself, I didn't even know what the CMA was before all this and I certainly know more about M&A than I ever thought I would. lol....quite educational all of this.
Money won.
Aint real life a bitch.
You know what we still may have one more twist in the ending, like the SAW movies![]()
Already antagonizing people.... lolAnd in fairness you shouldn't either with your bribery peddling theory.
I did - didn't see any reference to "corruption" that you've obviously inferred.. You still seem to be really concerned here about SLC when it's been really clear over the past week now that this deal was trending a completely different way between MS and CMA on a number of fronts...did you not watch until the end?
The key to unlocking this deal is hidden deep inside Aaron Greenberg's bum hole. Phil Spencer can only use his tongue and a McDonald's paper straw to get it out. He's got until 5pm tomorrow.You know what we still may have one more twist in the ending, like the SAW movies![]()
WEll, to be clear I lost and won. Lost cuz I was against the deal, but I voted that the deal would go through with behavioral changes. I guess there's still room for structural changes to ABK, but I kinda doubt it at this point.
No meltdowns from me because you learn to roll with the punches. As a good PC player should. Consolidation generally bad, but hey I been a gamepass subscriber since day 1...so yea, kinda played both sides of the fence like a good lil gaming whore.
You know what we still may have one more twist in the ending, like the SAW movies![]()
![]()
I don't understand how you guys can be this naive & not understand the game plan here, even after going through all the internal emails.
WEll, to be clear I lost and won. Lost cuz I was against the deal, but I voted that the deal would go through with behavioral changes. I guess there's still room for structural changes to ABK, but I kinda doubt it at this point.
No meltdowns from me because you learn to roll with the punches. As a good PC player should. Consolidation generally bad, but hey I been a gamepass subscriber since day 1...so yea, kinda played both sides of the fence like a good lil gaming whore.
If it is the same deal or worse, that will fail the judge's smell test no matter what words Microsoft use to describe Sony's change of heart, it will show the FTC decision fed the CMA and then that allowed Microsoft to leverage Sony. Judge won't look kindly on that having compromised the CMA, and then the real competition too. Could get people at the CMA disbarred.That's why I assumed that MS offered the same deal that was offered to Sony back in Dec 2022. From the little info we know about it, the agreement Sony signed seems to be materially the same.
The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruled on Monday that the full hearing of Microsoft's appeal, which was due to begin on July 28, should be adjourned.
Judge Marcus Smith said he was willing to adjourn next week's hearing if the CMA provided set out why it considers there has been a material change in circumstances or special reason justifying its adjournment application.
The judge also asked for the CMA to set out any new consultation process "so that everybody is clear as to how it will work".
I'm sure someone can post more Klob studio jerkoff images.Can we do ourselves a favour and not post Tweets from the usual shills after the deal closes. Them celebrating this deal will be intolerable and we'll only anger ourselves whilst at the same time time give them more exposure.
But if you checked all my recent days I said the chances of both the CMA and CAT being corrupt was close to zero. Judge was as you would expect. Intelligent and principled.That's why I assumed that MS offered the same deal that was offered to Sony back in Dec 2022. From the little info we know about it, the agreement Sony signed seems to be materially the same.
You went hard with this prediction.
I think he means "free to close as of midnight Saturday morning."
Hopefully it ends.So looks like they wont be closing until this is settled.
Who do you think is posting those tweets?Can we do ourselves a favour and not post Tweets from the usual shills after the deal closes. Them celebrating this deal will be intolerable and we'll only anger ourselves whilst at the same time time give them more exposure.