IllegalLemon
Member
3The Lies of P
3The Lies of P
oof I didn't know it runs that bad on laptops like that.. it runs great on the series S/X figured pc specs wouldnt be highYeah straight up potato mode out of the box. It's a heavy game for cheap laptops, which is what a lot of young kids play on.
While the real life performance differential between PS5 and XSX seems to be negligible in most cases, One X was undeniably more powerful than Pro. Did that help with market or mind share? I don't think it did, not very much at least.
I glanced at this thread title a few times..and it just hit me....
30%??
oof I didn't know it runs that bad on laptops like that.. it runs great on the series S/X figured pc specs wouldnt be high
This is nasty work by Phil. And he was acting as if Playstation weren't their main competition. I'd love to know what happened from this day going forward. Why didn't MS capitalize on this moment the way Phil saw it 3.5 years ago? Seriously, what happened?!
Just jumping to say that we shouldn't make this thread about Starfield (there are plenty already).Crayon has taken to the full time job of posting at least 20 negative posts per day about ms.
All this talk about Phil being horrible, sucks at everything, bla bla bla. Ok we get it, he's not perfect, nor is ms. Imagine a world where they actually get credit for the things they have actually done right. Take starfield for instance, here's a game that actually seems to deliver and yet still here we have people full time downplaying the sales, people playing, or even just that the game is very good.
Just jumping to say that we shouldn't make this thread about Starfield (there are plenty already).
But Starfield absolutely did not deliver. It delivered for as many people as Fallout 76 did at launch.
![]()
![]()
And obviously Phil won't say anything bad about Starfield now that he owns it, but he used the word "rough" for Fallout 76 and even considered ditching it and moving on.
![]()
https://www.thegamer.com/fallout-76-shut-down-almost-phil-spencer-low-player-count/
Considering people like or dislike Starfield and Fallout 76 pretty much the same, you can see why people complain about it and why you shouldn't downplay the grievances. There are genuine reasons that shouldn't be chalked up to fanboyish arguments.
Why would you take 81 critics' potentially biased reviews (most of whom didn't even have to buy the game) over 82,000 unbiased reviews from gamers who paid for it?That stat is very weird considering anyone with eyes and a controller knows starfield is much better than fallout.
I'd say take some time and read some more of people impressions of the game on the starfield main thread, they don't seem to match up either, nor does the metacritic scores for the 2 games. (Fallout 76 has 52 metascore vs starfield 84)
Feels like you are cherry picking stats that support your position vs the totality of the situation.
The One X came out a year after the Pro and the market had made its decision by then.
Same reason why if the PS5 Pro is released in Q4 24 and has the ability to play games like GTA6, Cyberpunk, Spider-Man, Wolverine, FF16 e.t.c. at high frame rates and high resolution with features like RTX AND has no competition from Xbox... it doesn't matter if Microsoft puts out a pro console in 2025. It'll be over by then. It doesn't matter if that console is more powerful.
It'll be a year on the market with Sony dominating the mindshare battle of the best place to play. And honestly, not just a year. You look at the last 2 years and that's been the case.
If you look at their potential roadmaps, 2024 and 2025 aren't going to be kind years to Xbox.
When you consider that a new generation is likely to start in 2028 or 2027, buying an XSX Pro that is going to be limited in what cross gen games it gets because of the XSS just becomes folly. It might be a worthwhile upgrade for someone who owns a Series S or X, but new consumers?
Why would you take 81 critics' potentially biased reviews (most of whom didn't even have to buy the game) over 82,000 unbiased reviews from gamers who paid for it?
Interesting, I never used to follow the gaming space closely back in 2016. In fact I never even knew the timelines of the release for the mid-gen refreshes, I thought both the Pro and One X released in the same time frame.
It's starting to make more sense now, I think Xbox had no plans for a mid-gen refresh until they caught wind of what Sony was doing, and they saw it as a good opportunity to ahead of them in terms of the power narrative. They were successful in that sense, I lost count at the amount of times Richard parroted about the "teraflop differential" in almost any video related to either consoles lol
Again, cherry picking, user scores for starfeild on metacritic are 6.6, yet a dismal 2.4 for Fallout, yet you think they are the same?
People still don't seem to get it. MS aren't in this for gaming, they're in it to push operating systems and services. They don't want to compete with Sony as a gaming entity, they want to destroy them so people have no choice but to use their services If they want to game.Thing is most causals would rather buy a ps5 or xbox over making a pc as some of the prices are crazy. I want to upgrade my 1080ti and graphic card prices are wild.
At the end of the day all I want it competition for sony and only one I see giving them that is xbox
I'm talking about Steam user reviews -- where people actually buy and play the games, and you can see the actual time played and reviews by verified purchasers.Again, cherry picking, user scores for starfeild on metacritic are 6.6, yet a dismal 2.4 for Fallout, yet you think they are the same?
I'm talking about Steam user reviews -- where people actually buy and play the games, and you can see the actual time played and reviews by verified purchasers.
I'm not talking about Metacritic user scores. Those are bullshit and easily bombed, so I never even brought them up.
It is apples to apples.If your going to compare apples to apples, curious as to what that number looked like for Fallout 76 when it launched........a 3?
It is apples to apples.
Both are Steam user reviews.
- Fallout 76 = 89,512 reviews | 71.76%
- Starfield = 82,227 reviews | 71.85%
We were not talking about sales. We were talking about why people may have genuine issues with the game. Why would you change the conversation to sales now?Except that no doubt Fallout 76 scores were lower at launch, so it's not.
I also notice that your conveiniently ignoring that there are almost as many Starfeild reviews at 2 weeks than a game that came out 5 years ago, so that's interesting. Clearly it's selling a massively higher amount than fallout 76.
Because at the point there weren't any numbers but the theorical difference in teraflops. They mentioned they had access to the same architecture and opted for the one they choose.When you're writing this e-mail to a CEO and CFO, after being warned specifically about being overly confident by a board of directors, yes, this is a really bad look.
It means as head of Xbox he has no grasp on the realities of the industry and if they can't trust him, how can he lead?
There's a reason why the main thread impressions don't match up, it's full of people like you high on copium. Its your only refuge. But once you look outside of that where reality hits, starefield ain't so pretty.That stat is very weird considering anyone with eyes and a controller knows starfield is much better than fallout.
I'd say take some time and read some more of people impressions of the game on the starfield main thread, they don't seem to match up either, nor does the metacritic scores for the 2 games. (Fallout 76 has 52 metascore vs starfield 84)
Feels like you are cherry picking stats that support your position vs the totality of the situation.
Because at the point there weren't any numbers but the theorical difference in teraflops. They mentioned they had access to the same architecture and opted for the one they choose.
It's not beyond ridiculous at all. What do these tech sites know about about actual chip and hardware design? Do you think Richard Leadbitter knows more or better than Cerny when it comes to the PS5? Or that the actual hardware designers and makers AMD were clueless about the design of the APU in PS5. Do you think they made the design and then told Sony just hope for the best?I literally just quoted you an example from one of the most respected tech sites out there, but go ahead and keep calling it fud spread by xbox shills. I mean crazy that industry magazines and reviewers would question someone who works for the company that is releasing the system, they definately aren't biased at all for thier own work. What your saying is beyond rediculous.
It's not beyond ridiculous at all. What do these tech sites know about about actual chip and hardware design? Do you think Richard Leadbitter knows more or better than Cerny when it comes to the PS5? Or that the actual hardware designers and makers AMD were clueless about the design of the APU in PS5. Do you think they made the design and then told Sony just hope for the best?
It was a sustained effort by MS shills to spread fud. Anyone with half a brain knew the PS5 was a masterful design.
It's not beyond ridiculous at all. What do these tech sites know about about actual chip and hardware design? Do you think Richard Leadbitter knows more or better than Cerny when it comes to the PS5? Or that the actual hardware designers and makers AMD were clueless about the design of the APU in PS5. Do you think they made the design and then told Sony just hope for the best?
It was a sustained effort by MS shills to spread fud. Anyone with half a brain knew the PS5 was a masterful design.
Xbox reddit lmao.Here's a fun thought experiment. What would Jim Ryan say here.
"Top three engineers, in my office, now."
"Yes sir. We're here. Sorry Mike was late. His wife was going into labor and he was on the way to the hospital."
"Okay, we all saw the presentation. Now translate that nerd speak for me."
"We have a 30% advantage, sir."
"That's funny. I'm reading 10 versus 12. What's wrong with this picture?"
"They use the power capping scheme with the variable clocks. We tried that and it doesn't work."
"Pencil neck over there seems to think it's pretty cool right. have you considered he made it work and you couldn't?"
"Well, Xbox Reddit sir...."
"Shut the f*** up. You don't run a business on hopium. Even if I had time to be hanging out on f****** Reddit, I want to hear it from my engineers. I want to hear it tomorrow. By noon. You're going to have best and worst case analysis of this thing on my desk."
He's right, Sony should pack it up, It's all about those better pixels![]()
![]()
The math doesn't add up to 30%, but both of them parroted the same figure. The "script" thing is so real!
It's leftover bullshit from the X1X original video that they memory holed when people called it out.He's right, Sony should pack it up, It's all about those better pixels
(what the fuck does that even mean, did anyone ask him?)
It's leftover bullshit from the X1X original video that they memory holed when people called it out.
They were hoping that you wouldHeh, I'd forgot about that
It's leftover bullshit from the X1X original video that they memory holed when people called it out.
We were not talking about sales. We were talking about why people may have genuine issues with the game. Why would you change the conversation to sales now?
The number of reviews is the same, and so are the user review scores. I don't understand how that is an incorrect comparison.
It's not beyond ridiculous at all. What do these tech sites know about about actual chip and hardware design? Do you think Richard Leadbitter knows more or better than Cerny when it comes to the PS5? Or that the actual hardware designers and makers AMD were clueless about the design of the APU in PS5. Do you think they made the design and then told Sony just hope for the best?
It was a sustained effort by MS shills to spread fud. Anyone with half a brain knew the PS5 was a masterful design.
It's leftover bullshit from the X1X original video that they memory holed when people called it out.
all 3 companies are only in it forrrrrrr.................Money. All 3 will do whatever makes them the most money.People still don't seem to get it. MS aren't in this for gaming, they're in it to push operating systems and services. They don't want to compete with Sony as a gaming entity, they want to destroy them so people have no choice but to use their services If they want to game.
thats why even tho its under powered,I'm happy about teh series S. it can run games for kids like minecraft,fortnite,COD perfect and thats all kids really care about or want to play..Well and roblox.A lot of kids have a laptop that can just run minecraft alright. Sometimes I think about if someone busted me down to something like that. A $200 laptop. And I could only game on that. I think I would just take a big sigh and say it could be a lot worse. Then happily play anything that will run. Which is a lot, truthfully. I'd live.
In the world of AI upscaling like DLSS, checkerboard TAA solutions, all being CHAMPIONED by gamers and tech sites (like DF)... keep your eyes on the shitspreaders that want to now all of a sudden focus on native res in attempts to FUDucate select brands... like the stooges at DF tried doing in the PS5Pro video. Clowns.
If even a fraction of the effort put into astroturfing and warring with Sony was put into game development, I believe we would have a very different picture of XBox as of now. That's the thing that always gets me. I've been aware, like many others, of these shenanigans for years. But I'm also aware that they don't work in real world terms. Sony is seeing massive success and XBox is not. Yet Phil and co. + shills just keep waging this pointless online/Twitter battle. It makes them look incompetent and, frankly, ridiculous too.
I particularly enjoy ignorant posts that label anyone saying anythng positive about xbox as a shill, or saying that ms trying to say anythjng positive is pointless. Yep, you are right, ms should just give up, and anyone on here that on the forum that likes ms should just shut up.
What a rediculous post, ms has 23 studios and is putting effort into game development.
It's getting really old really fast.
You're projecting pretty hard, dude. Maybe you should step away from defending MS for a bit.