Timberwolf25
Member
The welcome vid from MS means that it is immediate from my understanding.So here's my question. When does all this take effect? Is it next year? Later this year?
Sounds like they were just waiting for the CMA to sign the papers.
The welcome vid from MS means that it is immediate from my understanding.So here's my question. When does all this take effect? Is it next year? Later this year?
You sound very upset. Who hurt you?Imagine spending $100 billion on developers and publishers only to be in third place and have to give your flagship games away with bags of doritos lmao
Microsoft is malignant rectal cancer to this industry and I can't wait to watch them torpedo another half dozen established franchises with their hilariously out of touch management
The welcome vid from MS means that it is immediate from my understanding.
Sounds like they were just waiting for the CMA to sign the papers.
Sony cant just go and buy studios unless they are privately owned as they will just get outbid by other parties.How could Sony buy Bamco if Nintendo is a partial owner already?
That reminds me of my worst phone ever: The Xperia X1. An unholy alliance between Sony and Windows Mobile.I was managing a cell phone store at this time, and that was by far the biggest issue windows phones had. People would love the hardware, but would quickly change their tune when they found out they couldn't download their pinterest, Instagram, etc.
I'm sorry but. I still find it kind of comical how alot of people were clowning the warchest. Now that SOB has folks losing sleep because another publisher might be bought out.Given we only have guarantees of COD coming to PlayStation out of their two large publisher buyouts - I'd say they are well on their way to software monopolism. They've bought a lot of studios and IP to shut Sony out.
That's not arguable. Their leaked emails even said as such. Outspend Sony.
Imagine spending $100 billion on developers and publishers only to be in third place and have to give your flagship games away with bags of doritos lmao
Microsoft is malignant rectal cancer to this industry and I can't wait to watch them torpedo another half dozen established franchises with their hilariously out of touch management
Fucking hell bro, I could join X tomorrow and claim I was a Sony developer and post some shit like 'I'm in the know'.He claims he worked at Bend and Ember Labs.
I'm sure he'd like that, yes, but it's not happening (anytime soon), and what they do have now isn't going to cover the 5 or more 80+ million dollar budgeted AAA games on the horizon either.
Just a few years ago, Xbox had about 4 or 5 studios trying to compete with Sony and Nintendo. Now they have over 30!! And quite arguably the best stable of developers in the industry
Activision alone makes as much profit per year (about $2 billion), than Sony does as a whole gaming division (also about $2 billion profit).The stable of developers they have are mediocre at best, and poor at worst. Having 30 of them doesn't make them suddenly exciting to the vast majority of the fanbase.
The uphill battle Phil will have is actually turning these poorly run mediocre/poor studios into something that can achieve top tier levels of industry quality. It's not easy. Microsoft has been trying to do just that for the last few decades to no avail.
Activision alone makes as much profit per year (about $2 billion), than Sony does as a whole gaming division (also about $2 billion profit).
The profit from Activision's WOW, COD, King mobile games etc... will keep MS in gaming forever.
Xbox has plenty of good studios working for it.The stable of developers they have are mediocre at best, and poor at worst. Having 30 of them doesn't make them suddenly exciting to the vast majority of the fanbase.
The uphill battle Phil will have is actually turning these poorly run mediocre/poor studios into something that can achieve top tier levels of industry quality. It's not easy. Microsoft has been trying to do just that for the last few decades to no avail.
Xbox has plenty of good studios working for it.
Double Fine
inXile
Ninja Theory
Obsidian Entertainment
Playground Games
Rare
World's Edge
id
Tango Gameworks
Toys for Bob
Beenox
Infinity Ward
I'm not including Bethesda or Blizzard as the games they have released are controversial (despite good reviews and sales).
But if you think the list I provided are not good studios then you have a pretty narrow definition of what good means. Most Sony Studios won't even clear that bar.
Now you are just moving the goalposts. You claimed that the developers they had were mediocre at best, when one look at the list I provided and the accompanying recent critic/steam review scores would clearly show that not to be the case.The list you provided is significantly less impactful than those on each other rival platform.
They can still be "good", but in their current state they are not producing even a single GOTY candidate eligible title. Rival platform holders produce them routinely.
Not all of them need to, but your average consumer is not really looking at those studios with great anticipation (excluding CoD's mainstream legacy appeal)
I hope they become that someday, but after Bethesda's recent output amongst other MS studio failings, I'm not holding my breath
GotY candidate basically limits Sony to two studios.
Now you are just moving the goalposts. You claimed that the developers they had were mediocre at best, when one look at the list I provided and the accompanying recent critic/steam review scores would clearly show that not to be the case.
Nope, but then again most of Sony and Nintendo is not that good either.
Only ND and SSM have released GotY quality titles. The rest are sub 9/10 trash. (Sarcastic obviously but Forbidden West barely got any GotY wins, Obsidian got one less for a indie game). Sucker Punch? Ghost of Tsushima wasn't even top 100 for the year on Metacritic. The last time Insomniac released a 9/10 game on meta was 2004.Nope. Pretty much all the major studios from them, or partners, have released GOTY candidate titles. Including ND, SSM, GG, Insomniac, Sucker Punch, and Kojima
Mediocre doesn't mean BAD, there's no goalposts being moved
What false equivalency? Most Sony Studios are not as good as SSM or ND. This is quite obvious when look at metacritic scores. I agree that Microsoft studios are not that good either.This kind of false equivalency is pretty hilarious. The reason Microsoft is in last place on the console front is precisely because their quality and appeal from their own studios is nowhere near as strong
Only ND and SSM have released GotY quality titles. The rest are sub 9/10 trash. (Sarcastic obviously but Forbidden West barely got any GotY wins, Obsidian got one less for a indie game). Sucker Punch? Ghost of Tsushima wasn't even top 100 for the year on Metacritic. The last time Insomniac released a 9/10 game on meta was 2004.
Kojima isn't even Sony.
Right and the studios I listed are not mediocre either. I'm not sure how you can claim Sucker Punch makes GotY calibre games and then turn around and state the likes of Double Fine, inXile, and id are mediocre.
What false equivalency?
I said candidates, not wins.
At TGA, all of those studios have been represented in the last 4 years.
They can absolutely compete in Metacritic (and Steam reviews) and have been doing so for a while. Or did you not bother doing even basic research when calling those studios mediocre?The false equivalency that Microsoft's studios can largely compete with those below the two studios you mentioned, they do not in their current state. On a blend of objective metrics like sales and metacritic
Oh we changing it to TGA candidates now? In that case 4 Xbox studios qualify. But TGA is not the authority on the best games for the year, the Metacritic ranking is far better at that if you want something close to objective as possible.
But now you bring up sales when talking about the quality of a studio? Moving those goalposts again? But sure, Infinity Ward shits on everyone.
Metacritic doesn't differentiate between an indie game and an AAA game
any metric you use can be argued, but platform splits don't lie. There's a reason why Xbox is last and the gap is growing, and that's because the studios you mentioned aren't AAA or broadly appealing
Infinity ward is not exclusive and was never a Microsoft cultured studio. They are not indicative of any sort of Microsoft leadership direction or oversight
Nowdays I usually see you complain about the GOTY games so why are you hyping them up so much? Did you even like Elden Ring? What about TOTK for this year? BG3?The list you provided is significantly less impactful than those on each other rival platform.
They can still be "good", but in their current state they are not producing even a single GOTY candidate eligible title. Rival platform holders produce them routinely.
Not all of them need to, but your average consumer is not really looking at those studios with great anticipation (excluding CoD's mainstream legacy appeal)
I hope they become that someday, but after Bethesda's recent output amongst other MS studio failings, I'm not holding my breath
Wow.
Wasn't expecting those replies in a Nintendo sub.
Absolutely unanimous in cutting Phil to pieces.
Sly Cooper 5 would have one buyer.I've said a million times before if Sony announced Sly Cooper 5 I'd buy a PS5 right-goddamned-now.
Sly Cooper 4 is what caused me to spend an absurd amount of disposable income on a PS3 Slim. It was what caused me to be a PS4 guy until Sony decided only Xbox wanted to have competent mods on Fallout 4, and Skyrim SE.
There's two of us! I mean, Sly 5 is not the only announcement to make me jump into the 9th gen, but probably the only one to get me on board immediately. I got a Vita just to have a console to experience the trilogy since my PS2 is not in great shape.I've said a million times before if Sony announced Sly Cooper 5 I'd buy a PS5 right-goddamned-now.
Sly Cooper 4 is what caused me to spend an absurd amount of disposable income on a PS3 Slim. It was what caused me to be a PS4 guy until Sony decided only Xbox wanted to have competent mods on Fallout 4, and Skyrim SE.
Not for me it ain't.It a sad day for al of us!
This decision has proven clear as day that there's nothing wrong with Microsoft acquiring Activision/Blizzard
Sooo you are against or for this deal?Imagine spending $100 billion on developers and publishers only to be in third place and have to give your flagship games away with bags of doritos lmao
Microsoft is malignant rectal cancer to this industry and I can't wait to watch them torpedo another half dozen established franchises with their hilariously out of touch management
Fitting that this would happen on Friday 13th, a bad day for gamers everywhere.
Bruh....you too, are notorious for peddling your substandard opinions as a fact -- like you believe in your own online keyboard warrior legend created by a whole ass two people on this forum. Peddle that shit elsewhere. You're obviously feeling the sting of the latest acquisition.The stable of developers they have are mediocre at best, and poor at worst. Having 30 of them doesn't make them suddenly exciting to the vast majority of the fanbase.
The uphill battle Phil will have is actually turning these poorly run mediocre/poor studios into something that can achieve top tier levels of industry quality. It's not easy. Microsoft has been trying to do just that for the last few decades to no avail.
From next year to next genI'm sorry but. I still find it kind of comical how alot of people were clowning the warchest. Now that SOB has folks losing sleep because another publisher might be bought out.
Also. Just a few years ago, Xbox had about 4 or 5 studios trying to compete with Sony and Nintendo. Now they have over 30!! And quite arguably the best stable of developers in the industry. Like, phil wasn't kidding when he said "industry leading" stable of developers.
Now, this is just a whole new era for Xbox. Next gen is going to be utterly nuts. They'll practically be drooling heavy hitters from the gate. Just, crazy to think about..
So game pass when?
When can we expect the flood of games to hit gamepass?
Probably some older ones as early as next months first drop, I reckon.
With Bethesda they did a special drop less than a week after they closed.
Imagine spending $100 billion on developers and publishers only to be in third place and have to give your flagship games away with bags of doritos lmao
Microsoft is malignant rectal cancer to this industry and I can't wait to watch them torpedo another half dozen established franchises with their hilariously out of touch management
You sound very upset. Who hurt you?
Have to disagree here. They dont need just one flagship dev house or IP. This will happen with playing the long game with more and more banger releases from multiple studios over a period of time. In fact, I'd say this transition has already begun. Xbox is literally at the point where they are too big to fail - hence all the recent purchases. I firmly believe (of course this is my opinion, I'm not Moses with ten commandments or some shit....) that in five to ten years time, we will be having VERY different conversations about the house that is Xbox.Now you are just moving the goalposts. You claimed that the developers they had were mediocre at best, when one look at the list I provided and the accompanying recent critic/steam review scores would clearly show that not to be the case.
GotY candidate basically limits Sony to two studios. Are the rest mediocre then as well? Insomniac is irrelevant because none of the games they make can crack the 9/10 meta? Sounds silly to me.
Xbox has been releasing and will continue releasing good games. Are they as good as the very best of Sony and Nintendo? Nope, but then again most of Sony and Nintendo is not that good either.
You can certainly argue that Xbox needs a flagship studio and franchise (Halo is no longer it, and Forza Horizon won't do it either). But that is entirely different from the conversation that Xbox has no good developers.