justiceiro
Marlboro: Other M
Those don't track Nintendo digital sales, right?
Yes, the people currently being vocal wouldn't be vocal and the 'other side' would be instead. I think sales would likely be better because I think the two sides are not equal in number or impact on game sales.
I think that's really only true from a narrative perspective. The world (most of it) in AC is intended to be a realistic depiction of a historical setting, which is why they're able to easily repurpose them for the Discovery Tour stuff.Maybe that's true if you only consider literal magic to be the fiction, otherwise its backwards, Assassins creed is a fantasy first with the real cold hard facts tucked away as collectibles.
Assassin's Creed as a historically accurate series:
This is Pope Alexander VI with some weird magical tools:
![]()
This is Pythagoras as a 150 years old man who gives a magical staff to his daughter that makes her an immortal!
![]()
Yasuke is the first real protagonist and he's much more realistic than a real character like 150 years old Pythagoras in AC Odyssey. We don't have enough information about Yasuke and Ubisoft can tell their story and still more believable than a Pope using futuristic weapon or AC Odyssey protagonist fighting with Medusa.That's great and all, totally ignores that Ubi talks about their historical accuracy when they want to. Tell me, is Yasuke the first and only historical figure to be an AC protagonist?
Ask yourself that question... "Why would sales be better?" Go beyond number.
Because I think for many, a developer deciding the race of the protagonist based on what will most appeal to the audience they are selling to is more understandable / less annoying than it being decided based on the developer's desire to push their political agenda (which is frequently not shared by their audience).Better yet, ask yourself "why is one acceptable but the other (Yasuke and his African skin) is political?"
Leonardo wasn't a protagonist in AC2. Like it or not, ubi brought the scrutiny on themselves with the choice of Yasuke.Yasuke is the first real protagonist and he's much more realistic than a real character like 150 years old Pythagoras in AC Odyssey. We don't have enough information about Yasuke and Ubisoft can tell their story and still more believable than a Pope using futuristic weapon or AC Odyssey protagonist fighting with Medusa.
Was "everything" about Leonardo da Vinci in AC2 based on real events? No. And people didn't care. but Yasuke...
All AC games are combinations of realistic characters/events and fictions and AC Shadows is like that too.
That's great and all, totally ignores that Ubi talks about their historical accuracy when they want to. Tell me, is Yasuke the first and only historical figure to be an AC protagonist?
Yeah and iirc at some point they explained that they liked Yasuke as a protagonist because so little was known about him that he could be a blank slate and allow them to tell a cool story, which is an odd thing to say when every other AC protagonist is a totally fictional character, ie. the blankest slate possible.Like it or not, ubi brought the scrutiny on themselves with the choice of Yasuke.
I never said they shouldn't. I'm taking this game and it's choices in context to the entire series.Why shouldn’t they talk about the historical accuracy in the games? AC has always had historically accurate things in their games, it’s just that they are always mixed in with batshit insane things that aren’t accurate. Because it’s a video game.
But that’s always been the appeal of AC. There are things in there that are done well with a nod to history.
So a WHITE character is more appealing than a black character and is not indicative of a political agenda. Despite black people being among the global majority...I said why. While Team Woke is noisy and is artificially amplified by most (and until recently, all) major social media platforms, under all of that I don't think they are very numerous and I don't think they are -or were ever- a significant proportion of the actual gaming audience.
Because I think for many, a developer deciding the race of the protagonist based on what will most appeal to the audience they are selling to is more understandable / less annoying than it being decided based on the developer's desire to push their political agenda (which is frequently not shared by their audience).
I also think this is why a non-Western dev may not have provoked the same response: coming from a non-Western dev, there would not be the automatic assumption that the decision was motivated by, and indicative of, a political agenda.
If you just take a walk around a random village in Shadows, probably the most out of place thing on screen will be the African samurai.
Yes, correct. 'The global population' is not in any way representative of the audience for Western video games, obviously.So a WHITE character is more appealing than a black character and is not indicative of a political agenda. Despite black people being among the global majority...
Yes, correct. 'The global population' is not in any way representative of the audience for Western video games, obviously.
Although repetitive from what I played ACshadows seem good so far.
Missions are a bit mundane though.
Don't know if I agree with this, but I know a lot of the people hiding behind the "we want a Japanese male protagonist" excuse would be singing a different tune.
This particular chart is physical only for all companies, not just Nintendo.Those don't track Nintendo digital sales, right?
Which part doesn't make sense?That makes no sense. Am I not part of this western audience? Am I not a gamer? Are there not black gamers? I thought color didn't matter in a videogame?
Put it another way... Why is that more acceptable to have a white protagonist than any other skin color? I'm asking genuinely because I don't think you've realized that that's my underlying question.
I wouldn't expect Assassin's Creed to be as big on PC as MH, so there probably is quite a big gap between the two in terms of overall US sales.![]()
Assassin's Creed Shadows a Big Sales Hit in US, Beaten Only By Monster Hunter Wilds
One of 2025's best-sellerswww.pushsquare.com
![]()
Assassin's Creed Shadows a Big Sales Hit in US, Beaten Only By Monster Hunter Wilds
One of 2025's best-sellerswww.pushsquare.com
Astro BotWhat was third?
Sorry I meant in 2025 'week one $ sales' from the article above. It tells us what Shadows was beaten by, but not what it beat that's so impressive.Astro Bot
It beat every other game released so far this year (at least in terms of retail sales).Sorry I meant in 2025 'week one $ sales' from the article above. It tells us what Shadows was beaten by, but not what it beat that's so impressive.
Split Fiction, MLB The Show , Kingdom Come: Deliverance 2 , AvowedSorry I meant in 2025 'week one $ sales' from the article above. It tells us what Shadows was beaten by, but not what it beat that's so impressive.
Sales do not count game bundles. It has already been confirmed long ago.Take nothing away from AstroBot (fantastic game, deserves all its flowers) but…
![]()
Yeah, but is there any game in that group which it's particularly noteworthy for AC to have beaten? Stating which games it beat would probably undermine the conclusion the article reaches and which it wants the reader to come away with.It beat every other game released so far this year (at least in terms of retail sales).
Ubi haters:
![]()
My takeaway is that it beat what it should have beaten: Kingdom Come II, Donkey Kong, PGA Tour, Civ VII and Like A Dragon.Yeah, but is there any game in that group which it's particularly noteworthy for AC to have beaten? Stating which games it beat would probably undermine the conclusion the article reaches and which it wants the reader to come away with.
![]()
Assassin's Creed Shadows a Big Sales Hit in US, Beaten Only By Monster Hunter Wilds
One of 2025's best-sellerswww.pushsquare.com
also uhmm
![]()
Almost All the UK's Boxed Copies of Assassin's Creed Shadows Sold on PS5 Last Week
Who's laughing Naoewww.pushsquare.com