It's just my rant. JRPGs are the most bankrupt genre out there in terms of reviews. Heavily inflated scores. Been a decade of low tier stuff with the exception of a handful of games. Most reviewers are the "JRPG guy" that only plays JRPGs, inflates the scores of anything that makes it out the door half way functional. I could barely finish the demo for Atelier Yumia. Pointless combat, forgettable story, Vita level graphics and it's an 80 on MC. Unreal 5 WRPG with multiple excellent builds, possible best in genre combat Avowed is an 81. Avowed being an 81 is fine for me honestly, but Yumia is more like a 70 at best. You could probably subtract 10 points from almost every JRPG released in the last decade with the exception of Xenoblade, Triangle Strategy, maybe the new Yakuza (I haven't played it so I don't know). PS3 level Metaphor being a 90 while being virtually identical to Persona is extreme exaggeration.
To show how massively inflated those scores are, here you have a new team making their 1st game as a company with a AA budget, AA pricing and it's likely going to be massively better. Looks 2 generations ahead of Persona 5. And there are versions of Atelier Yumia that are $110. They need to be brought down a peg because it's super mediocre. Reminds me of Sea of Stars being $25 from a team that's never made an RPG and blowing out most classic style RPGs for the last 10 years. Reviews in this genre need a reckoning, imho.