Dr. Samuel Hayden
Member
Lower than I expected tbh
Battlefield 6 - Reviews Thread
- Thread starter adamsapple
- Start date
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Yep.
Thanks for saving me day 1 money EA. You did try to hype people up like they were going to get another BC2 single player or the like, and not the typical throwaway you claimed you wanted to get away from.
![L*][*N*K](/data/avatars/m/842/842515.jpg?1756724107){kind=avatar}
Luipadre
Member
84 are harsh reviews? What? Some of the comments here acting like 84 is a bad score lol
Last edited:
MatrixReloaded101
Member
Don't think so the reveiwer actually has a decent track record just looking at his past reviews.
Nope, he give Call of Duty: Modern Warfare III a 4/10 lol.
GudOlRub
Member
Read the IGN review people, it's only for the campaign https://www.ign.com/articles/battlefield-6-campaign-review.
It sucks that it brings the game's score down so much but reviewing the campaign and multiplayer modes separately makes complete sense imo. The problem here lies more with how websites like opencritic aggregate scores.
It sucks that it brings the game's score down so much but reviewing the campaign and multiplayer modes separately makes complete sense imo. The problem here lies more with how websites like opencritic aggregate scores.
clarky
Gold Member
3 too many.
Luipadre
Member
Most people cant read. Some of them still think 5 is the overall game score lmao
clarky
Gold Member
How does it make sense? You can't buy one without the other. If you are spending £70 to play a 6 hour campaign then you are doing it wrong, regardless of quality.
An actual review should be of the whole product noting in the review text that the campaign is gash. IGN just doing it for the clicks.
Last edited:
ChoosableOne
ChoosableAll
Cod BO6 review by the same guy.
Lokaum D+
Member
soulbait
Member
The IGN review, which stood out to me due to how low it is, is marked as the campaign review.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
GudOlRub
Member
Just read this thread, bunch of people literally do no care about the campaign and will only buy the game for the multiplayer. For games like this it makes sense, having an overall score of 6 or 7 because you give the campaign a 3 and the multiplayer a 9 would be silly.
Reviewing the modes separately informs people better about what they're interested in and helps making a decision on whether to actually spend money on the game.
clarky
Gold Member
Like I was saying 99% of people don't buy Battlefield games just for the campaign.
Those 99% of people dont really care about it. Its a nice bonus if its actually better than shit.
Lowering the score because one part of the product sucks makes perfect sense. You can review the whole product and inform people why in the review.
Last edited:
DirtInUrEye
Member
Except the summary seems fair if they're reviewing the single player campaign, which looks absolutely shit.
bender
What time is it?
You know what they say about a broken clock.
Negotiator101
Member
Looks like this ain't the COD killer it was made out to be.
Luipadre
Member
lol. Expected 95 meta or what?
clarky
Gold Member
Well its better than MWIII according to ign.
GudOlRub
Member
Again, read the thread, people do not read these reviews, they look at the scores and start blasting because it doesn't match their expectations.
Negotiator101
Member
Yeah but to usurp COD it's gonna take something better than this and I've pre-ordered this by the way.
M1987
Member
It's easily better than BO6 and 7,but it's COD so it's going to sell millions no matter what
Last edited:
clarky
Gold Member
Getting both. COD scratches a different itch.
clarky
Gold Member
which is why is dumb to review separate parts. Its got an 84 MC inline with expectations. Would have been more if they didn't count the single player only review.
Reviews are fairly useless anyways. Most people played the Beta and know exactly what to expect.
Last edited:
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
Black Ops 6 campaign is actually pretty good tho.
Avid Reading Horse
Member
Hey man if you had to fight over the leftover scraps of adsense dollars so you could get enough scratch to buy a can of beans from the dollar store, I bet you'd figure out a way to get your Game Journalist Review out pre-launch, now wouldn't you?
Twinblade
Member
$70? For some reason I spent $100. :-/
ChoosableOne
ChoosableAll
9 out of 10 good?
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
In a vacuum, I guess. My favorite recent CoD campaign is still Infinite Warfare.
But as far as 'return to forms' go, Black ops 6 was basically a 100% improvement over the last couple of years Modern Warfare campaigns and Vanguard.
Twinblade
Member
Nobody really buys battlefield, just to play single player.
Hero_Select
Member
I was never going to play the campaign anyway. If you want a good story go play Spec Ops: The Line
hinch7
Member
Yeah true which is why some of these reviews are pretty irreverent for most people (me included). Won't even bother with SP in these types of games, unless they're REALLY good.
It does add some value though in that aspect. But if not, meh lol. No loss.
Last edited:
ChorizoPicozo
Member
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
mitch1971
Member
Nah. Cut a hole in the bottom of your car and run with it like the flintstones, then download BF6.I'm debating this or CoD but luckily the universe gifted me with needing all 4 new tires on my car instead so I'll just stick with Absolum lmao.
Killer8
Member
Does not surprise me at all that a COD campaign scored better. COD campaigns have on average been much much better than Battlefield's. I only enjoyed Bad Company 2. Whereas COD has some absolute banger classics.
Loomy
Thinks Microaggressions are Real
Except outlets have had access to the MP for weeks now. Review the product as a whole since you can't buy one part and not the other.
Sethbacca
Member
Is it just me or is it a little weird for DF to do the HD pack vs non HD pack comparison without noting if there would be any substantive difference in the performance between the modes. The difference is so minimal visually that I think I'd rather have the extra FPS and storage space if it's any kind of meaningful difference. Granted I could have missed it, I was half paying attention while watching trying to knock some contracts out.
Last edited:
adamsapple
Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
MW2 and 3 campaigns kinda sucked but Black Ops 6 was legit good and as someone whose probably only touching BF for the campaign, this is poor showing as far as I'm concerned too.
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
I will take your word for it and try it out in the free week then.
I was hoping they were going to return to the BC2 form, especially how they hyped "dedicated single player narrative studio teams" for this one.
Mr. PlayStation
Member
Played BO6 campaign for a few hours, disliked it as much as CoD: Ghosts. BO Cold War was much better.