rodrigolfp
Haptic Gamepads 4 Life
The console delivers more games and programs??So the more expensive and larger hardware has longer battery life and better performance.
And the console is better value for what it delivers.
Nothing new.
The console delivers more games and programs??So the more expensive and larger hardware has longer battery life and better performance.
And the console is better value for what it delivers.
Nothing new.
Switch 2 holding up well against this thing but biggest problem for Switch 2 is that God awful screen. It undoes all of the good things when you have to look at your games on THAT.
I also can't believe a $1000 gaming handheld doesn't have an OLED display. Particularly when the Steam Deck OLED can be had for $549
Isn't shit like this the reason why this youtubers content hasn't been allowed here in the past?
thats a dumb nit pick as the rog ally doesn't limit itself to different modes its always running the best it can.
thats a dumb nit pick as the rog ally doesn't limit itself to different modes its always running the best it can.
No it isn't a "dumb nit pick". Not when this channel is using FSR to make it look worse than Switch 2. In those comparison, Rog Ally X is running 1080p 80 fps with FSR and FG. Switch 2 is 1080p 30fps with DLSS. The Rog Ally X doesn't need upscaling to get 1080p 30fps It can do that natively.
No it isn't a "dumb nit pick". Not when this channel is using FSR to make it look worse than Switch 2. In those comparison, Rog Ally X is running 1080p 80 fps with FSR and FG. Switch 2 is 1080p 30fps with DLSS. The Rog Ally X doesn't need upscaling to get 1080p 30fps It can do that natively.
You are right, but is 1080p native gonna be better than 1080p DLSS considering also the insane price difference between the two devices?
What happens if we make the comparison with the "standard" ROG Ally or the Steam Deck for that matter?
Crazy how well the Switch 2 holds it own in those graphical comparisons, especially in games like Cyberpunk. It even looks better in some cases. And at half the price.
DLSS is truly some wizard shit.
You are right, but is 1080p native gonna be better than 1080p DLSS considering also the insane price difference between the two devices?
What happens if we make the comparison with the "standard" ROG Ally or the Steam Deck for that matter?
Price difference has nothing to do with this thread. The comparison images being shown are bullshit. It is more a comparison of FSR vs DLSS than Rog Ally X vs Switch 2.
Isn't shit like this the reason why this youtubers content hasn't been allowed here in the past?
Price difference has nothing to do with this thread. The comparison images being shown are bullshit. It is more a comparison of FSR vs DLSS than Rog Ally X vs Switch 2.
It's a stupid take.
Switch 2 has 2 power mode, one low and one high. The Rog Ally X has several power modes I suppose, the video is comparing both highest modes available.
The guy who made the video could've plug the Rog Ally X to a dock to pretend to be more accurate but the result would've been the same.
The Switch 2 is able to render with DLSS and the Rog Ally X is only capable of rendering with FSR. Not sure why that's bullshit. It's a very relevant comparison of the capabilities of each device.
His point is they should compare like for like.
Because the Rog Ally X can run CBP2077 at 1080p 30fps natively. It doesn't need FSR to match Switch 2 with DLSS.
His point is they should compare like for like.
Because the Rog Ally X can run CBP2077 at 1080p 30fps natively. It doesn't need FSR to match Switch 2 with DLSS.
Comparisons are to be made only if you at least attempt to do apples-apples. If we are comparing handhelds, what's the best looking version of this game on Switch 2 handheld mode vs Ally X? That's an actual attempt at getting to the truth, even if an exact settings match isn't viable. This particular comparison isn't doing any of that, which is par for the course with ElAnalistaBits.The Switch 2 is able to render with DLSS and the Rog Ally X is only capable of rendering with FSR. Not sure why that's bullshit. It's a very relevant comparison of the capabilities of each device.
The Switch 2 is able to render with DLSS and the Rog Ally X is only capable of rendering with FSR. Not sure why that's bullshit. It's a very relevant comparison of the capabilities of each device.
the Ally can use XeSS and also can render natively at way higher resolutions if you match the settings
You can't change settings on Switch 2 games, is fair to use a similar settings configuration on the Rog Xbox X vs Switch 2. So at the end is going to be a DLSS ve FSR comparisonComparisons are to be made only if you at least attempt to do apples-apples. If we are comparing handhelds, what's the best looking version of this game on Switch 2 handheld mode vs Ally X? That's an actual attempt at getting to the truth, even if an exact settings match isn't viable. This particular comparison isn't doing any of that, which is par for the course with ElAnalistaBits.
All this is showing is DLSS eats FSR 3's breakfast. Well... no shit!
Switch 2 can do 40 fps as well, though? And for what's worth, it's still hanging at around 40 fps in these tests without frame gen, so it's not like the extra grunt is showing all that much.
Why did he even opt to use FSR 3.0 when XeSS 2.0 was available in the settings? We know why.
I get the complaints about the test method but I'm very doubtful that even with the best possible settings/wattage on the Ally X the difference would be transformative vs Switch 2
So it means very little in the big picture
Ally X can do XeSS 2. It can also do 1080p native with Framegen off. If you cap it at 30 fps, you can probably even go above 1080p. The point is to compare the best of each version. Not the best of one and some random combination on the other.You can't change settings on Switch 2 games, is fair to use a similar settings configuration on the Rog Xbox X vs Switch 2. So at the end is going to be a DLSS ve FSR comparison.
Because the Rog Ally X can run CBP2077 at 1080p 30fps natively. It doesn't need FSR to match Switch 2 with DLSS.
Ally X can do XeSS 2. It can also do 1080p native with Framegen off. If you cap it at 30 fps, you can probably even go above 1080p. The point is to compare the best of each version. Not the best of one and some random combination on the other.
Wait wait wait wait wait.....
Switch 2 gets more powerful when it is docked.
Are you telling me the Xbox Ally X does NOT get more powerful when it is docked?
Is that true? My goodness, if that is true it is crazy what people are paying for this. Does Steam Deck get more powerful when it is docked? Are ANY of these PC handhelds more powerful than the Switch 2 is docked? I always just assumed you could plug them into power and get better graphics....like on the fucking thing they copied.....
![]()
And "FSR4".the Ally can use XeSS and also can render natively at way higher resolutions if you match the settings
And "FSR4".
Okay, good. Thank you, lol. I was like WTF. My laptop does that too. Good.Yes. The Xbox Rog Ally X allows for higher TDP when plugged in. 35W not available on battery power which tops out at 25W.
Any comparisons out there on how that affects performance?Yes. The Xbox Rog Ally X allows for higher TDP when plugged in. 35W not available on battery power which tops out at 25W.
It doesn't change anything anyway because most of the time 1080p DLSS is better than native (because you also get a good AA with DLSS).
Okay, good. Thank you, lol. I was like WTF. My laptop does that too. Good.
It doesn't change anything anyway because most of the time 1080p DLSS is better than native (because you also get a good AA with DLSS).
yeah, but that's a hack to be fair. XeSS is right there in the settings menu as per a default option.