• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

There's a major development regarding Sydney Sweeney

G7rlhYJXIAAqh2H

Good man for keeping this thread mission focused.
 
For the first claim, one could easily say as a rebuttal the name: Viola Davis.
gxyMgukjEV5koIQI.jpg


Budget-50 million. Box Office---19 million opening, 97 mill total. Flop

This is what I mean. A film ostensibly directed towards males, war, martial prowess, conquest, etc. But fronted by a woman. Everything about the marketing of that film was aimed at guys. It's not just her either. Ballerina as well. Its ALL OF THEM. Do you think Milla Jovovich is gonna rock the world with Protector? Nope. Statham in A Working Man also just fell shy of 100 mill box office, but the budget was only 40 mill, so it likely made a little scratch. We will see if Shelter beats Protector.
Her main draw is acting talent and everyone knows this.
Ain't no dudes rushing to theater to see Davis act. They didn't for Woman King. They may see a film that happens to have Davis in it, sure, but not BECAUSE she is in it. That "fighting president" movie (which, strangely, is becoming it's own genre of late) she was in on Netlfix? maybe, didn't really knock the doors down but I watched it because the premise of "sorta kinda like Die Hard meets White House Down" still works.
 
Sure, if you trim what I initially said and leave out the.....EVERY SINGLE ONE fails when they do male fronted solo stuff. then the follow up may seem like a slight pivot to you, but it's obvious what I'm talking about initially, and it's consistent with what I said later.

But this is boring for the rest, I'm sure. I'm happy to debate semantics with you on DM if you prefer :P
Be a man and stand by the sentence you wrote bro
 
I honestly think that some feminists were angry about the ad using sex and the male gaze. This is not a career killer so they smeared with the eugenics stuff and the left jumped on it because must go against the other side no matter what the facts are.
 
I wonder if that was done in jest. Like if you got a picture with Henry Cavill and said something similar to make your friends laugh.

But there is one major difference between men and women.
Men look at Cavil and will consider exercising and eating better, to improve themselves and look better. Even if they know that they will never look as good as him. Men will look at him as an example to follow.
Women will look at Sidney and hate her because she is fit, healthy and pretty. Very few will look at her and think of her as an example to follow. They will only look at her as a target to take down.
 
But there is one major difference between men and women.
Men look at Cavil and will consider exercising and eating better, to improve themselves and look better. Even if they know that they will never look as good as him. Men will look at him as an example to follow.
Women will look at Sidney and hate her because she is fit, healthy and pretty. Very few will look at her and think of her as an example to follow. They will only look at her as a target to take down.
I am a man and can confirm this is my reasoning.
 
I honestly think that some feminists were angry about the ad using sex and the male gaze. This is not a career killer so they smeared with the eugenics stuff and the left jumped on it because must go against the other side no matter what the facts are.
You know how all the men perfume ads are actually targeting women because men never by perfumes themselves?

I'm thinking American Eagle tried to do the same, but with men. The thing is (as explained above) - men and women do not see things the same way. Try to buy your fat gf skinny jeans and she will absolutely massacre you for thinking she is fat.
 
Last edited:
You know how all the men perfume ads are actually targeting women because men never by perfumes themselves?

I'm thinking American Eagle tried to do the same, but with men. The thing is (as explained above) - men and women do not see things the same way. Try to buy your fat gf skinny jeans and she will absolutely massacre you for thinking she is fat.
Jean commercials for MEN shouldn't show the jeans on some twink 'all cheekbone' doofus standing aorund looking constipated. Ads FOR MEN show a guy using the jeans as an improvised tow strap for his jeep to pull a convertible out of the mud, while full of girls in bikinis. The allure of products FOR MEN show what the product can do, or sell us the fantasy that we might also do these things with said product. Women respond to the notion that a pair of jeans might make their fat ass and hanging gut magically disappear and give them a svelte hourglass shape, men respond to the notion that a pair of jeans might get them chopping wood or hiking up Everest.
 
Gah, at one times her bewbs used to compete. Damn mounjaro strikes again.
Nah, just age, 2 kids, and staying thin (which she has always been, dont think she needs meds for that). She never had really big melons and they are still pretty nice. Kids will put a number on them, for sure.
 
I was just watching Species last night after having not seen it in some time.

Too bad we didn't have the internet we have today with Natasha Henstridge at that time.
Now go watch Lifeforce.

JEBEZUSCHRIST that film woulda blown up the internet if it was made today :P

UsniRYdRZxdxbX7E.jpg


come to papa! She was so hot the nudity even bleeds through the "moderate" search setting :P
 
Top Bottom