If you care about censorship, you wouldn't be playing games on Playstation in 2025 anyways. They've been a primary driver of it for years now.
Early peview of the AI in action:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Why does this need a patent at all? I don't want a console to interfere with what I am doing. The console just needs to play the fucking game and fuck off otherwise.Isn't that the whole point of this patent?
Oh, and I'll repeat once again...... Companies make patents all the time to protect ideas, it does not mean these ideas will ever get made. In fact, we've seen loads of FUD threads about Sony patents for years and very few ever come to fruition but people like to dump on Sony I guess.
Why does this need a patent at all? I don't want a console to interfere with what I am doing. The console just needs to play the fucking game and fuck off otherwise.
WE need a reset I think.
That's why we need a reset imo
Because they could create single content for 18+ and then use AI to make that content suitable for younger ages. It would be your choice to turn that on or off or it would be based on your date of birth for the logged in account.Why does this need a patent at all? I don't want a console to interfere with what I am doing. The console just needs to play the fucking game and fuck off otherwise.
One of the reasons CCP has been heavily investing into AI is capability for pervasive censorship without the need to have hundreds of thousands of censors to monitor everything.The KGB could only dream of having censoring tech such as this.
Of course not, and anyone thinking so is delusional.... But they don't have to go after the porn... That's a bit below the belt.Is any corporation your "friend"?
Of course not and anyone thinking so is delusional.... But they don't have to go after the porn... That's a bit below the belt.
What do you have in mind?
Sounds useful for parents.
Because they could create single content for 18+ and then use AI to make that content suitable for younger ages. It would be your choice to turn that on or off or it would be based on your date of birth for the logged in account.
It needs a patent because the idea is a good one in theory so they want to protect that idea.
Mostly this.Wake me up when even 10% of these patents we always rage about for over 2 decades on here, ever come to fruition.
Most patents are filed to prevent/block others from even doing certain things, and they tend to vault them forever in those endeavors.
If it can automatically turn a not quite child friendly game safe then what's the problem?For lazy and stupid parents, yes.
Wake me up when even 10% of these patents we always rage about for over 2 decades on here, ever come to fruition.
Most patents are filed to prevent/block others from even doing certain things, and they tend to vault them forever in those endeavors.
If it can automatically turn a not quite child friendly game safe then what's the problem?
It's not like it's meant to be used for adults.
Wait you mean you don't have to stand up and yell McDonald's at the tv to get the boot up ad to go away when you try to launch a PS5 game?
AM I THE ONLY ONE?!
What if a game don't need to have age restrictions with this tech? What if you can just set your age and the game will automatically get tuned for your age? Maybe it could tweak Horizon to not have human kills so it becomes the ultimate kids game - I mean, it has Dinosaurs and Robots!The problem? The game already have age restriction, the console already have age restriction that you can configure on the fly.
All those things can be used anytime, never used for lazy one thats for sure.
If Sony want to help parents they should restrict credit card used from kids.
Are customers who glaze a game and company (like BG3) and then immediately turn on it after a bad headline (AI) the friends of these corporations?Is any corporation your "friend"?
Are customers who glaze a game and company (like BG3) and then immediately turn on it after a bad headline (AI) the friends of these corporations?
Exactly bean counters ruining everything trying to appeal to everyone.This is the problem with gaming now.
These suits want every single product to be appealing to every single person.
The world doesn't work that way.
WE need a reset I think.
Dont worry just yet, google stadia had sold terribly and every trailer of it had extremly terrible views numbers, amazon's luna is 10x as worse/has even worse views numbers, so we will be all long dead or enjoying our proper stationary ps9 before actual streaming/cloud future comes to lifeI'm hoping for a kind of semi crash which causes a hardware regression in some ways. This DDR situation will help to be honest but prices need to go back to being a low barrier to entry with lower specs imo forcing Devs to do a better job getting games to run well.
There would be a kind of crash but really developers that love games would find ways to deliver awesome games for budgets of like 5 to 10 million and then let them steadily increase again.(Expedition 33 style)
So Games only need a few million to be successful, we who love games get to play awesome games not ruined all the slop.
There's probably no chance and we will be all forced to stream games.......
What are you talking about? Mortal Kombat was obviously the most kid-friendly game ever:
![]()
Starting with those who are too ambitious for society.This is the problem with gaming now.
These suits want every single product to be appealing to every single person.
The world doesn't work that way.
WE need a reset I think.
My brain is broken.AI when it tries to figure out what to do with TLoU2:
![]()
![]()
Sony Says FUDGE Age Restrictions With New AI Censorship Patent - Retro Handhelds
Sony patented AI that can detect and sanitize violent, sexual, or profane content in games in real time, letting parents set rules and profiles across devices.retrohandhelds.gg
Sony, ever the pioneer, is toying with a future where any game can be flipped into "kid-friendly" mode on demand, and an AI system is holding the scissors. A newly surfaced patent outlines tech that can automatically spot, censor, or even replace problematic content in real time, turning mature scenes into PG experiences without the developer manually building a family-friendly version of the game.
At the core is an AI that analyzes what is happening on screen, violence, gore, sexual content, profanity, or other sensitive material, and then dynamically intervenes. Instead of a fixed content filter, this system responds to what the player is actually seeing or hearing at that moment.
The patent describes the AI muting dialogue, blurring or masking visual elements, or outright swapping assets like blood effects, animations, or character models to make scenes less intense. Because the system is rules-based, parents or guardians could pick from preset profiles or define their own boundaries for what is acceptable.
![]()
![]()
This goes several steps beyond classic platform-level parental controls that just block entire games or enforce age ratings. Instead of saying "no" to a title entirely, the AI tries to reshape it so it can still be played, just sanitized. In theory, that could let one copy of a game work for both adults and kids in the same household, with the content adapting per user account.
The system is also pitched as platform-agnostic, meaning it could operate across different devices and services, not just a single console generation. That raises the possibility of AI censorship baked into cloud gaming, streaming, or future subscription platforms, where content is filtered in real time at the service level.
On paper, the idea sounds convenient for families, but it also opens a huge can of worms around creative intent and control. If a platform owner can algorithmically redact scenes, tone, and themes, it effectively gains a new level of editorial power over games that were not designed to be altered this way.
There are also obvious questions around accuracy and bias: what the AI flags as "unsafe," how often it misfires, and whether developers or players get any say beyond whatever presets the platform offers. For now, this is only a patent, but it gives a pretty clear window into how aggressively Sony is thinking about using AI to reshape what players actually see on screen.
But it's the choice of the user/user settings, this is about opening games up to a wider audience without a massive amount of work to create that extra content. It means they don't have to compromise content due to hitting an age rating.From a conceptual point of view, the idea is very bad.
The line between mature and kids content is deeper than boobs and gore. The inventor of this believes that movies like Starship Troopers or games like TLOU would be suitable for kinds if they removed the explicit parts and that's wrong.
I don't want videogames or movies made by algorithms that try to "optimize their target audiences" by delivering slop that could be consumed equally censored/uncensored.
This is the exact patent, noone is getting their games censored if you are already over 18What if a game don't need to have age restrictions with this tech? What if you can just set your age and the game will automatically get tuned for your age? Maybe it could tweak Horizon to not have human kills so it becomes the ultimate kids game - I mean, it has Dinosaurs and Robots!![]()
Wow, the Debbie does Dallas VHS, was the first porno I found of the old man's somewhere in the 80s.This wouldn't be limited to playstation or even just video games. Imagine the possibilities....
![]()