ChorizoPicozo
Member
Yeah, the game they're about to have a deep dive showcase on in two weeks is definitely getting canceled and DOA.
Fable Legends got canned
Yeah, the game they're about to have a deep dive showcase on in two weeks is definitely getting canceled and DOA.
I understand what you are trying to say, but I also don't see how-how good looking they are is a part of an "appealing character" either when I'm not attracted to them in that way. Question is why would I want Stark to have attractive looks that have nothing to do with his character? I don't find that "appealing" in any way especially as a straight man. Realism I do so the badly groomed person in the first pic just wouldn't make sense for a self-centered playboy and the only reason why it wouldn't work.
Very similar situations too. You and the other guy might be onto something here.![]()
Fable Legends got canned![]()
I understand what you are trying to say, but I also don't see how-how good looking they are is a part of an "appealing character" either when I'm not attracted to them in that way. Question is why would I want Stark to have attractive looks that have nothing to do with his character? I don't find that "appealing" in any way especially as a straight man. Realism I do so the badly groomed person in the first pic just wouldn't make sense for a self-centered playboy and the only reason why it wouldn't work.
Yeah? I don't get what you mean?Especially as a straight man? Nah....we ain't on the same page at all bro. All good. Moving on
This was the entire story arc and plot of the film. I don't get it. Professor Klump was still a good character.
We still doing that?Year of xbox
What if they already revealed it and just kept the same character model for both sexes.I wonder if they will finally reveal you can play as a male character in Fable.
I don't know if you noticed but Microsoft is not very good at making decisions when it comes to Xbox.I can't believe Microsoft won't do a Fable trilogy remaster. The IP has been dead for fifteen years. There are people playing on PS5/XSX/PC right now who never played the original games, so they have zero connection to the franchise.
He already told you that is not about "Fucking a character"Yeah? I don't get what you mean?
You asked "who would you rather have playing stark." And I answered the second pic but not because he is "attractive" but because being a well groomed person fits his personality of a self centered rich playboy character. If the first pic was well groomed ie the selfcentered son of a rich person who could pay for braces, pay for a hairstylist and good skincare then it wouldn't matter if it was the first "more ugly" person but well groomed because I'm not after 'sexy' I'm after plausible characters. I'm not trying to fuck the character so why would his looks outside of realism to the character traits matter to me as a straight man? Seriously asking.
This was the entire story arc and plot of the film. I don't get it. Professor Klump was still a good character.
Like I said, this isn't about making the character fuckable. Seems I can't make that clear so I'll leave it.
You seem to have missed the point. I asked why would I want an attractive Stark beyond plausibly written character traits? And what has this got to do with Professor Klump, another good character who isn't attractive? as part of the plot. I'm not sexually attracted to those characters so why would I care? Same with Mrs. Doubtfire or any other character. If their attractiveness was part of the plot somehow like say The Girl Next Door or something then sure. I'm not watching those films to see eye-pleasing people, especially males.He already told you that is not about "Fucking a character"
There is a reason why there are entire agencies in charge of casting for TV and Movies... And when a casting goes horribly wrong you get this:
![]()
But there is also the acting, writing, costume and even lighting, etc...
2026 PC Screenshot Thread, Have you forgotten?Looks like we're finally getting some gameplay for Fable. Can't wait!
Yeah, he is fucking pathetic.So you edited this in but again this just highlights my point. Thor in Marvel was a muscular he-man looking character, Thor in God of War was a fat guy with a drinking problem
in the MCU, he got fat and depressed.. At no point in the game was I thinking "you know I wish Thor was muscular and attractive like in Marvel".
Thor became a comedic relief, a joke. Not necessarily "cool". (MCU).They were both cool characters and they fitted their personality traits well. I did not give a shit how "attractive" they looked.
Why would I?
why would I want an attractive Stark
I'm not sexually attracted to those characters
I'm not watching those films to see eye-pleasing people, especially males.
you know I wish Thor was muscular and attractive like in Marvel
I'm not trying to fuck the character
Especially as a straight man
Yeah? I don't get what you mean?
You asked "who would you rather have playing stark." And I answered the second pic but not because he is "attractive" but because being a well groomed person fits his personality of a self centered rich playboy character. If the first pic was well groomed ie the selfcentered son of a rich person who could pay for braces, pay for a hairstylist and good skincare then it wouldn't matter if it was the first "more ugly" person because I'm not after 'sexy' I'm after plausible characters. I'm not trying to fuck the character so why would his looks outside of realism to the character traits matter to me as a straight man? Seriously asking.
This was the entire story arc and plot of the film. I don't get it. Professor Klump was still a good character.
His drinking problem sure not his character/strength. He is like an Eddie Hall.Yeah, he is fucking pathetic.
Ok?in the MCU, he got fat and depressed.
sure he was portrayed as the ignorant guy who didn't really understand much of the world (would you say he was pathetic too? Not sure where you're going with that) being pathetic isn't about how you look.Thor became a comedic relief, a joke. Not necessarily "cool". (MCU).
In the game, as I said, he is a pathetic character
Outside of personality trait or plot no its not intrinsic. that was my entire fucking point. Take your example of Ellie, if anything she looks more like your typical lesbian teenage girl in the TV series but people are more upset that she doesn't match the game, not that a teenage lesbian girl isn't good looking/attractive. Imagine you had not seen game Ellie, why would you want TV series Ellie to be good looking?Related to The Nutty Professor :
The physical appearance is intrinsic to the characters; it matters.
And that's the point.
Except you still haven't answered the very simple question and you keep deflecting. I was asked who I would pick to be Tony stark. I said as long as the character is plausible I don't care which. Why would I care if Tony stark is good looking?Just one observation :
... I'm sorry bud, but you are trying too hard to not look gay.
(and no one is asking you to be gay btw )
Why did Thor got fat and depressed in the MCU?... Because he feels like a failure. Negative traits. (that's one the writers, isn't)sure he was portrayed as the ignorant guy who didn't really understand much of the world (would you say he was pathetic too? Not sure where you're going with that) being pathetic isn't about how you look.
Uh?... We are taking about characters, even live action characters (actors) are subject to "character desing". Physical appearance is part of it.Outside of personality trait or plot no its not intrinsic.
Thus, bad casting. Her physique and acting don't match the settingthat was my entire fucking point. Take your example of Ellie, if anything she looks more like your typical lesbian teenage girl in the TV series
Just as Bella was a bad casting, Abby (the physical appearance of the game character) was criticized, it was not plausible in the game's world and the excuse given for the appearance of the actress in the show just made the initial criticism even more valid.but people are more upset that she doesn't match the game, not that a teenage lesbian girl isn't good looking/attractive.
Klump and body love are the same actor, with different physical appearance, their physique matters.Professor Klump's character is good and him being fat or unattractive is the entire point of the plot. How are you using that to show me being perfectly ok with Stark being portrayed as a well groomed ugly guy isn't a valid point?
Literally nope, lol... And Andrew Tate?Like I said people like Elon Musk, Andrew tate, Zuckerberg aren't particularly good looking guys but they're normally cleanly groomed and they would still make a perfectly plausible Tony Stark.
Because no one is asking you to care about how good looking a character is.Except you still haven't answered the very simple question and you keep deflecting. I was asked who I would pick to be Tony stark. I said as long as the character is plausible I don't care which. Why would I care if Tony stark is good looking?
Again... No one is asking you to be gay.If I was female or a gay/bisexual male at least I can say it's because I find that attractive to look at but again why would I care? You can't seem to answer that.
But you do. Because you keep faling to understand that the physical appearance matters. How hard is that to understand.If you can't answer it there is no need for this stupidity about me "trying to not look gay".
well that but also want to revenge for Perfect Dark which looks like a pretty damn solid game and then it was canceledReally? Sad that you're wrong about it not being a canceled game? What pathetic shit is that? It could potentially be a damn good game too, let's give PG a chance, aight? Jesus.
Let me guess, it was dead because of a ugly protagonist? Because then I got news for you, if Jez Corden is to be believed (unless they decided against it)there will be a option for a male character too, maybe even a character creator, not sure.
I swear the hate this game gets by some is just hilarious.
I am more curious of they piss off Japan with some stereotype they put in FH6.
You know the word bomb will not be mentioned at all.Try to imagine if you can gain reputation for smashing temples
Yes he turned into "a slob" and let himself go which is a negative personality trait. What has this got to do with anything? Like say your ear shape or the size of your nose? These are not really personality traits.Why did Thor got fat and depressed in the MCU?... Because he feels like a failure. Negative traits. (that's one the writers, isn't)
Obviously we are talking about characters what else would we be talking about. They also have character designs to appeal to different demographics. This has nothing to do with personally being asked which Tony Stark I would choose and me replying I dont care about the facial structure as long as the character is plausible.Uh?... We are taking about characters, even live action characters (actors) are subject to "character desing". Physical appearance is part of it.
What? I don't even know what you're arguing about here.Thus, bad casting. Her physique and acting don't match the setting
For the fucking plot yes it matters a lotKlump and body love are the same actor, with different physical appearance, their physique matters.
Tony Stark at his peak
Tony Stark at his lowest:
Yes a wealthy well groomed man that looks after himself but isn't exactly a supermodel when it comes to his looks.Literally nope, lol... And Andrew Tate?. What are you smoking?
Physical appearance as in the size of their ears, their jawline/cheekbones being "attractive"? No it doesn't matter one bit for me. "Physical appearance" in that a wealthy self centred playboy character would typically be portrayed to have well cut hair, good dental care, hygiene etc. Yes that matters because it makes for plausible characters. You seem to be completely missing that point though and arguing about I don't know what.Because no one is asking you to care about how good looking a character is.
The point is that the physical appearance matters.
Still failing to answer why I would want Stark to be attractive. What doesn't make sense is your ludicrous idea that you think somebody is asking me to be gay when you constantly keep failing to come up with a rational answer to that question. Comically stupid take but you keep doing you.Again... No one is asking you to be gay.
You asking this question doesn't make sense.
But you do. Because you keep faling to understand that the physical appearance matters. How hard is that to understand.
I've read some fanboy drivel in my time, but that takes the biscuitFrumple the cave dwelling ogre being good for games instead of simply not going to such extremes to purposely make the character so ugly like they have, sure is one hell of a hill to die on.
Like im worried the game isnt real yet let alone the main character (anyone remember Jawanna Dark and a perfect dark "gameplay" segment that never was)
But like why fight so hard for the ugly character, its not really hyperbole with this one like aloy where its not really as bad as the narrative says, like this character is straight up hideous and purposely done so too, I guess its to take down the patriarchy? Who knows what the retard thinking was behind that character.
It doesn't matter to you but you keep asking why you should care.... When none is asking you to care about it in the first place.Physical appearance as in the size of their ears, their jawline/cheekbones being "attractive"? No it doesn't matter one bit for me.
Is someone attractive because you find them attractive, or do you find someone attractive because they are attractive?Still failing to answer why I would want Stark to be attractive
Somebody literally asked:It doesn't matter to you but you keep asking why you should care.... When none is asking you to care about it in the first place.![]()
Not sure what you're asking but I have a general sense of what the opposite sex finds attractive and what I find attractive. Does not necessarily mean that I want my characters to be attractive. For example I know that a lot of people are attracted to Ryan Gosling/Jessica Alba but doesn't mean I watch Jessica Alba/Ryan Gosling movies because it has them in it. I can watch movies with John C. Reilly, Whoopi Goldberg, Shelley Duvall or the example I gave with Robin Williams. As long as the character is plausible I really couldn't give a shit. I don't watch movies specifically to see eye-pleasing people.Is someone attractive because you find them attractive, or do you find someone attractive because they are attractive?
And the physical appearance is tied to the character portrayed.Somebody literally asked:
"Who would you rather have playing Tony Stark?"
And I gave my opinion that I literally couldn't care what the person genetically looks like as long as their personality traits are plausible for their portrayed character.
and sexy to me and I have no interest in how sexy Stark looks. I'm sure some ladies/gay men do.
It is about creating appealing characters. Appealing doesn't necessarily mean "sexy
But you are asking about "why I would want Stark to be attractive", right? Let's try not to fail at answering your inquiry.Not sure what you're asking but I have a general sense of what the opposite sex finds attractive and what I find attractive. Does not necessarily mean that I want my characters to be attractive.
So if I understand correctly, you don't watch movies to specifically see attractive people, but plausible characters. Right?. As long as the character is plausible I really couldn't give a shit. I don't watch movies specifically to see eye-pleasing people.
At this point I think they still don't have more than 4 seconds of gameplay to show.Hopefully they finally show some proper uninterrupted gameplay for Fable and it's not just a bunch of cutscenes with 2-3 seconds gameplay clips spread around.
At this point I think they still don't have more than 4 seconds of gameplay to show.
Aaah the classic, lets just pretend things dont happen and call people fanboys angle.I've read some fanboy drivel in my time, but that takes the biscuit
Can't wait for Fable. Up your's, to all the haters
How about they release it, PS5 port after, and then the Fable team at Playground is laid off?Yeah, the game they're about to have a deep dive showcase on in two weeks is definitely getting canceled and DOA.
Member that perfect dark deep dive... I memberYeah, the game they're about to have a deep dive showcase on in two weeks is definitely getting canceled and DOA.
Maybe ten seconds. And we've definitely not seen more than 4 seconds of combat. We saw the main character awkwardly dodging around a werewolf, and that's it. And it could easily be a Perfect Dark situation where that was just a complete fabrication.They literally showed more than 4 seconds already.
But what they showed apparently was never a real thing, as in actual gameplay. Sounds like they more or less pulled a Killzone 2 first footage/trailer on everyone. Let's see if Fable got downgraded.well that but also want to revenge for Perfect Dark which looks like a pretty damn solid game and then it was canceled
OMG her design makes total sense nowso.,....you're saying you would have sex with Jez Corden?
Like im worried the game isnt real yet let alone the main character (anyone remember Jawanna Dark and a perfect dark "gameplay" segment that never was)
Fable is probably 8-10 million sold for the entire series. The sheer cost of the newest entry must be at a point where Xbox are wondering if it is even feasible to release, and not just cancel the game.
I really can't see it happening. Please quote me if wrong.
Nobody remembers a Perfect Dark deep dive because there wasn't one.Member that perfect dark deep dive... I member
Nobody remembers a Perfect Dark deep dive because there wasn't one.
Better than the utter nonsense from you. I take it you only cared for Astrobot because you fancied it and wanted to give it oneAaah the classic, lets just pretend things dont happen and call people fanboys angle.
Ps5 = This is a XboxYear of xbox