NormalGamer
Neo Member
He's a +1 Reddit Elemental.He looks like I expected.
![]()
He's a +1 Reddit Elemental.He looks like I expected.
![]()
Pc gamer has been trash for YEARS AND YEARS
Reminded me of rofif for a second there.He looks like I expected.
![]()
You're like a robot who doesn't understand the concept of fun.Highguard does a bad job of communicating its "boring phase" to players. However, once you understand everything it's reasonably enjoyable. Consider...
1. The chests are "gambles" and are used to build 80% of your loadout.
2. Farming crystals allows you to finish off your loadout by buying expensive gear in the shop.
This system forces the player to ask reasonably fun questions based on time.
"Do I look for more chests and hope I pull a better gun, or can I rock with what I currently have?"
"Do I farm more or is my current economy enough to set me up for the next phase?"
You're like a robot who doesn't understand the concept of fun.
How they/them see themselves > how they actually look.He looks like I expected.
![]()
No matter if it sells/succeeds im certain marathon topics gonna be:Take your wins while you can get them.
Marathon approaches.
Nobody knows multi-player game design more than the people on NeoGAF who hate all things multi-player, right?
If we don't get a half dozen temp bans in the CCU thread post Marathon release it will mean we've all been domesticated like pugs.No matter if it sells/succeeds im certain marathon topics gonna be:
![]()
All the meltdowns and drama will be tasty af and i will be there to witness it
Speaking bit from outsider pov since i dont care/play that genre, am gonna enjoy the threads nonetheless![]()
If we don't get a half dozen temp bans in the CCU thread post Marathon release it will mean we've all been domesticated like pugs.
It's the same kind of sick mind that thought several minutes of QTE rock-hitting would be a fun thing to do every god damn match.I mean, this is the same guy who wanted the consoles you interact with in Helldivers to be full blown mini-games. Didn't think they were interactive enough and saw no problem in how that would work while you're getting your ass eaten by an army.
A lot of people seem to be enjoying itAm I the only one who thinks Arc Raiders is incredibly overrated? I have 10 hours in the game and am bored out of my mind, I can't even muster enough strength to boot it up anymore. What a waste of money.
Am I the only one who thinks Arc Raiders is incredibly overrated? I have 10 hours in the game and am bored out of my mind, I can't even muster enough strength to boot it up anymore. What a waste of money.
It's now at 7,400. It peaked yesterday at 12,700. So it'll likely top out around 10,000. And middle of the night drop to 3,000-ish.
As I suspected (hey got two forecasts out of 3 correct!), it looks like it topped out at 9,400 today. It's now prime time evening and now on the downslope at 9,000.So if the trend is similar, this game will likely peak at around 9,000-ish and that's it. Middle of the night it'll drop from 4,500 to probably about 3,000-ish.
If it was F2P more people would have tried it, like in this case. But if you want people to stick around the game actually needs to be something that people want to continue to play.I remember when Concord failed, many of the game's defenders were saying it would have succeeded if it were free to play instead of costing $40. I think Highguard failing so terribly, despite being free to play, proves those people wrong.
I'm shockedAm I the only one who thinks Arc Raiders is incredibly overrated? I have 10 hours in the game and am bored out of my mind, I can't even muster enough strength to boot it up anymore. What a waste of money.
Nobody knows multi-player game design more than the people on NeoGAF who hate all things multi-player, right?
ARC Raiders has entered White Rose status. There's like 8 unimpeachable games and ARC Raiders has been added to that list.I'm shockedMen_in_Boxes hasn't reply to your comment explaining why you are wrong
I advise you not to read these threads for too long, lest you aquire a super inflated teflon ego like myself.Did this forum widely expect Arc Raiders to bomb? If so can you link me to the thread?


If it was F2P more people would have tried it, like in this case. But if you want people to stick around the game actually needs to be something that people want to continue to play.
It's crazy when you think of stats like this because you'd think based purely on production values, some YT trailers or Geoff Keighley promos that any game with some level of marketing like this would be guaranteed some decent player demo play. Especially if any are F2P.concord would have died either way, there was a clear sign it was gonna fail like nothing ever failed before.
that sign? well, Concord's player numbers dropped during the second beta weekend.
why is that significant? because the first weekend was only for people who preordered, while the second weekend was open to everyone.
so the preorder exclusive weekend had more players than the open weekend, which means not only that people weren't interested to test it without any purchase needed... it also means even the people who preordered didn't come back for the second weekend. that right there is a devastating outcome.
then they did the usual "look at all those numbers from our beta! these many kills were done, and these many matches were played", where they tried to use the highest sounding numbers they could.
but people did the math and if you actually broke the numbers down, there were so few people playing the beta, that no interpretation of those numbers would result in a good outcome.
either the numbers show an OK-ish number of players that instantly uninstalled after only 1 match, or it was an ungodly small amount of players that played an OK-ish number of games. both are bad and showed a bad reception from players, before launch and before anyone had to buy it.
after the beta it was basically clear it would be a disaster.
Real classics are not held together by content calendars or promises of what is coming next monthARC Raiders has entered White Rose status. There's like 8 unimpeachable games and ARC Raiders has been added to that list.
.
.
Also, Out of Action hit Steam Early Access a week ago. For $20, it's fairly barebones with little to no onboarding, but it's showing some potential in terms of just sitting a bunch of cool stuff in front of players and letting them have at it. Action Half-Life and The Specialists players should seriously consider looking into this.
Nobody knows multi-player game design more than the people on NeoGAF who hate all things multi-player, right?
If you check it drops almost exactly 30% day to day at the lowest point, which is more or less right now. I mentioned yesterday we will have just north of 4K. Probably it will slow down as it goes even lower, but we don't know, it might as well me everybody left just decides to fuck it and go play something else with their mates.Currently sitting at 4010 ccu with 24h peak of 9987, we reached milestone of below 10k 24h peak ccu for the first time, bros![]()
I think at this low numbers it will accelerate its own demise, coz it will be harder to get a team which will reduce already very questionable funIf you check it drops almost exactly 30% day to day at the lowest point, which is more or less right now. I mentioned yesterday we will have just north of 4K. Probably it will slow down as it goes even lower, but we don't know, it might as well me everybody left just decides to fuck it and go play something else with their mates.
I think you nailed their plan in going with the 3 vs 3 idea. I which case as long as six people in the entire world are online looking for a match in Highguard then the game is not dead! These guys are brilliant! Now, what are the odds all six are whales...?coz it will be harder to get a team which will reduce already very questionable fun![]()
What feels surprising to me is that we have 30+ years of videogame history behind us with hundreds of amazing classics to chose from, yet there are around 4000 "people" that would chose Highguard over any of those.It keeps dropping lower and lower player numbers.
![]()
Its f2p, those could be 12yo checking any new steam release only to move on after day or two, lets check end of feb so full month after launch when it losts its novelty smell and new contenter on the block is about to steal its spotlight(marathon launches early marchWhat feels surprising to me is that we have 30+ years of videogame history behind us with hundreds of amazing classics to chose from, yet there are around 4000 "people" that would chose Highguard over any of those.![]()
Nice, can't wait to not play it!marathon launches early march
Only one thing left to doIt keeps dropping lower and lower player numbers.
![]()
It keeps dropping lower and lower player numbers.
![]()
I'm pretty sure majority of Zoomers would be unable to play an early X360 game, let alone 1990s classic.What feels surprising to me is that we have 30+ years of videogame history behind us with hundreds of amazing classics to chose from, yet there are around 4000 "people" that would chose Highguard over any of those.![]()
Nah, it feels quite nice the KCD games.First person mounts is a dumb concept, only viable on VR if the camera movement is right.
Ubisoft recently recommitted to GAAS native games. Hogwarts Legacy 2 is supposedly a GAAS title.I love the typical answer to "so many GAAS games are thrash" is "yeah, but but but there might be some that are really, really good and bring in hundreds of millions"! Ok, however the failure of a GAAS game hurts way more given the initial investment.