I'm noticing a really sad irony with the reality of the "anti ai hate brigade", in that it's effectively in how it plays out, "anti the little guy" and pro corporatist.
Ai is a tool that can significantly uplift small companies and creators, allowing them to more equitably compete with the big boys/billion dollar corps, and allow them to save money and punch above their weight. My own company does this, and ai is invaluable, it has allowed us to pursue projects that we would have never greenlit otherwise, and expand our team.
Small companies are far more vulnerable to the hate brigades than large ones, but the incentives for them to use the tools are far larger.
GOG is not wealthy, doesn't have big margins, is competing with steam, one of the most profitable companies on the planet.
If for example, this January sale will net steam $10 mil in profits.
But will net GOG $50k in profits (prob very generous).
An illustration such as they used would be about $500, that's 1% of their entire profits gone, for steam it's tiny fractions of that. Meaning their extreme wealth/profits makes hiring a person for it an insignificant cost, but it's an actual cost for gog. Now expand out to a smaller sale or a smaller company, and that $500 could easily be 10%, 20% or more. But that same company is of a size where anti ai brigading could cause significant measurable harm to them. So they are forced to either take that risk, or weaken their already limited competitiveness, where their larger competitors can get away with using the tools due to their market position and thus broaden enhance their dominant position.
Anyhow…shower thoughts at 9am