• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

NVIDIA is reportedly working on a new high-end RTX 50 for this fall

IbizaPocholo

NeoGAFs Kent Brockman

Nvidia is reportedly planning to launch a new high-end RTX 50 series graphics card, positioned above the current RTX 5090 and potentially named RTX 50 Titan or 5090 Ti, targeted for the third quarter of 2026 based on multiple credible sources.

Summary

  • The article Speculates on Nvidia launching a new RTX 50 series card in 2026, based on informal discussions at CES and a trip to Asia.
  • During CES visits with brands, three contacts vaguely mentioned a new RTX for 2026; initially dismissed as references to Super variants, but later confirmed by different sources in Asia specifying a card above the current RTX 5090.
  • Sources are described as direct, credible, and reliable, cultivated over years, not hearsay; five or six sources from different countries and companies provide a solid basis beyond typical rumors.
  • Hesitation to publish stemmed from market tensions, rising memory chip prices, Nvidia's AI chip prioritization, sources' likely NDAs, and avoiding criticism similar to MLID's leaks.
  • Decision to publish influenced by Nvidia's recent policy shifts, such as approving extreme custom cards (e.g., MSI Lightning Z, Asus) with unbridled BIOS from brands like MSI and Asus.
  • Presence of Nvidia's Geforce VP at MSI's RTX 5090 Lightning Z launch at CES, expressing enthusiasm for high-wattage overclocking, seen as a positive signal.
  • The new card's launch is targeted for the third quarter of 2026 ("Back to School"), with industrial processes (design, etc.) already underway; unrelated to Super cards, which are off the 2026 schedule.
  • Expected in small batches, primarily as a Founders Edition (FE) version; no 100% certainty due to Nvidia's history of sudden changes.
  • References a blurred January 2025 photo from another article hinting at an RTX 50 Titan.


We can't confirm it yet
We reached out to our own sources but have not received confirmation so far. Overclocking.com says it has checked the claim with multiple sources and describes it as more than a rumor. We will share any updates as soon as we learn more.
 
Even if you do you still won't get one.

K40Hvoz52859gMMP.gif
 
Best case scenario:
sophie-rain-bbl.webp


Worst case scenario:

_116388214_gettyimages-1175368064.jpg.webp
Best case scenario happens only in ur dreams, free sex with that baddie would require u to be some mega chad looks wise + likely having decent amount of wealth(multimilionaire at least) and status on top :P

Thats likely one of worst scenarios right there:


Mind u i live about 200meters(220yards or so? ) from actual prison complex thats put right in the middle of my smalltown, and noises i hear in the evenings/at night from there are already enough to have pristine motivation for being law obidient citizen :)
 
Then it means u need even more wealth, bro, if woman has the bag she will only respect u if u are even more wealthy, thats how hypergamy works :P
U cant look at it from male pov, women look at this stuff in totally different way.
 
Doubt. It's pretty safe to say that 90% of the 5090s are being bought for AI use already.
Why waste capacities for an even more expensive gaming GPUs instead of just making new Blackwells?

Somewhat doesn't make sense to me.
 
Last edited:
So, the RTX Pro 6000 with a bit less memory and repackaged for gaming?

The 5090 is currently overkill, and if the 6000 series is coming in late 2027 or early 2028, I don't see why anyone would purchase this.
 
Best case scenario happens only in ur dreams, free sex with that baddie would require u to be some mega chad looks wise + likely having decent amount of wealth(multimilionaire at least) and status on top :P

Thats likely one of worst scenarios right there:


Mind u i live about 200meters(220yards or so? ) from actual prison complex thats put right in the middle of my smalltown, and noises i hear in the evenings/at night from there are already enough to have pristine motivation for being law obidient citizen :)

Women aren't as shallow as most men think. Although women may want wealthy men, they don't use logic to choose romantic partners. They follow their emotions. If a woman likes a man, she is even willing to pay for his time.

I will share a story that will hopefully make people realise the true nature of women and what they really want.

My cousin Sebastian was broke, and his mum even made him move to the basement as a punishment for refusing to take care of his child. My aunt thought that, by doing this, women would lose interest in her son, and he would rethink his life and finally get a job, and take care of his child. However, my aunt underestimated her son, because women still wanted to sleep with him despite living in the basement!!!! Women would harass my aunt at 6am, asking where my cousin Sebastian was because they were in love with him and wanted to talk to him even at 6 am. It was a comedy that happened in real life. I remember visiting my aunt and we always joked about that.

My cousin was good-looking, but not exactly a Chad type that you see on TV shows. He was just 176 cm tall, had a muscular build and a good-looking face, but he went bald quickly. However, despite his shortcomings (having no job, car or future), my cousin had a magnetic character that attracted women. He oozed confidence (he was even a boxer for few years) but he was also funny and romantic. Women and people in general loved being around him, which is what attracted so many attractive women to him. Even in his forties, young women aged 18–25 were still wanted to sleep with him.

So no, hot women dont need wealthly men to want romantic relationship. If man is however ugly and have unatractive character (being weak, acting like a woman) they may however be attracted to the money. You can pay for a woman's time, but she won't desire you and will secretly find someone she's really attracted to. Many wealthy men finds that their beautiful wives cheat on them. Men who use money to attract women often find themselves in extremely toxic relationships and an unhappy life.

I don't think my cousin is a good role model for men, but his example shows that women aren't as shallow as men think. Take care of your looks because it will certainly help, and earn good money to raise your kids in a good environment. Just be a good person who enjoys life.
 
Last edited:
Bro, ur cousin was 1 in 10k men chad, literally, u said it urself, former boxer, muscular build, magnetic personality, and he was of avg height which is fine too :P
U know what it takes for a man in his 40s to be able to pull women in their prime(18-25)? As a 43yo guy myself, a lot :P
Avg looks man wont pull woman in her prime even if he is rich/has some kind of status(not A-list celeb but lawyer/doctor), for ur cousin to be so popular even in his 40s it means he had to be extremly handsome/charismatic/chickmagnet, we all know of such a guy but its 1 and only guy we knew in our hood/area, they are extremly rare ;)

Edit: Dont think chads are only of henry cavil/chris hemsworth/young brad pit/young leo lvl, those are chads above chads, those guys made generational wealth of their looks( worldrenown actors), there is plenty chads that are tier or two below them and they are still 3 leagues above avg guy like u or myself :)
 
Last edited:
So, the RTX Pro 6000 with a bit less memory and repackaged for gaming?

The 5090 is currently overkill, and if the 6000 series is coming in late 2027 or early 2028, I don't see why anyone would purchase this.
The 5090 isnt overkill for the most demanding games at 4K. A 4x faster GPU would be needed to run PT games at 4K native resolution at 120 real frames per second. While the RTX 5090 can use AI to achieve 4K at 120–240 fps, even in PT games, some people will still want a faster card to play with real resolution and framerate.
 
The 5090 isnt overkill for the most demanding games at 4K. A 4x faster GPU would be needed to run PT games at 4K native resolution at 120 real frames per second. While the RTX 5090 can use AI to achieve 4K at 120–240 fps, even in PT games, some people will still want a faster card to play with real resolution and framerate.
One of the biggest issues with gaming today is the obsession with framerates.

Unless you are a competitive gamer playing at the professional level, anything above 60 fps is largely meaningless to your ability to play and enjoy a game.
 
"WHAT DO YOU MEAN WE DIDNT RELEASE ANY NEW PRODUCTS IN 2026?"

First year for us to not release a new GPU in 15 years you say? "Hold my beer! - 5090 Ti $10k and 100 are made"
 
One of the biggest issues with gaming today is the obsession with framerates.

Unless you are a competitive gamer playing at the professional level, anything above 60 fps is largely meaningless to your ability to play and enjoy a game.
If you played at 240 fps on a 4K, 240 Hz monitor, you would quickly change your mind. Sure, 60 fps is still enjoyable (especially in games like borderlands 3 that have ultra low input lag), but the motion looks blurry and the mouse movement feels heavier than it does at 160–240 fps. Playing first-person shooter games at 160–240 fps drastically improved my experience. It's not a small difference.
 
If you played at 240 fps on a 4K, 240 Hz monitor, you would quickly change your mind. Sure, 60 fps is still enjoyable (especially in games like borderlands 3 that have ultra low input lag), but the motion looks blurry and the mouse movement feels heavier than it does at 160–240 fps. Playing first-person shooter games at 160–240 fps drastically improved my experience. It's not a small difference.
I can play at 4k/120. I see zero difference between that and 60 fps. Honestly, I'm often hard-pressed to tell the difference between 30 and 60 fps.

I play games, I don't count frames.
 
One of the biggest issues with gaming today is the obsession with framerates.

Unless you are a competitive gamer playing at the professional level, anything above 60 fps is largely meaningless to your ability to play and enjoy a game.
Obsession with frame rates was always a thing on PC. Back in the 90s with CRT monitors people would drop Counter Strike/Quake/etc resolution to 800x600 to get the "best" frame rates.

I can play at 4k/120. I see zero difference between that and 60 fps. Honestly, I'm often hard-pressed to tell the difference between 30 and 60 fps.

I play games, I don't count frames.
You can't play games without frame rates so your eyes are counting the frames even if poorly counting if you can't see the clearly gigantic difference between 30 vs 60+fps.
 
Last edited:
I can play at 4k/120. I see zero difference between that and 60 fps. Honestly, I'm often hard-pressed to tell the difference between 30 and 60 fps.

I play games, I don't count frames.
You don't need to count frames to see the difference between 30 and 60 loll

And if you really can't tell the differences between 30/60/120 maybe you should see an eye doctor tbh.
 
So, the RTX Pro 6000 with a bit less memory and repackaged for gaming?

The 5090 is currently overkill, and if the 6000 series is coming in late 2027 or early 2028, I don't see why anyone would purchase this.
People will buy what they can get. Killing the 5090 to repackage it as a 5090 Ti for 50% or more MSRP is just taking advantage of that reality.
 
I can play at 4k/120. I see zero difference between that and 60 fps. Honestly, I'm often hard-pressed to tell the difference between 30 and 60 fps.

I play games, I don't count frames.
One does notice when framerates fluctuate between 60 and 100 frames. About that however it doesn't really make a difference in my opinion. Hence my goal is always to max out games with around 120 fps. Only when I can't do that any more (with DLSS) an upgrade will be due.
 
So, the RTX Pro 6000 with a bit less memory and repackaged for gaming?

The 5090 is currently overkill, and if the 6000 series is coming in late 2027 or early 2028, I don't see why anyone would purchase this.
There are these weirdos who buy "best new something" even if it's +2% perf for +200% money.

That being said though the only way this rumor will turn out to be true is if Nvidia will EOL 5090 and put this one out instead at a much higher MSRP to compensate for the idiocy of memory market.
 
I am calling bullshit on this.

Why?

I have one reason:
Power. How much fucking power would this draw? 700W-800W? It would need 2 12VHPWR ports and almost no power supplies have that many. There is no way I would ever remotely consider running that much power through a single cable. The regular 5090 draws between 500-600, although it can be drastically decreased with undervolting and power limiting.
 
My prediction is- we not getting anything stronger than 5090, instead we getting chips bit weaker from 5090 that didnt qualify to be of that top quality, likely 5080ti with 24gigs vram, cutdown 5090 chips.
Pricewise it will be crazy expensive obviously, no matter msrp real streetprice will be upwards of 2500$.
 
One of the biggest issues with gaming today is the obsession with framerates.

Unless you are a competitive gamer playing at the professional level, anything above 60 fps is largely meaningless to your ability to play and enjoy a game.
not for me. On PC anything less than 90 fps is where I start to adjust settings. I can tolerate 60 on a console like my PS5 Pro, but I always go for the highest performance mode.

144fps is really the minimum that I go for, but in slower games like Alan Wake 2, I can tolerate 90.

Which is why if Rockstar limits GTAVI to 30 fps, I wont be buying it.
 
I am calling bullshit on this.

Why?

I have one reason:
Power. How much fucking power would this draw? 700W-800W? It would need 2 12VHPWR ports and almost no power supplies have that many. There is no way I would ever remotely consider running that much power through a single cable. The regular 5090 draws between 500-600, although it can be drastically decreased with undervolting and power limiting.

The RTX Pro 6000 is 600 W too. Maybe they could do 800 throwing in an 8 pin too.
 
Not the dumbest. That would go to those who say that anything above 30 fps is meaningless.

Believe it or not, I often envy those people who enjoy and can play games at 30 fps. I simply cannot. 60 fps is pretty agonizing, but I can tolerate it on my PS5. For PC I need at least 90. 144 is where I am actually happy. 180 and above is really where I prefer. If we still had CRT, I could easily tolerate those lower frames. 30 fps on a CRT is a night and day difference vs LCD/OLED. 60 fps on CRT is amazingly butter smooth.

That's where I think the LCD/OLED breakthrough can come from: figuring out a way to mimic how CRT presents an image, rather than trying to chase the mythical 1000fps/1000Hz.

120Hz BFI is pretty amazing. I would actually love to see Sony push for 72 fps as the minimum and push TV makers to include 144Hz BFI. where a black image is inserted between each of the 72 frames. There are just so many good options that can improve low framerate motion clarity.

I am amazed that Asus is really the only monitor manufacturer that uses BFI for OLED.

So much good could come from monitor makers trying to improve motion clariety and would make lower end GPUs much more viable.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom