• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

RTINGS.com is now a Paywalled Service

Good fucking riddance then. I dont buy devices every month to have a need to pay for a service. I get that they can't sustain stuff, but this is the worst way to do it.

Take Out The Trash GIF by GIPHY News
 
It'd be nice if this keeps them from succumbing to payola (i.e., getting paid to give certain products certain ratings), but for some reason I doubt it.
 
Grildon Tundy said:
It'd be nice if this keeps them from succumbing to payola (i.e., getting paid to give certain products certain ratings), but for some reason I doubt it.
Click to expand...
Is this a known thing or just an assumption based on them rating a product higher or lower than you would like? Because if true this would potentially destroy their whole service.
 
I don't really mind them charging for the service.

It seems weird to me that anyone would pay for this more than like once every few years if you are looking to buy a new TV or similar product.

But if it's actually profitable then I guess good on them.
 
It should be noted that not everything is paywalled:
While much of RTINGS.com remains free, our full test results and in-depth product analysis are now available only to members. We'll continue to iterate on what that looks like over time as we refine the model across different product categories.
Click to expand...
This likely means that you will still see the full score for a tv, but not all the sub-scores that factor into it.
 
poppabk said:
Is this a known thing or just an assumption based on them rating a product higher or lower than you would like? Because if true this would potentially destroy their whole service.
Click to expand...
An assumption, but not based on them rating a product higher/lower that I can point to. I don't really get invested in toy wars like that.

It's based on them apparently needing cashflow (changing to this model), human (or more like "corporate") nature, and precedents like Gamespot, Sitejabber, LendEDU, and any number of Amazon sellers who get caught paying for positive reviews.
 
that's annoying.

sadly they are the only decent PC Monitor review site.
like most PC Monitor reciews (including Monitors Unboxed) completely ignore VRR compatibility in their reviews.

they'll just list "oh it's HDMI 2.0" but don't clarify if it has HDMI Forum VRR Support, which many higher class HDMI 2.0 monitors have, but not all of them.

Rtings have a super easy console compatibility list in their reviews where they test HDMI VRR compatibility on the PS5. 1440p monitors especially are usually HDMI 2.0, but can support HDMI VRR, but don't fully advertise it anywhere because apparently it's not worth mentioning lol.

and again, even "respected" YouTube channels like Monitors Unboxed completely ignore it (or at least they have every time I watched a review of theirs)
 
I think they're pricing way too high. Without looking into it I can assume they do what everyone else does and sets up a direct debit, so it's not like they're altruistically giving people the freedom to have a single month sub up front for their likely usage time.

Make it $2/month and you'll get more in the door. I'd wager than if they halved the fee they'd get more than double the subs. Make it $2 and people might not even notice/care about the impact on their funds and keep it running.

But $10? Many won't even consider it. I know I won't.
kevboard said:
that's annoying.

sadly they are the only decent PC Monitor review site.
like most PC Monitor reciews (including Monitors Unboxed) completely ignore VRR compatibility in their reviews.

they'll just list "oh it's HDMI 2.0" but don't clarify if it has HDMI Forum VRR Support, which many higher class HDMI 2.0 monitors have, but not all of them.

Rtings have a super easy console compatibility list in their reviews where they test HDMI VRR compatibility on the PS5. 1440p monitors especially are usually HDMI 2.0, but can support HDMI VRR, but don't fully advertise it anywhere because apparently it's not worth mentioning lol.

and again, even "respected" YouTube channels like Monitors Unboxed completely ignore it (or at least they have every time I watched a review of theirs)
Click to expand...
It's awful that you need a third party site to get a reliable technical specification for a product, but I don't doubt it. There are plenty of times when I've struggled to find reliable product information.

I've had a conversation with AOC's CS about a monitor that still advertised a feature only present in earlier production batches. I've also had confusion about a Sony TV's 120hz mode that wasn't in mine. I don't remember if that was a regional thing or wrong website description, but either way it was difficult to get accurate information.
 
Grildon Tundy said:
An assumption, but not based on them rating a product higher/lower that I can point to. I don't really get invested in toy wars like that.

It's based on them apparently needing cashflow (changing to this model), human (or more like "corporate") nature, and precedents like Gamespot, Sitejabber, LendEDU, and any number of Amazon sellers who get caught paying for positive reviews.
Click to expand...
We'll see, but their reasoning for doing this gives them a chance of staying independent. AI scraping their reviews and not referencing the source, fewer visits via Google, plus buying all the products themselves isn't cheap. As they say, they had a choice between this and monetisation models which doesn't align with independent reviews.

I hope it works for them to be honest.
 
Soodanim said:
I think they're pricing way too high. Without looking into it I can assume they do what everyone else does and sets up a direct debit, so it's not like they're altruistically giving people the freedom to have a single month sub up front for their likely usage time.

Make it $2/month and you'll get more in the door. I'd wager than if they halved the fee they'd get more than double the subs. Make it $2 and people might not even notice/care about the impact on their funds and keep it running.

But $10? Many won't even consider it. I know I won't.

It's awful that you need a third party site to get a reliable technical specification for a product, but I don't doubt it. There are plenty of times when I've struggled to find reliable product information.

I've had a conversation with AOC's CS about a monitor that still advertised a feature only present in earlier production batches. I've also had confusion about a Sony TV's 120hz mode that wasn't in mine. I don't remember if that was a regional thing or wrong website description, but either way it was difficult to get accurate information.
Click to expand...
I think pricing is more when you need something not something to be kept year on subbed
 
What a strange decision. But it seems like it's due to AI scrapping and search engine algorithms.
I see they have already implemented the change. So several parts of their articles are blurred out.

One thing I was not aware is that they review a lot more things besides TVs and monitors.

Here is their explanation in video.
 
Last edited:
winjer said:
What a strange decision. But it seems like it's due to AI scrapping and search engine algorithms.
I see they have already implemented the change. So several parts of their articles are blurred out.

One thing I was not aware is that they review a lot more things besides TVs and monitors.

Here is their explanation in video.
Click to expand...

yeah they review software (vpns) and things like keyboard switches, mattresses, vacuums, toasters, microwaves, shoes. i get it. as they grew they wanted to expand but c'mon some of that is silly. maybe they should focus back on electronics/gaming/audio and more software (less expensive that buying physical things). ditch the whole home/kitchen product market outside of TVs. they must know what products people are visiting for. i've personally only ever used them for TV/monitor reviews
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Napster Music Service Is Dead, Again...
21
621
Toots replied
Ashley Buzzard is now a confirmed killer
19
466
KyoZz replied
What is the easiest way to retire early now?
2
52
489
jason10mm replied
AOL is finally shutting down its dial-up internet service
2
56
2K
Spukc replied
Mobb Deep's final album Infinite is out now
2
51
988
Portugeezer replied
Top Bottom