FMN
Member
It was #1 last week though.I edited my post:
Edit: Also it's first days of the month and people just got paid, so that's why CS2 spiked above RE:9
It was #1 last week though.I edited my post:
Edit: Also it's first days of the month and people just got paid, so that's why CS2 spiked above RE:9
It's #1 a lot of weeks, but it just spiked over RE:9 for a moment, which is pretty wild. Considering it's massive successIt was #1 last week though.
Odd, it's #2 under "global" on my side behind RE9.It's #1 a lot of weeks, but it just spiked over RE:9 for a moment, which is pretty wild. Considering it's massive success
Yup it was #1 for a brief momentOdd, it's #2 under "global" on my side behind RE9.
Well I guess that's even more evidence that top seller on steam says nothing lol.Yup it was #1 for a brief moment
Oh no..
I heard this before..
Countdown to men in boxes coming in to explain its not nicheRegardless of how it will perform, and whether it will be profitable or not, the question remains: Why would your next project be a niche title, when you have more than 800 mouths to feed, as a developer.
Bungie's management is beyond saving. Sony should clean house, appoint other leads and dictate the future roadmap...
3.6 billion dollars...![]()
Fixed.Billions will *not* be playing on launch day.
Marathon vs Arc Raiders vs Avowed vs Veilguard
4 weeks before release
Marathon - out of top 100
Arc Raiders - 85
Avowed - out of top 100
Veilguard - 75
3 weeks before release
Marathon - out of top 100
Arc Raiders - 31
Avowed - out of top 100
Veilguard - 63
2 weeks before release
Marathon - 82
Arc Raiders - 3
Avowed - 57
Veilguard - 48
1 week before release
Marathon - ??
Arc Raiders - 6
Avowed - 9
Veilguard - 15
Release week
Marathon - ??
Arc Raiders - 1
Avowed - 6
Veilguard - 3
I was waiting for Morgan Park's opinion on this game.Morgan Park
![]()
Oh no..
I heard this before..
Nah. Marathon seems that at launch won't be as successful as Destiny 2, Arc Raiders or Helldivers 2 but won't be a Concord at all.It's so insane that it is a real possibility that Bungie could experience a "Concord" (the game dying in less than a year).
134K CCU peak doesn't mean the demo had 134K players. It means that the highest amount of players connected at the same time was that. Meaning, maybe over 1M played the demo on Steam. And pretty likely way more than that played it in console. Adding that and combined with the previous playtests, maybe over 3M players already played it.I just don't get how let's say 500,000 people are interested in this game, and there's a free to play few days for one of the most polarizing modern games with one of the biggest studios in gaming history, how only 134k show up to play it?
I don't see how there's this group of people, 350k that is saying "no need to try it just take my 40 bucks".
I buy blind all the time which is fine but if and when there's demos, or betas or trials etc.. If in interested I will absolutely always try it.
It's not like they HAD to max a character out just to get wiped, they could've put 2 hours or so in and be done.
As I said before I thought 300k easy to "try it". I don't think 143k upon opening, down to 120k by days end, to then hover around 40-80k to finish the slam up as a free to play product.
Theres no wag at 40 bucks based off that it comes anywhere near it, I just don't see it
While Concord is used just to mock "woke" games, at this point, given the reception and performance after the server slam, launching with fewer than 100K CCU players would put Marathon in flopathon status right from the get-goNah. Marathon seems that at launch won't be as successful as Destiny 2, Arc Raiders or Helldivers 2 but won't be a Concord at all.
The thing is, progress in the demo won't carry to the game, which will release next week in a more complete and finished state (the demo must be minimum 2 months old due to testing + approval processes required in console, plus had many things disabled/locked).
Haters will say Marathon is a flop even if it achieves 4M CCU and sells over 20M copies in the first month.While Concord is used just to mock "woke" games, at this point, given the reception and performance after the server slam, launching with fewer than 100K CCU players would put Marathon in flopathon status right from the get-go
Gold (or master) was back in the day the milestone where when completed they got the version of the game that got printed in cartridges or CDs, a handful weeks before release. Back then that was the final version of the game.At the menu screen the version label of the demo was something like GOLDMSTR so very likely it is a final gold master and not an unfinished thing
Update: the label was GOLRETAIL, probably meaning gold retail
Sony wouldn't shut down Bungie. My guess is that if Sony didn't want them anymore, Bungie will be independent.next month gonna be like
![]()
(i hate html)
Oh no..
I heard this before..
Yeah this has me worried lol. Fucking access media needs to die.Oh, PC Gamer, that's the seal of disapproval, this game is cooked, lmao
Oh no..
I heard this before..
Saw some guy here on GAF saying he played the tutorial for 30 seconds before uninstalling because the mouse movement felt like shit (was literally a bug that got fixed the day after).i see people hating on it but not really giving reasons (assuming they played it). it's got some things it can improve but nothing a few patches/updates won't fix.
Well for me for example i played one of the earlier tests and i played some of the serverslam and there is just no reason for me to mix in Marathon in the rotation with Tarkov and Hunt(And Arc when i want a more chill experience in an exfil-shooter). I do think Marathon is OK but i just have more fun in thoose other games. I DO NOT find Marathon hard to get into at all, but that might be couse i play Tarkov i guessi see people hating on it but not really giving reasons (assuming they played it). it's got some things it can improve but nothing a few patches/updates won't fix.
Saw some guy here on GAF saying he played the tutorial for 30 seconds before uninstalling because the mouse movement felt like shit (was literally a bug that got fixed the day after).
Most people just made up their minds before giving it a solid shot. It is what it is.
Isn't that the sameSony wouldn't shut down Bungie. My guess is that if Sony didn't want them anymore, Bungie will be independent.
Regardless of how it will perform, and whether it will be profitable or not, the question remains: Why would your next project be a niche title, when you have more than 800 mouths to feed, as a developer.
Bungie's management is beyond saving. Sony should clean house, appoint other leads and dictate the future roadmap...
3.6 billion dollars...![]()
Oh no..
Oh no..
I heard this before..
the world needs more people like you.I hope the game is a success for Bungie. It was not my cup of tea, but I hope it sticks around for all the folks who do enjoy it.
Thanks. We do need more people who use the terms "gay" and "retard" in everyday vernacular for every situation.the world needs more people like you.
it's just refreshing to see someone say they don't like something but wish everyone else (studio/gamers) well. it's OK to not like things. doesn't mean it's bad or should not be enjoyed by anyone else. the game ain't perfect and most games at pre launch/launch aren't but the amount of hate the game has been getting is insane before it's even released. people have written it off already and will never give it a chance.Thanks. We do need more people who use the terms "gay" and "retard" in everyday vernacular for every situation.![]()
it's just refreshing to see someone say they don't like something but wish everyone else (studio/gamers) well. it's OK to not like things. doesn't mean it's bad or should not be enjoyed by anyone else. the game ain't perfect and most games at pre launch/launch aren't but the amount of hate the game has been getting is insane before it's even released. people have written it off already and will never give it a chance.
maybe it will be a failure. maybe it will suck and i'll regret buying it. but it hasn't done anything majorly wrong yet... at least to me. i think the game is great and has loads of potential.
Arent you the guy that hates people that hates games they dont play? And as an answer to me yesterday had to throw jabs at arc(i just said arc is in its own league)and now you qoute som tards from the net, i mean your not really consequent are ya.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ShillUp doing shilly things again
i think you'll find i didn't mention Bungie but knock yourself out.Agreed, I know for me I absolutely wish bungie well and to do well, make good games, plagiarize more, misuse retention bonuses, layoff before payoffs, wish them all nothing but the best!
So my answer was not acceptable to you couse i didnt say i wish the game well, i did say it was ok though. The answers has to fit your narrative though i guess.it's just refreshing to see someone say they don't like something but wish everyone else (studio/gamers) well. it's OK to not like things. doesn't mean it's bad or should not be enjoyed by anyone else. the game ain't perfect and most games at pre launch/launch aren't but the amount of hate the game has been getting is insane before it's even released. people have written it off already and will never give it a chance.
maybe it will be a failure. maybe it will suck and i'll regret buying it. but it hasn't done anything majorly wrong yet... at least to me. i think the game is great and has loads of potential.
i don't know who you are? i didn't reply to you at any point lol.So my answer was not acceptable to you couse i didnt say i wish the game well, i did say it was ok though. The answers has to fit your narrative though i guess.
i think you'll find i didn't mention Bungie but knock yourself out.