Windows Phone 7 |OT|

Status
Not open for further replies.
Of course. Messenger and Facebook chat are built directly into the phone and interchangeable with SMS/MMS at a core OS-level. I use it all the time, it's brilliant.

Well, that's good to know. I was under the impression they were still trying to outsource the msn functionalities out.
 
Since we're kind of on the subject, how does the phone decide what to use to contact somebody if you have them on FB, MSN, and you have their mobile number?

Does MSN take priority over FB, which takes priority over SMS/MMS? Because I don't see any way to choose which you use when you send a message to somebody you can contact in multiple ways.

Click the switch button. The icon with the two arrows facing different ways.
 
Since we're kind of on the subject, how does the phone decide what to use to contact somebody if you have them on FB, MSN, and you have their mobile number?

Does MSN take priority over FB, which takes priority over SMS/MMS? Because I don't see any way to choose which you use when you send a message to somebody you can contact in multiple ways.

it defaults to SMS if you have their number, you manually switch the conversation using the menu (... bottom right), I can't say which gets priority out of facebook/msn.
 
Just like everything on Windows Phone, messaging is "people first" so to speak. Meaning all the contacts you have on your phone automatically get populated with their Facebook information, Live Messenger information, phone number, etc. as long as you choose for the phone to do so.

This means that the phone automatically knows whether you have someone's Messenger/Facebook information or not. It also logs into the service, so it knows if those people are online on those services or not.

When you load up the messaging app, it'll default to Facebook/Messenger if the user is online on that service and you've set yourself to online. If they're not online, it'll default to SMS/MMS.

If you've already talked to someone, then it'll default to whatever you used last. If you last used Facebook and the user is not signed-in to Facebook, it'll tell you that you should probably switch to SMS instead but it won't do it automatically for you, since maybe you want to send an offline Facebook message.
 
This is probably a dumb question but what is the difference between all these chat applications and just text messaging back and forth? Is it faster? Slicker? More boss?
 
This is probably a dumb question but what is the difference between all these chat applications and just text messaging back and forth? Is it faster? Slicker? More boss?

No need to pay the insanely high priced txt messaging plans (or atleast drop down to the lowest one).
 
This is probably a dumb question but what is the difference between all these chat applications and just text messaging back and forth? Is it faster? Slicker? More boss?
It's free when you have WiFi or a data plan. Not everyone wants to pay extra for text messaging (something that costs the operators very little, but is a huge cash cow for them).
 
Something is wrong here.

opBFq.jpg
 
Its amazing what a little marketing money can do (both this and using the metric of carrier website rankings which are easily bought)

Amazon customer reviews are being bought by Microsoft to affect a ranking barely anyone uses? And they couldn't even pay enough money to buy up ALL the top slots?
 
so, maybe I'm missing something here but when I use the 'share on SkyDrive' option from the camera it compresses the pictures down and makes them look like garbage, but if you use the new SkyDrive app it uploads the original photo. Metadata and all.

I don't really want to open another app to share a photo when the option is already built-in. I thought that was the idea anyway.

is there some setting or something I'm not seeing?
 
so, maybe I'm missing something here but when I use the 'share on SkyDrive' option from the camera it compresses the pictures down and makes them look like garbage, but if you use the new SkyDrive app it uploads the original photo. Metadata and all.

I don't really want to open another app to share a photo when the option is already built-in. I thought that was the idea anyway.

is there some setting or something I'm not seeing?

Uploading from the camera is basically a snapshot function for quick and easy sharing. It would cost a lot of bandwidth to upload a 5 or 8 MP picture every time, so they're compressed. If you want the full quality, you can always sync the original picture with Zune to your PC, or now upload them with the SkyDrive app.

Should there be an option to turn the compression off? Absolutely, but Microsoft is probably picking the dumbest users for their focus tests, so options and switches and toggles confused them and Microsoft took it out.
 
"YouTube’s current API does not have any documented methods for obtaining high quality video content."

Then how are apps on iOS and Android doing it and will devs pull them too?

I thought that was covered in the article?

Unfortunately, Google has refused to allow Microsoft’s new Windows Phones to access this YouTube metadata in the same way that Android phones and iPhones do. As a result, Microsoft’s YouTube “app” on Windows Phones is basically just a browser displaying YouTube’s mobile Web site, without the rich functionality offered on competing phones. Microsoft is ready to release a high quality YouTube app for Windows Phone. We just need permission to access YouTube in the way that other phones already do, permission Google has refused to provide.
 
"YouTube’s current API does not have any documented methods for obtaining high quality video content."

Then how are apps on iOS and Android doing it and will devs pull them too?
Do third party Youtube apps on iOS have a HQ mode? I don't know since I've never tried any. The built in one is collaborated between Apple and Google, who gives private API access to Apple to stream videos in HQ.
 
Oooo not getting the YT thing totally sucks, but the scuffle might explain why MS went ahead and released some of their stuff on iOS and left Android out in the cold. I find it funny though cause not like Apple is putting their apps on WP7 either. MS seems to be trying to get their stuff on all the platforms though, and Apple and Google seem to have no reason to return the favor.
 
They don't seem to be surprised about it. More disappointed that the workaround is being shut down and they're not being given the same access as Android and iOS developers.
iOS and Android devs don't get a HQ stream either from the public API. I have no idea why Google won't expose it for third party developers.
 
Ahh, so it's only google themselves that are capable of providing an app for HQ youtube vids?

That seems less sinister to me. Though still annoying.
 
Ahh, so it's only google themselves that are capable of providing an app for HQ youtube vids?

That seems less sinister to me. Though still annoying.
Either themselves or you have to work with them to make your own like Apple did. And they seem to be very selective about who they're willing to work with to allow access to the HQ stream.

Microsoft could easily make their own Youtube app but maybe their relationship with Google isn't the best.
 
Ahh, so it's only google themselves that are capable of providing an app for HQ youtube vids?

That seems less sinister to me. Though still annoying.

Many of the third-party apps pull the data straight from the YouTube page without going through an API. LazyTube/MetroTube used the mobile site whilst others such as easyTube and SuperTube use the desktop version, which allows them to serve 720p videos.
 
Microsoft could easily make their own Youtube app but maybe their relationship with Google isn't the best.

didn't they just release a youtube app on the 360? :lol

my guess is YouTube are going to release their own app and that's why these third-party ones have been removed.

or maybe Google got the hump when Microsoft released all those iOS last week
 
didn't they just release a youtube app on the 360? :lol

my guess is YouTube are going to release their own app and that's why these third-party ones have been removed.

or maybe Google got the hump when Microsoft released all those iOS last week

I bet they don't do apps.... the app model for youtube is kinda stupid when they can just make the html5 website better and have that work be reflected for everybody.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom