Does the manga follow the series exactly? I rarely read the manga version of a series if that's the case.
I doubt most of us know how to cook.
I've actually never baked before. I want to feel like a wizard.
Maybe that can be a new years resolution...
so late to that depressing mind melt of a party![]()
I guess it's a time based thing. I simply don't have the time to read volume after volume of manga if I can get a condensed version of the story that can be experienced in 3-6 hours. I do agree with you in that the artwork and story of manga can be compromised when it's adapted. I found that to be the case with Blade of the Immortal. Holy hell did that series get shafted hard in the art department :lI'm the exact opposite. I almost never watch anime since the art is never as good and the story is often compromised.
I'm of the mind that whichever medium came first is probably the better one, and in most cases that's the manga.
Well that explains it. I don't think my body knows how to feel hungry. I forget to eat all the time; it's pretty bad. I'm pretty sure my body thinks it's photosynthetic.Baking is science for hungry people.
gurl pleaseYou'll bake and I'll read Pratchett.
I win because I'll be reading good books and you'll be failing at cooking AHAHAHA
I'm the exact opposite. I almost never watch anime since the art is never as good and the story is often compromised.
I'm of the mind that whichever medium came first is probably the better one, and in most cases that's the manga.
That's kind of what I hear. I only watch anime casually. I used to be really into the stuff, but gave up on it in '04. I just lurk the year end threads to check out the most recommended series when all is said and done. It helps to filter out the garbage. Only series I watched all year was Puella Madoka Magica and I just finished that yesterday night :l
When i'm going to be sitting eating my awesome pita bread surrounded by my pratchett collection you're going to be so jealous
I totally get what you're saying, but it's weird to hear anyone refer to manga (or any comics really) as the medium that "came first". I know it has some really old roots, but one of my favorite things about it is just how new and shiny it still is historically speaking.
I tend to only re-watch series that have themes that disturb me and make me thing about life in general - most of the themes in anime are too extreme to relate to real life
but depression and isolation themes of NHK stuck with me.
my Avatar has always been Potato from the Air anime anther very strange anime that stuck with me that I found hard to watch
I really have not watched anything serious for many years now I have not heard of anything really good on lately
I totally get what you're saying, but it's weird to hear anyone refer to manga (or any comics really) as the medium that "came first". I know it has some really old roots, but one of my favorite things about it is just how new and shiny it still is historically speaking.
I'm the exact opposite. I almost never watch anime since the art is never as good and the story is often compromised.
I'm of the mind that whichever medium came first is probably the better one, and in most cases that's the manga.
My next pic is going to be of me surrounded by my Pratchett collection.
I'll be very small in it.
I think if you like a series you must try both manga and anime.
Manga for the art and deeper story
Anime for the colors, motion, and music.
for example some of my favorite mangas was from Clamp but I knew nothing about about them until I saw Chobits. I just enjoyed the story so much I had to look for the origin and discovered some great artists.
What if I'm just really far away from the camera? And maybe I own every single one on my Kindle. YOU DON'T KNOW THAT
Man I don't think I've read any clamp since I was about 13-14. I loved the fact that they had such a range of styles due to multiple artists.
Also, I agree with you about disturbing anime being the most rewatchable. My favorite anime is probably still Serial Experiments Lain, since every time I watch it I feel like I understand my own philosophies a bit better.
They haven't all been released on the Kindle.
CRIMINALLY UNDERRATED.
Hey, who else read a lot of Piers Anthony as a kid and then recently decided to read them again and got really creeped out halfway into the first book?
Just me? Oh.
Last I watched was Gurren Lagaan and Paranoia Agent. Bit of Yu Yu Hakusho beatdowns, but that doesnt really count since it wasnt new to me.
Really need some new stuff to watch on that front.
Cheska somehow looks the same without looking like that girl I know. Strange. At least she won't think I hate her now.
Even if they were all available on the Kindle, a true fan would have the hard copies as well! (Even if the American covers suck.)What if I'm just really far away from the camera? And maybe I own every single one on my Kindle. YOU DON'T KNOW THAT
If you do this I'll forgive your avatar narcissism.My next pic is going to be of me surrounded by my Pratchett collection.
I'll be very small in it.
I've heard of the name but no, never read any of the guy's stuff. Sorry.Hey, who else read a lot of Piers Anthony as a kid and then recently decided to read them again and got really creeped out halfway into the first book?
Just me? Oh.
If you don't mind people eating animals (though none of it's graphic) I recommend Toriko. It's the property that those in Japan are pushing as the next big thing after One Piece, and it's a lot of fun. The plot basically boils down to a chef who wants to cook every dish partnering with a hunter who wants to taste every animal to take over the culinary world.
I think thats a good thing right?
Legs are awesome. Hottest part of a girl after hair.Damn Devo, those legs...
![]()
I've heard of the name but no, never read any of the guy's stuff. Sorry.![]()
I think she means in the context of a franchise in question. In that, if there was an anime series based on a manga, she'd prefer to read the manga since the anime was based upon it.
That's what I heard in regards to NHK. That it was a rather depressing and disturbing series.. so I was kind of thrown off when Kitsune mentioned that it was a hilarious manga. I was like... wait... what? And I think we may similar tastes. Magica Madoka was pretty good. It was a deconstruction of the magical girl genre. It was pain and torture wrapped up in a pretty pink shell. Pretty devious I think. It was sort of like Higurashi no naku koro ni without any of the horrific imagery.
I don't mean that it's more historical. I'm just talking about the fact that the overwhelming majority of anime series are adaptations of manga series.
My favorite anime series were all completely original projects and not adaptations, which is why they rocked so much. This does not seem to be the norm, however.
Also, I'm a speed reader, so I often get though a manga series faster than I can get through the anime.
Damn Devo, those legs...
![]()
I think more of you need to join TinychatGaf
It did? I saw it a several months ago, but I don't recall that. I hate how faded the series looks. As far as crazy anime goes, Evangelion will always be my number one. However, I recently watched it again (for the billionth time) and wasn't fazed by it. I wanted it to be more crazy. Maybe the third Rebuild movie will deliver -- it probably won't.man, I haven't watched Lain in forever. Box set is in my basement. It's kind of crazy how that show predicted the advent of web 2.0.
If you don't mind people eating animals (though none of it's graphic) I recommend Toriko. It's the property that those in Japan are pushing as the next big thing after One Piece, and it's a lot of fun. The plot basically boils down to a chef who wants to cook every dish partnering with a hunter who wants to taste every animal to take over the culinary world.
It's mostly light fantasy stuff that was the Harry Potter of its age, but reading it now I get the distinct feeling that he's a pedophile because every single book has gratuitous underage sex in it. Sure, it's done in a cutesy way, but the young girls are all raging nymphomaniacs.
Eek. Only person allowed to get away with that is my personal god Nabokov.It's mostly light fantasy stuff that was the Harry Potter of its age, but reading it now I get the distinct feeling that he's a pedophile because every single book has gratuitous underage sex in it. Sure, it's done in a cutesy way, but the young girls are all raging nymphomaniacs.
Tell me about it... been sitting here for the past hour telling myself that I was going to play Dark Souls tonight.But, my backlog!
Damn Devo, those legs...
![]()
I think more of you need to join TinychatGaf
Tell me about it... been sitting here for the past hour telling myself that I was going to play Dark Souls tonight.
Still haven't moved from the laptop.
Hey, who else read a lot of Piers Anthony as a kid and then recently decided to read them again and got really creeped out halfway into the first book?
Just me? Oh.
Eek. Only person allowed to get away with that is my personal god Nabokov.
My "Harry Potter" was basically anything written by Diana Wynne Jones. And man, I almost never get to talk about books and book-GAF moves so slowly. What other authors do you guys read?
Not just you. I really liked them as a kid, but I went back a few years ago to reread A Spell for Chameleon and...yeah. Super creepy, and not just a little misogynistic.Of course I also liked Clive Cussler as a kid and boy are those books bad in the same way. (I've read a lot of good and seriously crap fantasy in my time)
I got 1Q84 week one, and still haven't read it. I actually waited 3 years for that novel to be translated. I dont' know what happened to me :l Last book i read was The Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao. Loved that bookNeil Gaiman (Good Omens is secretly the best Pratchett book)
Kurt Vonnegut
GRRM
Haruki Murakami
Jon Ronson
There's a bunch more, but those guys are my favorites right now.
Not just you. I really liked them as a kid, but I went back a few years ago to reread A Spell for Chameleon and...yeah. Super creepy, and not just a little misogynistic.Of course I also liked Clive Cussler as a kid and boy are those books bad in the same way. (I've read a lot of good and seriously crap fantasy in my time)
When I was nine years old, I wrote a short story about an elf and a mage traversing an imaginary world and banishing evil back to the depths from whence it came. I was proud of the story. I showed it to my family and they read it, and pretended it was great. They put it on the fridge.
I reread the story years later and it was a difficult decision whether I should laugh or whether the embarrassment was too much even for hysterics. I thought fantasy fiction had a formula that alternated between a short climax and a short resolution like the regular, predictable oscillations of a wave pattern. Like that wave pattern, it seemed to go on and on so that a 20-paged story seemed to take forever to read. At nine years old, I thought this was an exciting, scintillating narrative. I thought it should be published. But it shouldn't have, I know that now.
It's a shame that the whole thing may as well have been plagiarized from this novel. They share the same structure, the same generic character models and the same laughably simplistic moralities that I could have been summarizing a 400-paged novel. And yet, my version didn't take five hours of your life. My version didn't make you sigh and look wistfully out the window as if to say, "since reading this book, time has passed inexorably onward, I have aged terribly, and yet I have learned nothing." The clouds float by and the traffic continues on the street, but a part of you has died. Unlike the novel, however, when pieces of your soul die, they stay dead. The same cannot be said for the major characters in Dragons of Autumn Twilight.
The plot reads as if played through a Dungeons and Dragons campaign. Not simply in the sense that it's disorganized and illogical, but also because the reader actually gets the sense that someone is rolling dice to determine the outcome. At various parts of the book that are meant to be exciting, the narrative devolves into explanations of the mechanics of the game. Raistlin is a mage, and thus must memorize his spells every morning if he is to use them throughout the day. Everyone is suddenly struck by fear and must roll 1d20 for a fear check (except the Kender, because he's immune). Tanis, as an elf, is able to see the aura of all living things, except past chapter 5 because it's too hard to keep talking about that ability for too long.
It's an ordeal to read. But I loved it when I was nine. I also had no idea what true hardship was.
I do now. It gives me a basis of comparison. There are many hardships I'd rather face than reading this novel again.