• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

US PoliGAF 2012 | The Romney VeepStakes: Waiting for Chris Christie to Sing…

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Turkish president can rest easy. Perry will never be president of the U.S.

Oh, and I found this article interesting;

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...te-show-newt-clueless-on-black-americans.html

Insulting Comments at Fox News Debate Show Newt Clueless on Black Americans

At the GOP debate Gingrich stood by his comments about African-Americans needing to demand work, and his description of Obama as the “food stamp” president, showing why he—and his party—can’t appeal to nonwhites.

Can't argue with that. 90% of blacks will always go Democrat because Republicans are pretty tone deaf when it comes to the politics that blacks care about. Also Hispanic voters are swinging 67-24 for Obama over Mitt Romney. Good luck in November guys.

It being Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Williams asked Gingrich whether some poor and minority voters might not be insulted at his claim that poor kids lack a work ethic and that black people should be instructed to demand jobs, not food stamps. Gingrich, as is his wont, haughtily dismissed Williams’s question, to wild applause.

Then Williams tried again, mentioning a black woman who had taken Gingrich to task for calling Barack Obama a “food stamp” president. By this point, the overwhelmingly white crowd had begun to boo the only African-American on stage. When Gingrich insisted that Obama was indeed the “food stamp” president—because more Americans are now on food stamps—and dismissed Williams’s criticism as “politically correct,” the crowd began to scream with delight. By the time Gingrich finished his answer, the crowd was on its feet in a standing ovation.

BTW, The comments are atrocious.
 
Theirs enough fodder on the previous page alone to give the Obama campaign several months of rhetoric to use against Mitt.

I used to be scared of Mitt. Not so much anymore.
 
By recently you mean over a year ago, and once again... Did you not follow what was going on at the time? Did you forget about the huge battle with the republicans and their freaken hostage tactics?

I can't believe anyone would blame Obama for extending the top-bracket Bush tax cuts.

That would require a person to have literally not been paying attention to the political scene in the last few months of 2010.
 
Theirs enough fodder on the previous page alone to give the Obama campaign several months of rhetoric to use against Mitt.

I used to be scared of Mitt. Not so much anymore.

Buying up companies and laying off their employees to make a profit. Pays around the 15% tax bracket...

Yeah, Obama's people are gonna get some use out of that.

I can't believe anyone would blame Obama for extending the top-bracket Bush tax cuts.

That would require a person to have literally not been paying attention to the political scene in the last few months of 2010.

For most people, the buck stops with the President. People won't care about the hostage tactics when it comes to the ads...

Never underestimate the conscious decision to remain ignorant on how the legislative sausage is made.
 
The Turkish president can rest easy. Perry will never be president of the U.S.

Oh, and I found this article interesting;

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...te-show-newt-clueless-on-black-americans.html



Can't argue with that. 90% of blacks will always go Democrat because Republicans are pretty tone deaf when it comes to the politics that blacks care about. Also Hispanic voters are swinging 67-24 for Obama over Mitt Romney. Good luck in November guys.



BTW, The comments are atrocious.

Ladies and Gentlemen, David Brooks:


"I sometimes wonder if the Republican Party has become the receding roar of white America as it pines for a way of life that will never return."
 
There are a lot of things to criticize Mitt about, but the fact that he's being vilified for being rich is idiotic. Republicans are usually high on slander, but the Democrats sure are catching up.

That's Republican spin for the valid criticism that Romney doesn't understand the value of money from the perspective of the vast majority of Americans.
 
Oh, and I found this article interesting;

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...te-show-newt-clueless-on-black-americans.html

Can't argue with that. 90% of blacks will always go Democrat because Republicans are pretty tone deaf when it comes to the politics that blacks care about. Also Hispanic voters are swinging 67-24 for Obama over Mitt Romney. Good luck in November guys.

I don't know who I respect less after last night--the candidates or the people in the crowd.
 
Yeah, that is going to go over well during the general. Vote for the multi-millionaire that pays a lower tax rate than you do!

FLORENCE, S.C. — Mitt Romney revealed for the first time today that his effective tax rate is “closer to 15 percent,” suggesting that he pays less in taxes than many middle income Americans despite being worth an estimated $250 million.

“What’s the effective rate I’ve been paying? It’s probably closer to the 15 percent rate than anything,” Romney said during a press conference
after an early morning rally. “Because my last 10 years, I’ve…my income comes overwhelmingly from some investments made in the past, whether ordinary income or earned annually. I got a little bit of income from my book, but I gave that all away. And then I get speakers fees from time to time, but not very much.”
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...is-tax-rate-is-probably-closer-to-15-percent/
 
Cap and trade made a lot of sense too when it was the "market solution" to a tax on carbon. I liked the article, but someone should bookmark Kosmo's reactions today to compare them with his reactions when such a plan becomes a political issue because it burdens industry.
 
Hmm, I don't think the Romney 15% effective tax rate plays very well in the age of Occupy Wall St. I guess he figures those people wouldn't vote for him anyways and just held it back till he got the GOP nom
 
15%?!

Taxes on job creators are too high! No wonder there are millions of unemployed, poor Mitt is being asked to give up more than 1/10th of his total income!
 
Obama is up 5 on Romney nationally:

Over the last month Romney's seen his negatives with independents rise from 46% to 54%, suggesting that the things he has to say and do to win the Republican nomination aren't necessarily helping him for the general. Obama's turned what was a 45-36 deficit with independents a month ago into a 51-41 advantage.

One thing that really stands out in this poll is the extent to which Obama has claimed the middle. He's up 68-27 on Romney with moderates. He also leads by 20 points with voters under 45, a group there's been some concern about slippage with, and he has a 66-30 advantage with Hispanics.
There. Will Diablos stop perpetuating the falsehood that Romney is beloved by moderates and independents, and PD that youth and Hispanics will abandon Obama in droves?
probably not
 
15%?!

Taxes on job creators are too high! No wonder there are millions of unemployed, poor Mitt is being asked to give up more than 1/10th of his total income!

Ironically, such low tax rates have created an inverse problem. Why should a rich guy like Mitt bother working if his tax rate is so low? He can just sit on his ass and the money pours in. If he actually works, his tax rate will go up. So why work? We've created a system where our "best and brightest" have the incentive to sit on their ass. Hang out at the beach. Maybe run for president as a hobby.

BTW, the GOP screwed up by not having this come out until now. They are stuck with Romney as their candidate at this point. Literally Mr.1% who pays taxes at a lower rate than Joe-Six-Pack. Brilliant move, GOP!
 
romney will shift to the center and start going after independents and moderates during the general election. it is way too early to make judgments, good or bad, from polls like this.
And if he does, Obama's team has a shit-ton of videos of him flip-flopping and going for the right. He's not getting off easy.

Yeah, of course the situation could change a lot before November, but if this were showing Romney up by 5 the media would be going apeshit.
 
romney will shift to the center and start going after independents and moderates during the general election. it is way too early to make judgments, good or bad, from polls like this.

I have a question about that though.

Can we say that McCain shifted to the center in 2008? I kept waiting for him to and he didn't, as far as I could tell: torture, Iraq, fiscal policy, etc. It seemed to me that he was more concerned with sustaining support from the base. That's what Palin was brought in to help out with.

Wouldn't Romney face the same constraints?
 
I have a question about that though.

Can we say that McCain shifted to the center in 2008? I kept waiting for him to and he didn't, as far as I could tell: torture, Iraq, fiscal policy, etc. It seemed to me that he was more concerned with sustaining support from the base. That's what Palin was brought in to help out with.

Wouldn't Romney face the same constraints?

Never really seemed like Obama shifted far from his primary positions, either.
 
Some hilarity on the 'not very much' he gets from speakers fees:

Financial disclosure forms that candidates are required to file annually shows that Mr. Romney earned $374,327.62 in speakers’ fees from February of 2010 to February of 2011, at an average of $41,592 per speech.

Jesus christ, this guy is out of touch.
 
Obama is up 5 on Romney nationally:


There. Will Diablos stop perpetuating the falsehood that Romney is beloved by moderates and independents, and PD that youth and Hispanics will abandon Obama in droves?
probably not

I never said Hispanics would abandon Obama, I argued they might stay home given the inaction on issues they care about. As we get closer to the election those moderate numbers should slowly reverse, assuming the economy grows slowly/stagnates

Decent poll for Obama I suppose
 
Sounds reasonable to me. Why exactly do you think people will flip out?



Because there are hardliners on the left (McKibbin and Hansen being at the forefront) that will not accept mitigation plans unless it's focused around Co2. It is an unacceptable compromise for them to tackle the other gasses/particulates (ie. low-hanging fruit) unless there are firm plans to mitigate Co2 at the same time.
 
I have a question about that though.

Can we say that McCain shifted to the center in 2008? I kept waiting for him to and he didn't, as far as I could tell: torture, Iraq, fiscal policy, etc. It seemed to me that he was more concerned with sustaining support from the base. That's what Palin was brought in to help out with.

Wouldn't Romney face the same constraints?


This is actually a good point, the old McCain never surfaced, and I always refer to him during this time as selling his soul for the presidency. Even since the contest, he has remained mostly the same, with only the occasional disagreement with the gop.
 
What's the point in recalling Walker if they don't have a decent candidate to run against him? Unless Feingold changes his mind on running I don't see the point
 
Jonathan Chait thinks the Obama-Romney general campaign began on Twitter yesterday.

Kevin Drum's take on Sullivan's piece on Obama that came out yesterday.

I really don't understand why anybody ever tries to "understand" or "explain" a politician. It seems to me an irrelevant waste of time. It doesn't matter what Obama believes or what his strategies, if any, are. Our job is to demand what we want, period. Criticism is one way in which demands are expressed. (You failed to do this = I want this.) It doesn't even matter if that criticism is fair or unwarranted or whatever, as long as it is coming from the right direction (that being the left!). All that matters is that a message is sent. The louder and more persistent the message, the more Obama (and other Democrats and even Republicans) has to bend to it.
 
Because there are hardliners on the left (McKibbin and Hansen being at the forefront) that will not accept mitigation plans unless it's focused around Co2. It is an unacceptable compromise for them to tackle the other gasses/particulates (ie. low-hanging fruit) unless there are firm plans to mitigate Co2 at the same time.

I don't know who those people are, but I'm happy to agree that they're dumb if they're outright ignoring science.
 
Because there are hardliners on the left (McKibbin and Hansen being at the forefront) that will not accept mitigation plans unless it's focused around Co2. It is an unacceptable compromise for them to tackle the other gasses/particulates (ie. low-hanging fruit) unless there are firm plans to mitigate Co2 at the same time.
So their evil plans of global wealth transfer are foiled?

McKibbin and Hansen have very little influence.

Climate change may end up being one of mankind's biggest problems but were too greedy and short-sighted to deal with it. Greedy and short-sighted describes humankind pretty well so perhaps it is best for us to suffer a fall from it. We steadfastly refuse to accept evolution.
 
Sullivan's long game argument is just a continuation of one of the most annoying Obama memes: that he's some master strategist who plays 11 dimensional chess, setting the board in his favor for the future. Yet most of what Obama has done has been reactionary or politically expedient. He is far more concerned with short term political victories than long term policy wins, especially if the victory is "bipartisan." Let's not forget this is the same guy who would have raised Medicare eligibility ages if Boehner's idiot caucus didn't torpedo the deal.

He may be a personal liberal. His background certainly suggests he cares deeply about the poor, disadvantaged/how government can help, race issues, etc. But from a governing perspective he's always been more interested in striking deals than being some ideologue or long-game player. To make matters worse, he treats government like it's the Harvard Law Review where allowing your conservative peers to have more articles in an issue might result in them working together with you in the future, networking, etc. He genuinely seems incapable of recognizing he's dealing with an opposition that does not want anything to do with him, and all the horse changing in the world won't change that. Personally I think this may be a glimpse into his personality and childhood.

This is a guy whose own father abandoned him, his mother was distant for much of his life as well. When you add in the racial identity confusion I think we're looking at a person who was not loved as a child to a level many children were by their parents, and has therefore attempted to find acceptance through joining close communities, always being the giver, constantly trying to impress or be accepted by others, etc. Boehner has taken advantage of that for four years, and Obama seems perfectly fine with it. The same could be said of Joe Lieberman and some other people anyone else would shitcan asap.
 
McKibbin and Hansen have very little influence.

Hansen who runs the GISS (NASA) has little influence? The guy who controls hundreds of millions of dollars in research money every year? McKibbin who was a key figure in getting the Keystone XL overturned has little influence? Okay.



Cyan said:
I don't know who those people are, but I'm happy to agree that they're dumb if they're outright ignoring science.

They're not ignoring science. They are purposely being hyperbolic for political/philosophical reasons.
 
Personally I think this may be a glimpse into his personality and childhood.

This is a guy whose own father abandoned him, his mother was distant for much of his life as well. When you add in the racial identity confusion I think we're looking at a person who was not loved as a child to a level many children were by their parents, and has therefore attempted to find acceptance through joining close communities, always being the giver, constantly trying to impress or be accepted by others, etc. Boehner has taken advantage of that for four years, and Obama seems perfectly fine with it. The same could be said of Joe Lieberman and some other people anyone else would shitcan asap.

Psychoanalyzing Obama?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom