I don't have many controversial opinion in terms of what most game enthusiasts that post on the net hold dear, but there are a couple.
1. Half-Life.....meh. So for full disclosure, I played and beat the PS2 version, which by all accounts was a competent port by Gearbox. I had no issue with playing the game on a controller (don't use m/kb anyway) and the game looked fine for its time. The speech had that low sampled "tinny" sound but that was the only technical flaw.
Personally I just don't like the pacing of the game, it feels too rushed for my taste and I always felt like my next objective was little more than something to just push me out of there. In terms of story, it makes sense but I felt like I didn't really accomplish anything. The innovative in game storytelling was also real dated and transparent when I played it. the game can't help that but it didn't impress. I felt HL2 was just much better on every level
2. Skies of Arcadia....most overrated JRPG by gaming enthusiasts. I term it that way because the average gamer or fan would probably feel that way about FFVII. Anyway, I get that the game has a decent sense of adventure, but almost everything else is average. Characters....flat, battles.....slow and boring, ship battles....even slower, encounter rate.....pretty fucking high, story.....lulz, it was the same shit that was cliche on SNES. Its a good game but I'll never get why people hold it in such high regard.
EDIT: In terms of positive flameworthy opinion, I really liked Bloodrayne 2. I thought it was the most fun melee based action game since the original DMC. Its not as technical as some of the others, but I enjoyed it a lot (for the PS2 era, just to be clear).
1. Half-Life.....meh. So for full disclosure, I played and beat the PS2 version, which by all accounts was a competent port by Gearbox. I had no issue with playing the game on a controller (don't use m/kb anyway) and the game looked fine for its time. The speech had that low sampled "tinny" sound but that was the only technical flaw.
Personally I just don't like the pacing of the game, it feels too rushed for my taste and I always felt like my next objective was little more than something to just push me out of there. In terms of story, it makes sense but I felt like I didn't really accomplish anything. The innovative in game storytelling was also real dated and transparent when I played it. the game can't help that but it didn't impress. I felt HL2 was just much better on every level
2. Skies of Arcadia....most overrated JRPG by gaming enthusiasts. I term it that way because the average gamer or fan would probably feel that way about FFVII. Anyway, I get that the game has a decent sense of adventure, but almost everything else is average. Characters....flat, battles.....slow and boring, ship battles....even slower, encounter rate.....pretty fucking high, story.....lulz, it was the same shit that was cliche on SNES. Its a good game but I'll never get why people hold it in such high regard.
EDIT: In terms of positive flameworthy opinion, I really liked Bloodrayne 2. I thought it was the most fun melee based action game since the original DMC. Its not as technical as some of the others, but I enjoyed it a lot (for the PS2 era, just to be clear).