At this point I wouldn't be surprised if a GOP candidate pointed out Obama's middle name as a critic against himWould be nice if they actually stopped resorting to the evil Obama crap, we get it but what would they do its getting abit tiresome at this point .Kind of why I like Paul the guy is consistent and says what he thinks instead of the usual blame game and dodging tactic crap.
I wish I could moderate one of these things.
And a state where only Christians can be sworn in as governor.
And most importantly, Romney is the most moderate. That's why he'll get the nomination... Conservatives will vote for NO (Not Obama). Independents, like always, will determine the victor. Romney appeals to them more than any other candidate.
lol he doesn't think global warming is real?
Is it just me, or is it odd that Romney keeps saying "The Creator" instead of "their Creator".
no he doesn't. Romney is no more appealing to Republicans than cough syrup is to children. Romney is neither who they are or what they want. He will be the nominee only because people think he has a better chance of beating Obama. But in truth, he motivates nobody.
Is that part of South Carolina law?
Also curious, why is South Carolina the deciding state on Republican candidates?
no he doesn't. Romney is no more appealing to Republicans than cough syrup is to children. Romney is neither who they are or what they want. He will be the nominee only because people think he has a better chance of beating Obama. But in truth, he motivates nobody.
So Romney says Obama is making it impossible for the private sector to rebound, yet previously when pressed with improving jobs numbers he argued the US economy always corrects itself and therefore Obama receives no credit. Which is it?
Is that part of South Carolina law?
Also curious, why is South Carolina the deciding state on Republican candidates?
wikipedia said:On December 20, 1860, South Carolina became the first state to declare its secession from the United States.
They're so mean, but so nice!http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/mitt-romney-comes-from-the-real-streets-of-americ
Mean Streets of America.
I posted about it above. It really got under my skin.
the south is obviously very important if the republicans are going to win
I really hope Romney loses. He's so boring.
He's also clearly not a Republican, but a Democrat pretending to be one for personal gain.
Yeah, if independents are going to vote for the most moderate person, they're going to vote for Obama, not Romney.
So the Republicans are the party of the south, and Democrats are the party of the north? What was the point of keeping America one country after the civil war if both sides continue to be at war politically?
Splitting the north and south apart would've invalidated the American RevolutionSo the Republicans are the party of the south, and Democrats are the party of the north? What was the point of keeping America one country after the civil war if both sides continue to be at war politically?
So the Republicans are the party of the south, and Democrats are the party of the north? What was the point of keeping America one country after the civil war if both sides continue to be at war politically?
A country can have different cultures within it.
There's a concept called the "nation-state" in political theory.
The "nation" represents the culture of a society.
The "state" represents the government.
Many countries are composed of multiple nations.
So the Republicans are the party of the south, and Democrats are the party of the north? What was the point of keeping America one country after the civil war if both sides continue to be at war politically?
No, because not everyone in the south is a Republican and not everyone in the north is a Democrat.But wouldn't both sides be happier if America split south/north? The south would get all the Republican policies they want, and the north would get all the Democrat policies they want.
]But wouldn't both sides be happier if America split south/north?[/B] The south would get all the Republican policies they want, and the north would get all the Democrat policies they want.
Was that Reince Priebus who said it didn't matter who the Republican nominee is because the election isn't about them anyway?
Gingrich has SC in the bag.
Today it is more liberals are on the coasts, and conservatives are the states in between.So the Republicans are the party of the south, and Democrats are the party of the north? What was the point of keeping America one country after the civil war if both sides continue to be at war politically?
I am unwilling to watch this debate on philosophical grounds. Has any candidate mentioned Obama as the Affirmative Action candidate, or asked for him to release his college transcripts yet?
Presidential elections with an incumbent rarely are.
Agreed. I just find it odd that a party chair would be so dismissive of the idea of their own candidate actually mattering in such a way two days before a vote.
It's true, of course, but politics is hardly about telling the truth all the time.
There are many Texans who would like this. Seriously however, as I mentioned that the country is more split center/coasts and the center states take in a lot more federal money percentage wise. So the financial incentives are greater than the political incentives.But wouldn't both sides be happier if America split south/north? The south would get all the Republican policies they want, and the north would get all the Democrat policies they want.
Breaking states is never fun. Just ask India and Pakistan.But wouldn't both sides be happier if America split south/north? The south would get all the Republican policies they want, and the north would get all the Democrat policies they want.
Well, he certainly doesn't have to worry about Romney.
Honestly, hasn't everyone entertained the idea of Texas seceding as a good thing, conservative or otherwise?There are many Texans who would like this.