• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

US PoliGAF 2012 | The Romney VeepStakes: Waiting for Chris Christie to Sing…

Status
Not open for further replies.
The thing I hate about this guy is that he has a MASSIVE ego. It's ridiculous. It's almost offensive how he flaunts this unearned arrogance. He's in it more for the glory than anything else. Ugh.
 
Well careful what you wish for with a Newt/Santorum ticket. I agree that it would be hilarious, but just listen to the crowd. They actually believe that the GOP is fiscally conservative. These guys are in a bubble.

If the GOP can unite behind Bush, I would be cautious with Newt because it's slick at selling snake oil.
 
Well careful what you wish for with a Newt/Santorum ticket. I agree that it would be hilarious, but just listen to the crowd. They actually believe that the GOP is fiscally conservative. These guys are in a bubble.

As long as that money isn't going to dirty poors or education.
 
The gap between the CO and MN caucuses on Feb. 7th and the AZ and MI primaries on Feb 28th is going to be torturously long.

Well careful what you wish for with a Newt/Santorum ticket. I agree that it would be hilarious, but just listen to the crowd. They actually believe that the GOP is fiscally conservative. These guys are in a bubble.

It's why Romney thinks he can just say whatever he wants and not be called on it. The GOP has been remarkably effective in weaving their own version of reality through rhetoric alone.
 
Well careful what you wish for with a Newt/Santorum ticket. I agree that it would be hilarious, but just listen to the crowd. They actually believe that the GOP is fiscally conservative. These guys are in a bubble.

You can find enough people to fill a room for any wackjob belief you could dream of. It's not very impressive
 
Well careful what you wish for with a Newt/Santorum ticket. I agree that it would be hilarious, but just listen to the crowd. They actually believe that the GOP is fiscally conservative. These guys are in a bubble.

If the GOP can unite behind Bush, I would be cautious with Newt because it's slick at selling snake oil.

And you think independents would lap up Newt? Even better, Santorum?

Those two are the most toxic political figures to independent voters.
 
Obama is not that good of a debater. He's decent at best. He's a great speaker, and the words always sound great falling out, but he's not very aggressive and he's not always effective at connecting certain concepts to the lives of the every day voter. Not being aggressive worked next to McCain, considering the ideas people had about McCain - and McCain was a fucking terrible debater. But the American public is feeling quite angry and lost right now, and they want an vocal spokesman to rally those feelings. Obama is definitely not that person.

I see what you're saying, and agree to a degree, but sometimes Obama's style is super effective. That time he debated the entirety of the GOP house regarding health care and absolutely tore all of them apart was pretty amazing.

I honestly think that Obama would make Gingrich look like an immature, ignorant fool in a debate. Obama would actually call him on his bullshit. Sure, Republican voters would think that Newt destroyed Obama, but independents, to whom Newt is already toxic, would see right through his bullshit sound-bites if Obama is there to call him on it.
 
Well careful what you wish for with a Newt/Santorum ticket. I agree that it would be hilarious, but just listen to the crowd. They actually believe that the GOP is fiscally conservative. These guys are in a bubble.

If the GOP can unite behind Bush, I would be cautious with Newt because it's slick at selling snake oil.

I think Newt with a wtf VP would be the best chance that Obama would be a clear victor over the Republican challenger and give congressional democrats some fire power. I just want Tammy Baldwin and Elizabeth Warren in the Senate...
 
Seriously. Newt supports gold standard? I doubt that.

Gold standard is the least appealing policy of Paul. He's popular for his foreign policy, civil liberties, and being the sole fiscal conservative in the GOP that actually is serious about it.
 
This speech has been 100% on Obama, unlike Romney's petty talking points against Gingrich in his speech.

His pandering is first rate. I think he can win Florida
 
Well careful what you wish for with a Newt/Santorum ticket. I agree that it would be hilarious, but just listen to the crowd. They actually believe that the GOP is fiscally conservative. These guys are in a bubble.

If the GOP can unite behind Bush, I would be cautious with Newt because it's slick at selling snake oil.

Absolutely agree. I'm not on the "LOL NEWT" wagon yet, especially if Santorum is his VP because of the evangelicals.
 
I think Newt with a wtf VP would be the best chance that Obama would be a clear victor over the Republican challenger and give congressional democrats some fire power.

You're not thinking like Republicans. Imagine you believe Newt's talking points, but you're weary of his personal life being in conflict with your social conservative beliefs (yes, yes, using big government to enforce bullshit ideas, I agree, but we're thinking like a GOP guy). Santorum would fix that weakness within Newt.

Remember people voted for Bush just 8 years ago.
 
I see what you're saying, and agree to a degree, but sometimes Obama's style is super effective. That time he debated the entirety of the GOP house regarding health care and absolutely tore all of them apart was pretty amazing.

I honestly think that Obama would make Gingrich look like an immature, ignorant fool in a debate. Obama would actually call him on his bullshit. Sure, Republican voters would think that Newt destroyed Obama, but independents, to whom Newt is already toxic, would see right through his bullshit sound-bites if Obama is there to call him on it.

We really can't tell because right now Newt, or any of the GOP candidates for that matter, are in an echo chamber. Nobody is challenging the platitudes they and their fans just automatically believe them. They dont have to really offer support. No one is there to call bullshit on their rhetoric.

My guess is the rhetoric changes radically after the primary because alot of this stuff can't play to swing voters and the harsh light of real skepticism.
 
And you think independents would lap up Newt? Even better, Santorum?

Those two are the most toxic political figures to independent voters.

Do you think independents are going to run out and vote Obama? I'm not so sure.
 
Gold standard is the least appealing policy of Paul. He's popular for his foreign policy, civil liberties, and being the sole fiscal conservative in the GOP that actually is serious about it.

I agree. Which is why its especially odd the aspect of Paul he said he supported was getting rid of the Fed and fiat money.
 
Absolutely agree. I'm not on the "LOL NEWT" wagon yet, especially if Santorum is his VP because of the evangelicals.

But look at how little moderates like Gingrich. And Obama beats him handily in most swing states in a hypothetical matchup.

My one concern is that Gingrich would get a base of supporters that would help pass the anti-gay marriage amendments on the ballot in South Carolina and Minnesota, while Romney wouldn't galvanize those people as much to the polls.

You're not thinking like Republicans. Imagine you believe Newt's talking points, but you're weary of his personal life being in conflict with your social conservative beliefs (yes, yes, using big government to enforce bullshit ideas, I agree, but we're thinking like a GOP guy). Santorum would fix that weakness within Newt.

Remember people voted for Bush just 8 years ago.

But both marginalize independent voters, Santorum even more so.
 
You're not thinking like Republicans. Imagine you believe Newt's talking points, but you're weary of his personal life being in conflict with your social conservative beliefs (yes, yes, using big government to enforce bullshit ideas, I agree, but we're thinking like a GOP guy). Santorum would fix that weakness within Newt.

Remember people voted for Bush just 8 years ago.

Yep. Santorum basically eliminates any concern of evangelicals.
 
We really can't tell because right now Newt, or any of the GOP candidates for that matter, are in an echo chamber. Nobody is challenging the platitudes they and their fans just automatically believe them. They dont have to really offer support. No one is there to call bullshit on their rhetoric.

My guess is the rhetoric changes radically after the primary because alot of this stuff can't play to swing voters and the harsh light of real skepticism.

A lot of this stuff can't play to many fiscal conservatives who aren't idiots either.
 
Red meat for the base, but this isn't gonna do much for moderates/independents.

And Santorum doesn't help win those voters either. Newt doesn't need him. (not that it would matter)
 
I honestly think that Obama would make Gingrich look like an immature, ignorant fool in a debate. Obama would actually call him on his bullshit. Sure, Republican voters would think that Newt destroyed Obama, but independents, to whom Newt is already toxic, would see right through his bullshit sound-bites if Obama is there to call him on it.

Yep, Gingrich's style would play right into Obama's hands. Obama's a counter-puncher.
 
You're not thinking like Republicans. Imagine you believe Newt's talking points, but you're weary of his personal life being in conflict with your social conservative beliefs (yes, yes, using big government to enforce bullshit ideas, I agree, but we're thinking like a GOP guy). Santorum would fix that weakness within Newt.

Remember people voted for Bush just 8 years ago.

And many of the same people voted for Obama who won by a pretty large margin.

Here's the real question: is it possible that anyone who actually voted for Obama the first time to buy the line these guys are selling? Trying to convince them that real Americans vote only for Republicans and that Obama is literally a radical socialist isnt going to play with people that actually voted for Obama the first time.

Sure, it fires up the base, but you have to change some votes to win.
 
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_...imary-exit-polls-2-3rds-say-debates-mattered/

Nearly two out of three South Carolina Republican primary voters say the recent Republican presidential debates played an important factor in their decision, according to early CBS News exit polls - a good sign for Newt Gingrich, who was widely seen as outshining rival Mitt Romney in both debates there this week.

Fuck ABC NEWS and fuck dumbass voters.

ABC inadvertently unleashed Newt because of their greed for attention. This is just more proof how dumb people are and how much of an effect the media has on elections.
 
Wasn't that post 9/11?

Approval_27267_image001.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom